Psychopathology Flashcards - Midterm 2
Front: What are two key findings from recent research on intellectual and developmental disabilities in the criminal justice system?
Back: The prevalence of intellectual and developmental disabilities in the criminal population and the challenges in adapting criminal justice services for this population.
Front: What are some of the key influences on the study of intellectual and developmental disabilities in the criminal justice system?
Back: Political, criminological, and humanitarian perspectives.
Front: How has the DSM-5 updated the definition of intellectual disability?
Back: The DSM-5 aligns the definition with the World Health Organization, focusing on deficits in both general mental abilities and adaptive behavior.
Front: How are the terms “intellectual disability” and “developmental disability” related?
Back: The terms are often used interchangeably, but intellectual disability specifically refers to impairments in cognitive reasoning and adaptive behavior.
Front: What are the key domains of adaptive behavior?
Back: Conceptual, social, and practical domains.
Front: What is the AAIDD?
Back: The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Front: What are the five key assumptions of the AAIDD definition of intellectual disability?
Back: 1. Limitations must be considered in community contexts. 2. Valid assessments account for diversity. 3. Limitations coexist with strengths. 4. Limitations are used to create support plans. 5. With support, life functioning improves.
Front: What is the ICD-10?
Back: The International Classification of Diseases.
Front: What are the key criteria for intellectual disability according to the ICD-10?
Back: Impaired intellectual and adaptive functioning, and an IQ score below 70.
What is challenging behavior in individuals with IDD?
back: Culturally abnormal behaviors that pose a risk to the safety of the person or others, or limit access to community facilities. Examples: aggression, self-injury, disruptive actions
What were some challenges in early research on intellectual disability?
Inconsistent definitions of intellectual disability.
Use of various psychometric tests.
Different age cut-offs.
These inconsistencies continue to be a challenge today
How are offenses committed by individuals with intellectual disabilities often handled?
“Back: They may not be reported to the police. If reported, they may not be acted upon by the police. The individual may not be charged. The matter may not be adjudicated in court.”
How has offending behavior been viewed historically?
Back: As a sign of social menace As an expression of lack of social competence As a result of exclusionary social structures and practices Used to justify both societal protection and individual care and protection
Front: What are the potential explanations for the overrepresentation of individuals with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system?
Back: Susceptibility hypothesis, psychosocial disadvantage explanation, different treatment hypothesis, and social services explanation.
Front: What is the susceptibility hypothesis?
Back: Individuals with intellectual disabilities are more likely to become involved in the criminal justice system due to personal traits like communication deficits, impulsivity, and limited understanding of legal concepts.
Front: What is the psychosocial disadvantage explanation?
Back: Individuals with intellectual disabilities are more likely to face unemployment, educational disadvantages, family dysfunction, substance abuse, and poor social skills, increasing their risk of criminal involvement.
Front: What is the different treatment hypothesis?
Back: Individuals with intellectual disabilities may be treated unfairly or differently within the criminal justice system due to their disability.
Front: What is the social services explanation?
Back: The lack of adequate community services and support for individuals with intellectual disabilities can contribute to their overrepresentation in the criminal justice system.
Front: What is the prevalence of mental health issues among individuals with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system?
Back: Individuals with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system often have a higher rate of co-occurring psychiatric disorders compared to the general population.
Front: What are the challenges in using an IQ cut-off of 70 to identify intellectual disability in the criminal justice system?
Back: Including individuals with borderline intellectual ability (IQ 70-79) can increase the apparent rate of intellectual disability among offenders, potentially leading to unfair assumptions and generic rehabilitation programs.
Front: What is the prevalence of psychotropic medication use among offenders with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Nearly two-thirds of offenders with intellectual disabilities receive psychotropic medication, but there is limited evidence that these medications reduce recidivism.
Front: How does the prevalence of intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system vary over time and across socio-economic factors?
Back: The prevalence can change over time and is higher in lower socio-economic areas.
