Q&A Flashcards
What factors impact the simplicity and clarity of the product from a customer point of view?
- underwriting and acceptance
- limits
- exclusions
- cost sharing
- pre-authorisation
- provider networks
- treatment protocols
Consistency
- Assumptions in an actuarial model should relate to each other in a realistic way
- any observed correlated or interdependencies between the different variables should be incorporated into the model
Extent of margin in pricing depends on:
- the extent of uncertainty associated with each parameter
- the extent of statistical risk inherent in the future experience
- the financial significance of the adverse experience
- the company’s attitude to risk
- the proprietor’s required return on capital
- the size of the company’s free assets
- the competitive nature of the market and the company’s unique selling proposition
Pricing investigations
- single policy profit test
- model office pg. 1277
Assumptions of BF
- for each origin year, the expected amount of claims in monetary terms, paid in each development year, is a constant proportion of the total claims, in monetary terms, from that origin year
- no explicit assumption is made for claims inflation
- the estimated loss ratio is appropriate
- the development factor to ultimate is never less than 1
- the first cohort is fully run-off, or its development to an ultimate position can be predicted with some confidence
Assumptions of basic chain ladder
- assumed that undiscounted claims reserves are required
- a constant proportion of the total claim amount arising from each origin year is paid in each development year
- the pattern of inflation within the existing data can be projected into the future
Assumptions for inflation-adjusted chain ladder
- undiscounted claim reserves are required
- a constant proportion of total claim amount, in real terms, arising from each origin year is paid in each development year
- claims inflation, both past and future, is x%
Assumptions for inflation-adjusted average cost per claim
- undiscounted claim reserves are required
- the average amount of claim payment (in real terms) is a constant for each development year
- a constant proportion of the total number of claims from each origin year are settled in each development year
Bootstrapping for stochastic claim reserving
- bootstrapping is a technique for determining the statistical properties of a quantity using the randomness that is present in the sample from the underlying population, and then applying a monte carlo approach
- it involves sampling repeatedly from an observed data set in order to create a number of pseudo-data sets that are then consistent with the original data set
- various statistics of interest can then be derived for each pseudo data set and the distribution of these statistics can be analysed further
- it is assumed that the sampled data are independent and identically distributed
- can be used to estimate the distribution of the reserve predictions
Bootstrapping steps
- obtain a set of past claims data, split by origin/development year
- back-fitting a model to the past data to find the expected claims for each cell
- calculating the residual noise present in each cell
- sampling from this residual distribution to produce many pseudo-data sets
- calculating reserve projections based on each data set
- collating the reserve projections to determine the distribution, moments and percentiles
Drawbacks of NPV
Comparisons based on NPV will only be valid if:
- there is a perfectly free and efficient capital market
- the risk discount rates used to discount two or more risky investments appropriately reflect their riskiness, which may be difficult to assess
- NPV is subject to law of diminishing returns
- if it were not, then company could sell infinite amount
- it says nothing about competition
- compare total NPVs for whole projects based on realistic assumptions of new business
- if the expected overhead costs are included, could give distorted view if mix isn’t as intended
- NPV doesn’t distinguish between contracts that have very different capital requirements
Merits of passive valuation approach
-pg.1388
+ relatively straightforward to implement
+ tend to involve less subjectivity
+ tend to result in relatively stable accounting profit emergence
+ less exposed to systematic risk
- at risk of becoming out of date
- may provide a false sense of security when market conditions are changing significantly
- less informative in terms of understanding impact of market conditions on ability of the company to meet its liabilities
Steps in the bootstrapping process for determining reserves using chain ladder
- project the triangle to ultimate using the chain ladder method
- back-fit the triangle to calculate the hypothetical past claims development, if the data has conformed precisely to the model
- calculate the triangle of raw residuals by subtracting each entry in the fitted incremental triangle from the corresponding entry in the actual incremental triangle.
- residuals based on incremental data are used in order to maintain the assumption that residuals are independent
- in practice, adjustment is applied so that they are approximately iid - obtain a pseudo-data set by calculating a new residual triangle where each cell in the triangle is picked at random from any of the points in the triangle of the adjusted residuals, and then adding this to your incremental fitted triangle
- sampling with replacement is used so that each residual can be selected more than once
- since the expected value of the residuals is zero, they can be added or subtracted
- this pseudo-dataset represents a hypothetical claims experience that could have emerged from the portfolio - use ultimate chain ladder method to estimate ultimate claims experience and get the outstanding reserves
- repeat steps 4 and 5 many times to obtain different estimates of the claim reserves for the portfolio
- the resulting distribution of reserves can be used to communicate all the uncertainty surrounding the reserves
Problems that confront the actuary
CCRRISPPPPP
- policy data
- product design
- product marketability
- pricing
- return on capital
- profitability
- supervisory reserves
- investment
- capital management
- risk management
- claims
Advantages and disadvantages of facultative
+ gives the insurer greater flexibility in that they can choose the reinsurance that is most suitable
+ can be used to cope with risks that otherwise fall outside the terms of a treaty
- arranged for each risk so takes time and costly
- may not be able to find appropriate reinsurance
- there can be a delay in finding cover before accepting risk
Advantages and disadvantages of treaty
+ gives certainty of being able to have reinsurance cover so can do financial and risk planning with greater certainty
+ it can be simple to operate and less expensive
+ can help control solvency and growth requirements
- takes time/expense to set up in the first place
- may restrict insurer’s actions
- insurer may not get best reinsurance deals
Insurance company risks
BBICCEPD+RR
- business volume + mix
- broker activity
- investment
- claims (+ anti-selection and non-disclosure)
- competition
- expenses
- persistency
- policy + other data
- regulation
- reinsurance
How to control these risks
- proper management and control procedures
- control claims
- pre-authorisation
- preferred provider networks & managed care
- control anti-selection
- control expenses
- review terms
- improving renewal rates
Compare underwriting
- cost
- anti-selection
- level of premiums
- speed of application
- attractiveness of cover
Purpose of underwriting
SAFARI
- suitable special terms
- avoid anti-selection
- financial underwriting
- actual experience in line with expected
- risk classification to ensure that all risks are rated fairly
- identify substandard risks while aiming to accept as many on standard terms as possible
Applications of risk adjustment
- budgeting
- pricing and reserving
- measuring efficiencies
- risk management
- measuring healthcare outcomes
- provider profiling
Disadvantages of formula approach to pricing?
Doesn’t allow for:
- proper timing of events
- accumulation of reserves
- capital needs
- the impact of net negative cashflows
- separate inspection of claims-related and premium-related cashflows
- variation in assumptions
- changes in future experience and cannot be used to measure sensitivity of profit for such variation
- cannot allow easily for more complicated product structures, such as unit linked products and options and guarantees
Criteria for condition to be covered under CI
- sufficient data to price
- clearly defined objective/unambiguous from medical point
- perceived to be serious and occur frequently
- limit anti-selection
Advantages of OSF
- economies of scale in terms of non-claims costs
- opportunity to cross-sell to existing customer basis
- established company so additional reach in terms of market penetration
- will only sell the company’s products
- insurer will have better control over the sales process i.e. the risks they sell to, information conveyed
- reduces incentive for mis-selling policies
Pricing challenges
- product design
- availability of data
- pricing model and assumptions
- underwriting
- claims incidence and amount
- other challenges
Ways to test model goodness of fit
- deviance residuals
- standard pearson residuals
- residual plots
Pricing process
- choose base period for pricing exercise such that data is…
- collect the data
- split the data into homogeneous groups
- adjust the base data
- calculate the burning cost premium for each group
- analyse data and adjust BCPs for any changes in insurer’s practice or relevance of past data
- project the adjusted basis forward
- the insurer will have to allow for other loadings
Operational risk
- failure of systems, processes or people
- dominance of a single individual over the running of the business
- reliance on third parties to carry out various functions for which the organisation is responsible
- theft or fraud
- non-disclosure
- data errors
- mistake in pricing
- wrong amounts paid out to claimants
- non-compliance with regulation
- change in regulation and taxation
- theft of equipment
- litigation
- reputational risks
- control failures relating to underwriting and claims management
- control failures relating to accounting and reporting
- data protection breach
- loss of key persons
- mis-selling product
- business interruption risk due to physical risk
Credit/counterparty risk
- risk of counterparties not meeting obligations
- downgrades of corporate bonds
- default on corporate bonds of coupon payments or capital repayments
- default of reinsurer
- default of third party providing outsourced services
- downgrade of reinsurer
- default of intermediaries
- default of derivatives providers
- default of care homes in providing service
- care homes providing unsatisfactory service
- default on cash holdings
Assumptions of a classic linear model
- error terms are independent and come from a normal distribution
- mean is a linear combination of explanatory variables
- error terms have a constant variance
Advantages of GLM
- more general than normal distribution as GLM can take on any distribution from the exponential family
- using a link function, can take account of the multiplicative nature of explanatory variables and their effects (classic assumes additive)
- the variance of the response variables is a function of its mean and can often increase with the value of the mean and as is usually the case when modelling claim amounts
Why monitor experience?
