Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PY331 > prosocial behavior > Flashcards

prosocial behavior Flashcards

1
Q

what is prosocial behavior

A

opposite of aggression, helpful behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are three implications of prosocial behavior

A
  • Says nothing about motive or circumstance
  • Can be selfishly motivated
  • Can occur with or without a cost to oneself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how is altruism different than prosocial behavior

A

Helping others without regard to (or despite) the costs to oneself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the two motives

A

egoistic motives and altruistic motives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the two broad categories of egoistic motives

A
  • social rewards motives

- experienced distress motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is social rewards motive

A
  • Social rewards motive: helping to increase one’s esteem in the eyes of others
  • Considerable research that others like people who help, we rate them positively, we are more likely to give money to someone that we have seen help someone else
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is experienced distress motive

A
  • Experienced distress motive: Helping to reduce one’s own distress caused by witnessing another’s distress
  • A person gets worked up and distressed when they see someone else get worked up and distressed, so it can calm us down to help them (helping them is a way for us to feel better)
  • This is why many pleas for help/donations try to increase a person’s distress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the altruistic motive

A

empathetic concern motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the empathetic concern motive

A
  • Helping to reduce the other’s distress, which is felt empathetically
  • We help because we want to reduce someone else’s distress not our own
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the empathy altruism hypothesis

A

The idea that when we feel empathy for a person we will attempt to help hat person purely for altruistic reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what can we take the empathy altruism hypothesis to mean

A
  • Can take it to mean that the only truly altruistic help is the help driven by empathy
  • Or, take it to mean that inducing empathy will then lead to help
  • When we get a person to take another’s person perspective they are more likely to help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain the Cialdini et all study that sees if empathy affects willingness to help (getting participants to take another persons perspective)

A
  • Dependent measure: will a participant share notes and help a person study when they miss class, was in a huge class (intro to psych) so people did not know everyone in their class
  • Participants watched a video of a girl being interviewed, recently in car accident and broke leg so it was hard for her to get around and get to class
  • Participants given opportunity to say they would help the girl in the class (give her notes and help her study)
  • Empathy manipulation: imagine what she must be feeling, put yourself in her head
  • Control condition: watched the video of her being interviewed

Results: consistent with the empathy-altruism hypothesis, when participants took her perspective they were more willing to help and put in more hours to help her, but we still do not know what happened when they took her perspective (did they want to help her reduce her distress, or did they want to reduce their own distress when they took her perspective?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the follow up Cialdini et al study

A
  • seeing if empathy-altruism hypothesis or experienced distress motive is right
  • Had same set up as first study but added another independent variable, participants were led to believe their mood was frozen or not (either drank beverage that was “found to make a person’s mood stuck” for a period of time or did not drink this beverage), people actually do believe this manipulation (Brown studied this herself)
  • If people think their mood cannot be changed, they would not help to make their own distress feel better because they think that their mood cannot be changed
  • So if people actually do help to decrease someone else’s distress, they should still help regardless of if they drank the drink or not

-So 2 (perspective vs. no perspective) x 2 (mood frozen vs. not frozen)

-Results: find that empathy increases helping, but when there is nothing to do to change feelings empathy does not increase willingness to help (people help to eliminate their own distress) GRAPH ON PAPER
Shows that on average, when perspective taking increases empathy we help because this perspective taking increases our own distress (not wholly altruistic, but this does not mean that altruism does not exist)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

who do we tend to help

A

family and people who have helped us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain helping family

A

those who receive help are family members, most likely to help other family members and receive help from them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain kin selection

A

those who help genetic relatives increase the likelihood that their genes will be passed on (evolutionary perspective), evolution favors helping genetic relatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

where do we see kin selection

A

across species

-the animals that have the highest rate of sacrifice in groups have the highest amount of genetic similarities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

explain kin selection study

A

hypothetical extreme helpful behavior, trolley problem, imagine there is a trolley coming to a fork (no matter what someone is going to die), one track has one person the other track has up to 5

when they are all strangers people choose to save the group of 5 people, but choose a family ember over a higher number of strangers
-70% choose saving brother over 15 strangers, 60% choose saving cousin over 15 strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

explain reciprocal altruism

A

we are more likely to help those who have helped us, in fact there are some theories that feeling gratitude for receiving help may have evolved to give us motivation to help others

-people can even feel a weight, a burden, that they have to help someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what happens if we develop a positive reputation for helping others in reciprocal altruism

A

if we develop a positive reputation for helping others, that benefits us because we are then more likely to receive help (even if we did not help someone directly

21
Q

what is the “but” in if something is evolutionary beneficial

A

just because something is evolutionary beneficial, it does not mean it is guaranteed (there are cases of familial abuse, etc)

22
Q

what are the situation determinants of helping

A

1) costs and rewards
2) number of bystanders
3) diffusion of responsibility
4) clarity of the situation and pluralistic ignorance

23
Q

explain costs and rewards

A

they matter when choosing to help or not to help someone

24
Q

what are some potential costs of helping

A

personal safety, being a witness, being implicated in the event, potentially making something worse, inconvenience to one’s own life

25
Q

what is social exchange theory relevant to helping others

A

relative costs and rewards matter not only in relationships, but in choosing to help or not help
-if helping comes with few costs and the potential to look good, we are more likely to help

26
Q

what is the costs and rewards activity we did in class

A

ranking likelihood of helping (picking up teacher’s papers vs. helping intervene in a fight outside of a bar)

