prejudice and discrimination Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

stereotypes

A

-beliefs about typical characteristics of members of a grp/social category
-overemphasize negative attributes
-underestimate variablity within grp
->make judgment about person on indv.level: logical fallacy
use when info is ambiguous/inedequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

prejudice

A

affective response towards a grp/member

  • evaluative (- or +) often negative
  • based on prejudgment

high prejudice= more stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

discrimination

A

negative behaviour towar inds. based on grp membership

  • blatant: historical
  • subtle: jokes (increse tolerence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

positive discrimination

A

favourable assessment

  • benevolent sexism: affection for woman (inferiority to men)
  • hostile sexism: dislike women in power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

social categorisation

A

lead to stereotype and prejudice

perceive the world as social categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

problems w positive discrimination

A
  • can justify holding negative stereotypes

- prevent equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

illusory correlation

A
distinct events capture attention, two distinct events combined: stand out more 
-> paired distinctiveness
-over representation in memory 
minority stands out catches attention
=cognitive illusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hamilton (1976)

A

stereotype occur without real evidence
negative and positive stereotypes in minorities
leads to prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

biased attribution

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

dual process model of social cognition

A

automatic: unintentional, effortless, unconscious
controlled: intentional, effortful, conscious
implicit vs. explicit: stereotypes and prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Devine (1989)

dissociation model of stereotypes

A

1) knowledge about stereotype- culturally shared
2) automatic activation
3) -> does not necessarily lead to stereotypical/prejudice responding
- low prejudice: engage in controlled processes to prevent automatic stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Devine study 1

A

Ps listed knowledge of content cultural steretypes

->knowledge of stereotypes is independent of prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

devine study 2

A

measured level of rasicm
Ps were flashed words, stereotypes or neutral
read scenario ambigious hostile behaviour
Ps in stereotypes grp, rated person as hostile
->activation of stereotypes is automatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

devine study 3

A

Ps listed alternative for Black americans then listed honest thoughts (anonymously)

  • high in prejudice listed - beliefs
  • low in prejudice listed + beliefs
  • > automatic stereotypes (prejudice) can be overcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

devine study 3

A

Ps listed alternative for Black americans then listed honest thoughts (anonymously)

  • high in prejudice listed - beliefs
  • low in prejudice listed + beliefs
  • > automatic stereotypes (prejudice) can be overcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

implicit measure

A

insight in stereotypes and prejudice
automatic / uncontrolled processes
people have subtle stereotypes/prejudice they would deny having

16
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

A

competition over scarce resources -> stereotypes, prejudice, discirmination

17
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

Robbers cave study phase 1

A

formation of grp

  • camping hiking swimming playing
  • develop: norma, roles, structure (leader&followers)
  • named themselves (rattlers and eagles)
18
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

robbert cave study, phase 2

A

intergroup conflict
-‘others’ ‘those guys’ ‘they’ ‘outsiders’
-requested sport competition
-dev of negative intergrp stereotypes/attitudes
-incresed within grp solidarity
-violent acts
(eagles burned flag of rattlers)
(rattlers raided cabin of eagles)
->chnage in intergrp relations: reluctant leader replaced by bully leader

18
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

robbert cave study, phase 2

A
intergroup conflict 
-'others' 'those guys' 'they' 'outsiders'
-requested sport competition 
-dev of negative intergrp stereotypes/attitudes
-incresed within grp solidarity 
-violent acts 
(eagles burned flag of rattlers) 
(rattlers raided cabin of eagles) 
->chnage in intergrp relations:
19
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

robbers cave study results

A

ease of antagonism created between grps

  • negative intergp relations (stereotypes,prejudice,discrimination)
  • negative inertgrp attitude
  • insults confrontational acts
  • ingrp favorism & outgrp derogation
20
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

realistic grp conflict

A

compettion over limiited resources->prejudice and discrimination
eco diff increases prejudice/discrimination
strongest from grp that lose

21
Q

grp level explanation:economic perspective

ethnocentrism

A

ingrp glorified
-incresed loyalty

outgrp vilified
-more stereotype & maltreatment

22
Q

motivational perspective

A

prejudice, resulst from motivation, view one’s ingrp more favourably than outgrp

bc we derive our self from our membership in the grp
->self serving motivation

23
Q

motivational perspectiveminimal grp paradigm

A

minimal condition from group biases is being a grp member

24
Q

social identity

A

part of self concept derived from grp membership

value and emotional significance associated w group membership

25
Q

motivational perspective social identity theory

A

people strive from + grp identity and worth
people compare own grp w other grp
seek to differentiate own grp positively from other grps

26
Q

positive differentiation

A

make the grp positively different from outgrp

ingrp bias does not reflect discrimination but differentiation