Federal Civil Procedure

Question 1

How do you determine whether you are in the right court?

Answer 1

• Personal jurisdiction
• Subject matter jurisdiction
• Venue

Question 2

What is the basic idea behind personal jurisdiction?

Answer 2

Whether the court has jurisdiction over the parties

i.e., can P sue D in this state?

Question 3

What is the analysis for personal jurisdiction?

Answer 3

1. Statutory analysis
   
   • Does the court’s jurisdiction over the parties satisfy the state statute?
2. Constitutional analysis
   
   • Does the court’s jurisdiction over the parties satisfy the Constitution (i.e., Due Process)?

Question 4

What is the Constitutional analysis for personal jurisdiction?

Answer 4

Personal jurisdiction is clearly constitutional if D is:

• Domiciled in the forum state,
• Consents to jurisdiction by the forum state,
• Voluntarily present in the forum state when served with process

Otherwise, assess the following factors:

• Contact between D and the forum state
• Relatedness between D’s contact and P’s claim
• Fairness

Question 5

What is the “contact” analysis for personal jurisdiction?

Answer 5

• Purposeful availment
  
  • Did D reach out to the forum state?
• Foreseeability
  
  • Was it foreseeable that D could get sued in the forum state?

Question 6

What is the “relatedness” analysis for personal jurisdiction?

Answer 6

• Specific personal jurisdiction
  
  • Does P’s claim arise from D’s contact with the forum state?
• General personal jurisdiction
  
  • Is D “at home” in the forum state?

Question 7

Where is a human always “at home”?

Answer 7

Where he is domiciled

Question 8

Where is a corporation always “at home”?

Answer 8

1. Where incorporated, and
2. Where it has its principal place of business

Question 9

Where is a corporation’s principal place of business?

Answer 9

Where the corporation’s managers direct, coordinate, and control corporate activities (i.e., the “nerve center”)

This is usually the headquarters

Question 10

What is the fairness analysis for personal jurisdiction?

Answer 10

• Does the forum state have specific personal jurisdiction?
  
  • If no, do not address fairness
  • If yes, consider:
    
    1. Burden on D and the witnesses
       
       • Can D show that the forum is so gravely inconvenient that it puts him at a severe disadvantage in the litigation?
         
         • Due process does not guarantee the most convenient forum
         • Relative wealth of the parties is not determinative
    2. Forum state’s interest
       
       • Is P a citizen of the forum state?
         
         • If so, the forum state may want to provide a courtroom for its citizens, who are allegedly being harmed by out-of-staters
    3. P’s interest
       
       • Is P injured and therefore wants to sue at home?

Question 11

What is the constitutional analysis for in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction?

Answer 11

The same analysis that applies for personal jurisdiction

Question 12

What is the basic idea behind subject matter jurisdiction?

Answer 12

Whether the court has jurisdiction over the case

i.e., can P sue D in this court?

Question 13

When do state courts have subject matter jurisdiction?

Answer 13

Almost always

Limited exception:

• Cases arising under a few federal laws must be brought in federal court
  
  • Patent infringement
  • Bankruptcy
  • Federal securities violations
  • Antitrust violations

Question 14

When do federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction?

Answer 14

• Diversity of citizenship (and alienage) cases
• Federal question cases

Question 15

What are the requirements for diversity of citizenship (and alienage) jurisdiction?

Answer 15

• The case is either between:
  
  • Citizens of different states (diversity)
  • A citizen of a state and a citizen of a foreign country (alienage), AND
• The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000

Question 16

What is the complete diversity rule?

Answer 16

Diversity jurisdiction does not exist if any P is a citizen of the same state as any D

Question 17

If an alien is admitted to the US for permanent residence (i.e., a so-called “green card” alien) and is domiciled in a US state, is he considered an alien or a citizen of the US state?

Answer 17

He is an alien, so litigation with him might invoke alienage, but not diversity jurisdiction

Note: There is a special rule that prohibits alienage when a “green card” alien is domiciled in the same US state as a litigant on the other side of the case. In these situations, subject matter jurisdiction is prohibited by statute

Question 18

When a “green card” alien is domiciled in the same US state as a litigant on the other side of the case, is there alienage?

Answer 18

No. In these situations, subject matter jurisdiction is prohibited by statute. The parties will have to litigate in state court.

Question 19

If a US citizen moves abroad and is domiciled in a foreign country, are they an alien? Are they a citizen of a US state?

Answer 19

No, they are not an alien, so there cannot be alienage.

No, they are not a citizen of a US state because they are not domiciled in a US state, so there cannot be diversity.

Litigation between this person and a citizen of a US state would have to take place in state court.

Question 20

What is the US state of citizenship for a natural person who is a US citizen?

Answer 20

The US state where that person is domiciled.

Note:

• Every human has a domicile
• No human can have more than one domicile

Question 21

How does a human establish a new domicile? What do courts look to in making this determination?

Answer 21

1. Physical presence there, AND
2. The intent to make that your permanent home
   
   • For intent, courts look to factors such as:
     
     • Taking a job
     • Buying a house
     • Joining civic organizations
     • Registering to vote
     • Qualifying for in-state tuition

Question 22

When should the test for diversity be applied?

Answer 22

When the case is filed.

So, if a party moves to the same state as his opponent after filing the case, diversity is not destroyed.

Question 23

What is the citizenship of an unincorporated association (e.g., partnership, LLC, etc.)?

Answer 23

The citizenship of all of its members (including both general and limited partners)

Question 24

What is the citizenship of a decedent, minor, or incompetent?

Answer 24

Wherever they are domiciled.

They must sue or be sued through a representative, but the representative’s citizenship is irrelevant.

Question 25

What is the amount in controversy requirement?

Answer 25

The claim must **_exceed_** $75,000.

Question 26

How are legal costs and interest treated with respect to the amount in controversy requirement?

Answer 26

You cannot count legal costs or interest _on_ the claim. But if a party is suing to recover interest _as_​ the claim, then you do include it.

Question 27

If the plaintiff claims more than $75,000, is that automatically the amount in controversy?

Answer 27

Yes, unless it is _clear to a legal certainty_ that P cannot recover more than $75,000 E.g., $50K of P's $100K claim is for punitive damages, and the relevant jurisdiction does not allow punitive damages in the case.

Question 28

If P sues for more than $75,000 but only wins a judgment of $10,000, is diversity of citizenship (or alienage) jurisdiction destroyed?

Answer 28

No. The amount that P recovers is irrelevant. But, in this situation, P will have to pay for his own and D's costs even though P won. Generally, the winner recovers costs from the loser.

Question 29

What do "costs" include?

Answer 29

Basic expenses of litigation, such as: * Filing fees * Discovery fees "Costs" DO NOT include _attorney's fees_. Each side pays its own attorney's fees.

Question 30

How does aggregation work?

Answer 30

Aggregate the claims of _one_ P v. _one_ D * Factually unrelated claims can be aggregated * There is no limit on the number of claims that can be aggregated * For _joint claims_ (i.e., claims against joint Ds), use the total value of the claim * For _joint claims_, the total number of parties is irrelevant _DO NOT_ aggregate the claims of two separate Ps

Question 31

What is the test to determine whether a claim for equitable relief satisfies the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction?

Answer 31

* Plaintiff's viewpoint * Does the alleged wrongdoing decrease the value of P's property by more than $75,000? * Defendant's viewpoint * Would it cost D more than $75,000 to comply with the requested relief?

Question 32

What kind of cases will federal courts refuse to hear even if the requirements for diversity or alienage jurisdiction are met?

Answer 32

* Divorce * Alimony * Child custody * Estate probate _BUT NOT_ domestic abuse

Question 33

What are the requirements for federal question jurisdiction?

Answer 33

The claim in P's complaint "arises under" federal law E.g., federal constitution, federal legislation, etc.

Question 34

What is the "well pleaded complaint" rule?

Answer 34

It is not enough that some federal issue is raised by P's complaint. The _claim itself_ must "arise under" federal law. Look at the complaint and ignore other material P alleged. Ask: Is P enforcing a federal right?

Question 35

If P sues D, and D argues that a federal statute protects him agianst the claim, does a federal court have jurisdiction?

Answer 35

No. P (not D) must be enforcing a federal right in order for federal question jurisdiction to apply. In this situation, D (not P) is enforcing a federal right.

Question 36

Unless the exam question says the claim is based upon a federal law, are the following claims federal? * Tort * Contract * Property

Answer 36

No. These are state common law claims, unless the question says otherwise.

Question 37

Once a case is properly in federal court, what additional claims can be asserted?

Answer 37

Claims that invoke: * Diversity (and alienage) jurisdiction * Federal question jurisdiction * Supplemental jurisdiction

Question 38

What is the test for supplemental jurisdiction?

