Practice Test 4 - Jon & Amy Flashcards
Identify and explain four errors or inconsistencies in the information provided within the case study.
- They state they will receive their State Pension at age 65.
- Due to their ages, this will be age 67/68.
- They want tax efficiency but have savings/investments in Jon’s name as a higher rate taxpayer.
- They should be in Amy’s name as a basic rate taxpayer.
- They are low/medium risk investors but have Asia Pacific/Recovery Equity investments.
- This is a high risk investment/conflicts with attitude to risk.
- They feel they have adequate pension provision, but they are only contributing £100 per month each to their pensions.
- This premium amount is unlikely to provide the level of pension income they would require.
State the long-term protection products you would recommend for Jon and Amy for their long-term financial security. Identify the level of cover, term and how each should be structured. Provide justification for each recommendation.
Term Assurance/family income benefit (FIB)/whole of life (WOL)
• Lump sum/income.
• Term or FIB cost effective/cheaper solution than WOL/WOL guaranteed insurability for life.
• Joint life first death/two single lives.
• At least £250,000/£50,000 per annum (5 x Jon’s salary).
• At least 28 years/to cover mortgage term/until children are not dependent/whole of life/ to retirement.
• Waiver of premium should be considered.
• To be placed in trust.
Income Protection Insurance (IPI) • For Jon. • Maximum 13 week deferment/short deferred period. • 50-75% of earnings. • Own occupation. • Indexation/escalation. • To retirement. • Breadwinner. • IPI for Amy when she returns to work/house persons cover.
Private Medical Insurance • For both/Jon. • Comprehensive. • Annually reviewable/open-ended. • Speedy return to work/quicker treatment.
Comment on the suitability of Jon and Amy’s existing pension arrangements.
- They are making low/inadequate contributions.
- They would be better off making higher contributions for Jon than Amy.
- Jon would receive tax relief at 40%/higher rate tax payer.
- Amy would receive tax relief at 20%/basic rate tax payer.
- Amy’s cash fund risk is inappropriate.
- Jon’s fund likely to be suitable.
Identify the main steps taken by an adviser in the pension planning process.
- Agree growth rate and inflation.
- Obtain current valuation.
- Identify target income in retirement allowing for pension commencement lump sum.
- Project current funds (to retirement age).
- Project current/ongoing contributions (to retirement age).
- Identify shortfall.
- Calculate required contributions.
- Allowance made for State Pension/BR19.
- Annual/regular review.
Comment on Jon and Amy’s investment portfolio and how it might be restructured to meet their attitude to risk and desire for tax efficiency.
- Asia Pacific Equity/Recovery Fund is a high risk investment and should be transferred to a lower risk fund.
- Investments should not be in Jon’s name/transfer taxable investments as he is a higher-rate tax payer and Amy is a basic-rate tax payer.
- Use of ISAs/National Savings Certificates.
- They need to use Capital Gains Tax (CGT) exemptions.
- Make use of inter-spousal transfers for CGT purposes to take advantage of the CGT 10% rate applicable to Amy.
- Make use of their Dividend Allowances/£5,000 and Personal Savings Allowances/£1,000 for Amy and £500 for Jon
- Could pay some of their investments into pension.
Recommend ways that their current portfolio can be utilised to provide income when Amy takes maternity leave.
- Take up to 5% tax deferred of original investment from bond.
- Assess availability of unused accumulative withdrawals from previous years on their bonds.
- Investigate market value reduction.
- Utilise Capital Gains Tax allowance for unit trusts.
- Take income from risk inappropriate investments first.
- Utilise income producing funds.
Describe in detail three ways in which Jon and Amy can repay their mortgage at or before their desired retirement age.
Interest only • ISA/investment vehicle/pension commencement lump sum by regular savings for tax efficiency. • Not guaranteed to repay mortgage. • Confirm attitude to risk. • Establish asset allocation. • Agree growth rate assumption. • Calculate required contribution level.
Capital and interest repayment
• Change to repayment.
• This will guarantee to repay the mortgage, assuming payments are maintained.
• It will also increase repayment considerably.
• Over payments.
• Save interest.
Use of capital
• Repay mortgage using existing investments.
• Reduced liquidity/investments may be required for other purposes.
• Will remove any potential for growth.
• Reduced outgoings.