Psychology HEALTH Paper Four Flashcards
Types of non-adherence include:
- Failure to follow treatment (e.g. to take tablets every 12 hours)
- Not engaging in preventative measures linked to health (e.g. stopping smoking)
- Failing to attend further appointments or interviews
Problems caused by non-adherence include:
- Wasted money on drugs
- Worsening of health
- Financial costs when appointments are not kept and they are unavailable for others to take
Rational non-adherence (Bulpitt)
Rational non-adherence refers to the patient making a reasoned decision due to undertaking a cost-benefit analysis. This means that a reason for non-adherence could be as a result of a well-considered and reasoned thought process that leads the patient to believe non-adherence is more beneficial.
Bulpitt Study
Bulpitt looked at the risks and benefits of a drug treatment for hypertension (high blood pressure).
Risks included increased diabetes, gout, and dry mouth but these were either not serious or at a very low rate.
Benefits included reduction in strokes by 40% and coronary events by 44%.
Bulpitt concluded that the benefits from treating hypertension in elderly patients far outweigh the disadvantages. It seems people rationally decide not to take the medication because of the risks whilst ignoring the benefits.
The Health Belief Model (Becker and Rosenstock)
The model outlines the factors that explain the beliefs and consequent decisions people make about their health. It assumes that the likelihood that individuals will follow medical advice depends directly on two assessments that they make: Evaluating the threat and a Cost-Benefit Analysis.
First belief of The Health Belief Model
The first stage is the evaluation of the health threat which includes:
- the perceived seriousness (the more serious, the more likely adherence)
- the perceived susceptibility (the more vulnerable, the more likely adherence) and cues to action.
Demographic factors e.g. age, socio-psychological variables and cues to action are all modifying factors that influence the perception of the problem. For example, an obese person may be in danger of developing a heart condition, however since they are young they believe they are less susceptible reducing the risk to minor.
Second belief of The Health Belief Model
A cost-benefit analysis influences the likelihood of taking action. For example, comparing the perceived benefits (being healthier) against the perceived costs (financial, situational, social). All these factors as well as cues to action interact to predict the likelihood of taking preventative health actions.
Self-reports to measure non-adherence
Self-reports involve asking the patient if they adhere to treatment requests. These are subjective and susceptible to response bias.
Subjective: self-reports (Riekart and Droter) Aim
Looked at the implications of non-participation in studies using self-report measures to investigate adherence to medical treatment for adolescents with diabetes.
Riekart and Droter procedure
- Adolescents with diabetes for more than one year (total of 94 families).
- The adolescents completed a series of questionnaires and interviews while their parents also completed a questionnaire.
- They both had a questionnaire to complete at home with a self-addressed return envelope - if not done within 10 days, they were called to remind them.
- Families were divided into three groups: participants/returners (52), non-returners (28) and non-consenters (14).
Riekart and Droter findings
- Significant differences in adherence levels between participants and non-returners.
- Those who returned the questionnaire had higher adherence scores and tested blood sugar more frequently.
- This suggests that when self-report measures are used the results may be distorted if only the results of those that completed the self-report are considered.
Objective: pill counting (Chung and Naya) Aim
To investigate if you can electronically assess adherence to oral asthma medication by using a trackcap.
Chung and Naya procedure
- 57 with asthma patients
- Underwent a screening period of three weeks and a 12 week treatment period in which they were told to take their medication twice a day, one in the morning and one in the evening approximately 12 hours apart and not at mealtimes.
- They received a three week supply with a week to spare.
- They were dispensed from a bottle fitter with a TrackCap medication monitoring system that registers when the bottle is opened/closed.
- Participants returned every three weeks to have their tablet counts measured.
Chung and Naya findings
- On days when patients took exactly 2 tablets, the mean time between doses 12½ hours.
- Median 89% compliance was found from Trackcap, but Median 92% from tablet counts. - Concluded that it is possible to electronically assess adherence with an oral medication using an event monitoring system.
- Compliance was measured by the number of times the cap was opened, the number of days the cap was opened 8 hours apart and number of pills left at the 12 week period.
Biochemical tests (Roth and Caron)
Roth and Caron suggested non-adherence could be measured through blood and urine samples.