Answer 38

The additional claim: * Must arise from the _same transaction or occurence_ as the underlying case, and * Must not fall within the supplemental jurisdiction _limitation_, and * The federal court does not exercise its _discretion_ to decline jurisdiction

Question 39

What is the supplemental jurisdiction limitation?

Answer 39

An additional claim cannot invoke supplemental jurisdiction if: * Asserted by P, * In an underlying diversity of citizenship (not federal question) case, **_AND_** * Asserted against a citizen of the same state as P

Question 40

Even if the requirements for supplemental jurisdiction are met, can a federal court decline jurisdiction?

Answer 40

Yes. The court has discretion to decline jurisdiction if: * The state law claim is complex, or * State law issues would predominate in the case, or * **The underlying claim is dismissed early in the case**

Question 41

What is "removal"?

Answer 41

Removal transfers the case from a _state trial court_ to a _federal trial court_

Question 42

What happens if removal was improper?

Answer 42

The federal court can remand the case back to the state court

Question 43

Who can remove a case to federal court?

Answer 43

Only the defendant. The plaintiff can never remove, even if he is a defendant on a counterclaim.

Question 44

When can a party remove a case to federal court?

Answer 44

Only within _30 days_ of _service_ (not filing) of the _first paper_ that shows the case is removable. Usually that means within 30 days of service of process.

Question 45

Who must join in the removal of a case to federal court?

Answer 45

_ALL_ defendants who have been _served with process_. But not those who haven't been served.

Question 46

What cases can be removed to federal court?

Answer 46

Any case that meets the requirements for diversity (or alienage) or federal question jurisdiction. _BUT_, if removal is based on diversity of citizenship jurisdiction, * No removal if any D is a citizen of the forum (in-state D) * No removal more than one year after the case was filed in state court

Question 47

When a case is not removable to federal court because of an in-state D, can it ever become removable?

Answer 47

Yes. If the claim against the in-state D is dropped, the case becomes removable. The 30 day period for removal begins on the date this claim is dropped (i.e., the first document that made the case removable)

Question 48

When a case is not removable to federal court because of an in-state D, and the claim against the in-state D is dropped more than a year after the case is filed, does the case become removable?

Answer 48

No. A case cannot be removed more than a year after it was filed in state court. _Unless_ the judge finds that P acted in bad faith by originally joining the in-state D to prevent removal.

Question 49

When a case is removed to federal court, which federal court is it removed to?

Answer 49

The federal district "embracing" the state court where the case was filed.

Question 50

How does a party remove a case to federal court?

Answer 50

1. File a _notice of removal_ in _federal court_ that: * States the grounds for removal (i.e., subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity or federal question) * Attaches all documents that were served on the moving party in the state action 2. Serve a _copy of the notice of removal_ on _adverse parties_ 3. File a _copy of the notice of removal_ in _state court_

Question 51

In response to a notice of removal, what should the plaintiff do if he thinks the case should not be removed?

Answer 51

Move to remand to state court

Question 52

When must a plaintiff move to remand a case to state court?

Answer 52

* If based on a lack of _subject matter jurisdiction_: * Anytime * _Otherwise_ (e.g., in-state D or necessary papers not attached to notice of removal) * Within 30 days after the notice of removal was filed

Question 53

What law should the judge apply in a diversity jurisdiction case in federal court?

Answer 53

The federal judge should follow the *Eerie* doctrine: * Is there a federal law on point that directly conflicts with state law? * If yes: * Apply federal law if it is valid (based on the supremacy clause) * If no: * Apply federal law for "procedural issues" * Apply state law for "substantive issues"

Question 54

When is a federal law valid?

Answer 54

When it does not modify substantive rights. This is probably met if it is "arguably procedural." No FRCP has ever been held invalid.

Question 55

What issues are "clearly substantive"?

Answer 55

1. Elements of a claim or defense 2. **Statute of limitations** 3. Rules for tolling statutes of limitations 4. Conflict (or choice) of law rules So when these issues arise in a diversity jurisdiction case, the federal court should apply state law.

Question 56

When an issue in a diveristy jurisdiction case is not "clearly substantive," how does the federal judge determine whether the issue is substantive or procedural?

Answer 56

Weigh the following factors: 1. Outcome determinative * If either applying or ignoring the state rule would affect the outcome of the case, it is probably a substantive issue, and state law should apply 2. Balance of interests * If either the federal or state system has a strong interest in having its rule applied, that rule should apply 3. Avoid forum shopping * If ignoring the state law on this issue will cause parties to flock to the federal courts, state law should apply

Question 57

Is there a general federal common law?

Answer 57

No. The general common law of contracts, torts, and property is _state_ law, and federal court should apply that state substantive law.

Question 58

When can federal courts create their own common law?

Answer 58

* Congress passes a statute that creates a new claim but fails to address certain things (i.e., leaves gaps) * International relations * Admiralty * Disputes between states * The right to sue a federal officer violating one's federal rights

Question 59

What is the basic idea behind venue?

Answer 59

Venue tells us which federal district a plaintiff can sue in Cf. Subject matter jurisdiction tells us that the plaintiff's case can be heard in federal court, whereas venue tells us which particular federal court that case can be heard in

Question 60

What are a plaintiff's choices for venue?

Answer 60

P may lay venue in _any district where_: * _ALL_ defendants reside (subject to the special venue rule) * A substantial part of the claim arose _Note_: when a state court is removed to federal court, these choices do not apply because in that situation, the venue for the removed case has to be the district that embraced the state court for the case

Question 61

What is the special venue rule?

Answer 61

If all Ds reside in _different districts of the same state_, P can lay venue in the district in which _ANY_ D resides. E.g., If D-1 resides in N.D.N.Y. and D-2 resides in W.D.N.Y., venue can be laid in either N.D.N.Y. or W.D.N.Y.

Question 62

Where do defendants "reside" for venue purposes?

Answer 62

* If D is a human: * The district where domiciled * If D is a business: * _ALL_ districts where subject to personal jurisdiction

Question 63

Where can a federal district court transfer a case?

Answer 63

Only to a district where the case _could have been filed_ The "transferee" must: 1. Be a proper venue, and 2. Have personal jurisdiction over D

Question 64

When can a _defendant_ waive the requirements for a transfer of venue?

Answer 64

Only when the transferee is proper In other words: * The defendant can waive the personal jurisdiction requirement (in fact, this amounts to consent which provides personal jurisdiction) * The defendant cannot waive the proper venue requirement

Question 65

When can a _plaintiff_ waive the requirements for a transfer of venue?

Answer 65

Anytime, but it is unlikely that P will do so. In other words, if all parties consent to the transfer, the case can be transferred to _any district_, even if an improper venue

Question 66

What do the 2 venue transfer statutes say?

Answer 66

1. Transferor is a proper venue * The transferor can order transfer based on: * Convenience of the parties, * Convenience of the witnesses, * Interests of justice 2. Transferor is an improper venue * The transferor may: * Transfer in the interests of justice, or * Dismiss the case

Question 67

What factors does the court look to in deciding whether to transfer venue?

Answer 67

1. The existence of a valid _forum selection clause_ * _​​_If the parties entered into a contract saying the dispute would be litigated in a particular district, the court will almost always transfer to that district 2. Public and private factors showing that the transferee is _the center of gravity_ * _Public factors:_ * What law applies * What community should be burdened with jury service * The desire to keep a local controversy in the local court * Private factors: * Convenience * E.g., where the evidence and witnesses are

Question 68

What is "forum non conveniens"?

Answer 68

The court's discretionary power not to transfer the case to a more convenience court, but _rather_ to: * Dismiss, or * Stay the case

Question 69

What does it mean to stay the case?

Answer 69

To hold in abeyance (i.e., nothing happens in the case, it just sits there)

Question 70

Under forum non conveniens, why does a court dismiss or stay?

Answer 70

Because the more convenient court is in a _different judicial system_ (e.g., a foreign country), so transfer is impossible

Question 71

What factors does a court consider when making a forum non conveniens decision?

Answer 71

* Is P a resident of the present forum? * If yes, FNC dismissal is almost never granted * If no, the court considers the same factors as it would for a transfer decision, and * Whether the other court is "available" and "adequate"

Question 72

If a foreign court does not permit trial by jury or recovery for emotional distress, will it be deemed inadequate for purposes of a forum non conveniens decision?

Answer 72

No. A court is adequate if the plaintiff will get his day in court.

Question 73

What is the basic idea behind service of process?

Answer 73

D is entitled to know that he has been sued.

Question 74

What does service of process consist of?

Answer 74

Together, the following two documents are called "process"? 1. A summons (i.e., formal court notice of the suit and the time for response) 2. A copy of the complaint

Question 75

Who can serve process?

Answer 75

Any nonparty who is 18 years old

Question 76

Does the process server have to be appointed by a court?

Answer 76

No

Question 77

How is process served?

