Qualitative lecture 10- Reflexivity Flashcards

1
Q

Identity and performance

A
  • We perform particular identities- socially scripted or expected.
  • Identity constructions have both practical and material consequences. (e.g. Gender inequality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Reflexivity?

A
  • Reflexivity speaks to the negotiation of power in research and the role identity plays in such negotiations
  • Reflexivity checks researchers’ assumptions, worldviews, standpoint methodologies, and experience.
  • Reflexivity involves a researcher’s reflection on who they are, their assumptions, and how they impact the research process.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do our identities, assumptions, experiences, and worldviews shape?

A
  1. The topics we study and the kind of questions we ask
  2. The approaches and methods
  3. The data we collect from participants
  4. Our interpretation of the data.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do we negotiate gender in the field?

A
  • Gendering has both practical and material consequences for both men and women. This is linked to social expectations
  • Fieldwork as a bodily experience- we are physically “there”
  • Our bodies “do” certain things in the field- appearances
  • Posture: the researcher’s way of situating themselves, their life experiences and situation, style and language in the fieldwork
  • Posture is informed by our life situations and experiences- a particular way of positioning ourselves in relation the the topic and participants.
  • Posture shapes dynamics in the research field- power.
  • The physical field (where research takes place) and power.
  • Participants are not passive- agency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Look at slides for the rest.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the process of reflexive thinking?

A

It is cyclical
1. Interview with participant
2. What were you thinking and feeling at the time?
3. Acknowledge your baggage: assumptions, values, political leaning, culture etc.
4. What influence might this have on your findings?
5. Re-evaluate your findings
6. Feed reflexive insight back into next interviews.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly