Psychology Paper 2 AQA 2023 Flashcards
Q1
Discuss research into plasticity and functional recovery of the brain after trauma. Refer to the views of the teacher and Xavier in your answer. ( 16 marks)
A03s
-
Discuss research into plasticity and functional recovery of the brain after trauma. Refer to the views of the teacher and Xavier in your answer. ( 16 marks)
A01s
Q2)
Outline the fight or flight response and use this to explain what Xavier was experiencing. ( 6 marks)
Outline the difference between endogenous pacemakers and exogenous zeitgebers.
Use examples in your answer. ( 2 marks)
Outline and briefly discuss cognitive neuroscience ( 8 marks)
A01:
Cognitive Neuroscience is the scientific study of brain structures on mental processes.
It has allowed us to discover specialised regions in our brain such as the visual cortex which provided evidence for the location of each region/component of the brain and what their specific function is.
Advances in brain imaging techniques such as PET scans have led scientists to be able to discern and describe the neurological basis of mental processes.
For example, in Tulving et al’s research involving tasks that required the use of episodic and semantic memory were able to show how these different types of long-term memory may be located on opposite sides of the pre-frontal cortex.
A03:
The use of scanning techniques provides correlational evidence of brain activity and cognitive processes but does not establish causality, therefore we cannot establish a cause-and-effect relationship between brain activity and cognitive processes.
While brain imaging allows us to observe neural activations during specific tasks, it does not reveal the exact mechanisms and casual relationships underlying process.
Moreover, most of the studies in cognitive neuroscience are laboratory experiments. This is a limitation because in real life human cognition is influenced by various factors such as individual and cultural differences, which may not be captured by laboratory experiments. These conditions in the laboratory experiments may not be applicable to real life settings and is thus low in ecological validity
In what ways might the biological approach explain the different attitudes of steph’s and georgie’s daughters to their schoolwork? (4 marks)
The biological approach suggests that genetic factors play a role in shaping individual differences, including attitudes and behaviors. It is possible that steph’s daughter has inherited genetic traits that contribute to her enthusiastic and motivated attitude towards schoolwork.
These genetic factors may influence her cognitive processes, such as her ability to seek challenges and experience positive reinforcement. On the other hand, georgie’s daughter may have genetic predispositions that make her more susceptible to anxiety or stress-related responses, leading to her avoidance of difficult tasks and negative attitude towards school.
The biological approach also recognises the influence of neurochemicals on behavior and emotions. It is plausible that steph’s daughter may have a balance of neurochemicals that promote feelings of reward, motivation, and enthusiasm. This balance could be related to the release of neurotransmitters such as dopamine and serotonin, which are associated with positive emotions and motivation.
In contrast, georgie’s daughter may experience an imbalance of neurochemicals that contribute to anxiety or low motivation, potentially affecting her response to challenging tasks in school.
Explain one strength and one limitation of using social learning theory to explain the different attitudes of Steph’s and Georgie’s daughters. ( 6 marks)
One strength of using social learning theory is that it has practical applications as it emphasises the importance of observational learning and the influence of having strong role models to ensure people can achieve their potential.
In this case, Steph’s daughter observes her mother’s positive experiences and achievements at work, which serves as a model for her own behaviour. She learns through observation that being challenged leads to praise and recognition, motivating her to be enthusiastic and proactive in her schoolwork. This highlights the strength of social learning theory in explaining how individuals acquire attitudes and behaviours through observing and imitating others.
One limitation of using social learning theory in this context is that it primarily focuses on external factors and neglects internal cognitive processes. While observational learning and vicarious reinforcement are important aspects of social learning theory, they do not fully account for individual differences in how individuals interpret and internalise the observed behaviours and consequences. Other extraneous factors such as personal beliefs cognitive may also influence the attitudes and responses of Steph’s and Georgie’s daughters to their schoolwork.
Therefore, social learning theory alone may not provide a comprehensive explanation for the differences in attitudes observed, as it does not fully address the cognitive aspects of learning and motivation.
How might vicarious reinforcement explain the different attitudes of Steph’s and Georgie’s daughters to their schoolwork? (4 marks)
In Vicarious Reinforcement, people observe a behaviour being praised and this leads to the observer being motivated to replicate that behaviour to gain similar praise.
This could lead to internalisation of behaviour, where a behaviour becomes part of the observer’s personality
Negative experiences serve as aversive reinforcement.
As a result, Georgie’s daughter experiences vicarious reinforcement of negative consequences associated with difficult work.
