psihologija paper 1 Flashcards
Burger strength (2)
The participants in Burger’s (2009) research are representative of people aged 20 and 81 years old with different levels of education from high school to Master’s degree, he had a larger sample then Milgram which means his research was more representative and generalisable.
Burger proved that Milgrams original experiment is reliable, he replicated it bz following the instructions and he got the same results as Milgram after half century after, which were that 70% of people obeyed and went over 150v.
Burger weakness (2)
One weakness are ethics, Burger deceived participants into thinking that learner were getting real shocks by teachers who were participants, he did reduce the voltage from 450 to 150v and excluded participants who were emotionally unstable but they could have still been psychologically harmed
Another weakness is that task used a schock generator machine to give shocks to learners for incorrect answers and that is not a realistic task for everyday life so there is a lack of task validity in the way in levels of obedience were tested
Social power theory strength
can be applied to real world, with soldiers, as they obey the authority figure because they have a legitimate power.
social power theory weakness
French and Raven claim that obedience is influenced by the
type of power the authority figure possesses which is not
the only explanation of obedience (1). Alternatively,
Milgram’s (1963) agency theory suggests that being in an
agentic state and giving up free will to an authority figure
will make a person obedient (1).
may obey because the person is source of authority giving an instruction rather then the type of power they own.
may be because of the agency theory, milgram suggested that the legitimacy of an authority figure increases obedience (having status in the place of work)
what is conformity and types
conformity, the process where people change their beliefs, attitudes, to more closely match those held by groups to which they belong or want to belong.
compliance - when an individual changes their public behaviours, but they do not change their private beliefs about something
internalisation - when person changes its personal and public beliefs to the group of people permenently
identification - is when a person changes their public behaviour and private beliefs while in the presence of a group but it is not a permanent change
Milgram (1963) and variations
100% went to 300v, 65% went to 450v
1. run down office (location change) - from 65% obedience fell to 47,5%
2. proximity, instructions through telephone - from 65% to 22,5%
3. uniform, ordinary man giving orders - from 65% to 20%
MSM strength
it divides sensory register, short term memory and long term memory into different store, for example it says that duration of stm is 18-30s but for ltm its unlimited, also information is encoded accousticaly into stm and semantically into ltm
MSM weakness
model is too simplistic, it does not explain different types of memory such as procedural or episodic memory and it over empathies the role of rehearsal.
quantitative and qualitative data
quantitatve - numerical data, used closed questions with yes or no answers
qualitative - descriptive written data, used open questions with explanations of people, gathering data with surveys, interviews…
primary and secondary data
primary - first hand gathered data by the researcher
secondary - already excisting information gathered from internet, newspapers…
- these are after used by a researcher as a part of investigation (there is no need for investigation to collect data)
ordinal data
ordinal data can be placed in order of value even when the difference between the values may not have the same meaning for example when people are place first second and third in the race when the time gap between those positions may be different.
etchical consideration in cognitive investigation (ours)
We made sure that those who took part were all over 16 years old, they could consent to their own participation in the test of recall, and then informed consent was gained from all the students by giving them a full description of the memory recall task for them to read before they agreed to the experiment.
imporvments in cognitive investigation (ours)
sample bigger, more represenatitve
We could have used an independent measures design with
different participants taking part in the different conditions which would prevent any demand characteristics from participants guessing the aim of the experiment that may affect the result accuracy.
HM case study
he had a brain injury because of the motorbike accident, he had to go on a surgery where his hippocampus was removed.
He had a damage on stm, and he only had his ltm till age of 11 (only could remember his life until then).
when researchers were trying to teach him a task, he improved during the next few days which means he has procedural memory that remembers the skills, but he could not remember learning the task before (no stm)
he had all the memory that required uncouscious thinking (procedural)
but he did not have any counsic memory which means he could not form new memories, learn new words, facts…
Clive Wearing
he had no stm, because of the virus that damaged his brain
he knew how to play the piano and had musical knowledge as well as historical events (wars) which means he had semantic and procedural memory. He had ltm, because he could remember his wife and kids, but he had no stm because he could only remember information for 7 seconds and after 7 seconds it was gone
supports the idea da different parts of brain are involved in different types of ltm and supports that their are different types of ltm.
kf case study
he had visual memory (visual spatial sketchpad) but his verbal memory was damaged (phonological loop) this shows us that there are different types of stm.
what are schemas
schemas are little pockets of knowledge that can add or change information, they are made of our expectations, previous knowledge, stereotypes and experiences.
