Prognosis, Re-eval, and Maintenance Flashcards

1
Q

A prediction of the course, duration and
outcome of a disease based on a general
knowledge of the risk factors for the disease
‣ It is established after the diagnosis is made and
before the treatment plan is established.

A

Prognosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

an evaluation of the course of the

disease without treatment.

A

Diagnostic Prognosis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

an evaluation of the course of

the disease with treatment.

A

Therapeutic Prognosis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

T/F: The GOAL is to Deliver a predictable and long term stable comprehensive tx plan

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

_______: the anticipated result of the

periodontal therapy with anticipated prosthetic treatment

A

Prosthetic Prognosis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In the studies, what combination of tx and maintenance showed the least number of teeth lost per year?

A

Tx and regular maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth can be stabilized with comprehensive periodontal
treatment and periodontal maintenance. Future loss of the periodontal supporting tissues is
unlikely if these conditions are met

A

Favorable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth is influenced by local and/or systemic factors
that may or may not be able to be controlled. The periodontium can be stabilized with
comprehensive periodontal treatment and periodontal maintenance if these factors are
controlled; otherwise, future periodontal breakdown may occur

A

Questionable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth is influenced by local and/or systemic factors that
cannot be controlled. Periodontal breakdown is likely to occur even with comprehensive
periodontal treatment and maintenance

A

Unfavorable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)

: The tooth must be extracted

A

Hopeless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

One or more of the following:  
‣ Etiologic factors can be controlled  
‣ Adequate periodontal support  
‣ Tooth or teeth can be adequately maintained by the professional 
and patient  
‣  Controlled systemic factors
A

GOOD:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
: One or more of the following:
• Up to 25% attachment loss measured clinically and radiographically
• Grade I furcation allows access for maintenance
• Tooth or teeth can be maintained with proper professional and
home care
• Limited systemic factors

A

FAIR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

\: One or more of the following:  
• Up to 50% loss has occurred      
• Grade II furcation with difficult access to the depth and position of the furcation  
• Greater than Miller class 1 mobility  
• Poor crown-to- root ratio  
• Lack of patient compliance  
• Presence of systemic factors
A

POOR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

One or more of the following:
• Greater than 50% attachment loss
• Grade II or III furcation involvement not accessible for maintenance
• Endodontically involved tooth that must be resolved before
periodontal treatment
• Tooth or teeth not easily maintained by professional and/ or patient

A

QUESTIONABLE:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

‣ One or more of the following:
‣ Inadequate attachment to support the tooth
‣ Grade III furcation involvement
‣ Miller class III mobility
‣ Tooth or teeth cannot be maintained by the professional and/ or the patient

A

HOPELESS:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the most important determinant of prognosis for individual teeth/

A

Amount of attachment loss

17
Q
when present extend into 
furcation areas of ~20-30% of 
mandibular and maxillary molars. 
This clinical photo illustrates the 
most common location of CEPs 
(buccal surface of second 
maxillary molar)
A

CERVICAL-ENAMEL PROJECTIONS

18
Q

What teeth commonly hace CEPs?

A

Max 2nd molars

19
Q

Where do enamel pearls typically occur?

A

Max 2nd and 3rd molars

20
Q

The palatogingival groove is found on what teeth typically?

A

Max laterals

21
Q

Amount of bone loss is about 3.6 times higher

than normal in teeth that have more or less root proximity?

A

Teeth having roots closer together have more rapid bone loss

22
Q

Are max or mand molars most often loss to perio disease?

A

Max molars

23
Q

73% OF MANDIBULAR MOLARS
cementum extending from the mesial to the distal of a furcation opening
-Hinders professional cleaning
-More rapid bone loss

A

Furcation ridge

24
Q

DOES A SUCCESSFUL ENDODONTIC TX EFFECT PERIO PROGNOSIS?

A

Does not

25
Q

Re-evaluation of periodontal case should occur about __
weeks after completion of SRP.
‣ Allows time for healing of epithelium and CT
‣ Allows patient sufficient time to practice and improve OH
‣ Gingival inflammation is usually reduced or eliminated
within 3-4 weeks after removal of calculus and local irritants

A

4-6 weeks

26
Q

Healing after STP: Formation of __________
‣ this attachment epithelium appears 1-2 weeks after therapy
‣ Gradual reductions in inflammatory cell population, crevicular fluid
flow, and repair of connective tissue will result in less
inflammation, redness and swelling

A

LONG JUNCTIONAL EPITHELIUM

27
Q

Does healing after SRP tx involve hypersensitivity?

A

Yes for a few weeks; should go away

28
Q

Ideally: No pockets =/> ___ mm and none >___ mm with BOP

A

> or =5; none >4 mm with BOP

29
Q

if the pt has a loss of attachment of __ mm or greater at re-
evaluation, should be referred

A

5 mm or more

30
Q

Treatment of advanced perio disease by a periodontist

usually successful if ___ to ____ mm pockets

A

5mm to 8 mm

31
Q

Does a pt need to have a good plaque score to be referred to a periodontist?

A

Yes ideally less than 20%

32
Q

includes all the procedures performed at selected
intervals to assist the periodontal patient in maintaining oral
health.
• These usually consist of examination, an evaluation of oral
hygiene and nutrition, scaling, root curettage, and polishing
of teeth.

A

SPT or perio maintenance

33
Q

In a study where SPT wasn’t performed, what happened to attachment loss over 2 years without maintenance?

A

1.2-1.9mm of attachment loss

34
Q

How often should SPT be delivered to a high risk patient?

A

Every 3 months

35
Q

(how often should pt be seen)
Patients displaying a low- risk profile for
periodontitis recurrence yield all risk factors in
the low-risk category or, at most, one risk
factor in the moderate risk category.

A

Once a year for SPT

36
Q

(How often should pt be seen)
Patients presenting with at least two risk
factors in the moderate-risk category and at
most one risk factor in the high-risk category
were classified as displaying a moderate-risk
profile.

A

Twice a year

37
Q

(How often should pt be seen?)
Patients showing at least two risk factors in the
high- risk category are defined to belong to a
high-risk profile for disease recurrence.

A

Every 3-4 months

38
Q

Maintenance is usually every __ months initially - WHY?
—-> Clinical Studies show it is the right regiment to keep
the clinical parameters stable.

A

3