Property Flashcards
In a lease of whole who is responsible for what?
- In a lease of whole, the tenant is responsible for repairing the whole building. The landlord insures the building and recovers the whole cost from the tenant.
In a lease in part who is responsible for what?
- In a lease of part, the tenant is responsible for repairing the demise, which will be defined in detail. The landlord insures the building and maintains the common areas and recovers a proportionate part of the cost from each tenant.
Qualified repairing obligation?
- A qualified repairing obligation limits the tenant’s repairing obligation to keeping the premises in the same state of repair as at the beginning of the lease term.
- Repair – who is responsible?
· A commercial tenant will almost always be responsible for the repair of their demise, ie the extent of the premises let to them. The first step is to look at the definition of “Premises”, “Demised Premises”, “Property” or similar in the lease.
· Lease of whole - the landlord’s title such as an office block, the definition of “Premises” will refer simply to the title and postal address of the office block. The tenant is responsible for the interior, exterior and structural repair.
· Lease of part - the definition of “Premises” will specify, for example, the fifth floor of the office block. But it will also go into much more detail of the demise, such as including the floor and ceiling coverings, but not the structure nor exterior of the building. The tenant is only responsible for interior repair.
· Lease of whole - the repairing responsibility is solely the tenant’s.
· Lease of part - other demises are the responsibility of their respective tenants. Areas of the building or estate used commonly by all tenants (“common parts”), such as hallways, lifts and staircases, communal car parking, etc, are the responsibility of the landlord.
· Although the landlord will bear responsibility for repairing the common parts, the landlord will recover the cost of doing so collectively from the tenants by way of service charge payments. An FRI lease typically contains extensive clauses setting out the services and how they are charged.
- Types of repairing covenant
· Full repairing obligation
· Qualified repairing obligation
- Limits of the repairing obligation?
· Unless the lease states otherwise, the tenant may generally choose whether to repair or replace an item of disrepair.
· Note that if the premises are damaged beyond repair; for example, if subsidence has caused the premises to be so damaged that they need to be rebuilt, this is renewal, not repair and the tenant is not responsible for doing this under a simple repairing obligation. A tenant may be asked to covenant to renew the premises, but this is onerous and should be avoided.
· If the lease refers to keeping the premises in good repair and condition, this is more onerous to the tenant (for example, condensation comes within condition, but not repair).
- Inherent and structural defects?
· If the property is newly constructed, it may have inherent or structural defects that only come to light over time. These may cause issues that the tenant would be obliged to repair under its repairing obligation.
· This is unfair, as the tenant is not responsible for them, and the landlord should have warranties from the contractors (the builder, structural engineer, architect, etc) that the landlord can rely on.
· A tenant taking a lease of a newly constructed property should ensure that inherent and structural defects are therefore excluded from the tenant’s repairing obligation and service charge contributions.
- Insurance?
· A commercial landlord will almost always be responsible for the insurance of the building (even where it is a lease of whole). In keeping with the principles of an FRI lease, the cost of insuring will be recovered from the tenant under the lease.
· In a lease of whole, the landlord will insure the whole, and the sole tenant will refund the landlord the whole of the insurance premium.
· In a lease of part, the landlord will insure the whole, and each tenant will refund the landlord a proportionate part of the insurance premium.
· The money that the tenant or tenants pay to the landlord will usually be referred to as “insurance rent”. The reason for this is covered in the element on termination of leases.
· A typical definition of insured risks in a lease might look like the following:
· fire, explosion, lightning, earthquake, tempest, storm, flood, bursting and overflowing of water tanks, apparatus or pipes, damage to underground water, oil or gas pipes or electricity wires or cables, impact by aircraft and aerial devices and articles dropped from them, impact by vehicles, subsidence, ground slip, heave, riot, civil commotion, strikes, labour or political disturbances, malicious damage
What are insured risks?
· These are the risks that will be covered by the insurance policy taken out by the landlord. The definition may allow for the landlord to add other risks to the list from time to time.
· They will also be excluded from the tenant’s repairing obligation, except in certain instances (eg, if the tenant’s negligence means that the insurance is not paid out).
- A full repairing obligation?
is typically expressed as an obligation to keep the premises in repair but extends to putting the premises into repair if they are not.
What could a covenant against alterations be?
- A covenant against alterations (and various other matters) may be absolute (not allowed), qualified (allowed with landlord’s consent) or fully qualified (allowed with landlord’s consent not to be unreasonably withheld).
What are alterations?