- update assumptions to reflect future experience
- identify trends
- monitor actual vs expected experience and take corrective action
- to provide information to management to aid business decisions
- make more informed decisions about pricing and the adequacy of reserves
Claims experience investigation
- identify whether increase is due to…
- depends on there being valid data
- experience must be credible
- take account of IBNR
- take account of large or exceptional claims
- take account of seasonality of claims
- allowance needs to be made for benefit changes
- group claims into homogeneous risk cells
- risk adjustment given that case mix may have changed
- allowance must be made for demographic changes
- allowance made for changes in medical treatment/technology over the benefit years
- changes in regulation
- claims a function of frequency and severity. The analysis needs to examine each component in turn
- experience should be compared to industry or market experience to identify whether trend specific to insurer
General experience investigation
- change in membership - demographics and volume of members
- marketing and communication - has there been a change in the way in which benefits are communicated to members
- risk management: has there been a change in the way benefits are managed
- claims experience
Managed care
- term given to a process whereby an insurer intervenes in the provision of medical care
- with the dual objective of optimising the quality of the treatment for the policyholder
- and controlling the cost to maintain the affordability of healthcare
- by such means as preferred provider utilisation and claims pre-authorisation
List different purposes for which the government can use risk adjustment
- budgeting
- risk management
- measuring efficiency of providers
- measuring healthcare outcomes
- creating provider profiles
- reporting on costs, outcomes and future plans
Properties of exponential family which make them particularly useful when using a GLM
- the distribution is completely specified in terms of its mean and variance
- the variance of the response variable is a function of its mean
Two tests that can be used to analyse the significance of the additional factors
The two models are nested models
- where the scale parameter is known, the chi-squared test for the change in scaled deviance can be used
- where the scale parameter is unknown, the F statistic can be used as the ratio of the change in the deviance and the scale parameter estimate is distributed
Other checks to carry out before including additional factors
- consistency of the factor over time
- consistency of the factor with other factors
3 ways of coping with uncertainty in financial forecasts
- sensitivity analysis - vary key assumptions
- scenario analysis - vary sets of assumptions
- stochastic modelling - simulations using distributions applied to key assumptions
- appropriate method depends on purpose, audience and level of detail required
Why it’s necessary to risk adjust efficiency factors
- hospitals treat a different mix of cases due to:
- different risk profiles of lives or
- facilities in the hospital
- e.g. some hospitals may have high proportion of cardiac cases will others have high proportion of day cases OR some hospitals may have expensive diagnostic equipment that is not available at other hospitals
- the differences in mix will impact the utlisation of resources
- as well as the cost of care
- therefore necessary to risk adjust on a like-for-like basis
Medical gap cover
- cover difference between cost of treatment and amount covered by conventional PMI
- can happen because of benefit limits or because of providers charging more than PMI covers
- usually focuses on providing cover for high cost events
- limited to annual amount per health event
- meets need of peace of mind
The factors that will influence marketability
- attractive to the target market
- meets needs of the target market
- levels of service
- distribution channel
- competitor products
- rating factors used by competitors
- terms and conditions - ease of understanding
- strictness of underwriting
How GLMs differ from ordinary least square regression
- similarly to ordinary least square regression, GLM can be used to model behaviour of a random variable that is believed to depend on the values of several other characteristics
- GLM is a flexible generalisation of ordinary least square regression
- generalises by allowing the linear model to be related to the response variable via a link function
- and by allowing the magnitude of the variance of each measurement to be a function of its predicted value
Why is multivariate modelling useful for modelling health insurance claims
- multivariate modelling is necessary when modelling multiple factors that are likely to be related or correlated to a certain extent
- examples of factors used in modelling health insurance claims that are likely to be related are:
- age and chronic condition
- age and family size
- maternity and gender
Advantages of Tweedie distribution for modelling PMI
- direct modelling of risk premium or incurred loss data for PMI business is problematic since a typical pure premium distribution will consist of a spike (point mass) at zero (where policies have not had claims) and then a wide range of amounts (where policies have had claims)
- the tweedie distribution is a special member of the exponential family
- it has a point mass at zero and corresponds to the compound distribution of a poisson claim number process and a gamma claim size distribution
PMB for CI
- cancer
- heart attack
- stroke
- coronary artery bypass graft
What does case mix represent
- reflects the severity of each case on a risk adjusted basis
- takes into account age, diagnosis severity
- reflects the expected relative cost of each DRG relative to the overall average cost per day in hospital taking account of risk factors
Factors affecting insurer’s appetite for XoL reinsurance
- volatility of claims with heterogeneous risk
- impact of extreme claims on financials
- availability of reinsurance
- free assets
- cost of reinsurance
- predictability of experience
- expertise in reinsurer’s claims management
- not much scope for solvency/tax arbitrage
Various approaches to experience rating
- can be applied prospectively or retrospectively
- prospective is based on prior period experience and applied to future rate
- retrospectively is adjustment to initial premium based on actual experience
- can be based on number of claims or amounts
- credibility approach has z factor as a rating. z is from 0 to 1 and is weighting applied to own experience vs book rates
- value of z depends on volume of claims and size of group
Risk adjustment
- normalizes population according to specified risk factors
- applied to historical data
Risk prediction
- used to predict future costs
- with reference to differences observed in the past