Problem 2: the ghost in the machine Flashcards
dualism
-mind and body are separate
-they can exist together, but possibly could also exist separately
substance dualism
-body and mind exist separately, they are different substances
interactionist substance dualism
-mind and body are separate substances but they can interact (e.g., too much alcohol in the body, the mind gets confused)
pairing problem
if the body and mind are independent, how are they paired?
property dualism
-solves the pairing problem: there is one substance that has two properties, the non-physical and the physical
physical property dualism
the mind is physical as well as the body, the mind is the relevant part of the brain, that provides interaction
parallelism
mind and body are separate but do not interact, however they do correlate.
there is a relationship, but not a causal one
Leibniz on the synchronisation in parallelism
god predetermines everything to be in sync with each other, including the mind and the body, but god does not actively intervene - it set everything up in the beginning
occasionalism
god is responsible for the synchronisation in parallelism, god actively intervenes
conservation laws
the conservation of mass and energy is a closed system, in which the total mass and energy stay the same over time. they do not interact because they are closed systems, they cannot accept energy from each other
epiphenomenalism + criticism
mental events and the mind are epiphenomena –> physical events can cause the mental, but not vice versa
(criticism: does not solve the mind body problem, because it doesn’t explain how the physical influences the mental & why this one sided relationship?)
emergentism + criticism
-physical is dominant over the mental
-the mind supervenes (oversees) the body, but they do not interact
-criticism: vague, contradictory, does not explain underlying mechanisms
physicalism
-everything is physical, therefore, the pairing problem is solved
behaviourism
the mind is behaviour, the mental is also behaviour
-hard core: there is no mind, only behaviour
-you should only observe what you can observe directly and from there deduce that the mind is
-mind is not important, focus on behaviour
absent qualia
-problem in behaviourism
-qualia are the experiences that make up our consciousness
token identity theory
type: pain
token: specific pain that you feel somewhere in your body
multiple realisability thesis
a single mental state can be realised in several different ways
functionalism + criticism
-mental state are functional states caused by the body: the body is a kind of computer
-focus should be on the function of the mind, not what it is
-criticism: absent qualia (there are no qualia)
eliminativism
-eliminates mental concepts/ideas
-there is no mind
-there are no non-physical things
idealism
-everything is mental, an illusion
phenomenalism
all knowledge can be based on sensory perceptions, but therefore it can also all be wrong
double aspect theory + criticism
-there is only one substance, but it can be seen in two opposite ways:
an extension of linear dimensions (body) or of thoughts (mind), but there is no interaction = two sides of the same coin
-criticism: not detailed enough, does not explain how the world works in practice
criticism on descartes by Ryle
category mistake: mind and body are not the same category (university example), even though descartes tries to apply his dualist view