- Alterations are changes to the premises, such as reconfiguring the internal walls, opening up new windows, adding a mezzanine floor, etc.
What happens if a lease is silent on alterations?
- If the lease is silent on alterations, then the tenant is free to carry out alterations. The only restriction imposed by law is the doctrine of “waste” which means that the tenant cannot carry out alterations which reduce the value of the premises.
- An absolute covenant against alterations?
means that they are not permitted. Landlord can always consent but it doesn’t need to give it or act reasonably.
* If the tenant wants to make an alteration covered by an absolute covenant, they can ask the landlord, but the landlord has no obligation even to consider such a request.
- A qualified covenant against alterations
means that they are only permitted with landlord’s consent. The landlord does not have to give consent.
- A fully qualified covenant against alterations?
is similar to a qualified covenant, but in this case, the landlord must act reasonably in deciding to withhold consent or adding conditions when giving consent.
When is a qualified covenent against alterations upgraded to fully qualified?
- If the lease contains a qualified covenant against alterations, s19(2) LTA1927 converts it to a fully qualified covenant insofar as the tenant’s proposed alterations are improvements from the point of view of the tenant.
licence for alterations?
- If the landlord consents to alterations under a qualified covenant, then the consent will usually be documented in a licence for alterations.
- As well as details of the works consented to, and any time limit for carrying them out, it will contain various tenant’s covenants as below:
· carry out the works in compliance with the landlord’s requirements, typically with good quality materials and a high standard of workmanship
· pay the landlord’s costs in dealing with the tenant’s application for a licence for alterations (these will usually be the surveyor’s and solicitor’s costs)
· obtain all necessary consents, which could include planning permissions and building regulations approval
· reinstate the premises at the end of the lease term (ie, put them back in their original state without the alterations and put right any damage caused)
- Tenant’s statutory right to carry out improvements?
- If the tenant’s proposed alterations are improvements, then even if the lease contains an absolute covenant against alterations, the tenant may be able to circumvent this.
· Under s3, LTA1927, the tenant serves notice on the landlord of its intention to carry out improvements.
· If the landlord objects, the tenant can apply for the court’s permission to carry out the improvements. The court will give permission if the improvements: - add to the letting value of the property;
- are reasonable and suitable to the character of the property; and
- will not diminish the value of any other property belonging to the landlord.
· If the landlord does not object within three months, the tenant may go ahead and carry out the improvements.
· The landlord may offer to carry out the works itself and increase the rent, but the tenant does not have to agree to this. However, the tenant can then not ask the court for permission.
- User meaning in lease?
- User refers to what the lease allows the tenant to use the premises for.
- If the lease were to be silent on user, then the tenant is free to use the premises for anything they like. The lease will therefore control the use of the premises with a user clause.
- The user may be very specific (“as a tailor’s shop”) or more general (“as retail premises”) or may be by reference to the appropriate use class (“as a use within Class E(a) of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987”).
- Generally, the tenant will want a more general use to allow them flexibility, and to make the lease more appealing if they want to pass the lease on.
- Conversely, the landlord may wish to keep the user very narrow. However, this can backfire on the landlord, as it limits the appeal of the premises. This could limit the market rent on rent review.
Covenant against change of use?
- As with alterations, the lease may prohibit changes of user (an absolute covenant), allow changes of user with consent (qualified covenant) or allow changes of user with consent not to be unreasonably withheld (fully qualified covenant).
· Note that unlike a qualified alterations covenant (regarding tenant’s improvements), statute does not convert a qualified user clause to a fully qualified user clause.
What happens if the landlord consents to change of use?
section 19(3) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 does mean that if the landlord decides to give consent to a change of use, the landlord may not charge a lump sum or increase the rent for giving consent unless the change of use also requires structural alterations (in which case the landlord may charge a lump sum or increase the rent for giving consent).
- Code for Leasing Business Premises affect on alterations and change of use?
- The Code sets out some points of good practice on alterations and change of use such as the following:
· The lease should only restrict alterations and change of use insofar as necessary to protect the value of the premises and any adjoining or neighbouring premises of the landlord.
· The Code (subject to certain exceptions) requires a landlord to at least give the tenant a fully qualified covenant for internal non-structural alterations in a lease of part, and the tenant the ability to carry out internal non-structural alterations without consent in a lease of whole.
· If the landlord will require any alterations to be reinstated at the end of the lease, this should be made clear in the heads of terms. Otherwise, the lease may only require this if it is reasonable