Possible test questions Flashcards

1
Q

What is Auditing?

A

An unbiased examination and evaluation of the financial statements of an organization. It can be done internally (by employees of the organization) or externally (by an outside firm).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the different levels of assurance

A

Reasonable assurance
Moderate assurance
No assurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the different levels of assurance

A

Reasonable assurance
This means that the auditor has done adequate work to report with reasonable certainty that the information being assured is, or is not, reliable.

Moderate assurance
This means that the auditor has done adequate work to report whether or not anything came to their attention that would lead them to believe that the information being assured is not worthy of belief.

No assurance
In such circumstances an assurance provider must ensure when reporting to users that they make clear that they are merely reporting the activities that they have performed (and in some engagements, their findings) and are not providing assurance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When would each level or assurance be used?

A

Reasonable assurance
When an auditor is in the position to say whether in their opinion the financial statements are in accordance with relevant laws and accounting standards and they present fairly the financial position of the reporting entity.

Moderate assurance
The auditor is not in a position to say that in their opinion the financial statements are in accordance with the relevant law and accounting standards, and does present fairly the financial position and performance of the reporting entity.

No assurance
When an engagement where no assurance is provided is a compilation engagement, where an auditor compiles the financial information as provided by the client and arranges it into a set of financial statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Threats to independence

A
Self-interest threat
Self-review threat
Advocacy threat
Familiarity threat
Intimidation threat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Legal liability to clients

A

A client can establish that the auditor owed them a duty of care in one of two ways: (1) under contract law for breach of contract or (2) under tort law for negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Under contract law …

A

a client can sue the auditor for breach of contract. This action may be taken when the auditor fails to live up to their responsibility implicit in agreeing to act as the auditor and explicit in the engagement letter. For example, if the auditor withdraws from an audit without cause, before completing the audit and issuing the report, the client can sue the auditor for breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Under the tort of negligence …

A

a client can claim that the auditor failed to take reasonable care in the performance of the audit. This means that the work was below the standard that may be reasonably expected from a designated public accountant. The injured party must prove that the auditor’s carelessness or unintentional behaviour caused harm and therefore breached the duty of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Legal liability to third parties

A

Establishing that a duty of care is owed to third parties is not straightforward. Third parties include anyone other than the client and its shareholders who use the financial statements to make a decision (for example, creditors). As third parties generally do not have a contractual relationship with the auditor, they must rely on tort law. The key difficulty for third parties is establishing that a duty of care was owed to them by the auditor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contributory negligence

A

means that where a plaintiff (the party suing) and the defendant (the auditor) can be proven to have been negligent, each party must be held accountable in proportion to their guilt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

To prove that an auditor has been negligent

A

a plaintiff, whether a client or a third party, must establish that an auditor did not comply with auditing standards, ethical pronouncements, or some element of the law in place at the time the auditor conducted their audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stages of an Audit

A

Planning an audit
Performing an audit
Concluding and reporting on an audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the stages of an audit

A

Planning an audit
Learning more about the client and industry.

Performing an audit
The performance, or execution, stage of the audit involves detailed testing of controls, transactions, and balances.

Concluding and reporting on an audit
The final stage of the audit involves drawing conclusions based on the evidence gathered and arriving at an opinion regarding the fair presentation of the financial statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Audit risk model

A

The model states that audit risk is inherent risk multiplied by control risk multiplied by detection risk

High-risk client
Audit risk = Inherent risk (high) x Control risk (high) x Detection risk (low)

Low-risk client
Audit risk = Inherent risk (low) x Control risk (low) x Detection risk (high)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

three components of audit risk

A

Inherent risk
Control risk
Detection risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Inherent risk is also assessed at the assertion level for classes of

A

transactions, account balances, and disclosures

17
Q

Audit risk model Formula with Audit risk strategy

A

Audit strategy—high-risk client
Audit risk
Inherent risk (High) x Control risk (High + No (or very limited) tests of controls) x Detection risk (low + Increased reliance on substantive tests of transactions and account balances)

Audit strategy—low-risk client
Audit risk
Inherent risk (low) x Control risk (low and Increased reliance on tests of controls) x Detection risk (High + Reduced reliance on substantive tests of transactions and account balances)

18
Q

Assertions about classes of transactions and events for the period under audit

A

Occurrence
Transactions and events that have been recorded have occurred and pertain to the entity.

Completeness
All transactions and events that should have been recorded have been recorded.

Accuracy
Amounts and other data relating to recorded transactions and events have been recorded appropriately.

Cut-off
Transactions and events have been recorded in the correct accounting period.

Classification
Transactions and events have been recorded in the proper accounts.

19
Q

Assertions about account balances at year end

A

Existence
Assets, liabilities, and equity interests exist.

Rights and obligations
The entity holds or controls the rights to assets, and liabilities are the obligations of the entity.

Completeness
All assets, liabilities, and equity interests that should have been recorded have been recorded.

Valuation and allocation
Assets, liabilities, and equity interests are included in the financial statements at appropriate amounts and any resulting valuation or allocation adjustments are appropriately recorded.

20
Q

Assertions about presentation and disclosure

A

Occurrence, rights, and obligations
Disclosed events, transactions, and other matters have occurred and pertain to the entity.

Completeness
All disclosures that should have been included in the financial statements have been included.

Classification and understandability
Financial information is appropriately presented and described, and disclosures are clearly expressed.

Accuracy and valuation
Financial and other information is disclosed fairly and at appropriate amounts.