Prognosis, Re-eval, and Maintenance Flashcards
A prediction of the course, duration and
outcome of a disease based on a general
knowledge of the risk factors for the disease
‣ It is established after the diagnosis is made and
before the treatment plan is established.
Prognosis
an evaluation of the course of the
disease without treatment.
Diagnostic Prognosis:
an evaluation of the course of
the disease with treatment.
Therapeutic Prognosis:
T/F: The GOAL is to Deliver a predictable and long term stable comprehensive tx plan
True
_______: the anticipated result of the
periodontal therapy with anticipated prosthetic treatment
Prosthetic Prognosis:
In the studies, what combination of tx and maintenance showed the least number of teeth lost per year?
Tx and regular maintenance
(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth can be stabilized with comprehensive periodontal
treatment and periodontal maintenance. Future loss of the periodontal supporting tissues is
unlikely if these conditions are met
Favorable
(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth is influenced by local and/or systemic factors
that may or may not be able to be controlled. The periodontium can be stabilized with
comprehensive periodontal treatment and periodontal maintenance if these factors are
controlled; otherwise, future periodontal breakdown may occur
Questionable
(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth is influenced by local and/or systemic factors that
cannot be controlled. Periodontal breakdown is likely to occur even with comprehensive
periodontal treatment and maintenance
Unfavorable
(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The tooth must be extracted
Hopeless
(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
One or more of the following: ‣ Etiologic factors can be controlled ‣ Adequate periodontal support ‣ Tooth or teeth can be adequately maintained by the professional and patient ‣ Controlled systemic factors
GOOD:
(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
: One or more of the following:
• Up to 25% attachment loss measured clinically and radiographically
• Grade I furcation allows access for maintenance
• Tooth or teeth can be maintained with proper professional and
home care
• Limited systemic factors
FAIR
(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
\: One or more of the following: • Up to 50% loss has occurred • Grade II furcation with difficult access to the depth and position of the furcation • Greater than Miller class 1 mobility • Poor crown-to- root ratio • Lack of patient compliance • Presence of systemic factors
POOR
(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
One or more of the following:
• Greater than 50% attachment loss
• Grade II or III furcation involvement not accessible for maintenance
• Endodontically involved tooth that must be resolved before
periodontal treatment
• Tooth or teeth not easily maintained by professional and/ or patient
QUESTIONABLE:
(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
‣ One or more of the following:
‣ Inadequate attachment to support the tooth
‣ Grade III furcation involvement
‣ Miller class III mobility
‣ Tooth or teeth cannot be maintained by the professional and/ or the patient
HOPELESS: