PSY 403 EXAM 1 Flashcards
linguistics (vs psycholinguistics)
study of grammars, systems of languages, lang structure; takes a descriptive approach
psycholinguistics (vs linguistics)
study of the psych factors involved in language perception, production, and acquisition; experimental approach
nativists (theories of language development)
S. Pinker, Noam; support the Genetic Bio-program Hypothesis, that genetic evolution produced language organ” in humans, we r specialized for complex specialized language production
anti-nativists / constructionists (theories of language development)
Tomasello; lang developed universally in humans as a result of our shared cognitive, social, linguistic hardware; not genetically pre-determined
Hockett’s Design Fts (5)
i. semanticity - permanency in our understanding of the meaning of words
ii. arbitrariness - no direct links between objects and the words that signify them (randomness)
iii. discreteness - clear boundaries between linguistic units of a language
iv. displacement: ability to distinguish different states of time and place
v. productivity: discreteness allows for limitless combos of words
sound symbolism
violation of HDF of arbitrariness where certain sounds are associated with certain words/concepts ex. takete/maluma, gl = light
continuity (comparative MHL perspectives)
modern human language as a result of quant changes to primitative lang (ANTI-NATIVISTS)
discontinuity (comparative perspectives)
modern human language as a result of qualitative changes to primitive lang (NATIVISTS)
what apes CAN do
i. accumulate a (100+word) lexicon
ii. spontaneously comment (not strictly transactional)
iii. displacement, productivity, prevarication, grammar
iv. exceptional working memory
v. some comprehension
what apes CANT do
i. lang acquisition is variable, only exceptional apes can learn it (not tru for humans)
ii. innovate, babble (apes copy)
iii. as utterances grow longer, complexity doesn’t increase (repetition does)
communicative intent
human trait of using words to convey intentions/planned actions; apes don’t use or understand this, but babies (and dogs!) do (ex. pointing)
- domesticated dogs/foxes exhibit better comm intent than wild ones, may be a result of living in packs or in closer proximity to humans –> cooperation/tameness as a selected for trait
joint attention
the awareness between 2+ that they are paying attn to the same thing; perhaps only present in humans; contributes to social behaviors that enhance comm (helping, fairness, altruism) even in children
physical language adaptations in humans
vocal tract is more vertical/columnar than apes –> conducive to oral speech production but increases risk of choking (can’t breathe and talk @ same time); potential evolutionary trade off
specific language impairment (dissociation between lang skills and general cognitive ability)
patients have normal IQ but grammatical, morphological, working verbal memory problems; diagnosed @ age 4-5; may have genetic component (mutation of FOXP2 gene)
williams’ syndrome (dissociation between lang skills and general cognitive ability)
patients have abnormal brain structure and function, mental impairment but lang abilities are generally left intact