Psychopathology: Paper 1 Flashcards
Deviation from social norms
- A person is abnormal when their behaviour does not follow the social norms of society.
How does defining abnormality as a deviation from social norms help society intervene? (1)
- Allows us to know when to intervene when people cannot help themselves
- As we can identify behaviours that deviate from the norms of society.
- For example, if we see that a person has sudden weakness on one side of the body and difficulty understanding speech or trouble speaking they are suffering from a stroke and we should call the ambulance immediately.
- Ensures they receive treatment for their abnormal behaviour
How does defining abnormality as a deviation from social norms help society? (1)
- Take into account the effect that behaviours have on others.
- According to this definition, abnormal behaviour is behaviour that damages others.
- Social rules are established to help people live together and integrate with society.
- For example, laughing at someone’s death at a funeral is wrong and educating a person why it is wrong through the unwritten social norms helps them fit into society.
- Preventing any behaviours that can cause damage to society such as violence.
How can cultural differences limit the definition of abnormality in terms of deviation from social norms? (1)
- In different societies, there are different cultures.
- Cultures have different norms meaning there is no universal norm.
- For example, in Saudi Arabia, it is completely illegal to consume alcohol whereas in London it is perfectly legal to consume alcohol at 18 years of age or more.
Why do social norms changing after time limit the definition of abnormality in terms of deviation from social norms? (1)
- What is considered socially acceptable now, may not have been in the past.
- For example, homosexuality.
- Therefore, there is no clear, steady definition of deviance as it can change over time.
What are ethical implications for defining abnormality in terms of deviation from social norms? (1)
- There are ethical implications from defining behaviour that deviates from social norms as ‘abnormal’.
- It can lead to society excluding and stigmatising people who do not fit the norm.
- As a result, people who go against the norm can be seen as mentally ill.
Deviation from statistical frequency is
behaviour that is statistically infrequent.
This means that the behaviours are very rare as they are found in a very few people compared to the rest of the population.
For example, these abnormal behaviours are found at the extreme ends of a normally distributed curve in a bell curve graph.
What is a strength of having an agreed cut off point? (1)
5% of the population that fall more than two standard deviations from the mean are classified as abnormal.
This means abnormalities are easier to diagnose and thus it is easier to collect data.
What are real life applications of this definition of abnormality? (1)
A strength of the statistical defnition is that it has a real-life application in the diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder.
There is therefore a place for statistical infrequency in thinking about what are normal and abnormal behaviours and characteristics.
Actually all assessment of patients with mental disorders includes some kind of measurement of how severe their symptoms are as compared to statistical norms (as distinct from social norms). Statistical infrequency is thus a useful part of clinical assessment.
What are infrequent characteristics that can actually be desirable? (1)
Very few people have IQs over 150, yet we would not want to suggest that having high IQ is abnormal.
There are also frequent characteristics that are undesirable.
For example, having an eating disorder is common but is still viewed as undesirable.
Thus, using statistical infrequency to define abnormality means we are unable to tell the difference between desirable and undesirable behaviour.
How can cultural relativism limit this definition of abnormality? (1)
Another problem with using deviation from social norms to define behaviour as abnormal is that social norms vary tremendously from one generation to another and from one community to another.
This means, for example, that a person from one cultural group may label someone from another culture as behaving abnormally according to their standards rather than the standards of the person behaving that way.
For example, hearing voices is socially acceptable in some cultures but would be seen as a sign of mental abnormality in the UK.
This creates problems for people from one culture living within another culture group
What is failure to function adequately?
It means not being able to cope with everyday living.
Not functioning adequately may cause distress and suffering for the individual and may cause distress for others.
For example, people may lack the ability to function normally in their everyday life such as being content with not having showers or playing games all day.
If this does not cause distress to oneself or others, we can propose and suggest ‘abnormality’.
What are the characteristics of failure to function adequately?
- Causing distress to one self and others
- Psychotic Behaviour
- Lack of goal oriented behaviour
These are barriers which prevent sufferers from living normally in their day-to-living.
Why can labelling limit this definition of abnormality? (1)
When we make a judgement that someone is failing to cope we may end up giving them a label that can add to their problems.
For example, it would be very ‘normal’ to get depressed after the loss of a job, home or relationship and suffer from being unable to function adequately.
Someone in that position might well have benefitted from psychological help. However, future employers, partners and
organisations may attach a permanent label to that person.
Real life applications (1)
Led to the development of the global assessment functioning scale: score of 1-100 of how well one is coping based on symptoms that affect their day to day living.
How can a patient’s perspective be a strength of this definition of abnormality? (1)
A strength of failure to function adequately is that it does attempt to include the subjective experience of the individual.
It may not be an entirely satisfactory approach because it is difficult to assess distress, but at least this definition acknowledges that
the experience of the patient (and/or others) is important.
In this sense the failure to function adequately definition captures the experience of many of the people who need help. This suggests that failure to function adequately is a useful criterion for assessing abnormality.
How can failure to function adequately depend on who makes the judgement? (1)
In order to determine ‘failure to function adequately’ someone needs to decide whether this is actually the case.
