Problem 7: Domestic violence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the lifetime and yearly prevalence of female victimization in IPV?

A

Lifetime prevalence: Up to 48%.

Yearly prevalence: 7% to 34.9%.

Minority groups, especially Latino women, have a higher prevalence (53.6%).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the consequences of IPV for women and children?

A

Women face a threefold increased risk of developing major depressive disorders.

Children exposed to IPV have a higher risk of emotional, psychological, and behavioral problems (r = .25 effect size).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the recidivism rates for domestic violence among male abusers?

A

Domestic violence recidivism rates range from 16% to 80%, highlighting the need for effective interventions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are common risk factors for IPV identified in surveys?

A

Early dating (before age 14)

Dating aggression

Parental violence

Substance abuse

Prior criminal history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What role does alcohol play in IPV risk?

A

Eightfold increase in partner assault likelihood on drinking days.

Probability of severe aggression rises elevenfold.

Risks are heightened in men with antisocial personality disorder (APP).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the “abusive personality” as per Dutton (2008).

A

Marked by:
* Fear of abandonment
* Quick anger
* Use of violence to maintain control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are patriarchal beliefs’ roles in IPV?

A

Linked to negative attitudes toward women and minimizing IPV seriousness.

Social learning theory highlights association with abusive peers as predictors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the SARA tool used for?

A

The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) is a 20-item tool that assesses:
* Criminal history
* Psychosocial adjustment
* Spousal assault history
* Includes clinical diagnoses, used by trained clinicians.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ODARA tool, and how is it different from SARA?

A

The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA):
* 13-item scale focused on historical and dynamic risk factors (e.g., violence during pregnancy).
* Designed for police use, not clinical settings.
* AUC predictive validity: .65 to .67.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of mandatory arrest policies in IPV cases?

A

Strengths: Lower re-abuse rates (13%) compared to removal (26%) or advice (18%).

Weaknesses:
* Mixed results in later studies.
* Over 50% of charges dropped.
* No-drop prosecution policies led to court backlogs and victim dissatisfaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the limitations of punishment-focused approaches to IPV?

A

Punishment provides temporary relief but fails to lead to long-term behavior change.

Specialized courts and probation have not increased victim safety.

These approaches neglect criminogenic needs of batterers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the outcomes of treatment for male batterers, as shown in evaluations?

A

Early studies (Dutton, 1986):
* Re-abuse rates 4% (treated) vs. 16% (untreated) after 6 months.
* Benefits sustained at 2.5 years.

Later studies: Mixed results, with meta-analyses showing small reductions (r = .09) or no significant effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the three responses to domestic violence?

A

-Arrest the suspect

Removal of the offender for 8 hours

Advising the parties to seek help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the origin of the term “battered women,” and how did it shape IPV research?

A

Coined in the 1970s to describe victims of severe abuse.

IPV was framed as male-perpetrated violence against women, based on shelter, hospital, and police data.

Advocates emphasized domestic violence as a critical social issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the four main types of IPV?

A
  1. Coercive Controlling Violence (CCV): Chronic violence aimed at maintaining control.
  2. Violent Resistance: Defensive violence by victims against abusers.
  3. Situational Couple Violence (SCV): Violence from situational conflict, not control.
  4. Separation-Instigated Violence (SIV): Violence during or after separation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Coercive Controlling Violence (CCV)?

A

A pattern of physical violence, intimidation, and emotional abuse to exert control.

Often associated with male-perpetrated violence but not exclusively.

Linked to patriarchal structures; represented by tools like the Power and Control Wheel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How does Situational Couple Violence (SCV) differ from other IPV types?

A

Arises from situational conflict, not rooted in power dynamics.

Typically gender-symmetric.

Found more frequently in community and national surveys than in shelter or court samples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is Violent Resistance, and how is it classified?

A

Defensive violence by victims against abusive partners.

Relevant for all genders, previously labeled as Self-Defense.

Often misunderstood or overlooked in traditional IPV studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why is differentiation among IPV types important?

A

Enables better screening tools and decision-making in family courts.

Ensures appropriate sanctions and treatment programs for specific IPV contexts.

