Prosocial Behavior & Prejudice/Discrimination Flashcards

1
Q

Prosocial Behavior

list the 5 step process of deciding what to do in an emergency based on the case of Kitty Genovese & Latene & Darley’s (1970) subsequent research

A

Step 1: Noticing the Event
Step 2: Interpreting the Event
Step 3: Assuming Responsibility
Step 4: Determining How to Help
Step 5: Deciding Whether or Not to Help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Prosocial Behavior

according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by noticing that something unusual is happening, which may not occur because the bystander is preoccupied with their own thoughts or because of stimulus overload

A

step 1: noticing the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prosocial Behavior

according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander interpreting the event as an emergency, which may not happen because of the ambiguity of the situation or because of pluralistic ignorance (or the misperception of how others are thinking or feeling)

A

step 2: interpreting the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prosocial Behavior

according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander recognizing there’s an emergency and deciding whether or not to provide assistance when other bystanders are present, which may not happen because of diffusion of responsibility (or a reduced sense of personal responsibility due to the belief that others are willing & able to provide assistance)

A

step 3: assuming responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Prosocial Behavior

according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander recognizing that a victim needs assistance and attempting to determine how to do so, which they may be unable to do or they may not feel competent to

A

step 4: determing how to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Prosocial Behavior

according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander deciding whether or not to provide help, which may not happen, even if they competent to, because of evaluation apprehension (or concerns about being judged negatively by others)

A

step 5: deciding whether or not to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Prosocial Behavior

this term, associated with step 1 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, occurs in big cities & other noisy environments, which causes a person to restrict their attention to stimuli that seem personally meaningful

A

stimulus overload

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prosocial Behavior

this term, associated with step 2 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, refers to the misperception of how others are thinking or feeling and occurs when a bystander doesn’t take action because they conclude that the inactivity of other bystanders is due to the fact that they know the situation does not constitute an emergency

A

pluralistic ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Prosocial Behavior

this term, associated with step 3 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, refers to a reduced sense of personal responsibility due to the belief that others are willing and able to provide assistance, and it increases as the number of bystanders increase

A

diffusion of responsibility

studies have found that a victim is most likely to get help when there is only 1 bystander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prosocial Behavior

this term, associated with step 5 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, refers to concerns about being judged negatively by others and involves a bystander, who feels competent to provide help, having difficulty deciding whether or not to do so

A

evaluation apprehension

aka audience inhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prosocial Behavior

which of the following statements most accurately describes research examining bystander apathy:

A) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s current location, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in an urban area

B) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s current location, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in a rural area

C) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s location of socialization, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in an urban area

D) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s location of socialization, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in a rural area

A

A) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s current location, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in an urban area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prosocial Behavior

according to this hypothesis, empathic concern provides the altruistic motive for helping people, i.e., people help another person because they’re concerned about the person’s well-being

A

Batson’s (1991) empathy-altruism hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Prosocial Behavior

this model, focused the role of egoism, proposes that people help others to reduct their own distress and assumes that people may feel empathy for a person in-need, but their empathy produces sadness or guilt, which they attempt to alleviate by providing help

A

Cialdini et al.’s (1973) negative state relief model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prosocial Behavior

this explanation of empathy as a source of motivation for helping others has received the most empirical support, which has provided evidence that a helping others for altruistic (rather than egotistic) reasons is more likely to lead to sustained helping

A

empathy-altruism hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

list 3 benefits Aronson et al. (1978) found in his research using jigsaw classrooms

A
  • reduced racial/ethnic prejudice & discrimination
  • increased self-esteem & empathy
  • improved academic performance among ethnically marginalized students without hindering the performance of white students
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

Sherif’s (1966) Robbers Cave study found the most effective strategy to reduce intergroup conflict was this, which refers to a shared goal that can only be accomplished when group members worked together cooperatively

A

superordinate goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this theory assumes that prejudice & discrimination are the result of direct competition between different groups for scarce & valued resources and a number of studies provide evidence for this theory, including Sherif’s (1966) Robbers Cave study.

