Constitutional Law Flashcards
What is the source of judicial power?
Article III
How is judicial power limited?
Limits:
- Actual cases and controversies
- Political question doctrine
- Sovereign immunity
- Abstention
- SCOTUS special rules
What is the doctrine that determines whether an actual case or controversy exists?
What does it depend on?
Doctrine of justiciability depends on:
- What the lawsuit requests (no advisory opinions)
- When when the lawsuit is brought (ripe and not moot)
- Who brings the lawsuit (someone with standing)
What are advisory opinions?
Federal court opinions that would lack either:
- An actual dispute between adverse parties
- Any legally binding effect on the parties
Would it be an advisory opinion if:
Secretary of State asks SCOTUS for an opinion regarding the meaning of federal treaties and laws?
YES
(no actual dispute)
Would it be an advisory opinion if:
Plaintiff sues at the defendant’s request, and the defendant finances and directs the lawsuit?
YES
(no adverse parties)
Would it be an advisory opinion if:
Federal law allows veterans to file pension claims in federal court, but gives the Secretary of War the power to ignore court decisions?
YES
(no legally binding effect)
Would it be an advisory opinion if:
A firm subject to tax seeks a declaratory judgment on the constitutionality of the tax?
NO
When is a controversy not ripe?
Pre-enforcement review of laws (i.e., declaratory judgment actions) are generally not ripe, unless both:
-
Substantial hardship in absence of review
- The more the better
-
Issues and record are fit for review
- The more legal than factual the better
Would a case be ripe if:
Plaintiff seeks declaration on the constitutionality of an anti-contraceptive law not enforced in 80 years?
NO
(no substantial hardship, because no threat of enforcement)
Would a case be ripe if:
Drug firms seek declaration that FDA lacked authority to require generic names on all drug labels and ads, where compliance would be extremely expensive and non-compliance would result in serious criminal and civil penalties?
YES
(substantial hardship, and more legal than factual)
When is a controversy moot?
A case is not moot if:
- In a case for declaratory and injunctive relief:
- The challenged law or conduct continues to injure
- In a case for damages:
- Plaintiff is not made whole
Exceptions:
- Injury has passed, but:
- It is capable of reptition, yet evades review because of inherently limited duration
- Defendant may restart challenged activity at will
- Some other member of a class action suffers an ongoing injury
Would a case be moot if:
Inmate suing to change prison condition completes sentence?
YES
(no more injury)
Would a case be moot if:
Pregant woman challenging abortion restriction delivers?
NO
(capable of reptition yet evades review because of inherently limited duration)
Would a case be moot if:
Strip club that city sought to close closes, and owner retires?
NO
(defendant may restart at will)
What are the elements of standing?
- Injury
- Causation
- Redressability
For purposes of standing, what constitutes injury?
Almost any harm, but not:
- Ideological (i.e., political) objections as citizen or taxpayer
- General grievances as citizen or taxpayer
Exceptions:
- Taxpayers have standing to challenge their tax liability
- Citizens have standing to challenge congressional spending (but not executive) in violation of the Establishment Clause
For purposes of standing, when is the injury required to occur?
Injury must either:
- Have already occurred
- Will imminently occur
For purposes of standing, who must suffer injury?
The plaintiff must personally suffer injury (i.e., no third-party standing)
Exceptions:
-
Close relationship (e.g., parent-child)
- P injured
- P unable or unlikely to sue
- 3P can adequately represent P
-
Organization on behalf of members (e.g., NAACP)
- Members have standing
- Members’ injury related to organization
- Members’ participation not required
-
Free speech overbreadth
- __Substantial overbreadth in sweep of law
- Not commercial speech
Does the third-party have standing if:
Doctor challenging abortion law raising claim of patient?
YES
(close relationship)
Does the third-party have standing if:
Non-custodial parent without decisionmaking authority challenging flag salute on behalf of child?
NO
(cannot adequately represent P)
Does the third-party have standing if:
Publisher of obscene website challenging internet indency ban on behalf of those with non-obscene websites?
YES, but only if challenging non-commercial free speech
(free speech overbreadth)
Does a legislator have standing if:
Challenging tie-breaking vote that nullified their vote?
YES
(sufficiently personal)
Does a legislator have standing if:
Challenging line item veto that gave President power to alter legislation passed by Congress?
NO
(not sufficiently personal because injures entire body of Congress)