Quiz 1 - Chapter 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What is Cesare Lombroso considered as?

A

Father of Criminology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Atavism

A

Criminals are “evolutionary throwbacks”; as indicated by physical features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Atavistic characteristics

A

E.g., asymmetric face, long arms, large jaw, sloping forehead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Modern views on atavism

A

No meaningful statistical comparisons between people who do and do not commit crimes
Theories discredited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Galton considered?

A

Father of eugenics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eugenics

A

Any practice (e.g., forced sterilization, genocide) aimed at “improving” the human species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two broad methods of eugenics

A

Discourages reproduction among those with “undesirable traits”
Encourages reproduction among those with “desirable traits”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Canadian example of eugenics

A

1930s-1970s: AB and BC had legislation allowing sterilization based on mental and physical “health issues”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

6 criteria for a good theory

A

Parsimonious
Causal mechanisms, mediators, moderators
Testable and falsifiable
Empirical data
Interdisciplinary compatibility
Respects gender, ethnicity, culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aim of behavioural genetics

A

Can help separate genetic and environmental influences to some degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How much of DNA is shared by all humans? What varies?

A

All humans share 99.9% DNA
0.1% varies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Monozygotic twins

A

Genetically identical (share ~100% genes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dizygotic twins

A

Same genetic similarity as typical siblings (50%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Concordance rate

A

Likelihood both twins engage in same behaviour
% at which both twins have been justic-involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the purpose of comparing concordance rates between identical and fraternal twins?
How?

A

Helps to separate effects of genetics vs. environment
If concordance rate is higher among individual twins, then we assume a genetic influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the concordance rate of eye colour?

A

Entirely genetic
50% for fraternal vs. 100% for identical

17
Q

What is the concordance rate of criminal offending? What does this tell us?

A

61% for fraternal vs. 81% for identical
Genetics are linked to crime, but certainly not the whole picture

18
Q

What is another indication of twin studies?

A

They also indicate degree of environmental (not just genetic) influence

19
Q

What do twin studies show about shared environmental factors?

A

Aspects of environment shared by family members (e.g., exposure to abuse/neglect, living in poverty); 40%

20
Q

What do twin studies show about nonshared environmental factors?

A

Aspects of environment not shared by all family members (e.g., peer groups); 19%

21
Q

What is a criticism of twin studies?

A

May overestimate genetic contributions
E.g., MZ twins likely have more similar environments than DZ twins

22
Q

What are adoption studies better at than twin studies?

A

Adoption studies can better control for environment

23
Q

Parent-offspring studies

A

Concordance rates between adoptive parents and adopted children are compared to concordance rates between biological parents and adopted children

24
Q

Sibling-offspring studies

A

Concordance between adoptive siblings vs. biological siblings

25
Q

Mednick et al. (1984) explanation

A

Study on 14,427 non-familial adoptions in Denmark

26
Q

Mednick et al. (1984) results

A

If no parents had criminal record: 13.5% of sons had criminal record
If adopted parent had criminal record, but not the biological parent: 14.7%
If biological parent had criminal record, but not the adopted parent: 20%
If both sets of parents had criminal record: 24.5%

27
Q

Findings of meta-analysis by Besemer et al., 2017

A

Found that the odds of a person committing a crime doubles if one of their (genetic) parents commits a crime (due to genes and environment)

28
Q
A