Front: How does the rate of imprisonment affect the prevalence of intellectual disabilities in prisons?
Back: Countries with high imprisonment rates may have higher prevalence due to a lack of alternative sentencing and policies favoring incarceration for nonviolent crimes.
Front: How do testing methods influence the identification of intellectual disabilities in prisons?
Back: Studies show higher prevalence when testing all inmates or large random samples compared to smaller samples or only new admissions.
Front: What are the challenges in identifying intellectual disabilities among offenders?
Back: Unreliable self-reporting can lead to underreporting of cases due to fear of negative consequences.
Front: How prevalent are intellectual disabilities among offenders receiving community-based sentences?
Back: Studies suggest significant overrepresentation (11-15%) of individuals with intellectual disabilities in this group.
Front: What are static risk factors?
Back: Static risk factors are unchangeable characteristics, such as gender or family criminal history.
Front: What are dynamic risk factors?
Back: Dynamic risk factors are variable traits or conditions, such as attitudes, cognitions, or impulsivity.
Front: How are static and dynamic risk factors used in risk assessment?
Back: Static factors help determine who should receive treatment, while dynamic factors guide the focus of treatment.
Front: What is the importance of the Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model?
Back: The RNR model emphasizes the importance of assessing both static and dynamic risk factors and tailoring treatment to individual needs.
Front: What are static risk factors?
Back: Static risk factors are unchangeable characteristics that predict recidivism, such as age, gender, and criminal history.
Front: What are some examples of static risk factors for offenders with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Younger age, male gender, history of substance abuse, diagnosis of personality disorder, and history of violence and offending.
Front: What is the VRAG?
Back: The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide is a validated actuarial tool for predicting violent reoffending in mentally disordered offenders.
Front: Where was the VRAG developed?
Back: The VRAG was developed from forensic psychiatric patients in Canada.
Front: How many static variables does the VRAG consist of?
Back: 12 static variables.
Front: What is the predictive accuracy of the VRAG?
Back: The VRAG predicts recidivism at 7 and 10 years post-discharge with a large effect size.
Front: What is the HCR-20?
Back: The HCR-20 is a structured clinical guide used to assess the risk of future violence.
Front: What are the components of the HCR-20?
Back: The HCR-20 combines static, clinical, and risk management variables.
Front: What is the history subscale of the HCR-20?
Back: The history subscale focuses on 10 static variables and can be used as a standalone static risk assessment.
Front: How is the HCR-20 used for comprehensive risk assessment?
Back: The HCR-20 is intended to be used by combining the static historical factors with dynamic clinical and risk management variables for a more comprehensive assessment.
Front: What is the RAPID tool?
Back: The RAPID is a screening tool developed for assessing risk in offenders with intellectual disabilities.
Front: What is the DRAMS?
Back: The Dynamic Risk Assessment and Management System (DRAMS) is used to assess risk for general offending in high-security settings.
Front: What is the ARMIDILO-S?
Back: The Assessment of Risk and Manageability for Individuals with Developmental and Intellectual Limitations who Offend Sexually is used to assess the risk of sexual offending in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Front: What is the CuRV?
Back: The Current Risk of Violence (CuRV) is used to assess the risk of aggression.
Front: What are some challenges in studying sexual offending among individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD)?
Back: Differences in definitions of sexual offending, study settings, and legal frameworks can complicate research.
Front: How does the inclusion of inappropriate sexual behavior (ISB) affect research on sexual offending among individuals with IDD?
Back: Studies that include ISB may show higher rates of sexual offending, as ISB may not always lead to formal legal proceedings.
Front: What are sex offender treatment programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities designed to address?
Back: These programs aim to improve sexual knowledge, victim empathy, and cognitive distortions.
Front: What are some examples of sex offender treatment programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: SOTSEC-ID
Front: What are the limitations of existing research on sex offender treatment programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Short follow-up periods and lack of control groups limit the strength of the evidence.
