PSYCHOLOGY paper 3 Flashcards
what is attachment?
attachment is a deep and strong bond between two people, usually a primary caregiver and a child. The relationship is reciprocal, which means that it is a two way relationship.
what is reciprocity?
reciprocity is when an infant responds to the actions of another person in a form or turn taking.
From around 3 months old, reciprocity increases in frequency as the infant and caregiver pay increasingly attention to each others verbal and facial communications.
It is suggested that showing this sensitive responsiveness, whereby the caregiver pays attention sensitively towards the infants behaviour will lay the strong foundation of attachment to develop later between the caregiver and the infant.
what is interactinal synchrony?
it takes place when infants mirror (imitate) the actions or emotions of another person.
Facial expressions, when they imitate and act as their caregiver simultaneously then two are said to be synchronized.
stages of attachment?
Schaffer and Emerson conducted a longitudinal study and found 4 stages of attachments.
1. asocial stage (preattachment)
2. indiscriminate stage (diffuse)
3. discriminate stage (specific)
4. multiple attachment
explain asocial stage?
- from birth to 6 weeks
- infant shows similar response to objects and people.
Towards the end they start displaying preferences for certain individuals.
explain indiscriminate stage?
- from 6 weeks to 7 months
- an infant now shows a preference for human company over non human company
- infant can distignish between different people and can be handled by a stranger without distress
explain discriminate stage?
- from 7 months onwards
- an infant shows a preference for one caregiver, displaying seperation and stranger anxiety
- the infant looks to a particular person for security and protection.
multiple attachement stage?
- from 9 months onwards
- attachment behaviours are now displayed towards several different people. (sibling and grandparents)
also known as secondary attachment, separation and stranger anxiety decreases,.
AO3, Schaffer and Emerson 1964 - supporting research
O’Connor (2013) AIM
investigate to what extend social learning theory based intervention promoted change in quality of child parent relationship.
O’Connor (2013) PROCEDURE
- randomized clinical trial on 174, 4-6 year old children from 4 primary schools in London
- it was a longitundial study (3 years)
- 88 interventional condition and 86 in non interventional condition
- informed consent was received from the parents and the local research ethics comittee also gave an approval for the study
- parents were thought new parental techniques and asked to practise skills at home.
- the post treatment observations were done through home visits by a team of 2 trained researchers who did not know which condition the family was in (all videotaped)
- 3 tasks to do:
1. 10 min free play with no instructions given
2. 10 min instructed challenge
3. 5 min of tidying up with minimal instructions - observers rated each of the 3 tasks, and the ratings showed whether there was a positive (sensitive responding) or negative parenting style.
- mutuality was measured as the degree to which each member seems to wilingly accept and seek the other’s involvement in a joint activity.
O’Connor results
- parents in the intervention condition showed higher number of positive behavioural changes and increased sensitive responding compared to the non intervention group.
O’Connor conclusion
- standard social learning theory based interventions can change aspects of parents child relationship quality.
O’Connor AO3 strengths
- as study has standardized procedure and controlled procedure with time limits of 10 and 5 min, video recorded and also used instructions, mean that the study is reliable and replicable
- for each intervention group, a profesoinal is provided to guide the parents and explain any misunderstandings and to make sure task was done corectlly, therefore results are not affected by any external variables ensuring internal validity.
- informed consent was given and the study helps imporve the quality of parent child attachment relationships. Beneficial and ethical.
O’Connor AO3 weaknesses
- the presence of 2 observes and a camera might have affected the performance of participants which leads to demand caracteristics which can influence results, the3refore it reduces the validity of the study.
- study has a sample of 174 4-6 year old kids from only 4 primary schools in London, therefore it cannot be applied to other nationalities or ages above 6. It lacks population validity.
Bowlby monotropic theory
takes an evolutionary perspective. He argued that children are born with an innate tendency to form attachments with their parents in order to increase chances to survivol.
