Psychopathology Flashcards
psychopathology
psychopathology is the study of mental health and diagnosis it deals with emotional and behavioural problems
involves research into the diagnosis and classification, causation, prevention, and treatment of psychological disorders
abnormal
means deviating from the average, so any rare behaviour or ability would be abnormal
statistical infrequency
statistically rare behaviour seen as abnormal depends on normal distribution curve
occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic
statistical infrequency example
IQ and intellectual disability disorder
when we deal with characteristics that can be easily and reliably measured like intelligence, we know that in human characteristics that majority of peoples scores will be around the average and further below or above the fewer people
this is called normal distribution
average IQ is set at 100, 68% of people range from 85 to 115, 2% are below 70 those individuals below this are called abnormal and receive a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder
statistical infrequency - a03 - real life application
real life application in diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder, statistical infrequency has a place in thinking about what are normal and abnormal behaviours and characteristics
all assessments of patients with mental disorders include measurements of how severe their symptoms are compared to statistical norms, statistical infrequency is a useful part of clinical assessments
statistical infrequency - a03 - unusual characteristics can be positive
IQ over 130 is as unusual as IQ under 70, but intelligence is not thought of as undesired characteristic
just because a characteristics is rare it is classed as statistically abnormal but doesnt mean it requires treatment to turn back to normal
limitation because statistical infrequency cannot alone diagnose
statistical infrequency - a03 - not everyone unusual benefits from a label
someone living a happy fulfilled life might be labelled as abnormal no matter how unusual they are, them being labelled might have a negative effect on the way others view them and they way they view themselves
deviation from social norms
concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society, making a collective judgement as a society about what is right
norms are specific to the culture we live in, social norms may be different from each generation and each culture, so few behaviours are considered universally abnormal on the basis that they breach social norms
deviation from social norms example
antisocial personality disorder, a person with antisocial personality disorder is impulsive aggressive and irresponsible, one important symptom of antisocial personality disorder is an absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour
deviation from social norms - a03 - not a sole explanation
it has real life application in the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder, there is a place for it in thinking what is normal and abnormal
however there are other factors to consider for example the distress to others resulting from antisocial personality disorder, so in practice deviation from social norms is never the sole reason for defining abnormality
deviation from social norms - ao3 - cultural relativism
social norms very tremendously from one generation to the next and from one community to another
e.g. one person from on cultural group may label someone from another cultural group as behaving abnormally according to their standards an example of this is that hearing voices is okay in some cultures but not others like in the UK, this creates problems for people from one culture living within another cultural group
deviation from social norms - a03 - can lead to human rights abuse
overreliance on deviation from social norms to understand abnormality can lead to systematic abuse of human rights in the past diagnoses were in place to maintain control over minority ethnic groups and women
the classifications now appear ridiculous - but only because our social norms have changed more radical psychologists suggest that our categories of mental disorder are really abuses of peoples right to be different
failure to function adequately
occurs when someone is unable to cope with ordinary demands of day to day living
we can tell if someone if failing to function adequately by the signs proposed by Rosenhan and Seligman which are used to determine when someone is not coping
- when a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules for example respecting personal space
- when a person experiences severe personal distress
- when a persons behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
failure to function adequately example
intellectual disability disorder - one criteria for this is having low IQ however a diagnosis would not be made on this basis only and individual must also be failing to function adequately before a diagnosis is given
failure to function adequately - a03 - patients perspective
attempts to include the subjective experience of the individual, not entirely satisfactory approach because difficult to assess distress, but at least acknowledges that the experience of the patient is important
therefore this is a strength because it captures the experience of many people who need help, suggests that failure to function adequately is a useful criteria for assessing abnormality
failure to function adequately - a03 - it is simply a deviation from social norms
in practice it is hard to say when someone is failing to function and when they are just deviating from social norms
not having a job or a permanent address could be seen as a sign of failure to function adequately, people with alternative lifestyles who choose not to have these things are labelled as abnormal for example having spiritual and religious beliefs could be seen as abnormal
if we treat these behaviours as failure to function adequately we limit personal freedom and discriminate against minority groups
failure to function adequately - a03 - subjective judgements
when judging if someone is failing to act adequately, distress has to be judged, these judgements can be made as objective as possible by using checklists however the principle remains that someone has the right to make this judgement
deviation from ideal mental health
occurs when someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health
Jahoda’s criteria
we have no symptoms or distress
we are rational and can perceive ourselves accurately
we self actualise
we can cope with stress
we have a realistic view of the world
we have good self esteem and lack guilt
we are independent of other people
we can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
deviation from ideal mental health - a03 - comprehensive definition
covers a broad range of criteria for mental health, covers most of the reason someone would seek help from mental health services or be referred for help, the sheer range of factors discussed in relation to jahoda’s ideal mental health make it a good tool for thinking about mental health
deviation from ideal mental health - a03 - cultural relativism
Jahoda’s classification is specific to western european and north american cultures, emphasis on self actualisation could be seen as self indulgence in much of the world because the emphasis is so much more on the individual than the family and community
similarly much of the world would see independence from other people as a bad thing (individualist cultures)