Promotes healthy parent–child contact and reduces gender-based conflicts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does the Power and Control Wheel represent?

A

A tool to illustrate the tactics used in Coercive Controlling Violence (CCV).

Emphasizes patterns of control beyond physical abuse, including emotional, financial, and psychological abuse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the main tools used to measure IPV?

A
  1. Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS): Quantifies acts of violence but lacks differentiation.
  2. Power and Control Wheel: Focuses on patterns of control and abuse, particularly in CCV.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What characterizes Coercive Controlling Violence (CCV)?

A

Pattern of power and control through tactics like:
* Intimidation, emotional abuse, isolation, coercion, economic abuse, threats.
* Often depicted in the Power and Control Wheel.
* Can exist without physical violence, described as a “liberty crime” (Stark, 2007).
* Predominantly male-perpetrated but can occur across genders and relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the psychological and physical impacts of CCV?

A

Psychological impacts:
- Fear, anxiety, depression, PTSD (twice as likely compared to other IPV).

Physical impacts:
- 76% involve escalating violence, 88% of victims report injuries.
- Increased risks of sexual abuse, gynecological issues, and STDs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is Violent Resistance, and how does it differ from self-defense?

A

Violence used in response to Coercive Controlling Violence.

Broader than legal self-defense; includes various reactions to harm or threats.

Women who resist are twice as likely to sustain injuries compared to those who do not resist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is Situational Couple Violence (SCV)?

A

Most common form of IPV, arising from conflicts or poor anger management.

Typically minor physical acts (e.g., shoving) without control dynamics.

Gender-symmetric: Both men and women initiate violence equally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How does SCV differ from CCV in its impacts and resolution?

A

SCV: Less frequent/severe, arises from situational conflicts, often ceases after separation.

CCV: Frequent, severe, escalates over time, continues post-separation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What defines Separation-Instigated Violence (SIV)?

A

Violence occurring during/after separation, often from severe emotional reactions.

No prior history of IPV or control dynamics.

Typically isolated incidents, often triggered by betrayal, infidelity, or humiliation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What distinguishes SIV perpetrators from those in CCV?

A

SIV perpetrators are often embarrassed or ashamed of their actions.

They may have been caring parents or partners before separation.

Unlike CCV, violence in SIV does not typically involve long-term control or intimidation.

29
Q

How prevalent is Separation-Instigated Violence?

A

21% of high-conflict custody-disputing parents report SIV (Johnston & Campbell, 1993).

14% of violent incidents start after separation (Statistics Canada, 2001).

30
Q

Why is differentiating IPV types important in family courts?

A

Ensures tailored interventions and appropriate custody decisions.

Distinguishes isolated SIV incidents from the chronic danger of CCV.

Helps mitigate fear and fosters healthier post-separation relationships.

31
Q

What are key psychological outcomes for victims of CCV compared to SCV?

A

CCV victims: Higher rates of depression, PTSD, and anxiety.

SCV victims: Fewer mental health impacts but still experience depression and suicidal ideation in high-violence cases.

32
Q

What is the prevalence of IPV in custody disputes?

A

California Family Court study: IPV reported in 76% of cases entering custody mediation.

Australian disputes: IPV allegations in 48–79% of cases, with 50–60% considered serious.

33
Q

What are common types of IPV in custody disputes?

A

Coercive Controlling Violence (CCV): Severe, ongoing abuse with control dynamics.

Situational Couple Violence (SCV): Violence from situational conflict, not control.

Separation-Instigated Violence (SIV): Temporary violence triggered by separation.

34
Q

How does IPV affect children’s adjustment?

A

Behavioral issues: Aggression, delinquency, truancy.

Emotional impacts: Depression, anxiety, PTSD.

Interpersonal problems: Poor social skills, peer rejection, conflict with authority.

More severe outcomes with exposure to CCV.

35
Q

What are key differences in IPV types affecting children?

A

CCV: Most severe effects, including depression and PTSD.

SCV: Fewer adverse effects, though high violence levels still harm children.

SIV: Least severe impacts, comparable to nonviolent families.

