Q&A and random shit Flashcards
countries with much slavery that lost out
= countries that were initially most prosperous and most densely populated tend to be the countries that subsequently exported the largest nr of slaves
- e.g. Ghana, Nigeria, Togo, Benin, Gambia
quote Rwanda reading
“this is not a question of whether the intentions of the leadershi are moe benevolent or otherwise praiseworthy. The issue may be restricted to whether rent management is directed toward the short-term enrichment ofmembers of the poliical class and its allies, or alternatively towards ‘growing the pie’ of the national economy, maximizing opportunities for long-erm accumulation”
Tri-Star/CVL plays a critical role in getting capitalism started: investments that met urgent social/political needs + earned the monopoly profits that would have accrued to any first comer.
Rwanda’s dev patriomonialism differs from the model of earlier regimes of this type (e.g. Banda’s Malawi): distinctive features of the regime do not seem to include a blurring of the distinction between the resources of the state and the private income or wealth of the ruler/ruling group.
- Boundaries between the gov operations and private-sector operations of the RPF and the army are clear and formalized
- One of the effects of the Tri-Star/CVL arrangement has been to enable the political elite to enforce an unusually strong anti-corruption line
his graph
investment necessary for development
investment determined by structural factors
- geography (natural resource curse, tropical, landlocked)
- history (affects institutions and form of state: e.g. slavery -> dispersed populations -> hard to establish centralized state + lack of trust (to pay taxes))
- institutions = should be inclusive
- the state = centralized with enforcement capacity + developmental (not neoliberal and predatory)
- culture (debated)
these shape the prospects for investment
as polsci: institutions and state box priority
- if geography matters, it matters bc it affects politics
- we can overcome geographical/historical constraints with politics
- structural factors make dev. difficult
basic formal institutions + centralized state alone don’t work:
- ignored: isomorphic mimicry, too demanding, forbearance
- imported: lack of local political ownership/legitimacy
- broken
- resisted: losers, past winners, ethnic groups (diversity or discrimination)
what should we do?
- accountability: reward and punish to make people do the right think (social accountability to protest, electoral to hold politicians accountable)
- collective action: changing norms, overcome free riding
- representation: parties and women
agency and leadership to use collective action, representation and accountability -> by building developmental coalitions
getting better leaders is intrinsically hard: path dependency (they got power this way, why get rid of the system, why change corrupt system)
- change comes from critical juncture
!!!top 10 take aways not for exam
path dependence vs policy feedback
path dependence is to hold things and keep them doing the same thing
- it holds things constant, nothing changes
embedded autonomy
= the developmental state (active, disciplined, encourages investment)
embedded autonomy lets the developmental state to do this: it creates the discipline (autonomy: not being subject to political pressure)
- industry knows it will be cut off from subsidies if not competitive -> will use initial subsidies in a really good way, bc otherwise it will be cut off
- relation with private sector key - network = embeddedness
*can come from developmental coalitions