Answer 77

1. Personal service * Process is given to D personally, ANYWHERE 2. Substituted service * Process is left: * At D's usual abode (e.g., summer home in the summer is fine) * With someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there (e.g., not a babysitter) 3. Service on D's agent 4. Other methods (e.g., mail) permitted by the law of the state where: * The federal court sits * Service is made

Question 78

In federal court, can the plaintiff use substituted or agent service even if personal service would be possible?

Answer 78

Yes, they are all alternatives

Question 79

How does waiver by mail work for service of process?

Answer 79

1. P mails to D: * A copy of the complaint * Two copies of a waiver form * With a prepaid means of returning the form to P 2. D executes and returns the waiver form within _30 days_ 3. P files the waiver form with the court, and it is effective

Question 80

If D waives formal process, does he waive any defense (e.g., lack of personal jurisdiction)?

Answer 80

No.

Question 81

What happens if D does not return the form for waiver of service of process?

Answer 81

If D does not have good cause for failing to return the form, he must pay for the cost of service

Question 82

What does the process server have to do after serving process?

Answer 82

File a report with the court detailing how service was made. If the server was a civilian, the report is by _affidavit_ (i.e., a sworn statement under oath)

Question 83

What happens if a process server fails to file a report detailing how service was made?

Answer 83

Nothing - the service is still valid. P will just have to prove that service was made.

Question 84

How are documents other than process served?

Answer 84

They still get served, but it does not have to be done formally. These documents (e.g., answer, pleadings, motions, discovery) are delivered or mailed to either: * The party's attorney * The party (if pro se)

Question 85

What is the effect of mailing rather than personally delivering documents that require a response within a particular time period (e.g., interrogatories)?

Answer 85

If mailed, the responding party gets an extra 3 days

Question 86

Can documents be served via e-mail?

Answer 86

Yes, if the receiving party agrees

Question 87

What are the "pleadings"?

Answer 87

1. Complaint 2. Response * Can be in the form of a motion or answer, but only the answer is a pleading 3. Counterclaim 4. Crossclaim 5. Additional claims 6. Amended pleadings 7. Supplemental pleadings

Question 88

What is the complaint and what are its requirements?

Answer 88

Filing this commences an action Requirements: 1. Statement of grounds of **_subject matter jurisdiction_**, 2. Short and plain statement of the **_claim_**, showing that P is entitled to relief, 3. Demand for **_relief_** sought (e.g., damages, injunction, declaratory judgment)

Question 89

What is the standard for stating the claim in a complaint?

Answer 89

**P must plead facts supporting a plausible claim** To determine plausibility, the judge uses his own **"judicial experience and common sense"**

Question 90

Does P have to allege the grounds for personal jurisdiction or venue in his complaint?

Answer 90

No

Question 91

What matters must be pleaded with more detail?

Answer 91

The following matters must be pleaded with _particularity_ or _specificity_: * **Fraud (circumstances of the fraud must be in detail)** * Mistake * Special damages

Question 92

How and when should D respond to a complaint, and what FRCP requires this?

Answer 92

_FRCP 12_ requires D to respond by either: 1. Motion, or 2. Answer Within _21 days_ after service of process, or If D waived service, within _60 days_ from when P mailed him the waiver form

Question 93

Are motions pleadings?

Answer 93

No. They are requests for a court order.

Question 94

What are the motions regarding issues of form?

Answer 94

* Motion for a more definite statement * The pleading is so vague that D can't frame a response (this is rare) * Motion to strike * Aimed at immaterial or scandalous things

Question 95

What are the FRCP 12(b) defense motions, and where can they be included?

Answer 95

The following 12(b) motions can either be included in: * A _motion to dismiss_, or * The _answer_ 1. Lack of _subject matter jurisdiction_ 2. **Lack of _personal jurisdiction_** 3. **Improper _venue_** 4. **Improper _process_ (i.e., problem with papers)** 5. **Improper _service_ (i.e., problem with procedure)** 6. Failure to state a _claim_ 7. Failure to join an _indispensible party_

Question 96

Which 12(b) motions are waivable, and what does that mean?

Answer 96

The following motions must be included in the _first_ FRCP 12 response (i.e., motion or answer). Otherwise they are waived. * 12(b)(2) * 12(b)(3) * 12(b)(4) * 12(b)(5)

Question 97

If D waives the improper venue motion - 12(b)(3) - or the lack of personal jurisdiction motion - 12(b)(2) - can he still move to transfer the case to a proper venue that has personal jurisdiction over him?

Answer 97

Yes. The court has discretion to transfer

Question 98

When can the lack of subject matter jurisdiction motion - 12(b)(1) - be raised?

Answer 98

Anytime, even after trial

Question 99

When can the failure to state a claim motion - 12(b)(6) - or the failure to join an indispensible party motion - 12(b)(7) - be raised?

Answer 99

Anytime throughout trial, but not after trial

Question 100

What is included in the answer?

Answer 100

* Response to allegations in the complaint * Admit * Deny * State lack of sufficient information to admit or deny * Affirmative defenses

Question 101

When can a defendant _NOT_ state in his answer a lack of sufficient information to admit or deny an allegation?

Answer 101

When the answer to the allegation is within D's control. D has a duty to investigate things within his control

Question 102

What happens if, in his answer, D responds to an allegation by saying something other than the following: * Admit * Deny * Lack of sufficient information to admit or deny

Answer 102

D has effectively _admitted_ to the allegation. "If you do not deny you certainly will fry." _BUT_ D is never deemed to admit _damages_

Question 103

What are the classic affirmative defenses to be included in a defendant's answer?

Answer 103

* Statute of limitations * Statute of frauds * Res judicata * Self-defense

Question 104

What if D does not plead an affirmative defense in his answer?

Answer 104

D waives the affirmative defense and cannot raise it at trial.

Question 105

What is a counterclaim?

Answer 105

A claim against an _opposing party_

Question 106

How would D assert a _counterclaim_? How would P respond?

Answer 106

* D would assert a counterclaim in his _answer_ * P would respond under FRCP 12: * Within _21 days_ by either: * Motion, or * Answer

Question 107

What are the two types of counterclaims?

Answer 107

1. _Compulsory_ counterclaim * This arises from the same _transaction or occurence_ as P's claim * Unless D has already filed the claim in another case, he must file it in the pending case or it is _waived_ 2. _Permissive_ counterclaim 1. This _does not_ arise from the same _transaction or occurence_ as P's claim 2. D may file this claim in a separate case

Question 108

Everytime a federal case involves a counterclaim, crossclaim, or additional claim, what must be assessed?

Answer 108

Whether the claim satisfies subject matter jurisdiction: * Diversity * Federal question * Supplemental

Question 109

What is a crossclaim?

Answer 109

A claim against a _co-party_

Question 110

What is the requirement for a crossclaim?

Answer 110

It _MUST_ arise from the same _transaction or occurence_ as the underlying action

Question 111

Is a crossclaim compulsory?

Answer 111

No. It may be asserted as a crossclaim or brought in a separate suit.

Question 112

If D-1 files a crossclaim against D-2 and then D-2 wants to file a claim against D-1, what would D-2's claim be?

Answer 112

A _counterclaim_ because it is against an opposing party. Once someone asserts a claim against you, you are opposing parties.

Question 113

When can additional claims be joined to a counterclaim or crossclaim?

Answer 113

Anytime, so long as they satisfy _subject matter jurisdiction_ (i.e., diversity, federal question, or supplemental) Additional claims can be _totally unrelated_ to the other claims.

Question 114

When does P have a right to amend?

Answer 114

Once within _21 days_ after D serves his _first FRCP 12 response_. Otherwise, he must seek leave of the court to amend.

Question 115

When does D have a right to amend?

Answer 115

Once within _21 days_ of serving his _answer_. Otherwise, he must seek leave of the court to amend.

Question 116

What should a party do if he wants to amend but the 21-day right to amend period has ended?

Answer 116

Seek leave of court. It will be granted _if justice so requires_, based on the following factors: * Delay * Prejudice * Futility of amendment (waste of time)

Question 117

What is a _variance_? When does it arise?

Answer 117

A variance is where evidence _AT TRIAL_ does not match what was pleaded

Question 118

If there is a variance, when can P move to amend his complaint to conform to the evidence? When can P not move to amend?

Answer 118

If D does not object to the variance, P can move to amend his complaint to conform the evidence. If D does object to the variance, the evidence at trial that does not conform to the pleadings is inadmissible because it is _at variance with the pleadings_.

Question 119

When can P amend his complaint to _join a new claim_ even if the statute of limitations has run?

Answer 119

If the amended pleading _relates back_. Amended pleadings to join a new claim relate back if: * They concern the _same conduct, transaction, or occurence_ as the original pleading. Relation back means you treat the amended pleading as though it was filed when the original pleading was filed. _Note_: In order to amend, P still needs to make sure that the amendment either: * Falls within the 21-day period for amendment, or * The court grants leave to amend

Question 120

When can P amend his complaint to _change a defendant_ even if the statute of limitations has run?

