Public Health Flashcards

1
Q

Define Public Health

A

The science and art of preventing disease prolonging life and improving health through organised efforts of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define equity
Define equality
Define horizontal equity
Define vertical equity

A

equity - give people what they need to achieve equal outcomes

equality - give everyone the same rights opportunities and resources

horizontal equity - equal treatment for people with equal health care needs

vertical equity - unequal treatment to unequal health care needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define inverse care law

A

availability of health care tends to vary inversely with its need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Determinants of Health

A

PROGRESS

P-PLACE OF RESIDENCE
R- RACE
O-OCCUPATION
G-GENDER
R-RELIGION
E-EDUCATION
S-SOCIOECONOMIC
S-SOCIAL CAPITAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 domains of public health practise

A

health improvement - societal interventions aimed at preventing disease, promoting health and reducing inequalities

health protection - measures to control infectious disease and environmental hazards

improving services - organisation and delivery of safe high quality services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

in assessing quality of healthcare there is a framework what is it called?

explain it?

then it is important to see structure, process and outcome - what does this mean

A

maxwells dimensions of quality of healthcare
3 a’s and 3 e’s

acceptability
accessibility
appropriateness

effectiveness
efficiency
equity

structure- what is there? no. of hospitals
process - what goes on? - how many pts seen?
outcome: no. of deaths for ex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

health needs assessment involves

give examples?

A

need - ability to benefit from an intervention

demand - what people ask for

supply - whats provided

eg: abx for mild infection is supplied and demanded but not deeded. routine vaccinations are needed and supplied but not demanded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

4 types of need

A

felt need - individual perceptions of variation from normal health -pt feels unwell

normative need - proffesional defines intervention for expressed need - then dr says what they need

expressed need - pt seeks help to overcome variation in normal health - pt goes to dr

comparitive need - comparison between severity, range of interventions and cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when doing a health needs assessment you can look at epidemiological, comparative or corporate perspective.

if i am looking at epidemiological perspective, tell me what it does, where it gets info from and the pros and cons?

A

look at:;
- size of pop - incidence/prevalence
- services available: prevention/tx/care
- evidence base: effectiveness/cost effectiveness

sources: disease registry, admissions, gp databases

good:
- uses existing data
-provides data on disease incidence/mortality/morbidity

bad:
- quality of data variable
-data collected might not be data required
-doesnt consider felt needs/opinions of pts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when doing a health needs assessment you can look at epidemiological, comparative or corporate perspective.

if i am looking at comparitive perspective, tell me what it does, where it gets info from and the pros and cons?

A

compares services/outcomes recieved by a population with others
- compare diff areas or pt of diff ages

look at:
- health status
-service provision
-outcomes

good:
- quick and cheap if data available
- shows if services are better or worse than compared group

bad:
- can be difficult to find comparable population
-data might not be available/high quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when doing a health needs assessment you can look at epidemiological, comparative or corporate perspective.

if i am looking at corporate perspective, tell me what it does, where it gets info from and the pros and cons?

A

ask local pop what their health needs are

use focus groups, interviews, public meeting

wide variety of stakeholders

good:
- based on felt and expressed need
- wide range of views takes into account
- recognises detailed knowledge and experience of those working with population

bad:
- can be difficult to distinguish need from demand
- groups might have vested interests
-may have political agendas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 beliefs to resource allocation methods!! and explain
1 good and 1 bad for each

egalitarian
maximising
libertarian

A

egalitarian: provide all care necessary and required for everyone
good: - equal
bad: too expensive

maximising: - act is evaluated solely in terms of its consequences
good: resources allocated to those who most likely to benefit from it
bad - those who dont make the cut get nothing

libertarian - each are responsible for their own health
- good: promotes positive engagement
bad: most diseases are not self inflicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain primary secondary and tertiary prevention

A

primary
- preventing disease from occuring in first place - eg vaccine

secondary:
- early identification of disease to alter disease course eg : screening

tertiary:
- limit consequences of established disease eg: limit consequences of established disease eg: prevent worsening renal function in ckd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 approaches to prevention

population approach

high risk approach

prevention paradox

A

population - prevention approach delivered to everyone to shift the risk factor distribution curve: dietary salt reductions through legislation

high risk approach: identify individuals above a chosen cut off and treat them eg : screening people for high bp and tx them

prevention paradox: preventative measure which brings much benefit to population often offers little impact to each participating individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Purpose of screening

disadvantages

A

identify apparently well individuals who have or are at risk of developing a particular disease so that you can have a real impact on the outcome .