Front: What is the overall effectiveness of sex offender treatment programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: While these programs show promise, more research is needed to validate their long-term effectiveness.
Front: What is a personality disorder?
Back: A personality disorder is an enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from cultural expectations, is pervasive and inflexible, has an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and leads to distress or impairment.
Front: What are the three clusters of personality disorders in the DSM-5?
Back: Cluster A: Paranoid, Schizoid, Schizotypal; Cluster B: Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, Narcissistic; Cluster C: Avoidant, Dependent, Obsessive-Compulsive.
Front: How has the understanding of personality disorders evolved?
Back: Recent research suggests that personality characteristics vary on a continuum, leading to discussions about a dimensional approach to diagnosis.
Front: What are the two methods for classifying personality disorders in the DSM-5?
Back: The main diagnostic system and an alternative dimensional system.
Front: What are the challenges in studying personality disorders in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD)?
Back: Early studies showed varying prevalence rates, and there have been inconsistencies in diagnostic criteria and methods.
Front: What are the findings of studies on the prevalence of personality disorders in individuals with IDD?
Back: Studies have reported a wide range of prevalence rates, from less than 1% to over 50%, depending on the study population and diagnostic methods.
Front: What are the implications of underreporting personality disorders in individuals with IDD?
Back: Underreporting can lead to missed opportunities for appropriate diagnosis and treatment, potentially impacting the individual’s well-being and risk of recidivism.
Front: What are the most common personality disorders found in individuals with IDD?
Back: Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is the most commonly diagnosed personality disorder in this population.
Front: What did Blackburn et al. (2005) find in their research on personality disorder?
Back: They identified two higher-order factors underlying personality structure: “acting out” and “anxious-inhibited.”
Front: What did Alexander et al. (2006) find regarding the relationship between personality disorders and recidivism?
Back: They found that a previous offense of theft or burglary, age less than 27 years, and the presence of a personality disorder were associated with reconviction.
Front: How are personality disorders related to criminal behavior and psychiatric patient status?
Back: Antisocial personality disorder is linked to criminal behavior, while borderline personality disorder is associated with psychiatric patient status.
Front: What is the relationship between intellectual disabilities (ID) and crime?
Back: The relationship between ID and crime is unclear due to methodological challenges in prevalence studies.
Front: How do different settings influence the prevalence of ID in the criminal justice system?
Back: The prevalence of ID may vary depending on the setting, such as community, prison, or hospital.
Front: How do inclusion criteria and diagnostic methods affect the identification of ID in the criminal justice system?
Back: Different inclusion criteria and diagnostic methods can impact the prevalence rates of ID among offenders.
Front: What are the general findings on the prevalence of ID among offenders?
Back: Studies have reported varying prevalence rates, ranging from 0% to 20%, depending on the study population and methodology.
Front: What are the recidivism rates for offenders with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Studies have reported varying recidivism rates, ranging from 25% to 72%, depending on the study population and follow-up period.
Front: What is the focus of cognitive-behavioral anger treatment for individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: The treatment aims to improve anger management skills and reduce violent behavior.
Front: What are the outcomes of cognitive-behavioral anger treatment for individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Studies have shown significant improvements in anger management and reductions in violent behavior.
Front: How does cognitive-behavioral anger treatment compare to control groups?
Back: Studies have demonstrated that individuals who receive cognitive-behavioral anger treatment are less likely to exhibit aggressive behavior compared to those in control groups.
Front: What is the relationship between alcohol use and offending in individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Studies have shown mixed findings, with some suggesting a strong link and others a weaker association.
Front: What are some interventions for alcohol-related offending in individuals with intellectual disabilities?
Back: A 12-session program combining education and relapse prevention strategies has shown promise.
Front: What is the need for future research in this area?
Back: More effective interventions tailored to offenders with intellectual disabilities who misuse alcohol are needed.
Front: How prevalent is firesetting among individuals in secure services?