36
Q

How do program completion and reoffense rates vary by IPV type?

A

SCV offenders: 77% completion, 21% re-abuse rate.

CCV offenders: Low completion (9–38%) and high reoffense rates (42–44%).

37
Q

What are effective interventions for different IPV types?

A

Feminist Psycho-Educational Programs: Target CCV offenders, address control dynamics.

Cognitive Behavioral Groups: Focus on SCV offenders, teach anger management and conflict resolution.

Support Groups for Violent Resistance: Assist women engaging in defensive violence.

38
Q

What safety measures are crucial for IPV mediation?

A

Separate sessions and staggered arrival/departures.

Use of support persons and protection orders.

Mediators trained to differentiate IPV types.

39
Q

What should custody assessments prioritize in IPV cases?

A

Gender-neutral evaluations: Investigate violence allegations from both parents.

Multiple hypotheses: Avoid assumptions; explore all explanations.

Types of IPV: Differentiate violence types for effective parenting plans.

40
Q

How does Coercive Controlling Violence (CCV) impact custody decisions?

A

The abusive parent is the primary risk.

Non-abusive, violent-resistant parents may need safe custody arrangements and support to restore positive parenting.

41
Q

How should Situational Couple Violence (SCV) or Separation-Instigated Violence (SIV) be handled in custody cases?

A

Mild or singular incidents may pose less risk.

Chronic or severe SCV requires analysis of escalation patterns and parental aggression tendencies.

42
Q

What framework can family courts use to assess IPV in custody cases?

A

Potency, Pattern, and Primary Perpetrator Framework (Jaffe et al., 2008):
* Potency: Severity of violence.
* Pattern: Type of IPV.
* Primary perpetrator: Identify the abusive party.

43
Q

What are the main custody outcomes in IPV cases?

A
  1. Co-parenting: Joint custody with cooperation.
  2. Parallel parenting: Minimized contact to reduce conflict.
  3. Supervised exchanges: Safe transfers between parents.
  4. Supervised access: Temporary monitored visits for a potentially dangerous parent.
  5. Prohibited contact: No contact for severely abusive parents.
44
Q

What is the definition of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)?

A

IPV refers to physical, sexual, or psychological abuse within an intimate relationship (Miller & McCaw, 2019).

45
Q

What demographic is most affected by IPV?

A

Women in heterosexual relationships represent the majority of IPV victims, though men and other demographics are also affected (Miller & McCaw, 2019).

46
Q

How did the Covid-19 pandemic impact IPV risk factors?

A

Prolonged proximity during lockdowns confined victims with perpetrators.

Increased stress due to economic crises heightened violence.

Victims faced barriers to seeking help due to restricted movement, fear of contagion, and monitored communication.

47
Q

What are pandemic-related forms of abuse?

A
  1. Threats of virus exposure.
  2. Withholding essentials like soap or sanitizer.
  3. Blaming victims for infections.
48
Q

What role does socioeconomic status play in IPV?

A

Low income and unemployment are linked to higher IPV risk.

Educational disparities in male-dominant cultures increase IPV risk for educated women challenging traditional roles.

49
Q

What are the individual factors associated with IPV risk?

A
  1. Age: Younger individuals face higher risk.
  2. Ethnicity: Minority groups experience higher IPV rates due to marginalization.
  3. Childhood exposure: Experiencing violence as a child is a strong predictor of future IPV.
  4. Psychopathology: Perpetrators often have personality disorders or substance abuse issues.
50
Q

What are the barriers for victims seeking help during the pandemic?

A

Fear of contracting the virus.

Limited access to shelters and health care.

Monitored communications by perpetrators.

51
Q

How can health care professionals support IPV victims during telemedicine sessions?

A
  1. Ensure privacy with questions like “Is it safe to talk?”
  2. Show nonjudgmental support by validating victims’ feelings and needs.
  3. Refer to resources like hotlines and shelters.
52
Q

What are the community and societal factors influencing IPV?

A
  1. Poverty and disorganized neighborhoods increase IPV prevalence.
  2. Gender inequality correlates with higher IPV rates.
  3. Strong community ties and resources reduce IPV risks.
53
Q

What strategies can governments implement to address IPV during emergencies?