Answer 120

If the amended pleading relates back. Amended pleadings to change a defendant relate back if: * They concern the _same conduct, transaction, or occurence_ as the original pleading, * The new party knew of _this case_ within _120 days_ of its filing, and * The new party knew that, but for a mistake, he _would have been named_ originally _IN OTHER WORDS_, P sued the wrong D first, but the right D knew about it _Note_: In order to amend, P still needs to make sure that the amendment either: * Falls within the 21-day period for amendment, or * The court grants leave to amend

Question 121

What are supplemental pleadings?

Answer 121

These set forth things that happened _after_ the pleading was filed. _Note_: amended pleadings are about things that happened _before_ the pleading was filed but were not asserted until later

Question 122

When will a court allow supplemental pleadings?

Answer 122

This is discretionary, but the court will often do so unless it will _cause delay or prejudice_

Question 123

What does FRCP 11 apply to? What does it say?

Answer 123

FRCP 11 applies to all documents except discovery FRCP 11 says: * When a lawyer or pro se party signs documents, he _certifies_ that to the best of his knowledge and belief, _after reasonable inquiry_: * The paper is not for an improper _purpose_ * The legal contentions are warranted by _law_ (or nonfrivolous argument for law change) * The factual contentions and denials of factual contentions have _evidentiary support_ This is a continuing certification - you make it everytime you advocate a position taken in a document

Question 124

If there is a FRCP 11 violation, against whom can sanctions be ordered?

Answer 124

* Party * Attorney * Firm

Question 125

What is the purpose of FRCP 11?

Answer 125

To deter, not punish Before imposing a sanction on a person, he gets a chance to be heard

Question 126

If another party in a case violates FRCP 11, what should you do?

Answer 126

"Serve, but don't file" 1. Serve a motion for sanctions on the other parties, but do not file it * The violating party has a _safe harbor of 21 days_ to fix the problem and avoid sanctions 2. If they do not fix it, _then file_ the motion for sanctions

Question 127

What are the required disclosures in discovery?

Answer 127

The following disclosures must be produced even though no one asks for them: 1. Initial disclosures 2. Expert witnesses 3. Pretrial required disclosure

Question 128

What are initial disclosures in discovery?

Answer 128

1. _Identifies of persons_ who have discoverable information that you (the disclosing party) may use to _support_ your claims and defense * Name * Telephone number * Subjects on which they have information 2. _Documents and things_ that you may use to _support_ your claims or defenses * You may produce: * Copies of these things, or * Descriptions of these things 3. _Computation of monetary relief_ and documents/ESI supporting it * This is required whenever someone claims monetary relief 4. _Insurance coverage_ * _​​_D has to disclose any insurance that might cover all or part of the judgment in the case

Question 129

What happens if a party fails to disclose something that he was required to disclose in discovery?

Answer 129

The party cannot use that material in the case, _UNLESS_ the failure to identify was: * Substantially justified, or * Harmless

Question 130

Does a lawyer have to identify as an initial disclosure things that he knows about but does not have?

Answer 130

No. You only have to disclose material in your _custody or control_

Question 131

As an initial disclosure, does D have to disclose insurance coverage when it will not be admissible at trial?

Answer 131

Yes. Discoverable is _broader_ than admissible

Question 132

When does each party have to identify their expert witnesses? Which expert witnesses need to be identified? What needs to be identified about the expert witnesses?

Answer 132

Expert witnesses must be identified at some point after the initial disclosures, _when directed by the court_ Any expert witness _"who may be used at trial"_ must be identified But if the expert will not be called to testify, they do not need to be identified - this is a _consulting expert_ The disclosure shoudl include: * The identity of the expert witness * The written report of the expert witness, which must include: * Opinions the expert will express * Bases for the opinions * Facts used to form the opinions * The expert's qualifications * How much the expert is paid

Question 133

After an expert witness is identified, can a party depose the expert? If so, how?

Answer 133

Yes, by doing the following: * Issuing a _subpoena_ to compel the expert's attendance * Paying the expert a _reasonable fee_ per hour (which the court can set if necessary)

Question 134

What is an expert witness?

Answer 134

Someone who, because of special skill or training: * May give _opinion testimony_, and * Is hired to render an opinion _for this case_ _Note_: Others may testify who have expertise, but they are not expert witnesses under this rule because they are not hired to render an opinion in the case * E.g., a doctor who developed opinions to treat the plaintiff, not for purposes of the litigation

Question 135

What is the "pretrial required disclosure"?

Answer 135

No later than 30 days before trial, parties must give detailed information about trial evidence, including: * Identity of witnesses to testify live or by deposition * Documents, ESI, and other things to be introduced

Question 136

Assuming no court order or stipulation provides otherwise, when can a party first request discovery from other parties?

Answer 136

After the FRCP 26(f) conference The FRCP 26(f) conference is when the parties "meet and confer" to discuss the following, and then present a _detailed discovery plan_ to the court: * Required initial disclosures * Claims * Defenses * Settlement * Issues regarding preservation of discoverable information

Question 137

Which tools can be used to get information from _non-parties_?

Answer 137

* Depositions * But you should _subpoena_ the non-party to compel attendance * Requests to produce * But you should _subpoena_ the non-party to compel production * Medical exam * But only if the non-party is in the custody or legal control of a party

Question 138

What is a deposition?

Answer 138

Person gives live testimony _under oath_ in response to questions by counsel or pro se parties The questions can be oral or written. If written, the court reporter reads them. The deposition is recorded by: * Sound * Video * Stenographically

Question 139

Do you have to subpoena a party for a deposition?

Answer 139

No. You just serve notice of the deposition (i.e., you "notice" the deposition)

Question 140

How do you depose a non-party?

Answer 140

You subpoena the non-party to compel attendance.

Question 141

What is a subpoena "duces tecum"?

Answer 141

It requires a deponent to bring requested materials with them to a deposition.

Question 142

Unless a non-party agrees, what is the farthest that the non-party can be required to travel for a deposition?

Answer 142

100 miles from where the non-party: * Resides, or * Is employed

Question 143

If a party wants to depose an employee of a company but does not know the identity of the particular employee, how can they depose the employee?

Answer 143

The party can either: * Request identification of the employee in _interrogatories_ to the company and then depose him, or * Notice the deposition of the _company_ and describe the matters for examination. Then the company has to send the right person to address those matters (i.e., the particular employee)

Question 144

What are the limits on depositions?

Answer 144

* No more than _10 depositions_ * No deposing the _same person twice_ without: * Court approval * Stipulation * No depositions longer than _1 day of 7 hours_ without: * Court approval * Stipulation

Question 145

How would you use a deposition at trial?

Answer 145

* _Any purpose_ if the deponent is an _adverse party_ * _Any purpose_ if the deponent is _unavailable_, unless: * The deponent's absence was caused by the party using the deposition * _Impeach_ the deponent

Question 146

What are _interrogatories_?

Answer 146

Written questions to be answered: * In writing * Under oath

Question 147

To whom can you send interrogatories?

Answer 147

Parties only

Question 148

How long does a party have to respond to an interrogatory with answers or objections?

Answer 148

_30 days_ from _service_

Question 149

Can a party respond to an interrogatory by saying they don't know the answer?

Answer 149

Not unless the information is not reasonably available. The party must respond based on information reasonably available to them.

Question 150

How many interrogatories can be sent to a party?

Answer 150

_25_ including subparts (so no more than 25 actual questions) unless: * Court order * Stipulation

Question 151

What should a party do if the answer to an interrogatory can be found in business records, but it would be burdensome to find the answers?

Answer 151

The resonding party can allow the requesting party to have _access to the records_

Question 152

What are the limits to using interrogatories at trial?

Answer 152

You cannot use _your own answers_ to interrogatories Others are okay per the FRE

Question 153

What are requests to produce?

Answer 153

They request that someone either: * Make available for review and copying documents or things (including ESI) * Permit you to enter designated property to inspect, measure, etc.

Question 154

In what form should ESI be produced?

Answer 154

The requesting party specifies the form. The responding party can object.

Question 155

What is unique about a medical exam?

Answer 155

You must get a court order in order, which requires you to show the following: * The person’s health is an actual controversy * Good cause

Question 156

Who can be ordered to undergo a medical exam?

Answer 156

* A party * Someone in a party’s custody or legal control (e.g., the child of a parent – this is narrow)

Question 157

Who chooses the licensed person to perform a medical exam?

Answer 157

The party seeking the court order for the medical exam chooses the licensed medical examiner

Question 158

If someone is ordered to undergo a medical exam, can they receive the exam? If so, what are the implications?

Answer 158

Yes. If you are examined you can request a copy of your exam from the party who sought it. If you request and obtain your medical exam, you _waive any privilege_ you may have concerning testimony or other evidence about all examinations of that medical condition. So, you would have to produce reports of your own doctors concerning the medical condition.

