Psych/Soc 3 & 4 Flashcards
What is the difference between self-concept and self-consciousness?
self-consciousness is merely awareness of oneself, self concept is the sum of an individual’s knowledge and understanding of his-herself. e.g. female, student, white, smart, future doctor, funny, etc
self-schema
long lasting and stable set of memories that summarize a person’s beliefs, experiences and generalizations about the self,
personal identity vs social identity
personal: one’s own sense of personal attributes e.g. smart, funny social: social definitions of who you are e.g. race, religion, gender, occupation, etc
t/f: the “self” is a personal and social construction of beliefs
True
Describe the features of the ADDRESSING framework
self-reference effect
the tendency to better remember information relevant to ourselves
what happens more readily? internalizing an event that runs contrary to self concept or externalizing the event?
externalizing: allows us to attribute that thing to an outside factor, thereby protecting our self-concept.
if we internalize it, we are going to have to adjust our self-concept
what are the 3 factors that impact an individuals self concept
- self efficacy: a belief in one’s own competence and effectiveness
-
locus of control: whether you believe you are able to influence outcomes through your own efforts and actions
- internal locus of control: belief that you are
- external locus of control: belief that outcomes are controlled by outside forces: can lead to learned helplessness
- self-esteem: one’s overall self-evaluation of one’s self-worth. related to self-efficacy in that if you are effective at an area that you value, your self-esteem will increase
learned helplessness
when a person either has or acts like they lack of control over outcomes for long enough that they exhibit lack of action in other areas even when they have control over that situation
What is the looking glass self
the theory that a persons’s sense of self develops from interpersonal interactions such that self concepts are based on their understanding of how others percieve them.
social behaviorism
the idea that the mind and self emerge through the process of communicating with others
socialization
the process through which people learn (or teach others) to be proficient and functional members of society. It is a lifelong process
social sanctions
rewards or punishments for behaviors that are in accord with or against norms
e.g. a disapproving look by a stranger
what’s the difference between norms and mores
mores are just more important norms because they are highly important for the benefit of society and are often strictly enforced
folkways
are norms that are less important than mores but shape everyday behavior
e.g. ways of greeting
taboo
behaviors that customs forbid, may be punishable or not but always elicit disgust for the violator
e.g. cannibalism
anomie
“normlessness”
the condition in which individuals are not provided with firm guidelines in relation to norms and vlaues and there is minimal moral guidance or social ethic.
theory was developed by Emilie Durkheim
anomie is more likely to occur in a society where__________________ predominates
individualism and autonomy
(even at the expense of the greater social order.)
antinormative behavior (aka non-normative behavior)
when individuals do not conform to the expectations implicit in social structures. This is a form of deviance
what is wrong with the label of deviant?
it is a social construct and is therefore not free of error. deviance is dependent on context and culture
differential association
D for Deviant
a perspective that argues that deviance is a learned behavior resulting from interactions between individuals and their communities. deviance relies on learning the techniques and rationalizations of deviant behaviors from close personal groups:
according to the theory: individuals become deviant when their contacts with favorable atituteds towards deviance outweight their contacts with unfavorable attitudes
labeling theory
a perspective that views deviance as a social construct and that the label of “deviant” we put on people increase that person’s deviant behavior. assumes the act in itself is not deviant.
within this view, labels are internalized and can cause people to exhibit the behavior prescribed by their label and have self-fulfilling prophecies/stereotype threat
agents of social control
groups that have the power to attach stigmas to certain behaviors, typically the power groups and majorities
e.g. men in business attaching labels to working moms
stereotype threat
when people are or feel themselves to be at risk of conforming to stereotypes about their social group.
structural strain theory
the perspective that states that deviance is a result of experiencing social strain in which there is a mismatch between the common scoial goals and the institutionalized means of obtaining these goals, causing pressure to use deviant means to avoid failure
e.g. someone born in a lower class my resort to drug-dealing to support herself
social institutions include all of the following EXCEPT:
- social networks
- families
- schools
- churches
A: social networks
because a social institution is a group of people with a shared purpose or origin but a network is not a group of people (they don’t all know eachother)
Which of the following is not a macro theory of sociology
- functionalism
- conflict theory
3 feminist theory
4 symbolic interactionism
4 symbolic interactionism
how is power defined?
the ability to implement one’s decisions despite opposition
collective behavior
describes the actions of people operating as a short-lived group. Collective behavior arises in spontaneous situations that may cause an individual to engage in an action that is otherwise socially unacceptable (unlike group behavior) In collective behavior, norms and mores are unclear, but this behavior can also be harmless actions like following a fad. Whether good or bad actions are a result, all collective bahavior is characterized by loss of the individual judgment in exchange for sense of the group.
It takes on 4 forms: crowds, publics, massess and social movements
Crowd vs public vs masses
crowd= a group that shares a purpose and can exchibit panic or mob behavior.
public = a group of individuals discussing a single issue. It begins when the discussion begins and ends when it ends.
Masses=a group whose formation is prompted through the efforts of mass media. Masses consist of large number of people who may or may not be in close proximity but still share common insterests
what is a social movement and what are the 2 subgroups
social movement is a kind of collective behavior scenario in which there is an intention of promoting change.