Although there are people who are distressed about being unable to cope with everyday living, there are some people who are content with the situation they are in or may not be aware that they are coping.
It is others who identify and judge their behaviour as abnormal.
Is it simply a deviation from social norms? (1)
In practice it can be hard to say when someone is really failing to function and when they are just deviating from social norms.
We might think that not having a job or a permanent address is a sign of failure to function adequately. But then what do we say about people with alternative lifestyles, who choose not to have those things such as for example bohemians who like to live in a caravan?
If we treat these behaviours as ‘failures’ of adequate functioning, we risk limiting personal freedom and discriminating against minority groups.
What is deviation from ideal mental health?
is defined as experiencing poor mental wellbeing.
Jahoda suggested characteristics of ideal mental health such as integration and self attitudes. For example, integration means the ability to cope with stressful situations and having a good self attitude is having high self-esteem and a strong sense of identity.
Deviation from ideal mental health according to Jahoda is defined as the absence of these characteristics. People who lack these characteristics are considered ‘abnormal’.
What is the PRAAAE acronym to remember all 6 characteristics of abnormality?
P - Positive attitude towards oneself
R - Resisting stress
A - Autonomy
A - Accurate Perception of Reality
A - Self-Actualisation
E - Environmental Mastery
How can the approach being positive be a strength of this definition of abnormality? (1)
Deviation from mental health offers an alternative perspective on mental disorder by focusing on the positives (desirable characteristics) rather than negatives.
Her ideas, despite not being taken up by mental health professionals, have had some influence with the ‘positive psychology’ movement, which focuses on human strengths and virtue.
A strength of deviation from ideal mental health is that it is very comprehensive (1)
- It covers a broad range of criteria for mental health such as emotional, cognitive and behavioural factors.
- This definition stresses a positive approach to mental health by allowing acknowledgement of desirable traits that help define abnormality.
- The sheer range of factors covered in Jahoda’s definition makes it a good tool for thinking about mental health.
A strength of deviation from mental health is that the definition allows individuals and professionals to target areas of dysfunction (1)
- For example when a person does not meet a specific criteria such as having distorted thinking, this provides a point of development as clear goals and support are provided the individual may be able to achieve ideal mental health.
- This could be important when treating different types of disorders, such as focusing upon specific problem areas a person with depression has.
Deviation from ideal mental health’s criteria is culture bound (1)
- If this is used with people of non-Western or non middle class, there is a likely chance of finding a higher abnormality.
- Jahoda’s classification is specific to Western European, making it cultural bound.
- For example, self-actualisation is relevant to members of individualist cultures, but not for collectivist cultures where people strive for the greater of good of community instead of self goals.
How can having an unrealistic criteria be a limitation of this definition of abnormality? (1)
It is impossible for any individual to achieve all of the ideal characteristics all of the time.
For example, a person might not have a good self attitude but is the ‘master of his environment.’
Therefore, lacking some characteristics of ideal mental health does not indicate abnormality.
What is a phobia?
An extreme and irrational fear of an object or situation
What is the first symptom of a phobia?
Persistent fear of a specific stimulus.
What is the second symptom of a phobia?
Irrational beliefs about the feared stimulus.
What is the third symptom of a phobia?
Avoidance of the feared stimulus.
What is OCD?
OCD is classified as an anxiety disorder.
What are the two main components of OCD?
Obsessions are persistent thoughts that cause anxiety and distress.
Compulsions are repetitive behaviours (rituals) that temporarily relieve the distress and anxiety.
What is depression?
Depression is experiencing a depressed or sad mood state for a long period of time.
What are the seven symptoms of depression
- Low Mood
- Loss of Pleasure
- Irrational Negative Beliefs
- Difficulty concentrating
- Change in appetite
- Change in sleep patterns
- Social Withdrawal
What are the criteria for being diagnosed with major depression?
- Experienced at least 5/7 of the symptoms
- Experienced a low mood or loss of pleasure (emotional symptom)
- Prolonged period of 2 weeks or more
What is a depressive episode?
When a person experiences a period of low mood, which lasts for at least one week, this is called a depressive episode.
What is a manic episode?
When a person experiences a period of high mood, which lasts for at least one week, this is called a manic episode.
What is manic depression? (Bipolar disorder)
When a person cycles between depressive episodes and manic episodes, this is called manic depression.
What is the two-process model in terms of classical conditioning?
- Phobias are acquired through classical conditioning
- Fear is developed of a neural stimulus alongside an unpleasant unconditioned stimulus.
- Association is formed between neutral stimulus and unpleasant unconditioned stimulus
- Eventually, through repeated pairing, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus, eliciting a conditioned response - fear.
What is the two-process model in terms of operant conditioning
- This is maintained through operant conditioning
- Through avoidance of a specific feared stimulus, an individual’s feelings of fear and anxiety is removed.
- As a result through avoidance of a punishment (encountering the feared stimulus), this behaviour is negatively reinforced, increasing the likelihood that this behaviour is repeated.