Question 159

What is a request for admission? On whom may it be served?

Answer 159

it is a written request that someone admit things. A request for admission can only be served on _parties_

Question 160

If a party _fails to deny specifically or object_ to a particular request for admission, what happens?

Answer 160

The responding party is deemed to have admitted that fact.

Question 161

Can a party respond to a request for admission by saying they do not know the answer?

Answer 161

Only if they: * Made reasonable inquiry and cannot find enough to admit or deny the fact, and * They state this in their response

Question 162

What is a common use of requests for admission?

Answer 162

To authenticate documents (i.e., "admit that this is the contract")

Question 163

What is required of every discovery request and response?

Answer 163

It is signed by counsel _certifying_ that: * It is _warranted_ * It is not interposed for _improper purpose_ * It is _not unduly burdensome_

Question 164

What do you do if circumstances change and your discovery response (i.e., required disclosure, interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission) becomes incomplete or incorrect?

Answer 164

You have a _duty to supplement_ your response, even though nobody asks for it

Question 165

What can you discover (i.e., what is the scope of discovery)?

Answer 165

Anything _relevant to a claim or defense_ Relevant includes things that are **"reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence"** This is _broader than admissible_

Question 166

Does a party have to disclose something that is harmful to them?

Answer 166

Yes. It need not be disclosed in _required disclosures_, but may well be discoverable using the _regular discovery tools_

Question 167

When would evidence of D's net worth be relevant, and thus discoverable?

Answer 167

If P sued to _punitive damages_ because it P needs to know how much will actually punish D But not just _compensatory damages_ because it is irrelevant to how much harm was inflicted upon P

Question 168

What is the doctrine of _proportionality_?

Answer 168

The court has authority to limit discovery, even if the request is relevant, if it is: * _Cumulative_, or * The _burden outweighs the importance_ of the issue

Question 169

If material that is requested in discovery can only be provided at an enormous cost, what will happen?

Answer 169

* The court can limit the request under the _doctrine of proportionality_ * The court can order production, but _allocate the expense_ between the parties

Question 170

What if information requested in discovery is privileged?

Answer 170

The responding party can _object_ on the basis of evidentiary privilege.

Question 171

What is _work product_? Is it discoverable?

Answer 171

Material prepared _in anticipation of litigation_ - i.e., trial preparation materials Work product is generally protected from discovery

Question 172

Does materials have to be generated by a lawyer to count as work product?

Answer 172

No, it does not have to be _attorney_ work product. Work product can be generated by: * An attorney * A party * A representative of a party

Question 173

What is _qualified_ work product?

Answer 173

Material that would otherwise be work product but is discoverable because the requesting party can show: * Substantial need, and * That it is not otherwise available E.g., a witness statement included in a PI's report prepared in anticipation of litigation

Question 174

What is _absolute_ work product?

Answer 174

* Mental impressions * Opinions * Conclusions * Legal theories

Question 175

P sues D regarding an auto collision between them. D asks a PI to find the identities of the eyewitnesses to the wreck. Doing so costs thousands of dollars in investigation fees. P serves an interrogatory on D asking for the names of all persons with information relevant to the case. Can D withold the identity of the witnesses based on work product?

Answer 175

No. The identity of people with discoverable information is discoverable.

Question 176

Can a party's own statement (e.g., a recording after a car wreck) be witheld based on work product?

Answer 176

No. A party is entitled to request and obtain his own statement.

Question 177

What do you need to do if you withold discovery or seek a protective order based on privilege or work product?

Answer 177

Claim the protection _expressly_ and describe the materials _in detail_. Do this in a _privilege log_ that lists the protected materials by: * Date * Author * Recipient * Privilege or protection claimed This must be in enough detail to allow the judge to determine whether the material is protected

Question 178

What should you do if you inadvertently product privileged or protected material?

Answer 178

Notify the other party _promptly_. The other party must return, sequester, or destroy the material pending decision by the court about whether there has been a waiver

Question 179

What are the three ways that courts get involved in discovery disputes?

Answer 179

1. Protective order 2. Ruling on a partial response to a discovery request * E.g., responding party answers some questions but objects to others and the judge decides whether the objections were legitimate or whether to impose sanctions 3. Ruling on no response to a discovery request * E.g., judge decides whether to impose sanctions based on the responding party's complete failure to: * Attend a deposition * Respond to interrogatories * Respond to requests for production

Question 180

When can a party get a protective order?

Answer 180

A party can get a protective order when she thinks a discovery request: * Subjects her to annoyance * Subjects her to embarrasment * Subjects her to undue burden * Subjects her to undue expense * Is cumulative * Is not proportional to the case

Question 181

What should a party do to get a protective order?

Answer 181

_Certify_ that she tried in good faith to deal with the request without court involvement - i.e., that she asked the other side to _"meet and conver"_

Question 182

What can a court do if it agrees with a request for a protective order?

Answer 182

* Deny discovery * Limit discovery * E.g., rule that a trade secret only be used in litigation and not be exploited in the marketplace * Permit discovery on certain terms

Question 183

What does a party do if it wants the court to impose sanctions based on a party's partial response to a discovery request?

Answer 183

Two steps: 1. Move for an _order compelling_ the party to answer the unanswered questions, plus costs (including attorney's fees) of bringing the motion 2. If the party violates the order compelling him to answer, ask the court to impose _RAMBO sanctions_ plus costs (i.e., attorney's fees and costs of bringing the motion) * The court could also hold the party in contempt for violating a court order (unless it is based on a refusal to submit to a medical exam - you cannot be held in contempt for that)

Question 184

What does a party do if it wants the court to impose sanctions based on a party's complete failure to respond to a discovery request?

Answer 184

One step (no need for an order to compel): * Ask the court to impose _RAMBO sanctions_ plus costs (i.e., attorney's fees and costs of bringing the motion) The court could also hold the party in contempt for violating a court order (unless it is based on a refusal to submit to a medical exam - you cannot be held in contempt for that)

Question 185

What are the court's options for so-called _RAMBO sanctions_?

Answer 185

* Establishment order (i.e., establishes facts as true) * Strike pleadings of the disobedient party (as to issues regarding the discovery) * Disallow evidence from the disobedient party (as to issues regarding the discovery) * Dismiss P's case (if _bad faith_ is shown) * Rare * Enter default judgment against D (if _bad faith_ is shown) * Rare

Question 186

If a party fails to produce ESI, when will the court _not_ impose sanctions?

Answer 186

If the failure is because the information was lost in the _good faith, routine operation_ of an electronic information system. In these situations, the court will only impose sanctions _in exceptional circumstances_

Question 187

When can: * Multiple parties sue together as co-plaintiffs? * One party sue multiple parties as co-defendants?

Answer 187

When the claims: * Arise from the _same transaction or occurence_, AND * Raise at least _one common question_, AND * The case satisfies _subject matter jurisdiction_

Question 188

Why would a court force a non-party into the case?

Answer 188

Because the non-party is _necessary_ (i.e., required)

Question 189

Who is a necessary party?

Answer 189

An absentee who meets _ANY_ of the following tests: * Without the absentee, the court _cannot accord complete relief_ among existing parties * The _absentee's interest_ may be harmed if he is not joined * _D's interest_ may be harmed (i.e., he may be subject to a risk of multiple obligations) if the absentee is not joined

Question 190

Are joint tortfeasors necessary?

Answer 190

Never

Question 191

If a party is necessary, is the party automatically joined?

Answer 191

No. The party's joinder must be _feasible_. Joinder is feasible if: 1. The court has _personal jurisdiction_ over him, and 2. Joinder will not destroy _subject matter jurisdiction_

Question 192

What happens if joinder is feasible?

Answer 192

The court orders joinder

Question 193

What happens if joinder is not feasible?

Answer 193

The court must either: 1. Proceed without the absentee, or 2. Dismiss the entire case

Question 194

How does the court decide what to do when joinder is not feasible?

Answer 194

It looks at the following factors: * Is there an _alternative forum available_ (e.g., state court)? * What is the _actual likelihood of harm_ to the absentee (e.g., maybe the claim isn't likely to win anyway)? * Can the court _shape relief_ to avoid harm to the absentee?

Question 195

What happens if the court decides to dismiss rather than proceed without an absentee?

Answer 195

The absentee is deemed an _indispensible party_

Question 196

What is the difference between claims staring with a "C" (e.g., counterclaims, crossclaims) and claims starting with an "I" (e.g., impleader, intervention)?

Answer 196

"C" claims are between existing parties "I" claims involve someone new joining the case

Question 197

What is an impleader?

Answer 197

A new party that D brings into the case (i.e., a third-party defendant - TPD)

Question 198

If you have an impleader claim, do you have to assert it in this case?

Answer 198

No. It is never compulsory. The only compulsory claim is the compulsory counterclaim.

Question 199

What is an impleader claim usually for?