2 types:
- active movements which attempt to foster social change
- expressive moveemnts which attempt to foster individual change e.g. support groups
mass hysteria is an example of what kind of behavor?
collective behavior
agents of socialization
something that influences our lives and development of culture over time: family, school, peer groups, workplace, religion/government, mass media/technology
cultural assimilation
the process in which an individual forsakes aspects of his or her own cultural tradition to adopt those of a different culture, usually this is a member of a minority attempting to conform to the culture of the dominant group.
This usually produces greater social integration and inclusion, BUT when it is forced assimilation, you get the opposite effect, more exclusion
amalgamation vs assimilation
amalgamation occurs when a majority and minority group combine to forma a new group with a unique cultural identity.
what is multiculturalism
a perspective that endorses equal standing for all cultural traditions. It promotes the ide of cultures coming together in a true melting pot rather than in a hierarchy.
it is under debate as to whether it empowers minorities or encourages segregation
What are the stages in Kohlberg’s stages of moral development?
mnemonic: “we’re motivated to be nice so St. Nicholas doesn’t give us KOHL for christmas” This list is about the differences in intrinsic motivation for morality over the lifespan
-
obedience and punishment orientation
- “how can I avoid punishment?”
-
self-interest orientation
- “what’s in it for me?”
-
conformity and interpersonal accord
- “what will make others like me?”
-
social order and authority orientation
- “what am I supposed to do?”
-
social contract orientation
- “the greatest good for the greatest number of people”
- ethics: universal ethical principles (some people never reach this stage)
attribution theory
attempts to explain how individuals view their own and others’ behavior as being attributable to external causes (situational attribution) or internal causes (dispositional attribution)
3 factors influence this attribution:
- consistency: if the action is consistent with previous behavior for that individual, you would assign dispositional influence, if not, then situational
- Distinctiveness: if the same behavior is displayed to everyone rather than benig distinct to just one person, then you would assign dispositional influence, if not, then situational
- Consensus: if only that one person is angry rather than a group of people being angry, then you would assign dispositional influence, if not, then situational
fundemental attribution error
<strong>Subgroup of Attributional Biases Category</strong>
when we tend to underestimate the impact of the situation and overestimate the impact of a person’s character or personality
e.g. we are more likely to say that a driver who cuts us off is a jerk (personality/internal) rather than assigning his behavior to an external factor such as she’s rushing to see her dying mother
actor-observer bias
<strong>Subgroup of Attributional Biases Category</strong>
the tendency to attribute external forces to our actions and behaviors but internal forces to the actions and behavior of others.
e.g. when I cut someone off, I had a good reason, unlike everyone else
self-serving bias
<strong>Subgroup of Attributional Biases Category</strong>
Mnemonic: S for successes/failures - related to actor observer bias, but is more related to outcomes (ie successes and failures)
def: the tendency to attribute successes to ourselves and our failures to others or external forces.
Optimism bias
<strong>Subgroup of Attributional Biases Category</strong>
the belief that bad things happen to other people, not us
Just world phenomenon (aka just world hypothesis or just world belief)
<strong>Subgroup of Attributional Biases Category</strong>
the tendency to believe that the world is fair and people get what they deserve. So when something bad happens to a person, we assume it’s because of something they did rather than accepting that good things happen to bad people
e.g. “Karma will come back around”
halo effect
tendency to believe that people have inherently good or bad natures rather than looking at individual characteristics.
e.g. he’s nice so he must be a good dad
physical attractiveness stereotype
a specific type of halo effect. Describes how people tend to rate attractive individuals more favorably on personality traits and trustworthiness
What’s an example of how culture affects attributional biases?
Western cultures tend to endorse individualistic attitudes and causes them to err on the side of internal attributions
Eastern cultures tend to err on the side of external attributions which causes them to see a situation very differently. (e.g. they would blame insider trading on the company to which the individual belongs rather than on the individual themselves)
social perception
the process whereby we try to understand others in our social world. It uses the information we selectively process about other people in order to understand their mindsets and intentions and allow us to predict a range of social phenomenon
different from social cognition the same way that perception of sensation differs from thinking about that perception
social cognition
different from social perception in that it refers to the ability of the brain to store and process information regarding social perception (it’s at a more meta level)
false consensus
when we assume that everyone else agrees with what we do even when they may not
projection bias
when we assume that everyone has th same beliefs as us
it occurs because we have a tendency to look for similarities between people
prejudice
thoughts, attitudes, and feelings someone holds about a group that are not based on actual experience
e.g. an employer reading more resumes with white sounding names than black without being consciously aware of it
diff between prejudice and discrimintation ?
prejudice is a sentiment discrimination is an action
institutonal discrimination
unjust and discriminatory practices employed by a large organization that has been codified into operating procedures or institutional objectives
e.g. dont’ ask don’t tell policy
How does emotion play a role in prejudice
prejudice can be coming from a place of fear or frustration, which are emotions. The effect can be:
- the tendency to direct that hostility at someone leading to forming scapegoats
- or the activation of self-inhibition
scapegoat
a person at whom displaced aggression is directed
e.g. blaming the impoverished for an economic collapse or blaming the Jews for economic struggles preceding WW2
How does cognition play a role in prejudice?