Adaptive AO1
attachments are adaptive which means they give humans an advantage, making them more likely to survive.
if an infant has an attachment, they are kept safe, given food and kept warm by their caregiver
Social releaasers AO1
- infants posses inborn social releasers, which unlock an innate tendency for primary caregiver to care for them.
- physical, ‘‘baby face’’ that make baby’s appear cute
- behavioural, crying and smilling to get attention
Critical period AO1
- infants must form an attachment with their caregiver during the critical period which is between 3 and 6 months of age. (3 years old)
- If attachment is not formed, infants would be damaged in following areas - intelectually, socially, physically, emotionally
Monotropy AO1
- Bowbly believed that infants form a very special attachment with their primary caregiver. This special and intense attachment is called monotropy.
- If the mother is not available, the child can bond with another person known as mum’s substitute
Internal working model AO1
- an internal template for future relationships expectations.
If a child has a strong and healthy attachment with their primary caregiver then they will develop strong and healthy relationships in the future (same with negative ones)
Theory of maternal deprivation AO1
- it occurs when an attachment bond is formed between an infant and caregiver but is broken later in life. (up to 3 years )
- if maternal deprivation occurs it would have lasting negative effects on a child in terms of their emotional development.
Bowlby 44 thieves study AIM
- to investigate the long term effects of maternal deprivation on people to see whether delinquents have suffered deprivation
Bowlby PROCEDURE
- opportunity sample of 88 children was selected from the clinic where Bowlby worked.
- 44 juvenile thieve and 44 controls, 65 boys and 23 girls (had emotional problems but no crimes commited)
- each child had their IQ tested by a psychologist and two groups were matched for age and IQ
- children and parents were interviewed to record details of the child early life by Bowlby, psychologist and a social worker, they all made different reports.
Bowlby RESULTS
14 thieves were identified as having affectionless psychopathy, with 12 of those having experienced maternal deprivation.
Bowlby CONCLUSION
- maternal deprivation in the childs early life cause, permanent emotional damage
Bowlby AO3 strengths
- Bowlby used a range of methods to collect his data such as full scale IQ tests, observations of the child’s emotional state and interviews giving a valid measure as he was able to gather in depth data for both the group of 44 thieves and the control group to compare the effects of maternal deprivation on affectionless
psychopathy - ## Bowlby’s research has had a significant impact on important institutions such as hospitlas. The robertson 1952, observed a 2 year old girl named Laura who was in the hospital for 8 days. Laura strugggled to cope with the motional deprivation, demonstration real distress. Psychlogical researh has provided hospitals with new ideas to support children who suffer from maternal deprivation by providing substitue emotional care.
Bowlby AO3 weaknesses
- 44 thieves cannot be applied to the whole population as they are juvenil, there was also an imbalance of gender
- research bias, as bowlby conducted the experiment himself and made the diagnosis of affectionless psycopathy. He also knew in what group children were in, therefore his findings may have been unconsicouly influenced by his own expectations which decreases validity.
- Lewis 1944 replicated Bowlby’s study with a larger sample of children but did not find similar results <(that early deprivation was a predicted for criminal behaviour) Furthermore, Barrett (1997) found that securely attached children are more resistant to the negative effects of maternal deprivation in comparison to insecurely attached children. This makes Bowlby’s study not reliable and replicable.
strange situation procedure AO1
observational method looking at the attachment between a caregiver and an infant.
- infants aged between 12-18 monts were placed in a situation of mild stress, unfamiliar room whereby they are left alone, left with a straneg and reunited with their caregiver.
Insecure avoidant
infant keeps a distance drom the mother and avoids proximity.
- has low stranger anxiety and no seperation anxiety
- do not approach mother for the comfort and they will have insensitive caregivers who ignore their emotional needs
secure
- the mother becomes a safe base for exploration
- high stranger and seperation anxiety
- wwwelcoming reunion the baby looks for comfort and proximity and mother shows sensitive responsiveness
insecure resistant
clingy to the mother in the new situation
high seperation and stranger anxiety
- reject the attachment figure whrn interactingf
mother is incosistent with their sensitive responsivemess
SSP AO3 strength
- reliabililty, videoreocded, it had standardized procedure and several observers were wathicng and coding the same infant behaviours. There was 94% agreement between observers and when inter rater reliability is assumed to a high degree the results are considered more meaningful.