27
Q

how are there multiple kids of helping

A

there can be direct and indirect ways of helping (intervening yourself vs. calling the police)

28
Q

what happens if blood is present in a situation

A

the likelihood of help decreases

study: person fake falls, in one condition there is fake blood and in the other condition there is not, people re less likely to help with blood (potential for transmitting diseases)

29
Q

what is the bystander effect

A

the more people present when a person needs help, the less likely it is that help will be given (and if give, the slower it will arrive)
-as number of people present increases, the likelihood of helping others decreases

30
Q

what was Brown’s example of the bystander effect

A

two different car accidents

1) outside of DC on the beltway, 4 in the afternoon and 6 car chain reaction, while waiting for tow truck people drove by and yelled and cursed at Brown because they were pissed about the traffic
2) driving in the middle of the night in Ohio, drove car off the road, every car except one asked Brown if they were okay

31
Q

explain the bystander effect study about the survey and smoke in room

A

Study: participants were completing a survey in a room, researchers manipulated if they were alone, with two other real participants, or two confederates (told to do nothing, focus on survey)
-Smoke starts entering the room, record how long it takes participant to do something after they first notice the smoke

Results: People with confederates look at the other people first to see what they are doing, takes them a lot longer to report that there is smoke in the room or do not report it at all (after twenty minutes)
-When participants were alone over 70% got up within two minutes, only 10% in confederate condition, slightly over 10% in participant condition

32
Q

what do the findings in the smoke study and bystander effect show us

A

striking finding, as soon as there are other people present we are less likely to act, even when everyone was capable of saying something about the smoke in the participant condition

33
Q

explain the study about the bystander effect with people thinking someone else was having seizure

A

Study: participants heard a staged incident that sounded like someone else was having a seizure (all freshmen at a university), experiment described as college adjustment study- told the point was to have people talk with each other about their adjustments to college (could not see each other’s faces), talking over intercom, took turns talking for 2 minutes then onto next person, participant was always second person talking

  • Manipulated number of people: participant and one person, participant plus two people, participant plus five people
  • First person described himself as being from small town, mentions he has epilepsy and that when stressed he can have a seizure, second time the intercom came back to him he sounded like he was getting a seizure (could not speak coherently, other symptoms), measured how long it took people to help (could not talk to other people talking)
34
Q

what were the results of the seizure study

A

Results: average time to help

  • Alone: 100% left room to seek help, average time to help was 52 seconds
  • 1 other person: only 85% helped, average time to help was 93 seconds
  • 5 other people: only 60% helped, average time was 3 minutes

so, the belief that other people are just listening still affects one’s likelihood to help

35
Q

what are the explanations for the bystander effect

A
  • diffusion of responsibility
  • anonymity
  • clarity of the situation and pluralistic ignorance
36
Q

explain diffusion of responsibility

A

the feeling of responsibility gets diffused across everyone present when there are more people present

37
Q

what is diffusion of responsibility similar to

A

social loafing

-when there are more people working on a task people do not give as much effort as they would if they were alone

38
Q

explain anonymity as a factor in the bystander effect

A

if we are the only person present, if we help or not is known to the individual who needs help
-when other people know our identity we feel more accountable for helping

if we are in a larger crowd, we feel anonymous which decreases out likelihood to help

39
Q

what is anonymity similar to

A

deindividuation, anonymity changes behavior (more likely to act in a way you would not if you were by yourself)

40
Q

explain clarity of the situation

A

a lot of situations are ambiguous if help is needed or not

  • when the situation is not clear we do not think it is a situation we need to intervene
    ex. seeing a man on the ground in the city (maybe he is homeless or maybe he is having a medical issue)
  • if everyone else is walking by we assume that the person does not need help
41
Q

explain pluralistic ignorance

A
  • we look to others to try and figure out how we should act
  • look around to see if anyone else is doing anything, if no one is, assume it is not an emergency (everyone else is doing the same thing, so everyone is concluding nothing is wrong, even if something is wrong)
42
Q

what is pluralistic ignorance similar to

A

group think, people might disagree, but these individuals are waiting to see if someone else speaks up and if no one does they assume they are the only one who disagrees and do not say anything (even though there are multiple people who disagree that are going through the same process)

43
Q

what two influences can affect helping or not helping

A

normative and informational

44
Q

what is normative influence

A

we change our behavior because we do not want to be embarrassed and we want other people to like us
-If we are not sure that someone needs help (ambiguous), and no one else is doing anything, we do not want to embarrass ourselves by overreacting

45
Q

what is informational influence

A

we do not know what is actually happening so we look to others to see what is actually happening (do not know if someone actually needs help)
-If no one else is acting, we assume that it is not an emergency

46
Q

what is beneficial to do in potential help situations and Brown example

A
  • it could be beneficial to ask someone if they need help so you are not influenced by the above factors
    ex. Brown, because she teaches this, feels the responsibility to help because she knows that other people could be affected by these factors
47
Q

what is Darley and Latane’s Bystander Intervention Decision Tree

A

Shows that there are a lot of stages where help could potentially not be given
-Do not notice the incident, do not interpret as emergency, do not assume responsibility

(show chart on paper)

48
Q

summary: when do people help in emergencies

A
  • Clear emergency
  • Danger to helper is minimal
  • Helper is asked
  • No one else can help
  • Helper has time to help

PY331 (16 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions