Prosocial Behavior & Prejudice/Discrimination Flashcards
Prosocial Behavior
list the 5 step process of deciding what to do in an emergency based on the case of Kitty Genovese & Latene & Darley’s (1970) subsequent research
Step 1: Noticing the Event
Step 2: Interpreting the Event
Step 3: Assuming Responsibility
Step 4: Determining How to Help
Step 5: Deciding Whether or Not to Help
Prosocial Behavior
according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by noticing that something unusual is happening, which may not occur because the bystander is preoccupied with their own thoughts or because of stimulus overload
step 1: noticing the event
Prosocial Behavior
according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander interpreting the event as an emergency, which may not happen because of the ambiguity of the situation or because of pluralistic ignorance (or the misperception of how others are thinking or feeling)
step 2: interpreting the event
Prosocial Behavior
according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander recognizing there’s an emergency and deciding whether or not to provide assistance when other bystanders are present, which may not happen because of diffusion of responsibility (or a reduced sense of personal responsibility due to the belief that others are willing & able to provide assistance)
step 3: assuming responsibility
Prosocial Behavior
according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander recognizing that a victim needs assistance and attempting to determine how to do so, which they may be unable to do or they may not feel competent to
step 4: determing how to help
Prosocial Behavior
according to Latane & Darley’s (1970) process, this step is characterized by the bystander deciding whether or not to provide help, which may not happen, even if they competent to, because of evaluation apprehension (or concerns about being judged negatively by others)
step 5: deciding whether or not to help
Prosocial Behavior
this term, associated with step 1 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, occurs in big cities & other noisy environments, which causes a person to restrict their attention to stimuli that seem personally meaningful
stimulus overload
Prosocial Behavior
this term, associated with step 2 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, refers to the misperception of how others are thinking or feeling and occurs when a bystander doesn’t take action because they conclude that the inactivity of other bystanders is due to the fact that they know the situation does not constitute an emergency
pluralistic ignorance
Prosocial Behavior
this term, associated with step 3 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, refers to a reduced sense of personal responsibility due to the belief that others are willing and able to provide assistance, and it increases as the number of bystanders increase
diffusion of responsibility
studies have found that a victim is most likely to get help when there is only 1 bystander
Prosocial Behavior
this term, associated with step 5 of Latane & Darely’s (1970) process of deciding what to do in an emergency, refers to concerns about being judged negatively by others and involves a bystander, who feels competent to provide help, having difficulty deciding whether or not to do so
evaluation apprehension
aka audience inhibition
Prosocial Behavior
which of the following statements most accurately describes research examining bystander apathy:
A) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s current location, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in an urban area
B) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s current location, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in a rural area
C) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s location of socialization, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in an urban area
D) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s location of socialization, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in a rural area
A) bystander apathy is more associated with a bystander’s current location, which means a bystander is less likely to help a person in distress when the incident occurs in an urban area
Prosocial Behavior
according to this hypothesis, empathic concern provides the altruistic motive for helping people, i.e., people help another person because they’re concerned about the person’s well-being
Batson’s (1991) empathy-altruism hypothesis
Prosocial Behavior
this model, focused the role of egoism, proposes that people help others to reduct their own distress and assumes that people may feel empathy for a person in-need, but their empathy produces sadness or guilt, which they attempt to alleviate by providing help
Cialdini et al.’s (1973) negative state relief model
Prosocial Behavior
this explanation of empathy as a source of motivation for helping others has received the most empirical support, which has provided evidence that a helping others for altruistic (rather than egotistic) reasons is more likely to lead to sustained helping
empathy-altruism hypothesis
Prejudice & Discrimination
list 3 benefits Aronson et al. (1978) found in his research using jigsaw classrooms
- reduced racial/ethnic prejudice & discrimination
- increased self-esteem & empathy
- improved academic performance among ethnically marginalized students without hindering the performance of white students
Prejudice & Discrimination
Sherif’s (1966) Robbers Cave study found the most effective strategy to reduce intergroup conflict was this, which refers to a shared goal that can only be accomplished when group members worked together cooperatively
superordinate goals
Prejudice & Discrimination
this theory assumes that prejudice & discrimination are the result of direct competition between different groups for scarce & valued resources and a number of studies provide evidence for this theory, including Sherif’s (1966) Robbers Cave study.
realistic conflict theory
Prejudice & Discrimination
this theory assumes that people have a natural tendency to categorize people into groups, to identify with one or more groups, & to favor in-groups and that prejudice & discrimination are the result of in-group favoritism, which occurs when positive feelings toward an in-group increase a group member’s self-esteem leading to increased negative feelings towards out-groups
Tajfel & Turner’s (1986) social identity theory
Prejudice & Discrimination
this theory assumes that prejudice occurs because members of dominant groups use discrimination against weak target groups to vent their frustration and disappointment and has been used to explain why frustrating socioeconomic conditions (e.g., high rates of unemployment & inflation) can cause members of the majority group to discriminate against members of minority groups
Breckler et al.’s (2006) scapegoat theory
Prejudice & Discrimination
this theory attributes extreme forms of prejudice & discrimination to an authoritarian personality, which is described as being the result of a harsh, restrictive upbringing and involving 9 personality traits: conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition & stereotypy, power & toughness, destructiveness & cynicism, projectivity, & puritanical sexual attitudes
Adorno et al.’s (1950) authoritarian personality theory