practical investigation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

aim

A

to investigate gender differences in attitudes towards obedience and authority figures using self report questionnaires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the background of this practical

A

Investigating gender differences in obedience can help to potentially understand causes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

research which supports and refutes the aim

A

Milgram’s (1963) and Burger’s (2009) research found no gender differences with both genders being equally as likely to give up to 300V

Sheridan and King’s (1972) research found gender differences in that 100% of females would shock a dog compared to 54% of males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State the fully operationalised alternative hypothesis

A

There will be a significant difference in the attitudes towards obedience, measured by scores out of 50 and themes, between males and females.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State the fully operationalised null hypothesis.

A

There will be no significant difference in attitudes towards obedience, measured by scores out of 50 and themes, between males and females, any difference will be due to chance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What sample did we use in our practical?

A

39 ppts (20 males, 19 females)
16-18 years
King Edward VI College in Stourbridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sampling method

A

opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

methods used

A

questionnaire and thematic analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

content of the questionnaire

A

10 closed questions using a Likert scale
4 distractor questions
3 with reversed scoring
2 open questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

procedure

A

We used an opportunity sample of 39 ppts that study at KEDST aged 16-18 years.

We gave them a questionnaire containing 10 closed Qs with a Likert scale, 4 distractor Qs, 3 with reversed scoring, and 2 open Qs

Gave ppts a briefing, allowing them the right to withdraw and assuring confidentiality of their answers

Ppts completed the questionnaire privately with no time limit

Once complete we gave a debrief (using the same as in the beginning due to it being scripted), giving the ppts another chance to withdraw

After collecting data we used thematic analysis to decipher reoccurring themes in the 2 open questions

Using this we created codes for themes of attitudes towards obedience and refined the categories overtime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

variables in the practical

A

V = gender

DV = attitude towards obedience (scored out of 50 + themes)

Controls = same questions, all ppts answered privately, the same brief/debrief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

results of the qualitative data

A

Females = 33
Males = 33.5
The mean scores of males and females on their attitudes towards obedience were not significantly different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

results of the qualitative data

A

Females = 33
Males = 33.5
The mean scores of males and females on their attitudes towards obedience were not significantly different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

conclusion from the results

A

There was no gender difference in attitudes towards obedience, and so accept the null hypothesis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

improvements that can be made on the practical research

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evaluate using GRAVE

A