Roth and Caron procedure
- They conducted a study with 116 patients whose antacid regime was monitored.
- Patients estimated their intake average 89%, however actual intake averaged 47%.
- They found that pill counting was inaccurate and that patient self-reports often overestimated when they said they took medicine regularly.
Roth and Caron Conclusions
Therefore, Roth and Caron concluded the best measure of non-adherence is objective, quantitative tests, such as biochemical tests to measure non-adherence. They suggested that urine and blood tests taken over a number of months will give a more accurate indication of adherence.
Repeat Prescriptions (Sherman et al.)
Investigated if prescription refill history identified poor adherence with asthma medications more frequently than the doctor’s assessment.
Sherman et al. Procedure
- 116 children with asthma were interviewed with their parents on a clinic visit.
- Adherence was checked by telephoning the patient’s pharmacy to assess the ‘refill rate’.
- It was assumed that if the medication (the ‘refill’) was not collected from the pharmacy, then it could not have been taken, whereas if it was collected then the original prescription must have been taken.
- Patient adherence was operationalised by calculating the number of doses refilled divided by the number of doses prescribed over a period of up to 365 days.
Sherman et al. findings
Adherence was 72%, 61% and 38% for the three different inhalers prescribed to the children.
Checking refills is an accurate way of measuring adherence. Also found doctors are not able to tell if a patient is using their inhaler from consultation alone.
Improve Practitioner Style: Ley
Improve practitioner style by changing information presentation techniques. Ley Prepared a booklet of guidelines for doctors on how to communicate more clearly with patients.
Satisfaction: including listening to the patient and finding out what their worries are, etc
Understanding and memory: avoiding jargon, encouraging feedback to increase recall of instructions, etc
C:selecting Content - being aware of the effect of what they say to the patient (e.g. will it cause fear, is the patient particularly vulnerable), etc.
Use simple language, state the key information first, repeat key points (by summarising).
Behavioural Techniques: Yokley and Glenwick
Investigated the relative impact of four conditions for motivating parents to take their children to be immunised.
Conditions
Four experimental
Two Control
General prompt
Specific prompt
Increased access prompt
Money incentive prompt
Contact control group
No contact group
Yokley and Glenwick: Procedure
The participants were an entire population of a medium-sized midwest city (approx. 300,000). The target population consisted of children five years or younger who needed a vaccine. Each condition differed in the type of message on the postcard. Impact was measured over 12 weeks.
Yokley and Glenwick: Findings
- The results showed the money incentive group had the biggest impact on attendance, followed by increased access, specific prompt and then general prompt.
- Money incentives have a powerful and immediate impact, however may not be cost-effective, so a specific prompt would be the more cost-efficient.
Behavioural Techniques: Watt et al.
Making medical treatment programmes fun and engaging can have positive consequences on the levels of adherence. The Funhaler incorporates incentive toys into a child’s inhaler. If the correct breathing technique is used, the child is rewarded with a fun whistle sound and a spinning toy within the inhaler.
Watt et al. procedure
- 32 children with asthma
- Questionnaires were completed after the use of the Breath-a-Tech and then after two weeks of using the Funhaler
Watt et al. findings
- Found it was associated with improved compliance compared to a Breath-a-Tech
- 38% more parents medicate their children the previous day and 60% more children took the recommended four or more cycles. This provides support that behavioural techniques can be developed to reinforce positive health behaviours and improve adherence with children.
Pain
A sensory or emotional discomfort which tends to be associated with actual tissue damage or threatened tissue damage.
Acute
Mild OR severe pain that comes on quickly but lasts only for a brief time. Acts as a warning of damage to tissue or disease. Short duration, less than 6 months. For example, bruise, burns or cuts.
Chronic Pain
Constant, recurring pain that lasts for more than 6 months. May be associated with illness or disability. This gets progressively worse and reoccurs intermittently. People experience high levels of anxiety and have feelings of helplessness and depression as the pain doesn’t dissipate. An example would be migraines.
Psychogenic Pain
A type of pain that refers to episodes where there is not an organic cause for the pain, but the person is still experiencing it. For example phantom limb pain.