political parties - (labour and conservative) Flashcards
What is a political party?
A political party is an organisation of people with similar political values, views, goals and policies that it seeks to convert into political action by becoming a government or influencing the government in power. It may pursue it’s goals by gaining public support, identifying suitable leaders, selecting candidates for office and competing at elections
main features of political parties in the uk
- members of parties share similar political values and views.
- parties seek to secure the election of their candidates at various levels: national, regional and local
- they are an organisation that develops policy and recruits candidates and elects leaders
typical variations in the features of political parties
- some are mass memberships parties with many adherents (UK labour party); others have a small leadership group who seek supporters rather than members (the main US parties)
- some parties may be highly organised with a formal permanent organisation (German Christian Democrats) while others have a loose, less permanent organisation (US parties that only organise fully during election)
- Some parties may have a very narrow range of values and views and are intensely united around those views (left-wing socialist parties); others have a very broad range of views and values, and so may be divided into factions (UK conservative party)
- some parties are very focused in gaining power (main parties in the uk and us) while others recognise they will not gain power but seek merely to influence the political system (green parties)
What is a manifesto?
A manifesto is a written document that contains a list of promises/policies that is put together by a political party pre-election.
What is a electoral mandate / mandate ?
The right to implement its stated policies : the right of the party that has been elected to pursue its promises, pledges and policies that were set out by their manifesto without having to go back to votes to seek further approval (however, it does not have to implement all of its promises)
What is the Salisbury Doctrine?
This was developed by a conservative PM, lord Salisbury in the late 19th century. It developed in the 1940’s as constitutional convention to prevent the unelected house of lords of opposing the will of the elected government.
What is the franchise?
the right to vote
Does the concept of the mandate make sense? Yes
list points
- The franchise is widely held and there is a high level of individual voter registration.
- The first past the post electoral system usually results in a single party government, so it follows that the victors should have the right to implement their stated policies.
- The doctrine assumes the electors have full knowledge of the manifestos and so can make a rational judgment. Each party’s manifestos is readily available to voters ahead of polling day, both in print and online.
- Digested summaries of the main policies of each party are disseminated by the mainstream media. Televised leaders debates at the last two general elections have seen the leaders at the parties questioned on their main policies
- The mandate strengthens government, in that the winning party gains legitimacy for its policies.
- All the MPs from the winning party who are elected are ‘bound in’ by the mandate, as most voters vote for a party manifesto rather than an individual. Party leaders can therefore maintain discipline among members by emphasising to them that they were elected on the same mandate.
- If a government strays from its electoral mandate, parliament and assemblies can feel justified in challenging the government.
what is the first past the post electoral system?
FPTP is used in the UK General Election as well as English local elections. Each seat elects one member based on a plurality of the votes (i.e. the candidate with the most votes) Even if the winning margin is simply by one vote, that candidate still wins.
Does the concept of an electoral mandate make sense? No.
list points
- The low turnout at recent general elections means that the winning party can hardly claim to have secured a convincing mandate.
- It depends upon a single party wining an election outright coalition governments such as that seen in the wake of the 2010 general election mean that the actual content of the mandate is unclear; two or more parties must agree a compromise programme for which no single party has a mandate.
- Most voters pay little attention to party manifestos, whether in full or digested form. Voting behaviour is more about long-term factors or personalities than it is about policy detail.
- The concept of the mandate is flawed because it is impossible for voters to cast a ballot for or against a given party on the basis of a single policy
- It is clear that voters who have opted for one party do not necessarily agree with all its manifesto commitments. Yet the mandate does assume the electorate has given its consent to the whole of the manifesto.
- Some manifesto commitments may be rather vague and open to interpretation. This makes calling the government to account on the basis of its manifesto difficult and open to dispute.
list functions of political parties
1 - making policy 2 - representation 3 - selecting candidates 4 - identifying leaders 5 - organising elections 6 - political education 7 - reinforcing consent
Define what is policy
Policy is a set of principles to guide actions in order to achieve a goal/guide decisions that could help the community. (policies defer depending on the political ideology of the party)
Describe the role of making policy in the functions of political parties
policy making function of the ruling party is same as the policy making function of the government. It involves political leaders and civil servants, advisory units and committees and private advisors. Backbench Mps and peers local activists and ordinary members have some say through conferences and committees but their role remains very much in the background. Most policy is made by ministers and their advisors.
The policy- formulating function is sometimes known as aggregation which involves identifying demands and converting these into programmes of action that are consistent and compatible.
What is aggregation?
Aggregation involves identifying a wide range of demands made on the political system from party membership, from the mass individuals in society and other groups and then convert these demands into action. political demands of groups and individuals can influence policy making
what is partisan dealignment?
Partisan dealignment is a process whereby individuals become less partisan in terms of their support for a political party.
what is class dealignment?
class dealignment describes how the social classes are voting in far fewer numbers for the political party they used to traditionally vote for.
what is populism?
populism refers to political activities/movement or ideas that claim to promote the interests and opinions of ordinary people. new parties have emerged to appeal to the ordinary people or those who feel ignored by parties.
list the main ways that political parties can be funded
- raise donations from wealthy donors or organisations / companies
- campaigning / fundraising / conferences
- gain some funding from the electoral commission
- subscriptions to political parties - memberships from subscriptions
- some individuals may sell finance to put into the party
- trade unions fund parties e.g. the labour party
What act regulated funded of political parties in the UK
The funding of parties was regulated in 2000 by the political parties, elections and referendums Act (PPERA).
What regulations and stipulations did the political parties, election and referendums act (PPERA) make
- people not on the UK electoral roll could no longer make donations (thus reducing foreign influence)
- limits were placed on how much could be spent on parliamentary elections (£30,000 per constituency)
- Donations over £5000 have to be declared
- Donations over £7,500 were to be placed on an electoral register.
Why is party funding controversial?
Funding is hugely biased towards the two biggest parties. smaller parties are also disadvantaged by the UK electoral system at general elections and therefore the funding shortfall represents a double problem.
state why the question of party funding can lead to a number of issues which are even more serious and state the controversies
- the major parties are put at a huge advantage and conversely, small parties are put at a great disadvantage, particularly when it comes to fighting elections. current party funding therefore promotes political inequality.
- funding by large donors represents a hidden and unaccountable form of political influence. parties are not allowed to change specific policies or propose legislation as a direct result of donations, but donors must expect some kind of political return for their investment. This might be true of trade unions and the labour party and business interests and the conservatives
- Aspects of funding may well verge on being corrupt. It is suspected that some donors may expect to receive an honour from party leaders such as a peerage or knighthood in return for their generosity. This is sometimes known as ‘cash for honours’
- The steady decline of party membership has meant that parties are even more reliant upon donors, which further opens up the possibility of corruption and the purchasing of political influence.
What does the electoral commission do?
the electoral commission monitors the income of political parties in the uk.
State examples of the electoral commission monitoring reported examples of large donations to parties:
- between 2015-2017 the conservative party received £11.3 million from prominent figures and the companies in the financial sector
- in the same period, the conservatives received £3.6 million from property companies
- one individual, hedge fund proprietor angus fraser donated £1, 137,400 to the conservative party during this period
- the unite trade union gave £657,702 to the labour party early in 2017
- at the same time UNISON, the public service union donated £376,242 to labour
are individual donations considered undemocratic?
individual donations from organisations or unions are not see as undemocratic forms of influence but often carry some other kind of controversy. similarly, trade unions donations to labour have been criticised on the grounds that members of the unions are not given a clear enough choice as to whether their subscriptions should be spent in that way. It is also said that labour is unduly influenced by union leaders because of so much of their income comes from them
state alternative ideas for funding structures and restrictions of party funding:
1 - impose restrictions on the size of individual donations to parties. This is broadly the system used in the US (through donors can grant funds to thousands of individual candidates). To be effective, the cap would have to be relatively low.
2 - impose tight restrictions on how much parties are allowed to spend. This would make large-scale fundraising futile.
3 - restrict donations to individuals i.e. outlaw donations from businesses, pressure groups and trade unions.
4 - Replace all funding with state grants for parties, paid out of general taxation.
What is the case for funding political parties through taxation?
Philips report 2007 stated that there is a strong case for funding political parties to be funded through taxation. The case has become particularly pressing because of the vast discrepancy in the amount of money different parties received, as well as a number of financial scandals which undermined public faith in parliamentary democracy. It concluded the one way forward might be greater state funding for uk political parties, perhaps some form of ‘pence per state’ or ‘pence per member’ funding formula.
Although the case in favour of the comprehensive funding is widely contested there is already some state funding in the uk from the electoral commission
What type of funding does the electoral commission give to political parties.
the electoral commission gives funding to the main parties. These are called policy development grants (available to any party that has two or more sitting MPs) and can be used to hire advisors on policy. Over £2 million is available for this purpose. Parties also receive subsidies in respect of TV broadcasts and help with postage costs during election campaigns. In addition, there is also short money which is distributed to all opposition parties to fund their parliamentary work.
What is short money?
Short money is the money given to opposition parties by the house of commons to help conduct their affairs in parliament/parliamentary work and give financial assistance.
idea created from education secretary short (1968-1970)
Is short money heavily biased?
short money is heavily biased towards the large parties because it depends upon how many seats parties have won at previous elections. Thus, since 2015 the labour party receives £6.7 million in short money per annum, while the next biggest grant goes to the SNP with £1.2 million. Interestingly, UKIP refused over a half a million pounds in short money after winning one seat in 2015. The party suggested it was corrupt and designed to favour established parties.
What is cranborne money?
Cranborne money is money given to opposition parties given by the house of lords to help them with costs and help pay the necessary money to allow them to carry out their parliamentary work and pay for administrative costs
What is the debate about state financing in relation to party funding
Much of the debate about party funding relates to state financing. However, although several political parties favour this, there is little public appetite for it. Taxpayers are naturally reluctant to see their taxes being used to finance parties at a time when attitudes to parties are at a low ebb (dissatisfied with politics and the public). However, state funding remains the only solution that could create more equality in the system. As long as funding is determined by market forces it is likely that the large parties will be placed at a significant advantage. The other policy is to eliminate the abuses in the system. This involves full transparency, limits on how much business and union donors can give and a breaking of any link between donations and the granting of honours.
Should the Uk parties receive state funding? arguments for:
- it will end the opportunities for the corrupt use of donations e.g. favours for honours
- it will end the possibilities of ‘hidden’ forms of influence through funding
- it will reduce the huge financial advantage that large parties enjoy and give smaller parties the opportunity to make progress
- It will improve democracy by ensuring the wider participation from groups that have no ready source of funds
should the uk parties receive state funding? arguments against:
- taxpayers may object to funding what can be considered to be ‘private’ organisations.
- it will be difficult to know how to distributive funding. should it be on the basis of past performance (in which case large parties will retain their advantage) or on the basis of future aspirations
- parties may lose some of their independence and will see themselves as organs of the state (extension of the state)
- state funding may lead to excessive state regulation of parties
- philosophically state funding might also suggest that political parties were ‘servants of the state’ potentially limiting their independence.
- the funding of extremist parties such as the BNP would be extremely contentious
Will state funding arrive in the uk in the future?
It seems unlikely that state funding will arrive in the uk in the near future. Far more likely that the idea of individual donations should be limited. Greater transparency has been largely been achieved but the problem of ‘cash for honours’ or the suspicion that large organisations can gain a political advantage through donation persists.
Statutory regulation and public funds aside, it is clear that the main uk political parties still receive considerable sums in the forms of donations and that wealthy individual bankers have not been put off by the prospect of losing their anonymity. Action may well centre on a deal between the conservatives and labour. labour might sacrifice some of its trade union funding in return for caps on business donations and wealthy individuals bankrolling the conservatives. The liberal democrats with their unwavering support for state funding will have to remain on the side lines for the time being
What is the political spectrum?
The political spectrum is a device by which different stand-points can be mapped across an axes of a way of demonstrating their ideological position in the relation to one and the other.
What is the right-wing?
The right-wing are a political belief that derive from liberal and conservatives ideology. The liberal focus emphasises limiting excessive government, keeping tax low and protecting the individual liberty. The right emphasises the conservative values such as law and order, a strong defence and the importance of national sovereignty.
What is the left-wing?
left-wing emphasises the importance of creating a fair and equal society through positive state intervention. This includes higher taxes on the wealthy, extensive welfare provision and greater state influence in the economy. It is socially progressive and favours an internationalist approach to global problems
Left-wing refers to a type of political position where people who hold these views support social equality whilst opposing forms of social hierarchy and inequality. They are assumed to be concerned about the disadvantaged in society, seeking to reduce or abolish any unjustified inequalities.
How are political ideology discussed in terms of the political spectrum and what do these ideologies believe in?
Political ideology in the Uk has generally been discussed in terms of the simple left-right political spectrum that emerged in revolutionary France at the end of the 18th century.
- In modern usage, those on the extreme left on the political spectrum are said to favour some form of communal existence, with all property being held collectively as opposed to individually, while moderate left-wingers accept capitalism but favour greater government intervention in the economy and a more comprehensive welfare state.
- In contrast, those on the right are said to favour private enterprise over state provision, resulting in a process that the former conservative prime minister Margaret thatcher describes as ‘rolling back the frontiers of the state’
what do those on the political left on the political spectrum believe?
In modern usage, those on the extreme left on the political spectrum are said to favour some form of communal existence, with all property being held collectively as opposed to individually, while moderate left-wingers accept capitalism but favour greater government intervention in the economy and a more comprehensive welfare state.
what do those on the political right on the political spectrum believe?
In contrast, those on the right are said to favour private enterprise over state provision, resulting in a process that the former conservative prime minister Margaret thatcher describes as ‘rolling back the frontiers of the state’
what do all main British parties have that each comprises of members of a party having various different political shades
broad churches
state left wing political ideas (more socialist ideas)
- hold a positive view of the state and a collectivist view of society
- believe the government should reduce inequality and encourage social cohesion by providing an extensive welfare state
- the wealthier in society should pay a higher share of the cost of this through redistributive taxation (equal wealth within society). The government should also pay a major role in the economy through the nationalisation of key industries.
- left-wing politicians have generally enjoyed class relations with the trade union movement since the unions also represent the economic interests of the working class.
- socially, the left embraces multiculturalism. It is also socially libertarian and so supports giving alternative lifestyles equal status with more traditional areas.
state right wing political ideas (more individualistic ideas)
- The right wing of British politics focuses more on the importance of giving the individual as much control over their own life as possible.
- Right-wing politicians reject left-wing attempts of greater equality and believe that the free market operates best when there is little government intervention as possible
- governments should aim to keep taxation as low as possible and trade union influence needs to be limited in operation of the market
- companies operate most efficiently when there is competition so nationalised firms are best privatised.
- Although economically libertarian, the right-wing is socially conservative and so emphasises the importance of a shared national identity and encourages traditional lifestyles.
What is consensus politics?
consensus politics is a time during politics where there is consensus (agreement) / little fundamental ideological differences between the parties.
(they have great general agreement over ideas and policies)
Consensus politics is where there is a general agreement on an issue such as the economy between the major political parties. This can lead to there being more differences in political beliefs WITHIN political parties as there are BETWEEN political parties.
what is adversary politics?
adversary politics is where there is considerable conflict and disagreement over basic principles and ideology (deep divisions between and within parties)
Adversary politics is when there is a deep and broad disagreement between the main political parties. It is the opposite of consensus politics.
name times in consensus politics
1950s-1970s - labour government under clement atlee had undertaken a major programme of reform in the uk. the welfare state was created, including the creation of the NHS.
1997 - 2015 - post-thatcher consensus. Tony Blair and his leadership group dominant after 1997.
name times in adversary politics
1979-90s - significant period of adversary politics occurred in the 1980s. This was during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership which moved the conservative party to the ‘new right’.
What did the labour government under clement atlee do?
the labour government under clement atlee had undertaken a major programme of reform in the UK. the welfare was created, including the creation of the NHS. Major industries such as a coal, rail and steel were nationalised a comprehensive system of old-age pensions was initiated the provision of subsided housing was expanded and a wide range of new local authority services was introduced. This presented a problem for the conservative party when it come to power in 1951 and remained there until 1964 under four PMs.
under tony Blair premiership, there was general political agreement over key political issues
state these issues:
- the maintenance of strong well funded welfare state (investing, funding)
- constitutional reforms to make the uk more democratic and power to be centralised e.g. Scottish, welsh and northern Ireland assembly
- improved protection of human rights and social equally among groups
- commitment to a reduction in poverty
- public investment in services to promote economic growth
- promotion of individualism by encouraging home ownership and low taxation,
Why was there adversary politics under Margaret Thatcher?
Adversary politics occurred during the 1980s, this was because the conservative party under Margaret thatcher premiership moved to a position known as ‘new right’ politics. Meanwhile, the labour party under the leadership of Michael foot moved to the left. political conflict became deep and intense. The two parties had very different visions of which direction the Uk should be moving in.
state new right conservative policies during
1979-1990
- publicly owned industries were privatised by being sold to private investors. These included gas, cool, electricity, steel, water and telecommunications.
- A number of legal restrictions were placed on the activities of trade unions
- Tenants in council homes were encouraged to buy their properties at discounted prices and on a low mortgage rates. This became a legal right
- Legal regulations on the financial system were removed
- Rates of income tax for high income groups and tax on businesses were significantly reduced.
state left wing labour policies during 1979-1990
- Labour opposed the privatization and sought to nationalise more industries including, possibly, the banks
- Labour opposed the legal restrictions placed on the activities of trade unions and proposed additional worker protection measures
- Labour opposed the ‘right to buy’ policy and proposed increased local authority house building and controls on private rents
- Labour opposed that legal regulations of the financial system were removed and even suggested big banks might be nationalised
- Labour proposed a steeply progressive tax system to redistribute real income from rich to poor. A wealth tax was also proposed
What is one-nation conservatism?
one-nation conservatism is an approach created by Benjamin Disraeli which believes that the rich in society have an obligation to support the poor
What is paternalism?
paternalism is an approach to running the country in which members of the elite seek to govern in the best interests of the people
What is organic society?
Organic society is the idea that society operates like an organism or living entity. People are tied together by the common sense of being members of an interdependent society implying those who are well off do have a social responsibility to care for the poorer sections of society
What is pragmatism?
pragmatism is a flexible approach to society and politics, incorporating a sense of understanding of what is best for the people, what is acceptable to them and what will preserve a stable society on the basis of what works
- they are not bound by ideological ideas
what is the term new right?
The new right was used to describe a group of political values and ideas largely emerging in the US in the 1970s and 80s which were adopted by many conservatives throughout the developed world.
What was the new right a reaction against?
the new right was a reaction against socialist ideas gaining ground in Europe, Asia and south America and against the traditional conservative values that were seen too weak to deal with contemporary economic and social policies.
it was associated in the us with Ronald Reagan and in the uk with Margaret thatcher
What is the new right a combination of?
the new right is a combination of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism. Most, but not all conservatives of the NR subscribed to both sets of ideas, through often they leaned towards one more than the other.
What are supporters of thatcher and her approach of Thatcherism and the new right called?
Thatcherites - who favour the approaches of thatcher and favours the importance of the individuals over the needs of society as a whole
What did the advent of Thatcherism mark the death of?
The advent of Thatcherism marked the death of the post-war consensus and the rise of more adversarial politics. Thatcher referred to those who were not prepared to sign up to this agenda, in many cases the old one-nation Tories as ‘wets’
state policies thatcher offered through her radical agenda of ‘thatcherism’
- deregulation in the field of business
- privatisation of publicly-owned industries
- statutory limits on the power of trade unions
- a smaller state (‘rolling back the frontiers of the state’ and more limited state intervention in the economy
- a greater emphasis on national sovereignty
- more limited state welfare provision
State the difference between one-nation conservatism and Thatcherism
one nation conservatism advocates for a more unified society and every person in society having the social obligation to help the poorer sections of society - very pragmatic, paternalistic and asks for a mixed economy
whereas Thatcherism advocates for a more individualistic society and is very ideological promoting radical change and less reliance on the state but more emphasis on individualism - free market economy
How did the conservative party emerge?
The conservative party (CP) emerged from the Tory party in the 1830s, with many dating its birth to Robert Peel’s Tamworth manifesto in 1834. Conservatism in the Uk has its origins in the conflict that raged during the 17th century over the role and authority of the monarchy. Those who supported royal authority (as opposed to parliament) were known as royalists but eventually became known as ‘Tories’. During the (17th, it became clear that the supporters of parliament and democracy in general (mostly known as ‘whigs’) were gaining the upper hand over royalists. However, a new conflict began to emerge as the industrial revolution gathered pace in the middle of the 19th century.