Answer 199

* Indemnity (i.e., to have the impleader cover the full claim) * Contribution (i.e., to have the impleader cover a pro-rata portion of the claim)

Question 200

If D claims that someone other than himself is responsible for the claim, can he implead that person?

Answer 200

No. In this situation D is not trying to deflect his own liability. He is not liable at all.

Question 201

What are the steps for impleading a third-party defendant, and when can the defendant do this?

Answer 201

D must either take the following steps within _14 days_ of serving his _answer_ or get court permission: * D files a _third-party complaint_ naming the third-party defendant, and * D _serves process_ on the third-party defendant * So, the court must have _personal jurisdiction_ over the third-party defendant

Question 202

After the third-party defendant is joined, can P assert a claim against the third-party defendant?

Answer 202

Yes, but only if the claim arises from the _same transaction or occurence_ as the underlying case

Question 203

After the third-party defendant is joined, can the third-party defendant assert a claim against P?

Answer 203

Yes, but only if the claim arises from the _same transaction or occurence_ as the underlying case

Question 204

If D impleads a party from that same state as the P in a diversity jurisdiction case, does the court have subject matter jurisdiction?

Answer 204

Yes. It does not matter that P and the third-party defendant are from the same state. P's citizenship is irrelevant to the impleader claim because he is not party to the impleader claim.

Question 205

What is intervention?

Answer 205

When a non-party brings herself into the case, either as a P (to assert a claim) or as a D (to defend a claim) Application to intervene must be timely

Question 206

When can a party intervene?

Answer 206

When thay have _intervention of right_. * This is when the _absentee's interest may be harmed_ if she is not joined and adequately represented now. * This is the same as the second test for whether a party is _necessary_ * So, if a party is necessary based on the fact that her interest may be harmed, she would also have a right to intervene When they have _permissive intervention_ * This is up to the court's discretion * The absentee's claim or defense must have _at least one common question_ with the pending case * This is usually okay unless intervention will _cause delay or prejudice_ _Note_: the court must have _subject matter jurisdiction_ over the intervenor's claim

Question 207

Who sues in a class action?

Answer 207

A representative sues on behalf of a group

Question 208

What are the requirements for a class action?

Answer 208

The representative must demonstrative _all_ of the following: * Numerosity * There are _too many_ class members for joinder (no magic number) * Commonality * There is some _issue in common_ to all class members, so resolution of that issue will generat eanswers for everybody in one stroke * Typicality * The class representative's _claims are typical_ of those of the class * Representative adequate * The class representative will _fairly and adequately represent_ the class

Question 209

What are the steps for initiating a class action?

Answer 209

1. Demonstrate the _four requirements_ for a class action 2. Fit the case within one of the _three types_ of class actions 3. Get the court to _certify_ _the class_

Question 210

What are the three types of class actions?

Answer 210

1. Prejudice * Class treatment is necessary to avoid harm (prejudice) either to the class members or to the non-class party * E.g., multiple claims to a limited fund of money 2. Injunction or declaratory judgment * The class seeks and injunction or declaratory judgment because D treated the class alike * E.g., employment discrimination 3. Damages * Two requirements: 1. _Common questions **predominate**_ over individual question, AND 2. _Class action is the superior method_ to handle the dispute * E.g., mass tort case

Question 211

What must a court do if it certifies the class action? What additional step is required in a damages class action?

