electoral systems Flashcards

1
Q

define first past the post

A

First past the post is a name commonly used to describe the Uk’s electoral system for general elections, although its more formal title is ‘plurality in single-member constituencies’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define plurality

A

plurality refers to the result of an election where the winner only has to obtain more votes than any of their opponents. It does not mean that the winner has won an absolute majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define absolute majority

A

absolute majority refers to the result of a vote where the winner receives more votes than all the other candidates put together. In other words, the winner receives at least 50% of the total votes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define constituency

A

a constituency refers to a geographical area used to determine which people each elected representative represents. UK parliamentary constituencies’ are roughly 75,000 voters in size. Constituencies in devolved systems and local government are much smaller but also roughly equal in size. Elected representatives are expected to look after the interests of their constituency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the working of the FPTP

A

The main system used for UK general elections in the UK is commonly known as FPTP, which is to some extent an misleading title.

  • Its true description should be ‘plurality in single-member constituencies’
  • the country is divided into 650 constituencies of roughly equal size. The average adult population of constituencies is 75,000, though there may be some variation.
  • Geographical size of constituencies varies greatly. This can be seen in tightly populated London constituencies are clearly much smaller than sparsely populated constituencies in the highlands of Scotland.
  • to win a seat in a constituency it is only necessary to win more votes than any of one’s rivals.
  • This is known as a ‘plurality’. A plurality should be seen in constant to an absolute majority, An absolute majority is when a candidate wins at least 50% of the votes available.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

state an example that illustrates the character of the FPTP system

A

This was evident in 2015 general election which showed the characteristics of the FPTP where only 319 out of the 650 MPs won an absolute majority. 50 MP’s in that election secured their seat with less than 40% of the popular vote. Therefore, most elected MP’s in 2015 had to admit than more people voted against them rather than for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

state examples that illustrates the importance of concentrated support

A

The FPTP electoral system has the effect of favouring parties with concentrated support as seen in 2017 General Election results.

This was evident in the 2017 general election where the conservatives won 42.4% of the popular vote, won 48.9% percentage of the seats and gained 318 seats. This was primarily due to the fact that conservative support is concentrated in south and central England.

Additionally, labour in the 2017 general election won 40.0% of the popular vote, won 40.3% percentage of the seats and gained 262 seats. This is mainly due to the fact that labour support is concentrated in northern England and wales.

In contrast, parties such as the liberal democrats won 7.4% of the popular vote, won 1.8% percentage of the seats and gained 12 seats. This was because the party support is widely dispersed across the country which has meant that FPTP actively discriminates against small parties like the liberal democrats as they fail
to convert their proportion into seats.

This was can also been seen with the green party in the 2017 general election which won 1.6% of the popular vote, won 0.2% percentage of the seats and gained 1 seat which reinforces the idea that FPTP discriminates against smaller parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain the importance of concentrated support

A

The FPTP emphasises the importance of having concentrated support as it enables parties with concentrated support to dominate the system. However, this can be a problem for parties who have dispersed support such as UKIP, the Green Party and the Liberal Democrats win few individual constituency contests and hence gain few seats in parliament.

This can be seen in the result of the Lanark and Hamilton East election shown previously labour and the conservatives, whose support in Scotland is widely dispersed (unlike, England) came a strong second and third, both just behind the winning SNP candidate.

This kind of result was replicated all over the country, through few were as close as this constituency.

In England, conservative support is heavily concentrated so that results like that for Arundel and the South Downs are quite common. The winning candidate achieved an overall majority of the votes in the constituency.

In Scotland, the SNP does well because its support is concentrated in specific areas of the country. It was other parties - conservatives, labour and liberal democrats who suffer from dispersed support in Scotland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

State examples which illustrate the impact of FPTP is relation to looking at how many votes per average and successful candidate it took for each party to secure the election of a candidate

A

Another way of considering the impact of FPTP is to look at how many votes, on average it took for each party to secure the election of a candidate. This can be calculated by dividing the total number of votes won by each party nationally by the number of seats the party won.

2017 GENERAL ELECTION EXAMPLES:

For example, the green party wins nationally a total number of votes of 525,371
and nationally won 1 seat.

