Ptsr Flashcards
What is ethics
Moral principles that govern a persons behaviour
What is law
A system of rules that are created and enforced through social or governmental institutions which regulate behaviours.
3 ethical duties of care
Protect patient life and health
Respect autonomy
Act justly and fairly
Therapeutic relationship
Engagement between patient and dentist which has a beneficial impact on patient
Gd principle 5
Have a clear and effective complaints procedure
Outline complaints procedure (RDRD)
Resect patients right to complain
Deal with the complaint in a calm and constructive manner
Resolve the complaint by apologising and offering a practical solution
Dentist should have insurance and indemnity (financial protection).
Case law
Law that evolves with new decisions neing made by judges in court
Statute law
New law that is issues by governement
What happened in case of RvBrown 1989
Deception of NHS as dentist was claiming fees for work he had not done
Christie v Somerset Health Authority 1991
She suffered from permanent residual numbness following wisdom tooth extraction = Neglicence case as harm caused to patient
3 conditions for neglicence proving
Dentist had a duty of care to patient
Harm was resulted to patient
Dentist caused the harm
Montgomery v Lanarkshire 2015
Case law passed that patients must be informed of risk if treatment and reasonable alternatives - links to GDC standard principle 3 - valid consent
Gdc role
Provide a set of standards that must be abided
Protect patients abd regulate the dental team
- registration of dentists
- education and continual professional development
- discipline of health and professional misconduct
Carmichael vs GDC 1990
Professional misconduct leading to deregistratioj from GDC
Helsinki declaration 1960
Any research involving humans must take consent and be informed and voluntary and benefit should outweigh the harm.
Bolam test
Assesses medical negligence and used to base it on the reasonable dentist - which meant that it depended on whether another clinician wpuld testify in doing the same thing as what the doctor/dentist in the particular case did
New bolam test
Moves towards reasonable patient.. clinician must make patient aware if material risks so they must consider whether patient or any reasonable and prudent patient would attach significance to the risk
Appleton vs Garret 1997
Informed consent
Patients not given enough information on treatment so sued their dentist due to gross over treatment
What is battery
Unlawful touching of a person without their consent
Doctrine of necessity
If patient is unconscious the doctor must act in their best interest regardless of relatives opunujn
Paternalism
Restricting freedom and responsibility of patients, as the dentist acts as a parent and makes the decisions for the patient on the basis of what they believe is in the best interest of the patient.
Remember golden rule
Useful in every topic to mention
Maintaining confidentiality
Secure note storage
Privacy in the clinic
Dont discuss patient information when speaking on the phone in clinic
Privacy on social media
Verbally reassure patient about confidentiality
All staff on premises should be trained on the policies on maintaining confidentiality
Criteria for medical records
Up to date
Complete
Accurate
Tarasoff case 1976
Confidentiality- a case law that now states that confidentiality can be breached if there’s potential of harm to someone else eg tarasoff girl ended up killed.
3 stages pf making a competent decision on treatment
Take in and retain the information
Believe it
Weigh the info in terms of risks and needs
Re C (1994)
Patient with schizophrenia (delusions) refused amputation of gangrene in leg
F v West Berkshire 1990
36 year old woman had mental disability, the clinician acted in her best interest and a sterilisation occured without her consent, this was legal since she was incompetent.
Mental capacity act 2005
Appearance and behaviour shod not determine competence + unwise decisions + mental disability/learning difficulty
Capacity is assimed unless groubds for believing otherwise
Gillick case 1985
Case law on childrens competence - under 16 year olds - consent can be taken as long as they fit the competence criteria. If not then parent can give it.
Nhs plan for nhs dental services 2000
1) rewarding dentidts for their commitmentbto the nhs
2) more funding to dental practices to mskr services more accessible
3) dental access centres for ppl not registered with a dentist
4) increase availability of information about treatment and oral health advice
Thorndikes law of effect (1898)
The result of a behaviour influences the rate of occurence of the behaviour. Positive result = increase in behaviour frequency