Answer 211

``` # 1. Define the class and the class claims, issues, and defenses 2. Appoint class counsel ``` In a damages class action, the court must notify all reasonably identifiable class members that they are in a class and tell them: * They can opt out * They will be bound by the judgment if they don't opt out * They can enter a separate appearance through counsel

Question 212

Who is bound by the judgment in a class action

Answer 212

All members, except for members who opt out of the class in a damages class action

Question 213

Can the parties settle or dismiss a class action?

Answer 213

Only with court approval

Question 214

In a diversity of citizenship class action, who is considered for purposes of citizenship? Who is considered for purposes of the amount in controversy requirement?

Answer 214

Only the _representative_ is considered for citizenship. Only the _representative_ is considered for amount in controversy. _Exception_: the _Class Action Fairness Act_ grants subject matter jurisdiction if: * _Any class member_ (not just the representative) is of diverse citizenship of _any defendant_, and * The _aggregated claims_ of the class _exceed $5M_

Question 215

What is the basic idea behind preliminary injunctive relief?

Answer 215

P is planning to file suit or has sued, and is worried that D may do (or fail to do) something that will prejudice P's case. The court is nervous about this because the merits of the case have not been decided E.g., a court enjoins employee D from using trade secrets obtained from employer P pending resolution of a case between them

Question 216

What can a party do in the meantime while he waits to get a preliminary injunction?

Answer 216

Seek a _temporary restraining order (TRO)_

Question 217

What is it called whenever a court does something without giving notice to the other party?

Answer 217

Ex parte

Question 218

Can the court issue a TRO ex parte?

Answer 218

Yes, but _only if_: 1. The applicant files a paper _under oath_ clearly showing that if the TRO is not issued, he will **_suffer immediate and irreparable harm_** if he must wait until the other party is heard, and 2. The applicant's lawyer _certifies in writing_ his efforts to give oral or written notice to D or D's lawyer (or why such notice should not be required under the circumstances)

Question 219

What does a TRO applicant have to do if the court issues a TRO?

Answer 219

Post a bond (security) to cover the other side's costs and damages caused if it turns out the restraint is wrongful

Question 220

What does a TRO have to include?

Answer 220

It must state: * Its _terms_ in specificity * In detail _what D must do or refrain from doing_ * _Why_ it was issued * Why the threatened injury to P was _irreparable_

Question 221

If the court issues a TRO, what does the court have to do?

Answer 221

_Serve_ the order on D as soon as possible

Question 222

If the court issues a TRO, what can D do?

Answer 222

Move to _dissolve or modify_ the TRO

Question 223

How long is a TRO effective?

Answer 223

_14 days_ (or lesser time state by court) If applicant shows good cause before expiration, it can be _extended for another 14 days_ So a TRO cannot extend beyond _28 days_

Question 224

What is the purpose of a preliminary injunction

Answer 224

_Maintain the status quo_ until the court can adjudiicate the underlying claim on the merits

Question 225

Can a prelminary injunction be granted ex parte?

Answer 225

Never

Question 226

What does an applicant have to show to get a preliminary injunction?

Answer 226

1. He is likely to suffer _irreparable harm_ if the injunction is not issued 2. He is likely to _win on the merits_ of the underlying case 3. The _balance of hardship_ favors him (i.e., threatened harm to applicant outweighs harm to other party if injunction is issued) 4. The injunction is in the _public interest_

Question 227

What does a preliminary injunction applicant have to do if the court issues a preliminary injunction?

Answer 227

The applicant must post a bond, just as with a TRO

Question 228

What does a preliminary injunction have to include?

Answer 228

It must state: * Its terms in specificity * In detail what D must do or refrain from doing * Why it was issued * Why the threatened injury to P was irreparable

Question 229

Can a party appeal a preliminary injunction?

Answer 229

Yes. Immediately.

Question 230

What should a plaintiff do if he wants to withdraw his case?

Answer 230

If D has not served an answer or motion for summary judgement: * P has a _right_ to make a voluntary dismissal by _filing_ (not a motion) a _notice of dismissal_ Otherwise, P can: * Make a _motion_ for a _voluntary dismissal_. * This can be done _anytime_.

Question 231

What happens if P files a timely notice of dismissal?

Answer 231

The case is dismissed _without prejudice_ (i.e., P may re-file the case), but _only once_

Question 232

What happens if P files a timely notice of dismissal in the second case?

Answer 232

The case is dismissed _with prejudice_ (i.e., P cannot refile the case)

Question 233

What will happen if D does not respond to the complaint in time?

Answer 233

* The court will enter _default_ (if P moves for it) and * Enter a _default judgment_ (if requirements are met or P applies to a judge for it)

Question 234

What is default?

Answer 234

A _notation_ by the court clerk on the docket sheet of the case

Question 235

Does the court enter default _automatically_ on the 22nd day after service of process on D?

Answer 235

No. P must move for it. It is not automatic but it is easy to get

Question 236

What does P have to show to get the court clerk to enter default?

Answer 236

That D failed to respond in time. Until default is entered, D can respond by motion or answer (even beyond 21 days)

Question 237

What is the effect of entry of default?

Answer 237

It cuts off D's right to respond

Question 238

Does entry of default entitle P to recover?

Answer 238

No. In order to recover P must get a default judgment.

Question 239

How does P get a default judgment?

Answer 239

* First, the court must enter default * Then, the _clerk_ of court can enter judgment if: * D made _no response at all_ * The claim itself is for a _sum certain in money_ * Claimant gives an _affidavit_ (sworn statement) * D is not a _minor or incompetent_ * Otherwise, D must apply to the _court_ (i.e., a judge) to get a default judgment * The judge will hold a hearing and has discretion * D only gets notice of this hearing if he appeared in the case

Question 240

P sues D for $100K. What is the most she can recover on a default judgment?

Answer 240

$100K. You cannot get more than you pleaded.

Question 241

P sued D for damages, but not an injunction. On default judgment, can the court enter an injunction?

Answer 241

No. You cannot get a different kind of relief than you pleaded.

Question 242

If a case goes to trial, can P recover more (or a different type of relief) than she pleaded in her complaint?

Answer 242

Yes. Unlike with a default judgment, P is not restricted by her pleadings.

Question 243

Is there anything that D can do if the court enters default or a default judgment?

Answer 243

Yes. D can move to have the court set aside the default or default judgment by showing: * _Good cause_ (e.g., excusable neglect) * A _viable defense_ in the case

Question 244

What FRCP is the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim?

Answer 244

FRCP 12(b)(6)

Question 245

What is FRCP 12(b)(6)

Answer 245

Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim

Question 246

In ruling on a FRCP 12(b)(6) motion, what does the court consider?

Answer 246

Only P's _allegations of fact_ in the complaint, asking: * If these facts were true, would P win a judgment? The court ignores P's _legal conclusions_

Question 247

If the law does not recognize a claim based on the facts in P's complaint, what will the court do?

Answer 247

* Grant D's FRCP 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss * Let P amend his complaint to try to state a claim * This is common

Question 248

What is the name for a FRCP 12(b)(6) motion that is made after D has answered the complaint?

Answer 248

Motion for judgment on the pleadings

Question 249

What is FRCP 56?

Answer 249

Motion for summary judgment

Question 250

What FRCP is motion for summary judgment?

Answer 250

FRCP 56

Question 251

Can the judge look at evidence when deciding an FRCP 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim?

Answer 251

No. The judge can only look at the face of the complaint.

Question 252

What does the party moving for summary judgment have to show?

Answer 252

1. There is **_no genuine dispute of material fact_**, and 2. The party is entitled to _judgment as a matter of law_

Question 253

If the party moving for summary judgment satisfies the requirements, does the court have to grant summary judgment?

Answer 253

No. It is discretionary.

Question 254

Who can move for summary judgment and when can they do so?

Answer 254

Any party can move for this _no later_ than _30 days_ after the close of _discovery_.

Question 255

What evidence can the court look at when deciding a summary judgment motion?

Answer 255

* Affidavits * Declarations * Deposition testimony * Interrogatory answers All of these items are under oath

Question 256

When are the following motions made? * FRCP 12(b)(6) * FRCP 56 * FRCP 50

Answer 256

* FRCP 12(b)(6) * Before discovery * FRCP 56 * After discovery, but before trial * FRCP 50 * During or after trial

Question 257

Can P rely on his complaint to defeat a motion for summary judgment?

Answer 257

Not unless: * The complaint is verified (rare) * D failed to deny an allegation in the complaint, so it is treated as a fact A motion for summary judgment is decided based on the evidence. _Pleadings are not evidence_, unless: * They are verified (i.e., under oath)

Question 258

Can an affidavit explaining what someone heard be used to defeat a motion for summary judgment?

Answer 258

Probably not. This is hearsay and the evidence used to defeat the motion must be first-hand knowledge. It may work if the affidavit is admissible hearsay.

Question 259

What is a scheduling order?

Answer 259

An order that the court enters after the FRCP 26(f) conference that schedules cut-offs for: * Joinder * Amendment * Motions * Completion of discovery This is a roadmap for how the litigation proceeds up to trial

Question 260

What is a pretrial conference?

Answer 260

A conference that determines: * The _issues_ to be tried * The _evidence_ to be proferred at trial

Question 261

Why is the pretrial order an important document?

Answer 261

It supersedes the pleadings It is a roadmap of: * Issues to be tried * Evidence to be presented * Witnesses

Question 262

What is a motion in limine?

Answer 262

A motion during which the judge decides whether the jury should hear certain evidence

Question 263

When is there a right to a civil jury trial in federal court? What provides it?

Answer 263

The Seventh Amendment provides the right to a jury trial in _civil actions at law_ but not suits in equity If a case involves _both law and equity_, the jury _first_ decides the facts underlying the legal claim and the judge determines the equity claim

Question 264

Does the Seventh Amendment apply in state court?

Answer 264

No. The Seventh Amendment is not incorporated

Question 265

In order to get a civil jury trial, what does a party have to do?

Answer 265

The party must demand a civil jury trial _in writing_ no later than _14 days_ after _service_ of the last pleading raising a jury triable issue Otherwise, they waive the right to a jury

Question 266

What are the two kinds of challenges to jurors?

Answer 266

1. For cause * E.g., the potential juror will not be impartial 2. Peremptory * No reason necessary

Question 267

How many "for cause" strikes can a party make? How many "peremptory" strikes can a party make?

Answer 267

For cause - unlimited Peremptory - 3 per side

Question 268

What are the limits on peremptory strikes?

Answer 268

They can only be used in a _race and gender neutral manner_ This is because jury selection is state action

Question 269

How many jurors are on a civil jury in federal court?

Answer 269

Minimum - 6 Maximum - 12

Question 270

What jury vote is required for a verdict?

Answer 270

Unanimous unless the parties agree otherwise

Question 271

Can the parties influence the jury instructions? If so, when?

Answer 271

Yes. The parties submit _proposed jury instructions_ to the judge at the close of evidence or earlier. The parties can make _specific objections_ to the instructions and to the rejection of proposed instructions _before the final argument and instruction_.

Question 272

When can a party raise the jury instructions on appeal?

Answer 272

A party can raise a problem with the instructions on appeal as long as: * An _objection_ was made before the jury was "charged", or * The instruction contained _plain error_ that affects _substantial rights_

Question 273

What are the different types of verdicts?

Answer 273

* General * Says who wins, and if P wins, what the relief is * The _clerk_ then enters judgment on the general verdict * Special * Includes answers to specific questions about facts in dispute * The _judge_ then reaches legal conclusions based on the facts founds * General with special interrogatories * Jury gives a general verdict but also asks _specific questions_ designed to ensure that it considers the important issues

Question 274

What happens if the jury returns a general verdict with special interrogatories but the answers to the interrogatories are inconsistent with the verdict?