In comparison, labour won nationally the total number of votes of 12,874,985 and nationally won 262 seats. However, this is divided into an average which is 49,141 votes

Additionally, the conservatives won nationally 13,667,213 votes and won nationally 318 seats. This average was divided which meant that average votes per winning candidate was 42,978 votes

The liberal democrats won nationally 2,371,772 votes and nationally won 12 seats. This average was divided which meant that average votes per winning candidate was 197,583 votes.

Another prominent example would be the SNP which nationally won 997,569 votes and won 35 seats nationally. This average was divided which meant that the average votes per winning candidate was 28,501 votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain votes per successful candidate

A

Votes per successful candidates in the 2017 general election show the great disparities between how efficiently the parties turned votes cast for them into seats won by them. The Northern Ireland parties (DUP, Sinn Fein) have low averages largely because they are evenly matched and because of low turnouts.

This is significant as it highlights how big the disparity is between the Greens and Liberal Democrats which very high averages and the SNP with its very low average.

Additionally, during the 2017 general election the conservatives have had an advantage over labour, but not necessarily a decisive one.

This means that clearly and predictably the ‘losers’ in the electoral system FPTP e.g smaller parties such as the green parties and liberal democrats complain the loudest while the main ‘winners’ (conservatives and labour) have the least interest in reforming the system to remove such discrepancies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

state a summary of FPTP as a system (the main features)

A

The main features of FPTP are that:

  • each constituency returns a single MP who can represent the whole constituency
  • it is a simple system and voters can understand exactly what they are voting for.
  • It gives an advantage to parties that have concentrated support in certain regions.
  • it is disadvantageous to parties whose support is widely dispersed.
  • it favours the large parties and prevents serious challenges from small parties
  • there is a ‘winners bonus’ where the biggest party tends to win more than its proportionate share of the vote. In 2017, the conservatives won 42.4% of the votes but won 48.9% of the seats
  • Because it favours the large parties it tends to produce an outright winner that is a party that has an overall majority in the House of Commons. However, in recent general elections (2010, 2015, 2017) the system has failed to produce a decisive government majority, suggesting this characteristic may be changing.

FPTP is therefore associated with single party or majority government even though in 2017, there was a minority single party government. It is not clear yet whether the Uk is ready to accept the more common experience of a coalition and minority governments that is found in most of the rest of Europe, in the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define majority government

A

Majority governments refers to a government whose members and supporters do constitute a majority of the members of the legislature (e.g. the house of commons or Scottish parliament). This means they find it relatively easy to pass legislation and tends to make them stable and long lasting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define minority governments

A

Minority governments refer to a government whose members and supporters do not constitute a majority of members. In other words, there are more opposition supporting members than government supporting members. Such a minority government finds it difficult to pass legislation and is likely to be unstable and short lived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define safe seats

A

safe seats refer to a constituency where it is highly unlikely that the seat will change hands from one party to another at an election

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

define marginal seat

A

marginal seats refer to a constituency where the results of past elections suggest that the result of an election will be close.

BBC definition: where the winner of the seat at the previous election won by less than 10% from their nearest rival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain safe and marginal seats in relation to FPTP

A

The FPTP system produces two phenomena that are virtually unique to this system. There are ‘safe’ and ‘marginal’ seats.

Safe seats are constituencies where is it almost certain that the same party will win the seat at every general election. The electoral reform society estimates that 368 seats out of the 650 seats were safe seats in 2015.

The society calculates that as many as 25.7 million voters live in safe seats but there are many implications if they are so many safe seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

explain safe seats

A

Safe seat are essential seats that parties will pay little attention to as safe seats in are considered to be won by the party without any competition which means during election campaigns the voters will receive less information.

MPs sitting for such safe seats are less accountable for their actions because they have virtually no chance of losing their seat at the next election. This may lead to voters in safe seats feeling that their votes are ‘wasted’ because they have no realistic chance of influencing the outcome. This may be the case whether they support the winning party or one of the losing parties.

It means that votes are, effectively not of equal value. Votes in safe seats are worth less than votes in seats that are closely contested where the voters may have an impact.

The electoral reform society estimated that in the 2015 general election, there quarters of the voters, numbering 22 million were effectively casting ‘wasted’ votes because they had no chance of influencing the outcome in their constituencies as the seats were safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

explain marginal seats

A

There are no precise definition of a marginal seat but in general they are those seats where the outcome of the election is in great doubt. Such seats a re very likely to change hands from one party to another at each election.