A

realistic conflict theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this theory assumes that people have a natural tendency to categorize people into groups, to identify with one or more groups, & to favor in-groups and that prejudice & discrimination are the result of in-group favoritism, which occurs when positive feelings toward an in-group increase a group member’s self-esteem leading to increased negative feelings towards out-groups

A

Tajfel & Turner’s (1986) social identity theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this theory assumes that prejudice occurs because members of dominant groups use discrimination against weak target groups to vent their frustration and disappointment and has been used to explain why frustrating socioeconomic conditions (e.g., high rates of unemployment & inflation) can cause members of the majority group to discriminate against members of minority groups

A

Breckler et al.’s (2006) scapegoat theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this theory attributes extreme forms of prejudice & discrimination to an authoritarian personality, which is described as being the result of a harsh, restrictive upbringing and involving 9 personality traits: conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition & stereotypy, power & toughness, destructiveness & cynicism, projectivity, & puritanical sexual attitudes

A

Adorno et al.’s (1950) authoritarian personality theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this theory is based on the assumptions that 1) like other animals, humans have a biological drive to stay alive and 2) unlike other animals, humans have cognitive abilities that allow them to be aware of their own existence & of threats to existence that thwart the drive to stay alive of prejudice & discrimination and has been applied to a number of phenomena, including mental health, personality, altruism, aggression, and prejudice & discrimination

A

Greenberg et al.’s (1986) Terror Management Theory

22
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

research by Tajfel et al. (1971) found that in-group favoritism developed even in “minimal group” conditions, explain what this means

A

when group membership was temporary & based on relatively unimportant similarities

23
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

Adorno et al. (1950) developed the F (fascism) Scale to assess authoritarianism and found that scores on the scale had high correlatoins with scores on measures of these 2 personality/behavioral factors

A

ethnocentrism & prejudice

24
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

terror management theory contends that awareness of mortality creates a sense of terror and that cultural worldvies & self-esteem act as defenses against terror - in other words, people manage terror due to awareness of mortality in these 2 ways

A

1) by maintaining faith in cultural worldview that imbues reality with order, meaning, & permanence and provides paths to literal and/or symbolic immortality for those who meet prescribed standards of value
2) by adhering to standards consistent with their worldview to maintain their self-esteem

25
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

according to terro management theory, this term refers to awareness of the inevitability of death

A

mortality salience

26
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

some studies investigating terror management theory’s impact on prejudice & discrimination have established that amplifying what increases negative evaluations of & reactions to out-group members and increases positive evaluations of & reactions to in-group members

A

mortality salience

27
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

Schimel et al. (1999) found that amplifying mortality salience increases stereotypic thinking & preference for people who conform to stereotype. What do they propose is the reason for these effects?

A
  • people use their cultural worldview (i.e., their own conception of social reality) as a shield against deeply rooted fears
  • by viewing others as their stereotypes & preferring those who confirm (over those who disconfirm) these stereotypes, they solidify their own conception of social reality (i.e., their cultural worldview)
28
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

list 3 methods for increasing mortality salience

A

1) asking subjects to imagine their own deaths or complete a death anxiety scale
2) interviewing subjects outside a funeral home or near a cemetery
3) exposing subjects to subliminal death-related words (e.g., dead, coffin) during a computer-administrated world-relation test

29
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this concept refers to an evaluative stance (merely cognitive or also behavioral) toward other humans that involves drawing a line between individuals or groups (as in-group/out-group) according to an assumed concept of what it means to be human and is used to explain prejudice & discrimination, which

A

dehumanization

30
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

early theories focused on blatant dehumanization, which denied the humanness of outgroup members and can elicit extreme aggression & violence toward them, whereas recent theories focus on this concept, which views outgroup members as less than human rather than non-human