  • exposure of well individuals to distressing or harmful diagnostic tests
    -detection and treatment of sub-clinical disease that would never cause any problems
    -preventive interventions that may cause harm to the individual or population
  • incorrect results
    -anxiety or false reassurance
    over tx/tx risks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

benefits of screening

A

reproductive choice
worthwhile use of resources
informed decision
reassurance
more effective tx
better future health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

uk 3 screening programme examples in pregnancy

A

infectious diseases in pregnancy screening programme - hep b, syphillis, hiv

sickle cell and thalaseemia screening

fetal anomaly screening programme - downs, edwards, pataus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

3 uk screening programmes in newborn babies

A

newborn and infant physical exam - hearts, eyes, hip, testes

newborn hearing screening programme - permanent childhood hearing impairement

newborn blood spot screening programme - sickle cell, cf, congenital hypothyroidism + 6 inherited metabolic disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

define sensitivity and specificity?

A

sensitivity: proportion of those with disease who are correctly idenitified - does the test pick up the disease

specificity - proportion of people without the disease who are correctly excluded by screening test: does the test identify people who dont have the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

in terms of specificity and sensitivity explain what a positive and negative predictive value would mean?

A

positive: proportion of people with a positive test result who actually have the disease

negative: proportion of people with negative test result who don’t have the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the wilson and jungner criteria?

4 bits to it

the saying to help understand

A

knowledge of disease - important. disease understood. recognisable stage.

the screening test: suitable test. accepted by public

treatment: organisation and cost: cost of case findings balance out to possible expenditure. ongoing process

tx: accepted tx. enough facilities. agreed policies on who to tx.

In Exam Season NAP -
- important disease
- effective tx available
- simple and safe
- natural hx of disease known
- acceptable - not too invasive
-policy on who to tx agreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

calculations with sensitivity and specificity and positive predictive value and negative predictive value

A

sensitivity: a/a+c
specificity: d/b+d
positive predictive: a/a+B
negative predictive: d/c+d

(REFER TO PAPER TABLE I HAVE MADE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is a length time bias?

what is a lead time bias?

A

length time bias - disease that progresses more slowly is more likely to be picked up by screening which makes it appear that screening lengthens life.

lead time bias - early identification by doesnt alter the outcome but appears to increase survival as pt has the disease identified earlier than normal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is a selection bias?

what is an information bias?

what is an allocation bias?

what is a publication bias?

A

selection - error in selection of study participants. allocation of participants to different study groups.

information - observes recall and reporting, participants, instrument wrong calibrated