Back: Over 21% of individuals in secure services have a history of arson.
Front: What kind of interventions are effective for firesetting behavior?
Back: Cognitive-behavioral interventions, such as those developed by Taylor and Thorne, have shown positive outcomes in reducing firesetting behavior.
Front: What are the benefits of cognitive-behavioral interventions for firesetting?
Back: These interventions can improve anger management, self-esteem, and depression, and lead to long-term reductions in firesetting behavior.
Front: Are people with intellectual disabilities more vulnerable to victimization?
Back: Yes, people with intellectual disabilities are widely considered more vulnerable to criminal victimization than the general population.
Front: What are the challenges in studying victimization among people with intellectual disabilities?
Back: Challenges include a lack of rigorous research, inconsistent definitions of victimization, and the impact of measurement location and method.
Front: How do self-reports compare to proxy reporting and official records in measuring victimization rates?
Back: Self-reports often reveal higher victimization rates compared to proxy reporting or official records.
Front: What is the impact of measurement location on victimization rates?
Back: Victimization rates are lower in population-based surveys but higher in clinical settings where self-reporting is used.
Front: What are some theories that explain why people with intellectual disabilities (PWID) may be at increased risk of victimization?
Back: Dependency/Stress Model, Routine Activities Theory, Deviant Place & Lifestyle Theories, and Target Congruence Model.
Front: What is the Dependency/Stress Model?
Back: This model suggests that stress in caregivers can lead to abuse, but it has been criticized for victim-blaming and lack of empirical support.
Front: What is the Routine Activities Theory?
Back: This theory suggests that PWID may be vulnerable due to risky behaviors, lack of support, or appearing compliant.
Front: What are Deviant Place & Lifestyle Theories?
Back: These theories suggest that living in disadvantaged areas with high unemployment and substance abuse can increase victimization risk.
Front: What is the Target Congruence Model?
Back: This model suggests that victimization occurs when the environment, offender motives, and victim characteristics align.
Front: What are the challenges in determining the prevalence of victimization among people with intellectual disabilities (PWID)?
Back: There are limited studies, inconsistencies in definitions and methodologies, and underreporting of incidents.
Front: What is the difference between prevalence and incidence?
Back: Prevalence refers to the overall proportion of individuals affected at a specific time, while incidence refers to the number of new cases occurring within a defined period.
Front: How do differences in methodology affect victimization rates?
Back: Variations in definitions of intellectual disability, victimization, and sampling methods can lead to different estimates of victimization rates.
Front: Why are self-report studies important in assessing victimization among PWID?
Back: Self-report studies can reveal higher victimization rates than official records or proxy reporting, as they capture incidents that may not be reported to authorities.
Front: What is one challenge in defining intellectual disability (ID) in relation to victimization studies?
Back: Inconsistent definitions and assessment criteria can make it difficult to compare findings across studies.
Front: How do variations in terminology affect research on victimization of people with intellectual disabilities (PWID)?
Back: Different terms like “developmental disabilities” and “intellectual disabilities” can complicate cross-cultural comparisons.
Front: What are the challenges in defining victimization in relation to PWID?
Back: Vague definitions and reliance on self-reports or proxy reports can lead to inflated victimization rates.
Front: How does the use of euphemistic language impact the understanding of victimization among PWID?
Back: Terms like “maltreatment” or “abuse” can downplay the seriousness of crimes and increase the vulnerability of PWID.
Front: What is the role of legal definitions in understanding victimization among PWID?
Back: Using a “law and order” approach can help clarify victimization rates but may still underestimate the true prevalence due to underreporting.
Front: What is a challenge in studying victimization among people with intellectual disabilities (PWID)?
Back: Heterogeneity in study populations, including mixing physical and intellectual disabilities, and focusing on mild to moderate ID.
Front: How do sample sizes affect victimization research among PWID?
Back: Small sample sizes limit the power of research and the ability to generalize findings.