Bartlett (1932) study
aim - to find out whether the memory of a story is affected by previous knowledge and if cultural backround and unfamiliarity with the story would lead to inaccurate memory when it was recalled.
sample - 20 british people 7 men 13 women
procedure - he used a story called war of the ghosts, which contained unknown names and concepts to the participants, it would test out how memory may be reconstructed basen on the culture schemas
he did a serial reproduction which is when all participants hear a story and are asked to reproduc3e it after a short time and then do it over again after days, weeks or years
participants first had right to read the story twice, after 115 minutes they had to recall it, and after that all participants had a differnet time of the second reproduction between 20 hours to 10 years.
results - they maintained the order of events and main themes in the story, some participants changed title and names of the characters and also some words from canoes to boats
conclusion - after the repeated reconstruction the form of the story became stereotyped and rasionalised and it does not change much after this occured, the details that have been changed are chnaged to fit the participants own social group.
he also used repeated measure design, same participants for each condition
strength of Bartlett (1932)
application - allport and postman - subway drawing, from black guy that was dressed better then white ones, stereotypes changed him to the black guy with gun which is scary
weakness of Bartlett (1932)
G - he only used his own psychological students, it has low popoulation validity and is not reflective to general population, could lead to demand characteristics as he used psychology students and they may have guessed the aim of the experiments which could affect results. He could not contorl external variables such as if the students would talk about the story between the classes with ewach other.
R - unrelaible and not scientifically valid, lack of standardized procedures and control of external variables. Each participant must have same procedure for the experiment to be reliable, here some had 20 hours to recall and some 10 years. The experiment is not replicable.
what is assimilation and what is accomandetion
assimilation - is when you add information to your schema or when you can make a whole new schema for new knowledge
accomendation - when you change the already excisting schemas how you learn new information or have new experiences
how can personality affect conformity
a person may have a strong desire to be like someone as they have low self esteem meaning they are more likely to be compliant, because of the normative influence they seek approval from the group and they want to be accepted by others and that is why they would conform
how situation can affect conformity
for example school, they have rules and norms that create and shape social rules and responsibilities that could increase conformity
how can gender affect conformity
There are some small gender differences in conformity. In public situations, men are somewhat more likely to act independently, and refuse to conform, whereas women are more likely to conform to the opinions of others in order to prevent social disagreement.
social power theory - powers
reward power - person who has power to reward someone (give bonus to employees)
coercive power - someone who has a right to punish others that are in lower position than him
legitimate power - ceo, someone who has higher status than you
expert power - doctor, someone who is taught the job and you will obey because they are specialist in that area
referent power - power you got from a sense of identification others feel toward you (leader of a group, person that speaks for the group and their rights, someone trustworthy)
Moscovici (1969)
aim, procedure, results, sample
aim - investigate the influence of minority to majority (Asch experiment but reversed)
sample - 192 female
procedure - there were 2 confederates with 4 reall participants in one group
they were asked to explain 36 slides, they were all blue but they had different lighting because of the filters that were used
2 types of filters, natural one that reduces intesity of the lightening and photo filters that allowed lightning to go throug the filters
we had 3 states
1. consistent - 2 confed. said everything was green
3. inconsent - 24 green and 12 blue
3. control - without confederates
at the end of experiment participants filled in questions about the slides and other members of the group
results - 32% of the participants did agree at least once with confederates (minority)
conclusion - minority can influence on majority on verbal level and the way people behave is what influences them and not the social pressure
Moscovici (1969) weakness
sample is not reflective and representative to the male population it lacks population validity and generalisability