It is said that elections are won and lost in the marginal constituencies. In the 2015 general election the BBC estimated that there were 194 marginal seats in the Uk. They defined a marginal seat as one where the last winning candidate led by 10% or less from the nearest challenger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

state and explain the implications of the existence of marginal seats

A

The implications of the existence of marginal seats include:

  • parties concentrating their efforts on marginal seats, so voters there receive more attention and information.
  • votes in marginal seats are clearly more valuable than votes in safe seats as the voters in marginal seats will feel they may influence the result.
  • the character and policies of the candidates become more important in marginal seats. In safe seats, the qualities of the individual candidates matter little, but in marginals they may be crucial.
  • marginal seats may result in ‘tactical voting’. A tactical vote is when a voter who supports a party that is unlikely to win in a constituency switches allegiance to one of the other parties in the hope of influencing the outcome. A typical example is when liberal democrat supporters in marginal seats vote either labour or conservative, in other words their second choice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explain what a tactical voter is

A

A tactical vote is when a voter who supports a party that is unlikely to win in a constituency switches allegiance to one of the other parties in the hope of influencing the outcome. A typical example is when liberal democrat supporters in marginal seats vote either labour or conservative, in other words their second choice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

explain by-elections

A

By-elections take place when a sitting MP (or member of any other representative assembly, including local councils) dies or resigns their seat. This creates a vacancy, which was used to fill it, a by-election takes place only in that constituency. The same electoral system is used as for regular elections.

By-elections can produce strange results and no such seats are ‘safe’. The voters may use a by-election to ‘punish’ the party in government and so defeat a representative from the governing party unexpectedly.

The policies and personality of the candidates are also placed under greater focus, so unpredictable results can happen. Nevertheless, by-elections do provide an additional means by which voters can call government to account by punishing them with a defeat or rewarding them with a victory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why is FPTP controversial

A

FPTP is highly controversial. It has its supporters who are among the established members of the two main parties. This is not surprising, as the conservative and labour parties are the main beneficiaries of the system. although the labour party has considered changing its policy position towards reform of the system.

FPTP also has its detractors who are among the smaller parties that support a change to the system. Even the SNP which now benefits strongly from FPTP. supports reform. Pressure groups such as the Electoral Reform Society and Unlock Democracy are also prominent campaigners for change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

state arguments for retaining FPTP

A
  • it is easy to understand and produces a clear result in each constituency. The result is known very quickly.
  • it produces one single representative for each constituency and so creates a close constituency - MP bond.
  • Accountability of the individual MP is clear to the electors
  • The system tends to produce a clear winner in the general election, i.e. a single party with a parliamentary majority. This helps to promote a strong, stable and decisive government
  • It helps to prevent small parties breaking into the system. This is useful if the small parties are undesirable extremists
  • Arguably. FPTP has stood the test of time. Abandoning the system would be a dangerous step into the unknown.
  • A switch to a different system might have all starts of unintended consequences
  • In 2011, a referendum decisively rejected a proposal for change
  • In elections with complex concerns - as occurred in 2017 when the Brexit issue was combined with other social and economic matters
  • FPTP gave voters the opportunity to choose a candidate based on their individual attitude to such issues, rather than merely according to their party allegiance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

State arguments against FPTP

A
  • The overall outcome is not proportional or fair. Some parties win more seats than their support warrants, while others win less than they deserve
  • It means that many votes are effectively wasted because they can have no impact on the outcome in safe seats. Many seats become part of party ‘heartlands’ where there is no possibility of a realistic challenge from other parties. It also produces ‘electoral desserts’ where there is effectively no party competition
  • votes are of unequal value in the votes in safe seats are less valuable than votes in marginal seat. In 2017, UKIP votes were of hugely less value than conservative votes in 2015.
  • it encourages some voters to vote tactically and so abandon the party they really want to support.
  • it prevents new parties breaking into the system and so produces political inertia.
  • it has since 1945, always resulted in the winning party securing much less than half the popular vote. In 2015, the winning conservative party was elected with 36.9% of the vote. 63.1% of voters voted against the governing party. In 2005, labour won the election with a majority of 66 from only 35.2% of the popular vote. This calls into question the legitimacy of the government
  • FPTP always used to deliver governments with a majority of the seats in the house of commons. However, in 2015 and 2017 the system failed to do this, returning governments without such an overall majority. If it is failing to achieve its main objective in modern times, this suggests that it should be replace by a fairer and more proportional system.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

state an example of a plurality system

A

FPTP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

State examples of alternative systems which are used in different parts of the UK and around the world

