Problem 7 Flashcards

1
Q

Universal affirmative (A)

A

Every, all

–> Affirmo (“I affirm”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Particular affirmative (I)

A

Some

–> affIrmo (“I affirm”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Universal negative (E)

A

None

–> nEgo (“I deny”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Particular negative (O)

A

Some.. not

–> negO (“I deny”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Logical square

A

Refers to a diagram that incorporates 4 possible kinds of proposition with the same subject + predicate

–> universal proposition indicates whether subaltern is wrong or right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Contradictory

A

Opposite truth value
–> thus A is opposite to O; E vs I

e.g.: A false = O true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contrary

A

Cannot be true at same time but can be false or different at same time

ex.: All swiss watches + no switch watches are work of arts are both false propositions if only some are.

–> A vs E

AT LEAST ONE IS FALSE (not both true)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Subcontrary

A

Cannot be false at the same time, but can be true or different at same time

ex.: Some swiss watches are work of art + some are not are both true, if part of them are work of art and some not.

–> I + O

AT LEAST ONE IS TRUE (not both false)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Subaltern

A

If UP is true, the PP is too + If PP is false then UP is too

e.g.: “Truth comes from heaven + lies come from hell”

–> A + E are the UPs and I + O are the PPs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proposition

A

Sentence that is either true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Categorical proposition

A

Refers to a proposition that relates 2 categories

e.g.: subject + predicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Quantifiers

A

Specify how much of the subject class is included to excluded from the predicate term

ex.: all, no, some

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Copula

A

Link the subject with the predicate

ex.: are, are not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Quality of the proposition

A

Can be either affirmative or negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Existential import

A

Implying that one or more things denoted by subject actually exist or don’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Aristotelian standpoint

A

UPs about existing things have existential import

–> open to existence

17
Q

Boolean standpoint

A

No UPs have existential import

–> closed to existence

18
Q

Unconditionally valid

A

Refer to arguments that are valid from the boolean standpoint, which are valid regardless of whirler the terms refer to existing things

19
Q

Existential fallacy

A

The Boolean standpoint suggests that an argument is invalid merely because the premise lacks existential import.

➔ Detecting it: A pair of diagrams in which the premise diagram contains shading and the conclusion diagram contains an X. If the X in the conclusion diagram is in the same part of the left circle that is unshaded in the premise diagram, the inference commits EXISTENTIAL FALLACY.

20
Q

Conversion

A

Switching the subject with the predicate

ex.: No foxes are hedgehogs, no hedgehogs are foxes

21
Q

Obversion

A
  1. Changing the quality w/o changing the quantity
    e. g.: No S are P to All S are P
  2. Replacing the P with its term complement
    ex. : all horses are animal –> no horses are non animals

TRUTH VALUE STAYS THE SAME

22
Q

Contraposition

A
  1. Switching subject + predicate terms
  2. Replacing subject + predicate with their complements
    ex. : ALL goats are animal –> ALL non-animals are non-goats
23
Q

Rules of thumb

A
  1. Always use CONTRADICTION FIRST

–> If one of the remaining relations yields a logically undetermined truth value, the others will as well

  1. Whenever one statement turns out to have logically undetermined truth value, its contradictory will also.

–> Statements having logically undetermined truth value will always occur in pairs, at opposite ends of diagonals on the square.

24
Q

How do you prove the traditional square of opposition ?

A
  1. If the A statement is given as True (left S circle is empty) O statement false (left S circle is red.
  2. If the O statement is given as True (left S circle is not empty) O statement false.
  3. If the O statement is given as false (left S circle is empty) A statement true
  4. If the A statement is given as false (left S circle is not empty or overlap area is empty or both)
25
Q

How do you test immediate inferences ?

A
  1. Reduce the inference to its forms and test if from the Boolean standpoint.

–> If the form is valid, proceed no further

  1. If the inference form is invalid from the Boolean standpoint and has a particular conclusion, then adopt the Aristotelian standpoint and look to see if the left hand premise circle is partly shaded

–> If it is, enter a circled X in the unshaded part of the retest form, then the information of the conclusion diagram is represented in the premise diagram. Thus, the inference form is conditionally valid from an Aristotelian standpoint.

  1. If the inference form is conditionally valid, determine if the circle X represents something that exists.

–> If it does, the condition is fulfilled, and the inference is valid from the Aristotelian standpoint.

BUT: If not, the inference is invalid and it commits the existential fallacy from the Aristotelian standpoint

26
Q

General rule of translation

A

One should understand the meaning of the given statement, then re-express it in a new statement that has

a) quantifier
b) subject
c) predicate
d) copula

27
Q

Terms without nouns

A

If a term consists of only an adjective, a plural noun or pronoun should be introduced

ex.: all tigers are carnivorous –> carnivorous animals

28
Q

Nonstandard verbs

A

The only copulas that are allowed in standard-form categorical propositions are “are” + “are not”

ex.: All ducks swim –> all ducks are swimmers

29
Q

Singular propositions

A

Refer to propositions that make an assertion about a specific

a) person
b) place
c) thing
d) time

–> Parameters are used to translate singular propositions into UPs

ex.: George went home –> all people identical to george are people who went home

30
Q

Parameter

A

Refers to a phrase that when introduced into a statement, affects the form but not the meaning

31
Q

Distributed vs Undistributed

A

1.Distributed
A = distributes the S
E = distributes S+P

  1. Undistributed
    I = distributes neither
    O = distributes the P