Power & Polarity Flashcards
Hard power
Use of military and economic capability for coercion or as a threat.
Examples:
USS $60 million in military air to Ukraine to help to Russian aggression.
Soft power
Use of diplomacy, cultural relations and persuasion
Example:
Peace talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government
-States agreed to increase cooperation in developing a vaccine for COVID-19
Smart power
Combination of both soft and hard power
BRICS
5 leading economies
Brazil
Russia
India
China
South Africa
MINT
Emerging economies:
Mexico
Indonesia
Nigeria
Turkey
Superpower
A state that possesses characteristics of a great power but will be able to make it influence felt anywhere in the world through nuclear and cyber technology and means of delivering devastating military response at any time.
Has influence over its allies.
Great power
A state that has significant global influence militarily and economically through leading role in IGOs such as the UN, G7, G20 and the Bretton Woods institutions.
Plays influential role in global issues
Emerging power
A state that has started to require great power status but hasn’t met all of the criteria to become a great power.
Likely to have significant level of regional influence while in other areas it may still be developing
Unipolarity
One state dominates all others
A hegemonic state
Bipolarity
Two competing poles of power
E.g. the superpower rivalry between the US and Soviet Union drawing the Cold War clear balance of power
Multipolarity
Multiple poles of powers in which several states compete with each other
The Cold War
The Soviet union and the US has permanent members of the UNC would veto any perceived threats to their own interests.
The US was leading member of NATO and the Soviet union dominated the Warsaw pact.
Israel had close ties with the US
Cuba with the Soviet Union
Key event : the Cuban missile crisis
Realists and the Cold War
-The promoted peace since the existence of two evenly balanced powers meant that neither sides was capable of eliminating the other. MAD.
-If one side risk of war, the results for both would have been catastrophic
-Encouraged understanding and conflict resolution since both sides understood the best way of advancing own interest was by working with the other.
-The period of détente between the US and Soviet Union brought the SALT agreement which slowed the arms build between the two powers
Liberals and the Cold War
-Bipolarity is destabilising and dangerous because both sides will continually be advancing their military and economic interests in the expense of the other creating fear, suspicion and hostility
-It therefore doesn’t provide the conditions for lasting peace.
-Cold war was defined by very long periods of distrust and antagonism illustrated by US paranoia about the ‘missile gap’ and the near initiation of a nuclear war by the cuban missile crisis
-Showing MAD is far from stable
Proxy wars
During the cold war both sides trued to extend their global influence at the expense of the other.
In the Vietnam war the Soviet Union and US were not in direct combat but took opposing sides to win.