A
  • proportional systems
  • majority systems
  • hybrid system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

define proportional systems

A

proportional system refer to systems that produce an outcome whereby the competing parties are awarded seats in the legislature in proportion to the votes cast for them, either exactly or approximately. so a directly proportional system would award 40% of the seats to a party that won 40% of the popular vote.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

define majority systems

A

Majority systems are systems which are used to elect a single candidate, for example a president or major. They are designed to ensure that the winner can claim the support of an overall majority of voters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

define hybrid system

A

Hybrid systems which are mixture of two systems. The main example is the additional member system, which is mixture of FPTP and a proportional system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

define proportional representation (PR)

A

Proportional representation (PR) refers to any electoral system that tends to produce a proportional outcome. In other words, the seats in the representative body are awarded in an election broadly in the same proportion. as the votes cast for each party.

An example would be that if a party wins 40% of the votes it will be awarded 40% of the seats available. The regional list system and the single transferable vote system are examples of PR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the Additional Member system (AMS)

A

The additional member system is a hybrid system that combines FPTP with a PR system. It is used in Scotland, wales and for the greater London assembly.
A version is also used in Germany.

A proportion (which varies from country to country) of the seats is awarded through FPTP. The rest are awarded on a regional list system. This means that every voter has two votes. One is for a constituency candidate in the FPTP way, the other is from a choice of party lists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Explain the additional member system

A

The additional member system is a hybrid system that combines FPTP with a PR system. It is used in Scotland, wales and for the greater London assembly.

A proportion (which varies from country to country) of the seats is awarded through FPTP. The rest are awarded on a regional list system. This means that every voter has two votes. One is for a constituency candidate in the FPTP way, the other is from a choice of party lists.

some of the elected representatives have a constituency to look after, while others do not. The latter have been elected from the lists and are free of constituency responsibilities.

No real distinction is made between the two through the senior party members tend to be elected from lists rather than constituencies with an MP to represent them

it helps smaller parties, but also favours the larger ones

it achieves two objectives at the same time, preserving the idea of constituencies and a constituencies representative, but producing a much more proportional result than FPTP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

explain how AMS works in scotland and Wales

A
  • two thirds of the seats are elected using FPTP as for a UK general election
  • the other third of seats are elected on a PR system based on several regions of the country. This is known as the regional list part of the system
  • this is an important variation in the regional list part of the vote. The variable top-up system adjusts the proportions of votes cast on the list system. This is a complex calculation, but in essence, what happens is that the seats awarded from the system are adjusted to give a more proportional result. It is known as the D’Hondt method
  • Parties that do less well in the constituencies (typically conservatives and greens) have their proportion of list votes adjusted upwards. Those that do proportionally well under FPTP (usually labour) have their list of votes adjusted downwards
  • The overall effect of a variable top up is to make the total result in seats close to proportional to the total votes cast in both systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

state advantages of the additional member system

A
  • it produces a broadly proportional outcome and so is fair to all parties
  • it gives voters two votes and so more choice
  • it combines preserving constituency representation with a proportional outcome
  • it helps small parties which cannot win constituency contests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

state disadvantages of the additional member system

A
  • it produces two classes of representative - those with a constituency and those elected through the lists which the latter tends to be more senior
  • it is more complex than FPTP. having two votes may confuse voters
  • it can result in the election of extremist candidates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

evaluate AMS using the results of the election in scottish parliament in 2016

A

Results of elections under AMS show that a party can win some of its seats through constituency contests and the rest from regional list elections in which voters choose a party rather than an individual

The 2016 results highlight how well each party performed in both the constituency elections and the list elections. (* seats on the regional list system are manipulated to produce a more proportional result*)

For example, the scottish national party who dominates scotland elections won 59 constituency seats, won 4 regional list seats giving them a total of 63 seats, with 48.8% seats won and 31.7% of votes won in the regional lists.

This can be contrasted with the conservative party who won 7 constituency seats, won 24 regional list seats, giving them a total of 31 seats won, which meant they won 24% of the seats won and 22.9% of votes won in the regional lists

Another prominent example is the green party who won 0 constituency seats, won 6 regional list seats, giving them a total of 6 seats, meaning they won 4.7% seats won and 6.6% votes won in the regional lists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Assess the 2016 election in the scottish parliament

A

The scottish parliament elections in 2016 shows the proportion of seats won by each party is quite close to the proportion of votes each of them won in the party list contest, so the result is roughly proportional.