This reinforcement creates anxiety and a negative emotional response towards challenging tasks
Research Methods
A psychologist wanted to investigate whether exercise would affect stress levels in 15-year-olds. Previous research into the effects of exercise on stress in teenagers had shown that exercise decreased stress levels.
The psychologist decided to use a repeated measures design to investigate the effects of exercise on stress levels in 20 15-year-old students. All the students were approaching their end-of-year exams.
For condition A, students were required to complete a 2 km run during their morning breaktime each school day for one week.
In condition B, students continued their normal activities in the playground during their morning breaktime each school day for one week.
At the end of each week of the investigation, for both condition a and condition B. Each. Student was asked to rate their levels of stress on a rating scale of 1-10, where the higher the self-reported rating the greater the stress levels.
Q11
Explain why a repeated measures design was more appropriate than an independent groups design in this study.
A repeated measures design was more appropriate than an independent groups design in this study because it allows for participants to serve as their own control.
In this study, stress levels were compared between condition A (exercise) and condition B (no exercise).
By comparing the stress levels between the same participants, this reduces participant variables and allows the researcher to see the impact in which the different conditions have on the stress levels of the same participants.
Q12
Describe how the psychologist could have counterbalanced the students across the experimental conditions.
Help: Counterbalancing is when participants are divided into two different groups who perform slightly different tasks from each other in order to eliminate order effects.
The psychologist should divide the 20 participants into two groups: Group 1 and Group 2.
Group 1 will perform the condition A, where they were required to complete a 2km run (Exercise condition) in the first week whereas Group 2 will perform the condition B, where they performed their normal activities (control condition).
Then they will swap conditions in the second week so that Group 1 will perform control condition B in the second week and Group 2 will perform the exercise condition A in the second week,
This means that all participants are able to perform the tasks in both conditions without the presence of order effects as they perform a different tasks in a different week in no particular order.
Q13
Students self-reported their stress levels on a scale of 1-10.
Explain how this might have affected the validity of the data collected (4 marks)
Self-report measures rely on individuals’ subjective interpretations and perceptions of their stress levels.
Different students may have varying understandings and interpretations of stress, leading to potential differences in how they rate and report their stress levels.
This subjectivity thus may affect the reliability and validity of the collected data.
As well as this, students may feel inclined to provide responses that they believe align with societal expectations or what they perceive as the “correct” response.
For example, some students may feel pressure to downplay or minimise their stress levels due to societal expectations of being resilient or “strong.”
On the other hand, some students may exaggerate their stress levels to seek attention or support.
Social desirability bias can distort the accuracy of self-reported stress levels and affect the validity of the data.
Q14
Explain one strength and one limitation of collecting quantitative data in this study. ( 4 marks)
One strength of collecting quantitative data in this study is the ability to obtain precise and numerical measurements of stress levels using a rating scale from 1 to 10.
This numeric data provides precise measurements of stress levels and allows for easy comparison and analysis. It enables the researcher to quantify the extent of stress experienced by the participants and detect potential patterns or differences between the two conditions.
While quantitative data provides numerical measurements, it may lack depth and insight into the subjective experiences and nuances of stress.
By relying solely on a rating scale, the study may not capture the rich and contextual information associated with stress levels as factors such as individual variations in the stress response may not be adequately captured by a single numeric rating.
Q15
What do the median and range values presented in Table 1 suggest about students’ stress ratings after each condition? Justify your answer. ( 4 marks)
Condition A
Median Stress Levels: 5
Range: 6
Condition B
Median Stress Levels: 6.5
Range: 3
The range of 6 indicates the spread or variability in the stress ratings for Condition A. The highest stress rating recorded was 6 points higher than the lowest stress rating. This wide range suggests that there was significant variation (more spread out) among the students in terms of their reported stress levels after engaging in the 2km run during break time.
For condition B, The median stress level of 6.5 indicates that half of the students who continued with their normal break time activities reported stress levels at or below this value. This median value is higher compared to Condition A, suggesting that, on average, students experienced slightly higher stress levels after engaging in their regular break time activities.
The range of 3 suggests a narrower spread of stress ratings for Condition B. The highest stress rating recorded was only 3 points higher than the lowest stress rating, indicating a relatively smaller variation in the stress levels reported by the students after participating in their normal break time activities.
Q16
Explain one limitation of using the range to represent the spread of stress ratings. ( 4 marks)
One limitation of using the range to represent the spread of stress ratings is that it only looks at the highest and lowest values without considering the other numbers in between, so it does not take the whole data set into account.
This means we do not know if the ratings are clustered together or spread out evenly.
Moreover, these highest and lowest values could be outliers, leading to a misleading impression of the real dispersion of data.