Postmodernism and Crime Flashcards
IS NOT NAMED ON THE SPEC - CAN USE THESE SCHOLARS AS AO3 POINTS
Why do Postmodernists criticise other theories?
- They reject grand narratives - every individual is unique and make their own choices not influenced by structures
- Crime isn’t necessarily always a lifestyle choice - it can be a one-off unplanned event
What is Henry and Milovanovic’s view?
AO1/2
Crime is currently based on a very narrow legal definition. Crime should be defined by social harm rather than what is legal:
- Harms of reduction = when power is used to cause a victim immediate loss or injury e.g. theft, assault
- Harms of repression = power is used to restrict further human development e.g. homophobic graffiti, revenge porn
What is Maffesoli’s view?
AO1/2
- The term ‘subcultures’ is an outdated and inaccurate way to define social groups with different norms and values
- Subcultures have now been replaced by ‘neotribes’
- Neotribes are more fluid - members can join and leave as they please
- Individuals have freedom of choice over the amount of time and effort they put into their tribe
- Someone can be in multiple tribes at once
What is Katz and Lyng’s view?
‘Edgeworks’:
- Crime can be caused by the shere thrill e.g. shoptlifting, underage drinking
- It’s not always some sort of rational choice
- Every individual ‘flirts with the boundaries of what is acceptable’ - crime can be caused by emotional reasons
What is Young’s view?
AO1/2
Late modern approach: ‘Bulimic society’
- In the 1950s and 60s there was a ‘golden age’ of high employment, cultural inclusion, and low crime
- In the 1980s deindustrialisation lead to unemployment and the economic exclusion of workers. Along with pressure to consume, this led to anomie causing people to commit crimes to cope
What is Pacione’s study?
AI1/2
- Glasgow had a huge ship building industry
- The collapse of this in the 90s led to high unemployment
- Glasgow was very religious and traditional - women weren’t working as men were breadwinners
- So as men lost their jobs many families fell into poverty
- This led to a masculinity crisis as men felt the need to commit crime to provide for their families - gave them a sense of purpose and needed to survive
What was Winslow’s study?
AO1/2
Violent Night: crime is about escapism
- Young WC men in Sutherland who regularly engaged in binge drinking and violence on weekends
- Found that they were in low status and insecure employment
- This was because of deindustrialisation which left them with no sense of identity causing them to bringe drink and commit crime
What is the post modernist view on choice?
AO1
- Certain social groups commit more crime because individuals in these groups choose to take on a criminal identity
- e.g. WC women choosing to take on the identity of a prostitute
- e.g. WC ethnic minority boys choosing to identify as drug dealers
What is Foucalt’s view?
AO1
- Those with knowledge and power are able to control the discourse on crime
- This is why punishment has shifted from sovereign power to disciplinary power
- Sovereign = control people through threat of force e.g. public hanging, branding
- Disciplinary = psychological - aimed to change the way you think
What are examples of disciplinary power?
AO2
- Bentham’s panopticon: every prisoner has to assume that they are being watched due to the layout thus forcing them to be on their best behaviour at all times
- Bauman and Lyon: liquid suveillance - the smallest details of our lives are being monitored thus acting as a form of social control e.g. cookies on phones, social services
How has Foucalt’s view influenced how we protect ourselves from crime?
AO3
- Growing emphasis on private crime prevention e.g. fingerprint and facial recognition tech on phones, ring doorbells
- Increased use of informal control agencies e.g. G4S - security company
- Heightened surveillance to monitor everyone not just criminals e.g. CCTV
How can we evaluate the post modernist view?
AO3
- Glorifies criminality - how can murder be fun?
- Ignores structural reasons
- Identities are stigmatised - people don’t just choose to take on criminal identities out of their own freewill - there are bigger reasons at play
- Explains white collar, non-utilitarian, and hate crimes - people using their freewill to take on a criminal identity maybe for the thrill of it