Psychological Development in Adolescence Flashcards
Erik Erikson’s theory:
personalities evolve throughout life as a result of the interaction between “?” maturation and demands of “?”.
Biologically based maturation
Society
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 1. Basic “?” vs Basic “/”.
What age?
One learns that some people/things can be “?”.
Trust vs mistrust
Birth up to 18 months
Depended on.
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 2. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Autonomy VS Shame and doubt
18mo to 3 years
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 3. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Initiative VS Guilt
3 to 6 years old
Try new things
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 4. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Industry VS Inferiority
6 to 12 years old
To learn basic academic skills/work with others
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 5. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Identity VS Role confusion
Adolescence
To develop integrated sense of self
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 6. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Intimacy VS Isolation
Young adulthood
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 7. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Generativity VS Stagnation
Mature/Middle adulthood
Erik Erikson’s theory:
Stage 8. “?” vs “?”
What age?
Ego Integrity VS Despair
Old age/Late life
The ultimate form of identity integration
ego integrity
Delayed acting like a responsible adult or to commit oneself to poorly thought-out course of action is a example of “?”.
identity confusion
A period of free experimentation before a final sense of identity is achieved.
Psychosocial moratorium
The crisis of identity vs role confusion is best resolved through integrating “?”, present “?”, and future “?” into a consistent self-concept.
earlier identifications
present values
future goals
A sense of identity is achieved only after a period of “?3”
Questioning
Reevaluation
Experimentation
Those who do not arrive at answers for who they are, what they want out of life, and what kind of people they want to be, are apt to be “?4”.
Depressed
anxious
indecisive
unfulfilled
People develop their self-concept in terms of how others relate to them (ex. delinquent)
Looking-glass self
James Marcia’s categories of identity:
4 major ways in which people cope with identity crises.
- Identity achievement
- foreclosure
- identity diffusion
- moratorium
James Marcia’s categories of identity: people may be classified into these 4 categories on the basis of 3 primary criteria.
- An individual experiences a major ?
- An individual is committed to ?
- Whether there is commitment to some set of ?
- Whether the individual experiences a major crisis during identity development.
- Whether the person expresses a commitment to some type of occupation
- Whether there is commitment to some set of values/beliefs
Marcia: After exploring alternatives the individual decides on a specific identity and career choice.
Identity achievement
Marcia: Individuals who form their identity by adult input rather than their own experimentation and conclusions. They never experience an identity crisis. Shut self off from opportunities to grow and change.
Foreclosure
Marcia: Individuals who are overwhelmed and confused about forming their identity and do little to achieve one. Have a lack of direction and decision making
Diffusion
Marcia: Individuals who have yet to form a satisfactory identity regarding career or personal values and are continuing to experiment. Have intense anxiety and have crucial unresolved issues.
Moratorium
A set of principles regarding what is right and what is wrong.
Morality
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development:
3 levels, 6 stages.
1st level: Moral decisions are based on external standards, age ?
preconventional or premoral level
age 4 to 10.