Practice Test 1 - Peter & Katie Flashcards
Describe to Peter and Katie the taxation treatment of their investment bond both now and in the future.
Investment Bond
• Underlying fund subject to Corporation Tax.
• Income Tax may be payable on chargeable event.
• 5% per annum tax deferred of the original investment.
• Basic rate (Income) Tax deemed paid within the fund.
• Higher-rate taxpayers pay additional 20%.
• If basic-rate taxpayer there is no further liability.
• Unless the gain takes her into a higher rate of tax.
• Top slicing relief may apply.
• May impact on age allowance.
Explain how their investments could be made more tax-efficient.
- Transfer investments into Katie’s name as she is a basic rate taxpayer.
- Deposit funds to cash ISA and OEIC/investments to stocks and shares ISA.
- Use of CGT allowance.
- Take withdrawals from investment bond.
List the arrangements that may be available to Katie as methods of taking her pension income.
- A scheme pension/secured pension.
- A lifetime annuity.
- Phased retirement.
- Short term annuity.
- Flexi-access drawdown.
- Uncrystallised Fund Pension Lump Sum.
Describe the tax treatment of the rental income within Peter’s self-invested personal pension (SIPP), both when it is received by the SIPP and when it is paid out to him.
- Rental income free of Income Tax in self-invested personal pension.
- Subject to Income Tax/earned income at his highest marginal rate.
State the factors that Katie should consider regarding her proposed Alternative Investment Market (AIM) investment.
- Prospects for the company/company solvency.
- What is the amount of the investment?
- What is her attitude to risk/capacity for loss?
- Transaction costs/discount/bonus shares.
- How will it be funded/encashment of existing investment?
- Lack of diversification/liquidity.
Describe to Katie the nature of the AIM including any tax advantages that may apply to her.
- They are investments in small/new companies.
- AIM investments can offer high returns/losses/high risk/higher volatility.
- They are usually illiquid.
- Business Property Relief/Inheritance Tax relief if held for more than two years.
- Any capital losses can be offset against income.
Recommend in detail, using the appropriate amounts, how the structure of Peter and Katie’s proposed gift of £700,000 can provide them with maximum control without incurring any immediate charge to Inheritance Tax.
- £650,000 into a discretionary trust in respect of each of their Nil Rate Bands.
- Plus a further £12,000.
- Balance (£38,000) into a bare/absolute trust.
- Trustees to be Peter, Katie/must exclude son-in-law.
- Beneficiaries of bare trust to be the grandchildren.
Explain how the structure described in (d)(i) above meets Peter and Katie’s objectives.
- The money placed into discretionary trust is protected from the son-in-law.
- The fund will be used to benefit their grandchildren/can add further grandchildren to discretionary trust.
- Provided the gift into discretionary trust is within the available Nil Rate Band/gift allowances, there is no immediate charge to IHT.
State four drawbacks of the arrangement.
- They can never benefit from the money themselves.
- There may be periodic/exit charges.
- The bare trust may be wound up by the beneficiaries.
- A bare/absolute trust is irrevocable/inflexible.
- Complexity/costs.
Describe to Peter and Katie the taxation treatment of their open-ended investment company (OEIC) both now and in the future.
OEIC
Income Tax
• Dividends paid gross;
• on which Peter must pay an additional 32.5% on his share above his £5,000 Dividend Allowance;
• and Katie will pay an additional 7.5% on her share above her £5,000 Dividend Allowance
• May be subject to Inheritance Tax.
Capital Gains Tax
• Gains subject to Capital Gains Tax.
• Peter’s chargeable gains will be taxed at 20% if he is still a higher rate taxpayer at the time of encashment.
• Katie’s chargeable gains will be taxed at 10%.
• May be subject to Inheritance Tax.
Describe in detail the recommendations you would make to cover their liability with appropriate life assurance. (IHT)
- Whole of life.
- Joint life second death.
- Sum assured to cover the Inheritance Tax liability.
- Indexation/regularly review sum assured.
- Gift inter-vivos for PETs of £19,000 each.
- 2 x single life initial sum assured of £7,600 (40% of £19,000).
- Level term assurance to protect NRB
- 2 single life.
- Sum assured of £130,000 (40% of NRB £325,000)
- Each for 7 years.
- All policies written in trust.
State the reasons you would give to Peter and Katie to explain why you needed to review their investments annually.
- To review investments/performance/rebalance.
- To determine if they are still suitable/change in ATR.
- To see if there have been any changes in circumstances.
- Change in taxation/legislation/new products/economic changes.
- Use of annual tax allowance.