A

subtle dehumanization

31
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this theory focuses on a type of subtle dehumanization and refers to a process by which people consider their ingroup as fully human & outgroups as less human and more animal-like and occurs even in the absence of intergroup antagonism or differences in status

A

Leyens et al.’s (2001) infrahumanization theory

32
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

researchers distinguish between primary emotions as being non-uniquely human and secondary emotions as being uniquely human. List examples of each

A

primary: anger, surprise, fear

secondary: pride, hope, shame, resentment, disappointment

33
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

research on in-group/out-group members and positive/negative secondary emotions found that people tend to humanize members of their in-groups by attributing more positive secondary emotions to them which, in turn, elicits ____ and ____ ____ toward those individuals. In contrast, people tend to attribute fewer positive and negative secondary emotions to members of out-groups, which elicits less ____ and ____ of them.

A
  • empathy & prosocial behaviors
  • less empathy and acceptance
34
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this hypothesis, the basis of many interventions for reducing prejudice & discrimination, proposes that contact between members of majority & minority groups is most effective for reducing prejudice & discrimination when a) members of the groups have equal status, b) members must work together to achieve common (subordinate) goals, c) there is no competition between members, and d) the contact is sanctioned by law, custom, or institutional authorities

A

Allport’s (1954) contact hypothesis

35
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this occurs when people are aware of their racist attitudes & behaviors and try to conceal their true intent by giving socially acceptable explanations for them

A

inentional covert racism

36
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this occurs when people do not deliberately engage in harmful acts & are unaware of the negative consequences of their prejudiced attitudes & discriminatory behaviors

A

unintentional covert racism

37
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this is a type of covert racism and is characterized by a belief in egalitarianism coupled with the beliefs that 1) prejudice & discrimination no longer exist, 2) that members of certain minority groups violate traditional white American values such as the Protestant work ethic, individualism & self-determination, and 3) that the social & economical hardships of these groups are due to a lack of effort & other internal factors

e.g., a person exhibiting these behaviors might justify their opposition to affirmative action & other policies and programs designed to promote equality on the grounds that they’re unfair

A

(Sears, 1988) symbolic racism

38
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this is a type of covert racism and is characterized by a belief in egalitarianism that is accompanied by a non-prejudiced self-image and negative, often unconscious feelings about minority group members that were acquired early in life.

e.g., people exhibiting these behaviors may avoid interacting with minority group members when possible & act in discriminatory ways only when doing so can be justified on a basis other than race

A

(Dovidio & Gaertner, 2004) aversive racism

39
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this is a type of covert racism and is characterized by a combination of positive & negative attitudes towards minority group member and these conflicting attitudes lead to emotional tension, which a person attempts to reduce by amplifying their positive or negative attitudes; in other words, these individuals response in more extreme ways to situations involving a minority group member than they do to similar situations involving a majority group member

e.g., when rating minority & majority group members who have engaged in undesirable behaviors, these people will give more negative ratings to minority group members

A

(Katz & Haas, 1988) ambivalent racism

40
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

match the description with the correct level of racism: structural, institutional, interpersonal, & internalized (intrapersonal)

A) this level of racism occurs when individuals from socially & politically dominant racial groups behave in ways that diminish & har people who belong to other racial groups (e.g., microaggressions)

B) this level of racism refers to laws, policies, & practices that produce cumulative, durable, & race-based inequalities and includes the failure to correct previous laws & practices that were explicitly racist (e.g., redlining & overvaluing white residential property and neighborhood)

C) this level of racism refers to the acceptance by diverse racial populations of the negative societal beliefs & stereotypes about themselves… that reinforce the superiority of whites & can lead to the perceptin of themselves as devalued, worthless, & powerless

D) this level of racism results from policies, practices, & procedures of institutions, such as health care, law enforcement, & criminal justice systems, that marginalize diverse racial groups (e.g., Zero Tolerance policies in schools that cause a disproportionate number of racial/ethnic students to be suspended or expelled)

A

A) interpersonal
B) structural
C) internalized (intrapersonal; e.g., colorism)
D) institutional

41
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

research suggests that women are most commonly targets of sexism due to what?

