Protection (Wills + Intestacy) Flashcards
purpose
RESTRICTIONS ON POWER OF TESTATION
protection of the family
3 considerations
RESTRICTIONS ON POWER OF TESTATION
- Spousal protection
- Property rights
- Support rights
early 1900s
EVOLUTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS
= the decedent spouse was allowed to disinherit the surviving spouse
EXCEPTIONS
- Dower
- Curtesy
mid-1900s
EVOLUTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS
= disinherited spouse could renounce the will and elect to take ⅓ (or ½) of the probate estate
upc and modern statutes
EVOLUTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS
= a disinherited spouse is entitled to a share of the total marital assets
2 systems
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
- Community property
2. Separate property
community property
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
= each spouse own an undivided interest in all earning of the spouses and property acquired from such earnings during marriage
@ death, a spouse has testamentary power over only his or her one-half community share
community property states
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
- 9 states = community property states
- 3 states INCLUDING TN = optional community property states
separate property
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
= each spouse owns all of his or her earnings during the marriage
@ the death of one spouse, the surviving spouse has two options:
- Take under the decedent’s spouse’s will (or intestate laws if no will)
- Take an elective share
4 statutory tests
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
- intent to defraud test
- illusory transfer test
- general power of appointment test
- first-generation statute
intent to defraud test
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
= was the transfer made for the purpose of defrauding the surviving spouse out of his or her elective share?
2 factors
INTENT TO DEFRAUD TEST
- Subjective evidence
2. Objective evidence
objective evidence
INTENT TO DEFRAUD TEST
- Control retained by the transferor
- Amount of time between transfer and death
- Amount of property left to the surviving spouse
illusory transfer test
PROPERTY RIGHTS SYSTEMS
= did the transferor in good faith divest him or herself of ownership of the property or was the transfer illusory
rule
UPC GPOA TEST
- a marriage ends with death of spouse AND
- the deceased spouse had created an inter vivos trust during the marriage for which only that spouse had the general power of appointment
= the assets of that trust shall be included in the probate estate for the purpose of determining the omitted spouse’s share
rationale
UPC GPOA TEST
- public policy changes resulted in increased share of the estate for spouses upon divorce
- an omitted spouse’s access to marital assets should not be more restricted than that of a divorced spouse
inquiry required
UPC GPOA TEST
imposes an objective test that does not require an inquiry into whether the trust was created for the purpose of disinheriting the spouse and avoiding the spousal share under the statute
tn modern approach
PROPERTY RIGHTS
- Dower and curtesy are abolished
- Doesn’t affect rights that have vested before April 1, 1977
elective share
RESTRICTIONS ON POWER OF TESTATION
- designed to protect a surviving spouse from disinheritance
- give spouse an election to take a statutory share of decedent’s estate IN LIEU OF taking under the will
modern approach to protection of the surviving spouse
ELECTIVE SHARE
elective share statutes
tn omitted spouse protection
ELECTIVE SHARE
Will or any part revoked by both
- subsequent marriage AND
- birth of a child
(otherwise = spouse may opt for elective share)
tn elective share formula
AMOUNT OF ELECTIVE SHARE
surviving spouse’s elective share %
MULTIPLIED BY decedent spouse’s net estate
MINUS property passing to surviving spouse
= elective share
step one
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
surviving S of intestate D who elects AGAINST taking an intestate share
OR surviving S who elects against D’s will
- has a right of election
- to take an elective-share amount
- equal to the value of the D’s net estate
- determined by the length of marriage
— Less than 3 yrs = 10%
— 3 yrs but less than 6 yrs = 20%
— 5 yrs but less than 9 yrs = 30%
— 9 yrs or more = 40%
number of years (step one)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
- years do not have to be consecutive, may be separated by divorce
- number of years persons are married to the same person shall be combined
percentage of decedent’s net estate for less than 3 yrs (step one)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
= 10%
percentage of decedent’s net estate for 3 yrs but less than 6 yrs (step one)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
= 20%
percentage of decedent’s net estate for 5 yrs but less than 9 yrs (step one)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
= 30%
percentage of decedent’s net estate for 9 yrs or more (step one)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
= 40%
value of the net estate (step two)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
includes all of the decedent’s real property and personal property subject to disposition under will/intestacy laws MINUS
- secured debts to the extent that secured creditors are entitled to realize on the applicable collateral AND
- funeral and administration expenses AND
- award of exempt property, homestead allowance and year’s support allowance
net does not include (step two)
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
any assets over which the decedent held a power of appointment
- whether exercised or not
- UNLESS D exercises the power of appointment to direct the assets to be paid to the decedent’s personal representative for administration as part of probate estate
step three
TN ELECTIVE SHARE FORMULA
amount payable to S by the estate shall be reduced by the value of all assets includable in the decedent’s gross estate that were
a. transferred or deemed transferred to S OR
b. for the benefit of S
EXCEPT
1. homestead allowance AND
2. exempt property AND
3. year’s support allowance
fraud
NET ESTATE
any conveyance
1. made fraudulently
2. to children or others
3. with an intent to defeat S of distributive/elective share
= at the election of S, can be
a. includable in the decedent’s net estate
b. voidable to the extent the other assets in the decedent’s net estate are insufficient to fund and pay the elective share amount
finley factors application
NET ESTATE
- used to determination whether conveyance should be voided
- factors should not be applied mechanically
- weight and significance of factors = depend on the facts of each particular case