POS Systems and Functions (5) Flashcards

1
Q

L.P. –> model of empirical cycle–> Popper–> Quine/Duhem–>?

A

there will always be theory that can be neither verified nor falsified: meta-theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Metatheories serve these 3 important goals

A
  • Identification
  • Unveil underlying assumptions
  • Create linkages (find the links btw. theories and their sociocultural, political and historical context)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ontological question of metatheory?

A

What is the nature of social reality?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the nature of social reality?

A
  • there are different units of analysis (individual and collectivist level)
    individual
    collectivism/social holism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

individual:

A
  • human behavior depends on the situation in which one finds himself
  • no difference btw. individuals
  • ind. respond to exterior incentives
  • incentives determine human behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

collectivism/social holism:

A
  • social systems cannot be reduced to actions made on an individual level
  • assess situations by looking at the social system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Epistemological question of meta theory?

A

What is our goal when analyzing social reality?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is our goal when analyzing social reality?

A

Explaining

Understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explaining social reality

A
  • contains a series of facts that can be used to describe the context and clarify the effects of these facts
  • focus on discovering rules and laws that can be generalized and used in similar situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Understanding social reality

A
  • being able to get appreciation for certain categories of knowledge about social reality
  • constructed by the interpersonal interactions and the interpretation of social relationships
  • gives a situational understanding of culture, religion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What epistemology and what ontology? Social systems and functions

A

explaining and holism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What epistemology and what ontology? Rational choice theory

A

explaining and individualism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What epistemology and what ontology? hermeneutics

A

understanding and individualism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What epistemology and what ontology? social meaning

A

understanding and holism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social systems and function

A
  • describes why you do something
  • explains by looking at the function of the action
  • logical explanation, not necessarily causal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explanandum

A

object that is being explained (effect)

17
Q

explanans

A

object that actually explains something (cause)

18
Q

Problems when working with functional explanations

A
  • cause-effect relationships get reversed –> wicked disjunction
  • functional explanations assume a) existence b) regulating influence of her order social systems
  • alternatives are excluded
  • a functional explanation assumes that the explanans (which is functional towards some higher state of affairs) is a necessary condition

-> useful when looking for information or evidence

19
Q

Why is Social systems and function explaining and holism?

A

holism:

  • actors are heterogeneous
  • explanation hinges on interactions btw. actors
  • properties of the social system are emergent

explaining
- develops propositions to describe the antecedents (vorangehend) of an emergent (werdend) social process
(try to discover what the reasons are and when this phenomena exists
- aims for discovery of generalizable laws:

20
Q

Two points discussed by social explanations

A
  1. Can we demonstrate a higher order system?

2. Ca we allow social explanations?

21
Q

Are social explanations allowed according to Durkheim?

A
  • no because social facts are only able to explain other social facts
  • example: committing suicide is not an individual decision but caused by many different social and environmental incentives
22
Q

anomie

A

losing the frame of reference;

lack of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group.

23
Q

taxonomy

A

is the classification of individuals or objects in groups

24
Q

What is a paradigm?

A

theories sharing similar assumptions, ambitions, modes of explanation

25
Q

When are functional explanations admissible?

A

Only when a general causal feedback mechanism exists
e.g. in biology the general causal feedback mechanism is evolution or in economics it is economic competition and sociological legitimation

26
Q

How can we explain the relation btw. unemployment and crime on a social system level?

A

We have to use Coleman’s bathtub model of explanation

27
Q

Solution for:
Functional explanations confuse cause and effect in the chronological ordering
of events, leading to a ‘wicked’ disjunction:

A
  • causal feedback mechanism is identified –> functional explanation becomes redundant because there now is a causal explanation for the same phenomenon)
  • no causal feedback mechanism can be identified
  • -> functional explanation becomes invalid
  • looking at the system level to understand the functional explanation can sometimes help