Professional Responsibility Flashcards
What body of law applies for professional responsibility?
Virginia’s version of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC)
In 2000, the Virginia Supreme Court replaced the Virginia Code of Professional Responsibility with this.
How should professional responsibility essays be organized?
“The lawyer has a duty of _____ to _____ .”
What duties does a lawyer owe to his clients?
- Confidentiality
- Loyalty
- Financial responsibility
- Competence
(Clients Love Fierce Counsel)
What duties does a lawyer owe to entities other than his clients?
- Candor (i.e., truthfulness)
- Meritorious Claims
- Fairness
- Dignity (i.e., decorum)
(Courts May Feel Differently)
Other than his clients, what entities do a lawyer owe duties to?
- Court
- Adversaries
- Legal profession
- Third parties
- Public
(Court, OC, L Prof, 3Ps, Public)
What is the general rule for the duty of confidentiality?
Don’t reveal any information that:
- Is protected by the attorney-client privilege,
- Is gained through the professional relationship that would harm or embarrass the client,
- The client has requested be kept confidential
[AC + harm/emb + conf]
What is the attorney-client privilege?
The overlapping, but narrower, evidence rule that allows the client to prevent a lawyer from testifying about communications that she made to the lawyer in confidence.
When is the attorney-client privilege destroyed?
When the privileged information is revealed to non-essential persons who are not party to the privileged relationship.
What does the attorney-client privilege cover with corporate clients?
- Communications between the lawyer and high-ranking corporate officials, and
- Communications from other employees if:
- They are within the scope of the employee’s duties,
- Provided at the direction of the employee’s superiors, and
- The employee knows they are made to help the corporation get legal advice
When does a lawyer’s duty of confidentiality begin and end?
It begins when a lawyer receives communications from a prospective client for hte purpose of forming a legal relationship.
It continues after the attorney-client relationship ends, and even after the client’s death.
What are the major exceptions to the lawyer’s duty of confidentiality?
- Client consent (including evaluation for third party)
- Required by law or court order
- Defending yourself (and collecting a fee)
- Remedying client’s fraud against a third party
- Protecting client’s interests
- Bookkeeping or office management
- Preventing a crime (MUST promptly reveal)
- Revealing fraud on a tribunal (MUST promptly reveal)
What should a lawyer do if he discovers that his client intends to commit a crime?
- Advise the client of the possibla legal consequences of his actions
- Urge the client not to commit the crime
- Warn the client that you must reveal his intention if not abandoned
- If the crime involves perjury, warn the client that you must also seek to withdraw
If the client does not abandon his intention, the lawyer MUST promptly reveal the client’s intention
What should a lawyer do if he discovers that his client perpetrated a fraud upon a tribunal?
If the fraud:
- Was perpetrated during the course of the lawyer’s representation, and
- Relates to the subject matter of the lawyer’s representation,
The lawyer must:
- Ask the client to inform the tribunal of the fraud, and
- If he does not, promptly reveal the information
What is the general rule for the duty of loyalty?
A lawyer cannot represent a client if the representation creates a concurrent conflict of interest.
Representation creates a concurrent conflict of interest if an interest of another current or former client, the lawyer, or a third party (1) creates a significant risk of materially limiting the lawyer’s representation, or (2) his representation of one client is directly adverse to another.
What is the rule regarding a lawyer’s ignorance of a conflict of interest?
Ignorance is not an excuse unless it arises from short-term legal services under a court, agency, or non-profit program.
What are the exceptions to imputed disqualification?
- Purely personal conflicts
- When two lawyers are related as parent, child, sibling, or spouse, or are intimately involved, a conflict arises if they represent clients whose interests are directly adverse. But this type of conflict is not imputed to other lawyers.
- Trial counsel as a witness
- When a lawyer serves as a witness in a trial that his law firm is litigating, his disqualification from representation is not imputed on his colleagues
- Ethical wall
- A lawyer can avoid imputed disqualification by timely screening a colleague from participation in the matter when the colleague has a conflict due to (1) his prior government service, or (2) his work for adverse parties
- BUT:
- The screened colleague cannot share any part of the fee in the matter (aside from pre-arranged salaries of partnership shares), and
- His former government employer must be informed (no consent required, just informed)
- BUT:
- A lawyer can avoid imputed disqualification by timely screening a colleague from participation in the matter when the colleague has a conflict due to (1) his prior government service, or (2) his work for adverse parties
What are the remedies for a conflict of interest?
Depending on the posture of the case, a lawyer might:
- Refuse to take the case,
- Advise multiple clients to get separate counsel, or
- Withdraw from representation
When can a lawyer continue representation despite a concurrent conflict?
- The lawyer reasonably believes he can represent everyone effectively despite the conflict,
- The lawyer consults with each affected client,
- Each client provides written informed consent, or the lawyer writes to the client memorializing oral consent
Note: if the lawyer’s duty of confidentiality prevents him from fully disclosing information that a client needs to understand the conflict of interest, informed consent may not be possible
What types of concurrent conflicts cannot be waived?
- Representation of opposing parties in the same matter
- E.g., Law firm represents Texaco in labor matters and former Texaco employee asks law firm partner to sue Texaco for cutting off benefits. Even though partner never worked on Texaco matters, imputed disqualification means he represents Texaco. The employee and Texaco are in direct conflict, so partner cannot take the case.
When can a lawyer represent a prospective client who is adverse to a current client, and when can he not?
He can if:
- He will represent opposing parties in different matters, and
- All clients provide informed consent
He cannot if:
- He will represent opposing parties in the same matter, regardless of consent
When can a lawyer represent two clients with inconsistent positions (e.g., lawyer needs to argue both for an against the Managed Care Act in two different appeals)?
If neither client would be disadvantaged by the representation, the lawyer can argue the inconsistent positions.
If either client would be disadvantaged by the representation, the lawyer must obtained informed consent.
When can a lawyer represent multiple clients in the same matter?
- If there is not a significant risk of material conflict (i.e., a risk that representation of one client will materially limit representation of another), or
- If there is a significant risk of material conflict, and the clients provide informed consent
When can a lawyer not represent multiple clients in the same matter?
When the parties become directly adverse to one another, especially if one client provides relevant, confidential information that the lawyer cannot share with the other client.
The lawyer will not be able to fully pursue loyal representation of the second client, so at a minimum, he should withdraw from representing the second client.
Ideally, the lawyer should withdraw from both representations and advise the clients to get separate counsel.
When can a lawyer take on a new client with interests materially adverse to a former client?
When either:
- The representations do not overlap in function, scope, or information, or
- They do overlap, but the lawyer obtains informed consent from both clients
E.g., if A asks lawyer to represent him divorcing B, but lawyer’s senior partner once represented B in a business deal, lawyer is probably not disqualified becuase the representations do not overlap.
E.g., if A asks lawyer to represent him in an infringement action against B, and lawyer once represented B against infringement charges and accessed her personal files, lawyer cannot use this non-public confidential information against B, the former client, without consent.