Posterior full coverage crowns Flashcards
Reasons for full coverage of compromised teeth
- Restores function and morphology (occlusion)
- Restoring and improving aesthetics
- Preserving remaining tooth tissues and
increasing fracture resistance - Integrating with other prosthesis
- Improves patient’s confidence & psychology
Structural integrity of endodontically treated teeth
Weakened?
1) Preparation of pulp access cavity
2) Loss of roof of the pulp chamber
3) Fragile due to loss of dentine elasticity
Structural integrity of posterior teeth
Cuspal protection required? 1. Loss of marginal ridge 2. Loss of substantial tooth structure 3. Heavily restored tooth Restored with? 1. Adhesive restorations (direct resin composite) 2. Cusp-coverage cast restorations (onlay, ¾ crown) 3. Full-coverage restorations (crowns)
Assessment/ design considerations
- Aesthetic considerations
- Adjacent/opposing Teeth
- Caries / restorations
- Periodontal Tissues
- Pulp, RCT and periapical tissue
- Is the tooth in function (occlusion)?
- Retention of the crown
- Materials
Assessment/ design considerations: aesthetic considerations
- Upper vs lower
- Premolars vs molars
- Smile line
Assessment/ design considerations: adjacent/ opposing teeth
- Orientation /Drifted teeth
- Contact points
- Diastema / Spaces between teeth
- Crowded teeth
- Length of tooth
- Insertion path (study model)
- positioning & supraeruption of opposing teeth
Assessment/ design considerations: caries/ restorations
- Location of caries, sub/supra gingival
- Quality of existing restorations
- Secondary caries
- Interproximal and root caries
Assessment / Design Considerations: periodontal tissues
- Good oral hygiene and plaque control
- Status of disease (active/stable)
- Periodontal attachment (no or min pockets)
- No or min mobility of tooth
- Alveolar bone level (radiograph)
- Crown / root ratio (radiograph)
Assessment / Design Considerations: occlusion
- Facet or wear on teeth (localised or
generalised) - Working or nonworking interferences
- Contact of teeth on both sides
- Canine or Group guided lateral movement
- The distance and deviation between CR/ICP
Assessment / Design Considerations: pulp, RCT and periapical lesions
- Periapical lesions
- Quality of root canal treatments
- Length, configuration and direction of roots
“Pulpal death” following crown preparation
- Average of 6 - 20% of prepared teeth
- Aggressive insult to the tooth, dentine and
odontoblasts - Thermal damage
- Local anaesthesia
-due to adrenaline in LA reducing blood flow to pulp - Desiccation
-living tissues will die if dry - Bacterial contamination
Crown preparation: shoulder
A 1.2mm shoulder crown preparation on a
posterior tooth leaves
≤ 0.7mm remaining dentine thickness
(0.7mm in 50 % of maxillary molars and < 0.7mm in all other premolars and molars)
Major risk of crown
Loss of vitality
Assessment/ design considerations: retention of the crown
- Shape of tooth (possible // axial walls)
- Occlusal morphology
- Tooth occ-ging length
- Path of insertion (inclined teeth)
design considerations: materials of the crown
Balancing function and aesthetics
- Full Metal (FGC)
- minimal tooth reduction
- least aesthetic
- can be adjusted intra-orally
- least abrasive to opposing teeth
- high survival rate long term - Metal-Ceramic (PFM)
- metal core
- extensive buccal tooth reduction
- aesthetics at cost of tooth tissue
- only metal component can be adjusted intra-orally - All Ceramic
- high strength ceramic core
- most aesthetic
- low edge strength
- requires extensive reduction
- intra-oral adjustment not possible
Principles of tooth preparation
Schillingburg
- Preservation of tooth structure
- Retention and resistance
- Structural durability
- Marginal integrity
- Preservation of periodontium
- Preservation of tooth structure
Partial coverage VS Full coverage
Supra-gingival VS Sub-gingival
FGC VS PFM/All ceramic
- Retention and resistance
Retention prevents the removal of the restoration along the path of insertion or the long axis of the tooth
Resistance prevents dislodgement of the restoration by forces directed in apical or oblique direction and prevents any movement of the restoration under occlusal forces
Retention
1.Create parallel axial walls
2.Increase occluso-gingival length
3.Add internal features
4. Limit the path of insertion
An imaginary line along which the restoration is placed onto or
removed / Parallel axial walls of preparation / Long access of tooth
- Structural durability
Provide enough bulk of the restoration
- Occlusal Reduction
- Bevel of Functional Cusp
- Axial Reduction
Inadequate occlusal reduction
Weaker restoration
Easily perforated restoration during finished or by wear
Insufficient functional morphology
Gold alloy types
Type I (soft): very burnishable
-for inlays
Type II (medium): less burnishable
-multiple surface inlays
Type III (hard): most commonly used type of gold
-all-metal crowns and bridges
-gold 75%, silver 10%, copper 10%, palladium 3%, zinc 2%
Type IV (extra hard) used for partial denture frameworks
- Structural durability: Occlusal Reduction
- provide adequate bulk of material and strength to the restoration
- follow morphology of occlusion (> retention, < vertical dislodging, adequate height)
- Structural durability: bevel functional cusp
Functional cusps receive heavy occlusal load
Provides space for an adequate bulk of material
1. Insufficient thickness —> perforation
2. Poor occlusion & overcontouring
3. Overinclination of the buccal/lingual surface
Excessive removal of sound tissues
Reduced retention