(QUIZ 12) Flashcards

1
Q

According to the IUCN 2012 Primates in Peril report, 54% of primate taxa are classified in a threatened for extrinction category.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

According to IUCN conservationists, the leading causes of primate extinction include: habitat destruction, illegal wildlife trade, commercial bush meat hunting

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The leading causes of primate extinction are driven by natural processes.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mittermeier argues that the best “flagship” species for saving the tropical rainforest biome are primates.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A “flagship” species is one whose conservation improves the likelihood of the conservation of a biome.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Three excellent primate “flagship” conservation candidates in the Philippines include: galagos, tarsiers, crab-eating macaques.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thanks to the lengthy juvenile development, social learning requirements, and loss of habitat … primate conservation is not based on captive animal re-introduction.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Adoption of classroom primate mascots can enhance local conservation success.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In some places, more than one flagship species should be used. For example, Madagascar has numerous microhabitats and multiple primates should be added as flagship species to the current ring-tailed lemur flagship.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If diners knew about the conservation status and adorable faces of crowned lemurs, they might think twice before eating them in luxury restaurants.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to The Center for Biological Diversity, the natural “background” rate of extinction occurs at a rate of one to five species per year. Current estimates suggest that we are now losing species at a rate 1,000 to 10,000 times the natural background rate – literally, dozens of extinct every day

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Amboseli vervet population provides an excellent example of human caused extinction. This is due to the fact that fever trees have been chopped down in order to construct housing.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The life cycle of fever trees has an impact on vervet population numbers and the demise of the acacias can, at least temporarily, favor leopards.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Vervet reluctance to leave a the Amboseli grassland habitat, even in the face of predator pressure, reflects a strong preference for the familiar.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

It is fair to say that India has a complex relationship with nonhuman primates that pits traditional Hindu values against the stresses of modern living.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The God Hanuman is represented today solely by the sacred langur.

A

False

17
Q

One of the best stories about Hanuman, the Monkey God, is that he chased the sun across the sky everyday because he thought that it was ripened fruit!

A

True

18
Q

Tolerance of monkeys in India is a product of the traditional Hindu reverence of Hanuman – monkeys are the personification of this god

A

True

19
Q

In India, rhesus macaques and sacred langurs are found in wild, agricultural, sacred, and urban spaces.

A

True

20
Q

Temple monkeys in India are provisioned and soon populations expand outside of the temples and into neighborhoods. Their population sizes can then expand beyond human tolerance.

A

True

21
Q

Sacred langurs, like most folivores, are picky-eaters restricted to arboreal habitats.

A

False

22
Q

Normally sacred langurs form M:FF social groups. However, when population size becomes too large, sacred langurs adopt a social structure like that of highland baboons – numerous M:FF subuniits within a larger MM:FF troop. Unlike highland baboons, sacred langur males cannot control (kidnap, lure) female sacred langurs because they are born into lifetime matrilineal societies.

A

True

23
Q

Since female sacred langurs stay within their natal groups from birth to death, bachelor males must engage in group take-overs in order to replace an established sentry as the leader of a M:FF group. These events are violent and subadults sometime die due to proximity to their mothers or attraction to the excitement.

A

True

24
Q

Whereas some view the accidental death of subadults during sacred langur take-over events as evidence in support of “infanticide” as a selective force, others view these relatively rare outcomes as a product of overpopulation under urbanized conditions.

A

True

25
Q

When subadult sacred langurs are lost due to reproductive actions, it is the antithesis of adaptive behavior

A

True

26
Q

Southwick and Sidiqqi nicely demonstrate how, despite geographic breadth in distribution and high population numbers, rhesus monkeys are in trouble in India.

A

True

27
Q

Biomedical interest in rhesus macaques is due to: human similarity in physiology, genetics, disease; fast reproductive rates, ease of maintenance.

A

True

28
Q

Beginning in the 1950s, over 100,000 rhesus macaques were exported annually from India for biomedical research in the United States and Europe. Unnfortunately, as the census work of Southwick and Sidiqqi demonstrates, rhesus populations could not sustain continuation of those losses.

A

True

29
Q

Following culling for biomedical research, Indian rhesus populations were fragmented and natural demographic numbers had been altered.

A

True

30
Q

In India, loss of forest habitat had driven rhesus macaques into human habtats.

A

True

31
Q

As rhesus macaques forced human cohabitation in cities, monkey-human conflict increased.

A

True

32
Q

The human element is crucial to primate conservation – local people can create local conservation success stories!

A

True

33
Q

In the case of macaque populatons, conservation requires monkey management in urban areas in India and in other places such as the Philippines.

A

True

34
Q

In the case of India’s rhesus macaques, primate is an anthropological concern that can improve the lives of both the monkeys and the humans with whom they coexist.

A

True