A

their nondominant position in society

42
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

according to this theory, sexism includes two distinct but co-existing & complementary components (i.e., hostile and benevolent sexism), which both reflect the idea that women are inferior to men & thereby justify and maintain gender inequality

A

Glick & Fiske’s (1996, 2001) ambivalent sexism theory

43
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this term, associated with Glick & Fiske’s (1996, 2001) ambivalent sexism theory, refers to sexism involving antipathy toward women who are viewed as usurping men’s power

A

hostile sexism

44
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this term, associated with Glick & Fiske’s (1996, 2001) ambivaent sexism theory, refers to sexism involving a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology that offers protection & affection to women who embrace conventional roles

A

benevolent sexism

45
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

Glick & Fiske’s (2001) research confirmed that men exhibiting ambivalent sexism often reconcile their competing views of women by distinguishing between these two types of women

A

1) hostile sexism: feminists, career women, & other women who they view as violating traditional gender norms
2) benevolent sexism: women they believe are adhering to traditional gender roles

46
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this concept refers to a person’s unconscious internalization of positive & negative stereotypes that are applied to their own group by other groups

A

self-stereotyping

47
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

research 1) has found that self-stereotyping can have negative or positive effects, even when the stereotypes are negative and 2) supports the notion that endorsing negative stereotypes of one’s own group can help protect a person’s self-esteem how?

(e.g., women are more likely to adopt the stereotype “women are bad at math” when they anticipate or experience failure on a math exam

A

…by serving as an explanation of their behavior or outcomes

48
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

this occurs when situational factors activate group stereotypes in members of low status groups, including assimilation to the stereotypes or self-stereotyping

A

stereotype threat

49
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

which of the following statements most accurately reflects the findings of Hess et al.’s (2003) study on stereotype threat

A) performance of older adults (but not younger adults) on a memory task decreased after reading a news article that confirmed age-related memory decline but did not decrease after reading a news article that refuted the stereotype

B) performance of younger adults (but not older adults) on a memory task decreased after reading a news article that confirmed age-related memory decline but did not decrease after reading a news article that refuted the stereotype

C) performance of older adults (but not younger adults) on a memory task decreased after reading a news article that confirmed age-related memory decline and increased after reading a news article that refuted the stereotype

D) performance of younger adults (but not younger adults) on a memory task decreased after reading a news article that confirmed age-related memory decline and increased after reading a news article that refuted the stereotype

A

A) performance of older adults (but not younger adults) on a memory task decreased after reading a news article that confirmed age-related memory decline but did not decrease after reading a news article that refuted the stereotype

50
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

list 1 explanation for the impact of stereotype threat on task performance

A

it increases physiological arousal, stress, & negative self-talk, thereby reducing the cognitive resources needed to accomplish the task

51
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

studies on shooter bias using videogame simulation designed to recreate the experience of a police office who suddently encounters a potentially dangerous suspect has measure shoorter bias with response time & accuracy and confirmed its occurrence in these 2 outcomes

A

when subjects:
1) decide to shoot armed Black suspects more quickly than armed white suspects, but conversely, decide to refrain from shooting unarmed white suspects more quickly than unarmed Black suspects
2) erroneously decide to shoot unarmed Black suspects more frequently than unarmed white suspects, and conversely, erroneously decide not to shoot armed white suspects more frequently than they decide not to shoort armed Black suspects

52
Q

Prejudice & Discrimination

Correll et al.’s (2007) study comparing shooter bias among police officers vs. civilians (DMV workers) confirmed that what was a better predictor of shooter bias than personal endorsement of racial stereotypes or personal prejudice

A

participants’ familiarity with cultural stereoypes of Black men as being dangerous, violent, & aggressive