deviation from ideal mental health - a03 - sets an unrealistically high standard for mental health
very few attain Jahoda’s criteria for mental health therefore this approach sees pretty much all of us as abnormal, we can see this as a positive and negative
positive because it is clear to people the ways in which they could benefit from recieving treatment to improve mental health
negative because deviation from ideal mental health is probably of no value in thinking about who might benefit from treatment against their will
DSM-5 categories of phobias
all phobias are characterised by excessive fear and anxiety, triggered by an object place or situation, the extent of the fear is out of proportion to any real danger presented by the phobic stimulus
specific phobia: phobia of an object, such as an animal or body part, or a situation such as flying and having an injection
social anxiety: phobia of a social situation such as public speaking or using a public toilet
agoraphobia: phobia of being outside or in a public place
what are behavioural characteristics of phobias
panic, avoidance, endurance
behavioural characteristic of phobias: panic
a phobic person may panic in response to the presence of the phobic stimulus, panic may involve a range of behaviours including crying, screaming or running away
children may react slightly differently, for example by freezing clinging or having a tantrum
behavioural characteristics of phobias: avoidance
unless the sufferer is making a conscious effort to face their fear they tend to go to a lot of effort to avoid coming into contact with the phobic stimulus
behavioural characteristics of phobias: endurance
the alternative to avoidance is endurance, in which a sufferer remains in the presence of the phobic stimulus but continues to experience high levels of anxiety, this may be unavoidable in some situation, for example for a person who has an extreme fear of flying
emotional characteristics of phobias: anxiety
phobias are classed as anxiety disorders, they involve an emotional response of anxiety and fear, anxiety is an unpleasant state of high arousal this prevents the sufferer relaxing and makes it very difficult to experience any positive emotion
anxiety can be long term, fear is the immediate and unpleasant response we experience when we encounter or think about the phobic stimulus
e.g. arachnophobia, seeing or entering places associated with spiders increase anxiety and fear levels
emotional characteristics of phobias: emotional response are unreasonable
the emotional response we experience in relation
to phobic stimuli go beyond what is reasonable, for example a fear of spiders which are tiny and harmless is therefore our fear is disproportionate to the danger posed by any spider we are likely to meet
cognitive characteristics of phobias: selective attention to the phobic stimulus
if a sufferer can see the phobic stimulus it is hard to look away from it. keeping our attention on something really dangerous is a good thing as it gives us the best chance of reacting quickly to a threat, but it is not so useful when the fear is irrational
cognitive characteristics of phobias: irrational beliefs
a phobic may hold irrational beliefs in relation to phobic stimuli, for example social phobias can involve beliefs like ‘i must always sounds intelligent’
this kind of belief increases the pressure on the sufferer to perform well in social situations
cognitive characteristics of phobias: cognitive distortions
the phobic’s perceptions of the phobic stimulus may be distorted, so for example an omphalophobic is likely to see belly buttons as ugly and disgusting
what is the two-process model
Mowrer in 1960 proposed the two-process model based on the behavioural approach to phobias, this states that phobias are acquired by classical conditioning and then continue because of operant conditioning
what part of phobias can the behavioural approach explain
avoidance, endurance, panic
acquisition by classical conditioning
learning to associate something of which we initially have no fear with something that triggers a fear response
Little Albert was a nine month old baby that Rayner and Watson conditioned to have a phobia, Little Albert showed no unusual anxiety at the start of the study
unconditioned stimulus (noise) > unconditioned response (fear)
neutral stimulus (rat) + conditioned stimulus (noise) > unconditioned response (fear)
conditioned stimulus (rat) > conditioned response (fear)
Little Albert also expressed dislike to any fur white animal, this means the conditioning was generalised
maintenance by operant conditioning
responses acquired by classical conditioning are temporary while phobias are permanent, Mowrer explained this as the result of operant conditioning, both negative and positive reinforcement
in the case of negative reinforcement, when we avoid the phobic stimulus we escape fear and anxiety that we would have suffered if we had remained there
reduction in fear reinforces avoidance behaviour and so phobia is maintained
the behavioural approach to explaining phobias - a03 - good explanatory power
a step forward from the normal concept of classical conditioning, it explained how phobias could be maintained over time and this therefore had important implications for therapies because it explains why patients need to be exposed to feared stimulus
once a patient is prevented from practising their avoidance behaviour the behaviour ceases to be reinforced and so it declines
the application to therapy is a strength of the two-process model
the behavioural approach to explaining phobias - a03 - alternative explanation for avoidance behaviour
not all avoidance behaviour associated with phobias seems to be the result of anxiety reduction, at least in more complex phobias like agoraphobia
there is evidence to suggest that at least some avoidance behaviour appears to be motivated more by positive feelings of safety
in other words the motivating factor in choosing an action is not so much to avoid the phobic stimulus but to stick with the safety factor, this is a problem for the two-process model which suggests that avoidance is motivated by anxiety reduction
the behavioural approach to explaining phobias - a03 - an incomplete explanation of phobias
even if we accept that classical and operant conditioning have a part to play in development and maintenance of phobias however there are parts of phobic behaviour that need more explaining for example Bounton mentioned that evolutionary factors probably have an important role in phobias but the two-factor theory does not mention this we easily acquire phobias that have been a danger in our evolutionary past
seligman called this evolutionary preparedness - the innate predisposition to acquire certain fears however it is rare to develop a fear of cars and guns presumably this is because they have only existed very recently and so we are not biologically prepared to have fear response towards them
this phenomenon of preparedness is a serious problem for the two factor theory because its shows there is more to acquiring phobias rather than just conditioning
what is systematic desensitisation
is a behavioural therapy designed to gradually reduce phobic anxiety through the principle of classical conditioning, if the sufferer can learn to relax in the presence of the phobic stimulus they will be cured, essentially a new response to the phobic stimulus is learnt this is called counterconditioning
what is reciprocal inhibition
this is when one emotion prevents another emotion, you cant be afraid and relaxed at the same time