allocation: different participants in different groups - not equally spread

publication - trials with negative results less likely to be published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what is confounding?
when a factor is associated with the exposure of interest and independent influences the outcome but doesnt lie on the causal pathway not part of the exposure and the outcome but influences both. almost like air pollution for when the exposure is smoking and the outcome is lung cancer. but doesnt lie on the pathway from exposure to outcome. eg: lack of exercise causes weight gain but there are other confounding variables that also cause it
26
in a study design tell me the hierachy of evidence
systematic reviews and meta analysis randomised control trials cohort studies case-control studies cross-sectional studies case series and case reports editorials and expert opinions
27
what is a case control study? give me the advantages and disadvantages of it?
retrospecitve observational study look at cause of disease. compare similar participant with disease to controls without. advantages; - good for rare outcomes - quicker than cohort or intervention studies (outcome already happened) - can ix multiple exposures disadvantages: - difficulties finding controls to match with case - prone to selection and information bias
28
how would the design of a case-control study be?
you have exposed and unexposed for people with the disease exposed and unexposed to ppl without the disease
29
what is a cross-sectional study and what are the advantages and disadvantages for it?
retrospective observational collects data from population at specific point in time "snapshot" prevalence of risk factors and itself. advantages: - relatively quick and cheap - provides data on prevalence at single point in time - good for surveillance and PH planning disadvantages: - risk of reverse causality (did outcome or exposure come firsT) - cannot measure incidence - recall and response bias risk (may miss quick recoveries)
30
what is a cohort study? advantages disadvantages
prospective longitudinal study looking at seperate cohorts with different tx or exposures. wait to see if disease happens. advantages: - can follow-up group with a rare exposure -good for common and multiple outcomes - establish disease risk and confounders -less risk of selection and recall bias disadvantags: - take a long time -people drop out -need large sample size, expensive and time consuming
31
design of a cohort study
you take people without a disease from population. split into exposed and not exposed. then for each split the disease and no disease. (does it happen or not?
32
what is a randomised control trial/ advantage disadvantage
prospective study, all participants randomly assigned exposure or control intervention advantage: - low risk of bias and confounding - can infer causality diadadvantages: -time consuming, expensive -drop outs - inclusion criteria may exclude some populations
33
how would the design of an RCT look like?
study population then select by defined criteria then potential participants - non participants are those who dont meet inclusion criteria then invitation to participate the participants then randomisation then some give treatment and some control
34
what is an ecological study?
look at prevalence of the disease over time - population data rather than individual can show prevalence and association but not causation
35
what does it mean by odds - as a type of probability and how to work out? what is an odds ratio? how to calculate?
for binary outcome - disease occurs or it doesnt divide probability of it happening or not odds = probability events occurs - p / probability events doesnt (1-p) compare odds of an outcome occuring between 2 groups - 1 being exposure/tx and other control group : odds of an events (condition a)/ odds of an events (condition b CONTROL)
36
if odds ratio is =1 it means? if odds ratio is more than 1 it means? if odds ratio is under 1 it means?
1 means that there is no association between the exposure and the outcome. In other words, the odds of the outcome occurring are the same for both the exposed group and the unexposed group. if odd is over 1: - events odds high for group/condition in numerator. risk factor if under 1: - probability of outcome occurring lower than the exposed. - protective factor/tx provided
37
4 types of information bias
measurement - different equipment measuring differently observer - observers expectations influence reporting recall: - past events not recalled correctly reporting: people dont tell truth because of shame/judgement
38
publication bias is?
trials with negative results less likely to be published
39
What is the bradford-hill criteria for causality?
strength - strength of association dose-response - does a higher exposure produce higher incidence? consistency - similar results in different studies and populations temporaility - does exposure precede the outcome? reversibility - removing exposure reduced risk of disease biological plasuibility - does it make sense biologically? coherence - logical consistency with lab info : incidence of lung cancer with increased smoking is consistent with lab evidence that tobacco is carcinogenic analogy - similarity with other established cause-effect relationships in the past like thalidomide in pregnancy, not other teratogenic drugs show similar effects specificity - relationship specific to outcome of interest: introducing helmets reduced head injuries specifically, it wasnt that there has been an overal injury rate.
