PSY 223 Exam 2 Flashcards
Define object recognition. Which visual pathway (ventral or dorsal) and brain regions are important for object recognition?
Object recognition – Definition: Matching representations of organized sensory input to stored representations in memory
The ventral pathway
Inferior temporal cortex
Apperceptive Agnosia:
Associative Agnosia:
Prosopagnosia:
Apperceptive Agnosia: failure of object recognition due to problems with visual perception
problems with visual perception - can name touched object, when struggling to name the viewed object: may comment on other features, e.g. color
Associative Agnosia: failure of object recognition but not a problem with perception; normal visual representation.
associative agnosia thought to affect regions later along the ventral visual pathway than apperceptive agnosia,
“cannot derive the associations or assign meaning related to the stimulus input” i.e. not a perception problem - can name touched object,
when struggling to name the viewed object: may guess an object with similar features
Prosopagnosia: failure to identify or recognize individual faces visually
What are three reasons why faces might be a special class of visual stimulus? What is the Thatcher effect? What is the composite face effect?
1) Faces need to be recognized as individuals
2) Faces are perceived in a “configuration”: it depends not only what the features are, but where they are in relation to each other
3) Configural perception is disrupted when a face is viewed upside down
Know that the fusiform face area (FFA) has been argued to be specially devoted to faces, supporting the previous point that faces might be a special class of visual stimulus. Yet is the link between FFA and faces a perfect one-to-one mapping, such that only the FFA is active for faces, and only faces lead to greater activity in the FFA? Are there brain regions associated with classifying other types of objects?
Localization of function:
Mass action:
Most important for processing faces but also body parts and objects. It is not only active for faces. Are there brain regions associated with classifying other types of objects, the answer is yes there are other regions that have areas for processing.
Is only the FFA is active for faces? No
Do only faces lead to greater activity in the FFA? No
Are there brain regions associated with classifying other types of objects? Yes
Localization of function: each function is localized to a brain region / each brain region has a specific function
Mass action: each function can’t necessarily be localized to a specific brain region / each brain region isn’t specialized for a particular function
Semantic memory:
Episodic memory:
Short-term memory (STM):
Working memory (WM):
short-term vs. working:
Semantic memory: Long-standing knowledge, lacks autobiographical component - longer than a few seconds
Episodic memory: Integrating information into an episode or event, Associating information with the time and place it occurred, autobiographical
episodic vs. semantic: both types of long-term memory, but differ in whether it is more about facts or events
Short-term memory (STM): required when the memory retrieval test of the just presented information is (almost) immediately after the memory encoding phase
Working memory (WM): required when the memory retrieval test of the just presented information is (almost) immediately after the encoding phase and performing mental operations on the information may be required
short-term vs. working: differ in whether it requires performing mental operations on the information
Encoding:
Processing:
Type of memory:
Encoding: “processing of newly encountered information such that it can be stored and later retrieved”
Memory is like a storing in a filing cabinet and putting the paper in the filing cabinet would be encoding - this is processing and will always happened regardless of the type of memory in order to process/file it
Type of memory is representation so what is being processed specific to certain types of memory
Some regions more unique to verbal memory and some more unique to pictorial memory so this is representation
Some similar across all memory types like MT lobe which is processing regardless of the type of memory
What are 3 challenges of studying the cognitive neuroscience of semantic memory?
- Cognitive neuroscience of semantic encoding is challenging to examine (usually happens on a longer timescale than a single experiment)
- Disentangling semantic memory from language
- Some theories of semantic memory make similar predictions in the brain, making it harder to know which is right
Which brain regions are important for semantic memory retrieval?
Frontal lobe and temporal cortex (generally more lateral and often more anterior - more toward surface/front)
Divisions of of semantic categories - Based on lesion patients and neuroimaging studies, there is evidence that divisions between brain regions reflect:
Domain-specific categories:
Modality-specific categories:
Domain-specific categories: Semantic memory is “organized according to taxonomic categories” → living and nonliving
Modality-specific categories: Semantic memory is “organized according to the functional modalities…from which meaning derives” → not based on categories or subcategories but for living info (objects you receive it more passively but for living people take action or function
Repetition suppression:
Dementia:
Semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (more commonly accepted) / semantic dementia:
Repetition suppression: Suppressed, or decreased activity in response to a stimulus that is repeated in short succession
- Different regions show repetition suppression to different types of stimuli => repetition suppression can be used to query a region’s sensitivity to different types of stimuli
Dementia: neurodegeneration leading to “progressive impairment of intellect and behavior that, over time, dramatically alters and restricts normal activities of daily living”
Semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (more commonly accepted) / semantic dementia: “word-finding difficulties, abnormal speech patterns, and prominent spelling errors…other faculties such as memory of daily events, visual and spatial skills…remain relatively intact” - more selective to semantic memories
Different ways to study episodic memory or autobiographical memories
Recall task:
Recognition tasks:
Differences between Recall task and Recognition tasks
Relative:
Different ways to study episodic memory or autobiographical memories - could ask someone about their own experiences but has disadvantage bc don’t know if what they are retrieving is correct unless you can verify but also don’t know how recently they thought about that specific memory
Recall task: free recall = recall items in any order - can be more challenging
Recognition tasks: item recognition = recognize individual item as having been studied in the list
Differences between Recall task and Recognition tasks is how you test the memory not changing the words
Relative: recall of a sequence of easily confusable information (e.g. ’a t k p j c’) is worse than for less confusable (e.g. ‘r w k y f c’)
Which brain regions are important for episodic memory encoding, and episodic memory retrieval?
medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex
What is the subsequent memory design trying to determine? Which two types of stimuli are compared in this design, and is brain activity of the stimuli compared from encoding or retrieval?
Subsequent Memory Design: compare brain activity during encoding phase of what was remembered and what was forgotten
Compare neural activity during encoding for items that are subsequently remembered during the memory test vs. subsequently forgotten during the memory test
MT and Prefrontal cortex
Define autonoetic and noetic retrieval. What is the difference between autonoetic retrieval and noetic retrieval? How can autonoetic/recollection vs. noetic/familiarity be distinguished in an item recognition test?
- autonoetic: “necessarily involves the feeling that the present recollection is a reexperience of something that has happened before”
Recollection: Recognize the specific item and its associated category, color, etc. - High confidence
- noetic (“knowing”)
a) retrieving information with a feeling of familiarity but without retrieving the specific associated episode
b) semantic, i.e. not associated to an episode but more so because it reflects long standing knowledge
Familiarity: Recognize the specific item but not its associated category, etc. - Low confidence
Retrograde amnesia:
Anterograde amnesia:
Synaptic plasticity:
Retrograde amnesia: couldn’t retrieve memories of information a few years prior to surgery
Anterograde amnesia: couldn’t form new long-term episodic memories
Synaptic plasticity: “biological process by which specific patterns of synaptic activity result in changes in synaptic strength” - Nature (i.e., how strongly the same signal from the pre-synapse influences the post-synapse)