- primary caregivers gave full informed consent for them and their child to participante in the experiment therefore it decreases ethical issues.
SSP AO3 weakness
- lacks ecological validity, its an artifical and controlled setting meaning that the caregiver and the infnat are in unfamiliar encvirinment and therefore they might behave df+iffernetky which can imapct the results of the study and it lowers external validity
- overt observation meaning that the participants knew that they were observed, therefore there coud be demand characteristics which means that they might act differently as they guessed the aiim of the experiment, for example parent being overky affectionet with their child
- its not ethical to put a child in that situation, and leave it with a stranger, as they were distressed showing crying and anxiety as they were seperated from their primary caregiver.
Casibba AIM.
- to examen whether the distibutions of child and adult attachments clasifications converge with the global and to investigate wheathe most italian infants and adults have secure attacchment.
Cassibba PROCEDURE
child sample - 627 participants 17 studies
adult sample - 2258 participants 50 studies
they used meta analysis, psychINFO, and they used keywords being strangesituation procedure, attachment, italian.
they were compared to american to find differences
distribution of attachment types were assesed in terms of gender, age and type of particioant to find inter cultural differences
Cassibba CONCLUSION
differences are liekly to be a results of childrearing practises as italian parents encourage indepoendece from an yound age, unlike the american culture
Cassibba AO3 strength
+ large sample size used. cassibba has good generalisability because it used many studies for both adults and children. The study has 2885 participants making it representative of the Italian population . Therefore the study showed a good representation of the target population.
+ can be applied to helping the formation of parenting classes to encourage the formation of secure attachment.
+ its ethical as meta analyssi wwas used and no children had to go through ssp and be distress, therefore no one was directly involved and was protected form harm
+ all the child studies involved the SSP,, so it is internally valid as theya re experimental procedures in which cause and effect can be established.
Cassibba RESULTS
children overall attachment type was type B secure attachment and it was 53%
adult same 60%
Cassibba AO3 weakness
- the meta analysis used data from previous attachment studies and it may lack contemporaneus validity as some of them are more than 10 years old, therefore they should be retested to ensure their results. Theredore, data that Cassibba used an me outdated and flawed
- .cassibba used specific keywords such as italian, attachment, or ssp, therefore creating experimental bias because studies that did not fit were dismissed. Furthermore, the findings are not reliable bevcause there is no standard procedure in meta analysis, meanin it could be rejected and different conclusion made.the findings were in respect of attachment in italian population, therefore coudl be considered as ethnocentric and may not be generalizable to other countries, however, Cassibba was only studying Italians.
tVan izjendorn and kroonenberg AIM
Aim was to carry out a cross cultural analysis looking at differences between cultures and within cultures of the attachment types in different countries.
Van and Kroonenberg PROCEDURE
- they noted that attachment types varied across the world based on the studies that have already been compledet.
- meta analysis was used which involved a search for suitable studies using a large database from which they could analyse the strange situation procedures in terms of attachment types. 8 countries 32 different studies
- they calculated the average % for the differeent attachment styles in each country
- choice of studies excluded any special children such as those with Diwn Syndrome and any using of children who were oldre than 2 years old and theyy used only mother infants.
Van and kroonenber RESULTS
It was found that secure attachment was the most common type in all cultures.
- the lowest % was sjown in China and the hghes in the UK
- individualistic countries that support independence (Germany) had high levels of anxious avoidant, whereas collectivistvountries such as Japan had high levels of avodiant resistent.
Van and Kroonenberg CONCLUSION
since the global trend seems to reflect the US norm of secure attachment being the most common, it adds weight to the argument that secure attachment is the optimal attachment type for healthy development.