40
what does it man by reverse causality? - bradford hill criteria?
stress could have caused htn - rather than htn causing stress
41
why would you get results that suggest that the exposure influences the outcome
bias confounding factors chance reverse causality true assocation- meet the bradford-hill criteria
42
define epidemiology define incidence define prevalence define person time
study of frequency, determinants and distribution of diseases and health related states in populations in order to prevent and control disease incidence: no. of new cases over a certain time period prevalence: no. of people with a disease at certain point in time person time: measure of time at risk for all pts in study - eg 1000 pts studied for 2.5 yrs - your study looks at 2,500 person yrs
43
explain the diff between incidence and prevalence
incidence changes with time, new cases prevalence - number at set time of existing cases so eg: 30k student in sheff. 3,600 have asthma. over past 10 yrs they have 1000 new cases diagnosed. incidence: (1000/30,000)*100= 3.3% per 10 yrs prevalence - 3600/30000*100= 12%
44
define health behaviour illness behavior sick role behaviour
aimed to prevent disease - eg regular exercise illness behaviour - aimed to seek remedy- going to the doctor sick role behaviour - aimed at getting well - take meds
45
perceptions of risk influence by? health
1. lack of personal experience with problem 2. belief that it is preventable by personal action 3. belief that if it has not happened by now, its unlikley 4. belief that the problem is infrequent
46
points at with intervention are thought to be more effective - transition points
leaving school entering workforce becoming parents becoming unemployed retirement and bereavement
47
tell me the different models of behaviour change
health belief model theory of planned behaviour stages of change/transtheoretical model (TTM) social norms theory motivational interviewing social marketing nudging (choice architecture) financial incentives
48
what is the health belief model?
individuals will change their behaviour if: 1. believe are susceptible to the condition 2. believe in serious consequences 3. believe taking action reduces susceptibility 4. believe that taking benefits of action outweigh the costs. + a cue to action
49
Stages of change - transtheroretical model
precontemplation - no intention of changing behaviour contemplation - aware of problem but no comitment to action preparation - intent on taking action to adress problem action - active modification of behaviour maintenance - sustained change, new behaviour replaces old relapse - fall back into old patterns
50
what is an addiction?
craving, tolerance, compulse drug seeking behaviour, withdrawal
51
what can you offer a newly presenting drug users?
screening for blood borne virus health check sexual health advice/contraception check immunisation hx signpost to drug services
52
what is positive conditioning in drug users? negative conditioning?
addiction increases desire to use drug. people dont quit due to unpleasant symptoms.
53
principles of treating drug users?
reduce harm to user and family./friends improve health stabilise life reduce crime
54
how does heroin work? sx? side effects
acts on opiate receptors euphoria, miosis, drowsiness dependence, bad withdrawals, nausea, itching, sweating, constipation, resp depression
55
what is an opiate detox benefit of the 1st drug
methadone - helps transition - free no theft not injected naltrexone and buprenorphine used too
56
cocaine crack method of use how it works side effect - leads to what?
oral/snorting/iv smoking blocks reuptake of serotonin - intense pleasurable sensation depletion at secretory neurons - anxiety, panic, adrenaline secretion, wired. leads to depression, panic, paranoia
57
explain maslows hierachy of need
self-actualization - achieving ones full potential esteem needs - prestige and feeling of accomplishement belongingness and love needs: intimate relationships, friends safety needs: security,safety physiological needs: food water warmth rest self-actualisation is self fullfillment esteem and belongingness is psychological and safety and physiological is basic needs
58
screening questionaire for alcohol dependance how to calculate units?
cage questioniare audit - if score over 15 go to specialist units : volume (l) * % of alcohol = units
59
alcohol dependence - level of dependency - factors
withdrawal sx cravings - very strong desire to drink drink despite negative consequences: physical, mental or social/work life tolerance - individual has to drink larger amount to get similar effect primacy - put drinking before other activities - neglect other activities loss of control narrowing of repertoire - start to drink only 1 type of drink in 1 place
60
treating alcohol dependence
disulfiram - promote abstinence - alcohol intake causes severe reaction due to inhibition of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase acamprosate: reduces craving, weak antagonist of NMDA receptors, improves abstinence in placebo controlled trials
61
CI of disulfiram
IHD psychosis
62