cognition, in the form of information processing, conributes to bias in that we create conceptual categories (often formed in part by socialization and/or upbrining) in order to categorize and organize data based on similarities or differences; its an automatic shortcut that our brains like to take. When the conceptualization is based on similarity this can lead to stereotypes as well as the thinking that one member of a group is representative of that group.
ethnocentrism
when you judge people from another culture by the standards of one’s own culture
cultural relativism
judging another culture by its own standards
this can be difficult to do especially when that culture clashes with one’s own
group
a group is a collection of any number of individuals as few as 2 (called a dyad) who regularly interact and identify with eachother, share similar norms, values and expectations
primary vs secondary group
Primary: a group with whom an individualengages with in person and long-term. Serves expressive functions, meaning that it meets emotional needs. e.g. family
Secondary: a group wtih whom an individual engages with for more specific reasons and for shorter periods of time. They serve instrumental functinos, meaning, they meet pragmatic needs. e.g. study group
in group
a group that an individual belongs to and believes to be an integral part of who they are.
subgroup of both primary and secondary groups
outgroup
group to which you don’t belong
reference group
a group that serves as a standard measure to which you compare yourself.
e.g. your peers who are also studying for the MCAT… whether or not you are in an ingroup with them or not.
What is it called when people share the same space with others but are not part of a group with them
aggregate
(there can still be groups within an aggregate, for example if your group is studying in a coffeeshop, the people in the coffee shop form an aggregate but you are still a group)
bureaucracy
an administrative body with members at different levels with different tasks, and the processes by which this body accomplishes its tasks.
McDonaldization
the process by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant such as rationalizing a task into its component parts, are coming to dominate more and more sectors of American society.
The net effect is:
- efficiency
- calculability (assessing performance through output quantity or speed)
- predictability
- control (automation where possible)
iron rule/law of oligarchy
describes the paradoxical feature of bureaucracies that as they become more complex, they will inevitably become less revolutionary and less capable of adapting. This is because they are predicated on policies/procedures which are the antithesis of adaptation.
Does the mere presence of others have an effect on people’s performance?
Yes.
People tend to perform simple, well-learned tasks better when other people are present.
People tend to perform complex or novel tasks more poorly when others are present
What is the Social Facilitation effect?
Descibres how people tend to perform differently because of the mere presence of others.
Simple, well-learned tasks better when other people are present.
People tend to perform complex or novel tasks more poorly when others are present
deindividuation
when people lose their individual identity in exchange for identifying with a group. Is the result of disconnect between behavior and attitudes, usually stemming from lack of self-awareness
The conditions for deindividuation to occur:
- group size “lost in the crowd” feel
- physical anonymity
- arousing activities (ie escalating from a small start)
T/F: factors that reduce self-awareness increase a sense of deindividuation
TRUE
bystander effect
describes how a person is less likely to provide help/intervene in a situation whn there are bystanders
forced assimilation
the process in which an individual or group is forced to forsake aspects of his or her own cultural tradition to adopt those of a different culture but in such a way that it does not lead to increased inclusion, but rather exclusion
This usually produces greater social integration and inclusion, BUT when it is forced assimilation, you get the opposite effect, more exclusion
social loafing
describes how a person is less likely to work hard on a project, the more people there are working on that project. (less effort when evaluated as a gorup)
group polarization
the tendency for the viewpoints in a group to get stronger upon interacting with others in that group
*does not indivate that the group gets more divided necessarily
group polarization occurs as a result of:
- informational influence: when the most common ideas to emerge are the ones that favor the dominant viewpoint which gives everyone in the group to researse a viewpoint that is in accord with what was just said
- normative influence: when you want to be socially desireable so you expound on a view so that you can identify with a group more closely and be admireed.
informational influence aka informational social influence
when the most common ideas to emerge are the ones that favor the dominant viewpoint which gives everyone in the group to researse a viewpoint that is in accord with what was just said
compliance when we think others “know something I don’t know”
normative influence aka normative social influence
when you want to be socially desireable so you expound on a view so that you can identify with a group more closely and be admireed.
groupthink
the tendency for people to not bring up dissenting opinions in an effort to not rock the boat
T/F: Deviance is always bad
False, some deviance is good
e.g. rosa parks
what are the 3 ways behavior may be motivated by social influences
- compliance: motivated by punishment or reward
- identification: motivated by the desire to be like another person or group
- internalization: motivated by values and beliefs that have been integrated into a person’s value system
status
a term that refers to any socially defined position in a society, whether ascribed or achieved
e.g. wife, student, doctor, disabled, resident of california, black
Master Status
the status that dominates over the other statuses for a given individual and determines that person’s position in society
e.g. being a doctor or professional football player
what are the 3 components to attitudes?
ABCs
affect (feelings)
behavioral inclinations
cognition (beliefs)
role conflict vs role strain
role conflict: conflict in society’s expectations for multiple statuses held by the same person
e.g. male nurse
role strain: the conflicting expectations of a single status
e.g. be a good student but don’t be a know it all