Answer 274

No judgment can be reached The court can: * Instruct the jury to _reconsider_ its answers, or * Order a _new trial_

Question 275

What happens if there is juror misconduct?

Answer 275

The judge can: * _Set aside_ the verdict, or * Order a _new trial_

Question 276

What does it mean for the judge to "impeach" a verdict and when can that be done?

Answer 276

It means the judge sets aside the verdict or orders a new trial. A verdict may be impeached based only on "external" matters

Question 277

Can a new trial be ordered on the basis of a juror's testimony that another juror was _on drugs during deliberations_ or l_ied during jury selection_ to hide bias?

Answer 277

No these are intrinsic matters that cannot be considered A judge can only impeach a verdict based on extrinsic matters

Question 278

Can a judge refuse to impeach a verdict even if juror misconduct was external?

Answer 278

Yes, if the misconduct was _harmless_ E.g., juror chatted for a momen with P about the weather

Question 279

When there is no jury, who determines the facts?

Answer 279

The judge

Question 280

What does the judge specifically have to do in a bench trial?

Answer 280

* Record her _findings of fact_ on the record or in writing * Record her _conclusions of law_ separately from the findings of fact * Record the _judgment_

Question 281

What is a motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL)?

Answer 281

FRCP 50 This used to be referred to as a _directed verdict_ This is a motion requesting that the case _not go to the jury_ because: * Based on the evidence _presented at trial_, * _Reasonable people could not disagree on the result_ E.g., even though the evidence from discovery indicated a genuine dispute of material fact (and thus a motion for summary judgment would not have been granted), there was no evidence presented at trial to suggest such a dispute _Note_: just as with FRCP 12(b)(6) and 56, the court views the evidence _in the light most favorable to the non-moving party_

Question 282

What is a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (RJMOL)?

Answer 282

This used to be referred to as _judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)_ It is the same as JMOL except it comes up _after trial_ E.g., the jury reached a conclusion that reasonable people could not have reached

Question 283

What are the prerequisites to brining a RJMOL?

Answer 283

1. It must be within _28 days_ after entry of _judgment_ 2. The moving party must have _moved for JMOL_ at a proper time at trial

Question 284

What is a motion for a new trial? What are its prerequisites? What are examples?

Answer 284

A motion after judgment asking for a new trial due to some _non-harmless error_ at trial This motion must be made within _28 days after judgment_ Examples: * Judge gave an _erroneous jury instruction_ * _New evidence_ that could not have been obtained before with due diligence * _Misconduct_ by juror, party, or lawyer * Judgement is _against the weight of the evidence_ (serious error of judgment) * _Inadequate or excessive_ damages

Question 285

What should a party do if they were entitled to RJMOL but waived it by not moving for JMOL properly at trial?

Answer 285

Move for a new trial

Question 286

What is less drastic: * RJMOL * New trial

Answer 286

New trial because it results in starting over so the _same party could still win_ RJMOL results in _taking the judgment away_ from one party and giving it to the other

Question 287

What is the standard for ordering a new trial based on a damages figure that is excessive or inadequate?

Answer 287

The damages figure must **_shock the conscience_**

Question 288

If the damages figure "shocks the consicence," what might the judge do to avoid a new trial, which is a lot of work?

Answer 288

* Remittitur * Playing hardball with P * P can take a _lesser amount_ of damages (set by the judge), or go through a new trial * Additur * Playing hardball with D * D can pay a _greater amount_ of damages (set by the judge), or go through a new trial

Question 289

Are remittitur and additur allowed in both state and federal court?

Answer 289

Remittitur - yes Additur - no (only state court) SCOTUS has determined that additur violates the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. Remittitur does not because the jury verdict is still being accepted; additional damages are just being tacked onto it

Question 290

What is a motion for relief from order or judgment? What are the grounds for this motion? When does the motion have to be made?

Answer 290

A motion asking the court to set aside an order or judgment it entered Grounds and Timing * Clerical _error_ * Anytime * _Mistake_ or excusable neglect - e.g., default * Reasonable time (never more than 1 year * _New evidence_ that could not have been discovered with due diligence _in time to move for a new trial_ * Reasonable time (never more than 1 year) * Judgment is _void_ - e.g., no SMJ * Reasonable time (no maximum)

Question 291

What is the final judgment rule?

Answer 291

As a general rule, you can only appeal from _final judgments_ A final judgment is an _ultimate decision_ by the trial court _on the merits of the case_ To determine if a ruling is a final judgment, ask: * Does the trial court have anything left to do on the merits of the case?

Question 292

Is the denial of a motion for summary judgment a final judgment?

Answer 292

No. After denying (not granting) summary judgment, the trial court still has the entire case before it

Question 293

What does a party do if it wants to appeal?

Answer 293

File _notice of appeal_ with the **TRIAL COURT** within _30 days after entry of final judgment_

Question 294

Is the grant of a motion to remand to state court a final judgment?

Answer 294

Generally not. This is by statute.

Question 295

Can a party appeal even if there is not a final judgment?

Answer 295

Maybe. This would be interlocutory review

Question 296

When is a party entitled to interlocutory review _as a matter of right_?

Answer 296

When the appeal is based on orders granting, modifying, or refusing _preliminary or permanent injunctions_

Question 297

What does the Interlocutory Appeals Act say?

Answer 297

It allows appeal of a non-final order if: * The trial judge certifies that the order involves a _controlling issue of **law**_ * As to which there is substantial ground for _difference of opinion_, and * The court of appeals _agrees to hear_ it

Question 298

What is the "collateral order" exception?

Answer 298

An appellate court has _discretion_ to hear an issue if it: * Is _distinct from the merits_ of the case * Involves an _important legal question_, and * Is essentially _unreviewable_ if the parties must await a final judgment E.g., party claims it is an arm of the state and is immune from litigation, but the trial court rejects this argument and demands litigation - the party can appeal this as a collateral order

Question 299

What if a case involves multiple claims or multiple parties, and the court rules on one claim but not the others - is this a final judgment and thus appealable?

Answer 299

No because other claims are still pending. _BUT_ the court can _expressly direct entry of a final judgment_ on the particular claim it decided and allow appeal if: * It makes an _express finding_ that there is _no just reason for delay_

Question 300

When can a court of appeals hear an order granting or denying certification of a class action?

Answer 300

The court of appeals has _discretion_ to do so if: * The moving party seeks review _within 14 days of the order_ _Note_: the appeal does not stay the trial court proceedings unless the court of appeals or district court says so

Question 301

What is an extraordinary writ?

Answer 301

Also referred to as a _mandamus_ or _prohibition_ An original proceeding in appellate court to _compel the trial judge_ to _make or vacate a particular order_ Only available if the lower court _clearly violates a legal duty_

Question 302

What is the standard of review on appeal when the district court decides questions of law?

Answer 302

De novo - i.e., there is no deference to the trial judge E.g., trial judge put the burden of proof on the wrong side

Question 303

What is the standard of review on appeal in a non-jury trial for which the judge decided questions of fact?

Answer 303

The court of appeals will affirm the judge's findings of fact unless they are _clearly erroneous_ Due regard must be given to the trial judge's opportunity to assess the _credibility_ of witnesses at trial

Question 304

What is the standard of review on appeal in a jury trial for which the jury decided questions of fact?

Answer 304

The court of appeals with affirm the jury's findings of fact unless _reasonable people could not have made that finding_

Question 305

What is the standard of review on appeal for discretionary matters (e.g., whether the trial court granted a motion to amend pleadings, to allow permissive intervention, etc.)?

Answer 305

The court of appeals with affirm the judge's decision unless he _abused his discretion_ This is _very deferential_

Question 306

What is the standard of review on appeal for: * The _content_ of jury instructions? * The judge's _decision to give_ a particular jury instruction?

Answer 306

* The content of jury instructions * De novo - this is a question of law * The judge's decision to give a particular jury instruction * Abuse of discretion - this is discretionary

Question 307

On appeal, reversal is not required for an error (even an error of law) if ...

Answer 307

The error is harmless

Question 308

If Case 1 and Case 2 are in different judicial systems (e.g., state and federal), what preclusion law does the court apply in Case 2?

Answer 308

The preclusion law of _the judicial system that decided Case 1_

Question 309

Case 1 is litigated in federal court in Kentucky. Case 2 is litigated in state court in Arkansas. What preclusion law does the state judge in Case 2 use to determine whether there is claim or issue preclusion?

Answer 309

Federal law because Case 1 was decided by the federal system. _Note_: federal common law governs preclusion in federal courts

Question 310

What is claim preclusion? What are its requirements?

Answer 310

Also known as _res judicata_ You only get to sue on a claim once - i.e., you only get one case in which to vindicate all rights to relief for that claim Requirements: 1. Case 1 and Case 2 were brought by the _same claimant against the same defendant_ (i.e., same configuration) 2. Case 1 ended in a _valid final judgment on the merits_ 3. Case 1 and case 2 asserted the _same "claim"_

Question 311

A and B are involved in a car collision. In Case 1, A sues B and the case goes to final judgment. In Case 2, B sues A to recover for his injuries from the same crash. What is the result in Case 2?

Answer 311

Claim preclusion does not apply becuase it does not involve the _same claimant against the same defendant_ However, Case 2 is probably dismissed becuase B's claim is a compulsory counterclaim

Question 312

What is the general rule to determine whether a case ended in a final judgment on the merits?

Answer 312

When the court entered judgement, that judgment is on the merits unless: * The court said otherwise, or * The judgment was based on: * Jurisdiction * Venue * Indispensible parties

Question 313

How do you determine whether two cases asserted the same "claim"?

Answer 313

Majority view (including federal law) * A claim is any right to relief arising from the _same transaction or occurence_ Minority view * There are separate claims for _property damage and personal injuries_ because those are different _primary rights_

Question 314

How do you determine whether two cases involve the same claims when one is a property damage case and the second is a personal injury case that P did not know about when he brought the earlier case?

Answer 314

Some courts say the claims are the same, other courts say they are different. There is not even a majority/minority view on this

Question 315

What is issue preclusion? What are its requirements?

Answer 315

Also referred to as _collateral estoppel_ You cannot sue on an _issue_ that was _already litigated and determined_ Requirements: * Case 1 ended in a _valid final judgment on the merits_ * The _same issue_ was actually _litigated_ and determined in Case 1 * The issue was _essential to the judgment_ in Case 1 (i.e., the finding on this issue was the basis for judgment)

Question 316

Against whom can issue preclusion be asserted?

Answer 316

Only against somebody who was _a party to Case 1_ (or represented by a party to Case 1 - e.g., class action)

Question 317

By whom can issue preclusion be asserted?

Answer 317

* _Always_ somebody who was _a party to Case 1_ (or represented by a party to Case 1 - e.g., class action) * _Sometimes_ somebody who was _not a party to Case 1_

Question 318

When can somebody who was not a party to Case 1 assert issue preclusion?

Answer 318

Nonmutual _defensive_ issue preclusion: * Only if the party asserting issue preclusion: * Was _not a party to Case 1 and is a D_ in Case 2, and * Had a _full chance to litigate_ in Case 1 Nonmutual _offensive_ issue preclusion: * Only if it is not _unfair_ based on whether: * D had a _full chance to litigate_ in Case 1 * D had an _incentive to litigate strongly_ in Case 1 * The party asserting issue preclusion _could have joined easily_ in Case 1 (i.e., if so, they should have) * There are _no inconsistent findings_ on the issue * E.g., if there were multiple cases involving the issue and they came out differently