A

Integrate IPV protection into emergency contingency plans.

Strengthen social services and shelter systems.

Provide training for health care professionals to identify and support victims.

54
Q

What factors contribute to economic abuse during the pandemic?

A

Perpetrators exploit financial constraints to deny victims resources.

Women bear additional caregiving burdens, limiting economic opportunities.

55
Q

What are the IPV rates among bisexual individuals compared to heterosexuals?

A

Bisexual women: 61.1% (higher than heterosexual women: 35%).

Bisexual men: 37.3% (higher than heterosexual men: 29%).

56
Q

How does IPV prevalence compare among transgender individuals?

A

Transgender individuals report significantly higher IPV rates.

Massachusetts study: 34.6% of transgender individuals experienced physical abuse compared to 13.6% of non-transgender persons.

Transgender students are 9 times more likely to report sexual IPV compared to cisgender men.

57
Q

What unique IPV perpetration tactics are used in LGBT relationships?

A
  1. Closeting: Forcing concealment of sexual/gender identity.
  2. Outing threats: Using identity disclosure as leverage.
  3. Withholding necessities: Denying medication or medical funds.
  4. Sexual orientation invalidation: Forcing conformity to a specific identity.
58
Q

How do IPV rates among LGBT college students compare to cisgender heterosexual peers?

A

LGBT students are more likely to report:
* Emotional IPV (AOR = 1.34–1.99).
* Physical IPV (AOR = 1.58–2.93).
* Sexual IPV (AOR = 1.41–6.18).
* Bisexual and transgender students face the highest odds of IPV.

59
Q

What are the health outcomes associated with IPV among LGBT individuals?

A
  1. Physical injuries.
  2. Mental health issues: Depression, anxiety, PTSD, and substance abuse.
  3. Increased suicidal ideation and attempts.
  4. Elevated risk of obesity and social isolation.
60
Q

Why might bisexual individuals experience higher IPV rates?

A

Same-sex partners may use IPV to regain power (minority stress).

Opposite-sex partners may react with homophobia or misunderstand their sexual orientation.

61
Q

What theoretical frameworks explain IPV in LGBT relationships?

A
  1. Social-Ecological Theory: Considers individual, relational, community, and societal factors.
  2. Disempowerment Theory: Marginalized individuals assert control through IPV.
  3. Intersectionality Framework: Explores how overlapping identities influence IPV risk.
62
Q

What role does jealousy play in LGBT IPV?

A

Jealousy arises from societal perceptions of same-sex relationships as more sexual and less permanent, leading to controlling behaviors.

63
Q

What are the Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) for experiencing sexual IPV among bisexual and transgender students?

A

Bisexual students: AOR = 2.56.

Transgender students: AOR = 6.18.

64
Q

How does IPV prevalence differ by racial/ethnic groups?

A

Emotional IPV: Highest among “Other” racial identity (11.45%).

Physical IPV: Highest among Black participants (3.40%).

Sexual IPV: Highest among “Other” racial identity (2.26%).

65
Q

What are the primary risk factors for IPV among LGBT students?

A
  1. Sexual orientation: Bisexual and questioning individuals are most vulnerable.
  2. Gender identity: Transgender students report significantly higher IPV rates.
  3. Race/ethnicity: “Other” racial identity shows the highest overall risk.
66
Q

What intersectional identity had the highest odds of emotional IPV?

A

Black transgender students, with 6 times greater odds compared to cisgender, White participants.

67
Q

What theoretical framework explains the disproportionate IPV rates among LGBT students?

A
  1. Minority Stress Theory: Marginalization exacerbates IPV dynamics.
  2. Intersectionality: Multiple marginalized identities compound IPV risks.
  3. Social Acceptance Issues: Homophobia or biphobia may drive IPV against bisexual/questioning individuals.
68
Q

How do IPV risks differ between sexual orientations?

A

Bisexual students: Most at risk across all IPV types.

Questioning students: Higher risks for physical and sexual IPV.

Gay/lesbian students: Elevated but lower than bisexual/questioning students.