barriers to health for refugees
reluctance of gps to register them illiteracy communication lack of permanent site mistrust of professionals
63
what is an asylum seeker? what is a refugee? what happens if persons asylum seeker claim refused?
someone applying for refugee status someone grafted asylum status for 5 yrs only access emergency nhs services- get charged after.
64
what healthcare benefits do refugees get ?
vouchers to live off- sometimes restricted where they can spend NASS support package access to nhs not allowed to work initially, no control over location
65
what kind of health problems for refugees?
injury/illness from war/travelling communicable disease lack of health screening and immunisation malnutrition untreated chronic disease mental illness
66
explain malnutrition
deficiencies, excesses or imbalances in persons intake of energy and/or nutrients. covers 2 conditions: undernutrition - stunting - low height for age, wasting - low weight for height, underweight - low weight for age, and micronutrient - deficiencies or insuffieincyes - lack of important vits and minerals overweight, obesity and diet related noncommunicable diseases - heart disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer what is triple burden= micronutrient deficiencies - hidden hunger
67
tell me the 4 dimensions of food insecurity
availability (affordability) of food access - economic and physical utilisation - opportunity to prepare food stability of 3 dimensions over time
68
tell me all the different ways there can be error in practise by the doctor
sloth error: being lazy, not checking results/info for accuracy lack of skill: lack of appropriate skills or teaching in practise communication breakdown: unclear instructions or plans and not listening to others system failure: machine/equipment stopped working human factors: bravado, timidity fixation/loss of perspective = focus on 1 diagnosis = confirmation bias judgement failure neglect poor performance misconduct mistriage = over/under estimating the severity of the situation.
69
Define relative risk, absolute risk, and number needed to treat
Relative risk - Risk among exposed group divided by risk in unexposed group - doesn’t take into account baseline risk (e.g. new drug reduces incidence by 50%, may only be from 2 to 1) Absolute (or attributable) risk - Subtract risk from control group from the exposed group, giving you the excess risk caused by the exposure (e.g. new drug reduces incidence 2 in 1000, down to 1 in 1000, so AR is 1 in 1000) Number needed to treat - Number of patients to treat for one to benefit. 1/absolute risk. (E.g. AR is 1 in 1000, 1/(1/1000) = 1000 treated to save 1)
70
what is the bolam rule? what is the bolitho rule?
bolam - would a reasonable doctor do the same? bolitho - would that be reasonable?
71
4 aspects of negligence and error
was there a duty of care? was there a breach of that duty? was the pt harmed? was the harm due to the breach of care?
72
explain the swiss cheese model of error
falling through the holes because there is failed or absent defences against error happening. - called latent failures. organisational influence (to) unsafe supervision (to) preconditions for unsafe acts (to) unsafe acts
73
what is the bucket model of error
self = poor knowledge, fatigue, little experience/skill, feeling unwell context = distraction, poor handover, lack of team support, equipment task = errors, take complexity, new task, process
74
what is never event?
serious largely preventable pt safety incident that shouldnt occur if available, preventative measures have been implemented. eg: wrong site for surgery wrong drug given escape of psychiatry pt
75
what is a duty of candour
every healthcare professional must be open and honest with pts when something goes wrong with their tx causes, or has the potential to cause, harm or distress
76
define epidemic, pandemic, endemic, hyper-endemic
epidemic - more than expected incidence in a country pandemic - more than 1 country endemic - persistent level of disease occurence hyper-endemic - persistently high level of disease occurence
77
features of a disease that make it a public health concern
high mortality high morbidity highly contagious expensive to treat effective interventions
78
tell me about childhood consent - fraser and gillick
never inform parents - encourage them to inform under 13s can never consent to sex - inform social services. fraser guidlines - does she understand the advice? - has the dr encouraged her telling the parents? - will she have sex anyway? - is the mental/physical health going to be effected if you dont give it - best interests gillick's competence - does a child under 16 have capacity to make own medical decisions? -clinical judgement made by the dr: age capacity, maturity
79
what is the donabedian framework of health service evaluation? issues with health outcomes?
structure - what actually is the service eg: how many heart surgeons there are process - how does the process work outcome - 5 Ds = death, disease, disability, discomfort, dissatisfaction issues with health outcomes: - link between health service and health outcome can be difficult to confirm - time lag between service and outcome may be long -large sample sizes may be needed -data may not be available or have a problem with it (CART= completeness, accuracy, relevance, timeliness)