  • The election also shows how smaller parties won very few constituency seats but it is more compared to FPTP.
  • Conversely, the SNP won 59 out of the 73 constituency seats available as had this election been conducted under FPTP the snp would have dominated by winning 104 (81%) out of 129 seats
  • Under AMS, the SNP won 48.8% of the seats on 41.7% of the popular vote, a much more proportional outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What is Single transferable vote (STV)

A

STV is the system used in Northern Ireland for all of its elections. It is also used for local government elections in Scotland and for general elections in the republic of Ireland.

  • it is commonly described as a proportional system
  • it’s a complex system, especially when it comes to the counting and the establishment of the result. T
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Explain how the single transferable vote (STV) works

A
  • There are six seats available in each constituency.

Each party is permitted to put up as a many candidates as there are seats. i.e up to six. In practice, parties do not adopt six candidates as they have no chance of winning all six seats available. Four is the normal maximum amount for each party.

Voters place the candidates in their order of preference by placing a number 1,2,3 etc beside each name.

Voters can vote for candidates from different parties or even all parties, though few do

At the council an electoral quota is calculated. This is established by taking the total number of votes cast and dividing it by the number of seats available plus 1. So if 50,000 votes are cast and six seats are available the quota is 50,000 divided by 6+1 and works out at 7,143. One is then added to give the final figure of 7,144.

At first all the first preferences are counted for each candidate. Any candidate who achieves the quota are elected automatically.

After this stage, the counting is complex. Essentially, the second and subsequent preferences from the ballot papers of the elected candidates are added to other candidates. If this results in an individual achieving the quota he or she is elected.

This process continues until six candidates have achieved the quota and are elected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is STV designed to do?

explain the results of Fermanagh and south Tyrone constituency

A

STV is complex counting system designed to ensure that voters preferences are aggregated up to make sure that the six most popular candidates overall will be elected

The overall outcome tends to be highly proportional, with each party achieving its fair share of the votes and seats.

This was demonstrate in the single constituency contest from the Northern Ireland assembly election in 2016 illustrating how this system works

Results of Fermanagh and South Tyrone Constituency 2016:

  • DUP offered 2 candidates and 2 candidates were elected
  • Sinn Fein offered 4 candidates and 2 candidates were elected
  • Ulster Unionists offered 2 candidates and 1 candidate was electd
  • SDLP offered 1 candidate and 1 candidate was elected

The quota was 6,740. Only one candidate, Arlene Foster of the DUP achieved the quota on first preference of votes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Explain the results of the northern Ireland assembly 2016

A

The Northern Ireland Assembly 2016 overall results demonstrates how the proportional the outcome is as every party won approximately the same proportion of seats as the proportion of first preference votes gained. It is also interesting to see how many parties won some representation

For example, the DUP won 38 seats with 35.2% won and 29.3 % of first preference votes won

Sinn fein won 28 seats with 25.9% seats won and 24.0% first preference votes won

Ultster unionists won 16 seats with 14.8% won and 12.6% first preferences votes won

Alliance won 8 seats with 7.4% won and 7.0 % first preference votes won

This clearly shows how proportional the outcome is with the single transferable vote system as every party won approximately the same proportion of seats as the proportion of first preference votes gained. It is also interesting to see how many parties won some representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

State the advantages of STV

A
  • it produces a broadly proportional outcome
  • it gives voters a very wide choice of candidates to choose from. The second and subsequent choices of the voters are taken into consideration in the counting.
  • voters can vote for candidates from different parties and show a preference between candidates of the same party
  • as there are six representatives per constituency, each voter has a choice of those to represent them and usually they can be represented by someone from the party they support
  • it helps small parties and independent candidates to be elected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

state the disadvantages of STV

A
  • It is a complex system that some voters do not understand
  • the vote counting is complicated and can take a long time
  • it can help candidates with extremist views to be elected
  • with six representatives per constituency the lines of accountability of are not very clear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Define the supplementary vote (SV)

A

Supplementary vote is a system used where a single candidate is to be elected. It is designed to produce a winner who can claim to be supported overall by a majority of voters.

In the Uk, its main use is to elect city mayors. it could be used to elect MPs but there is no appetite for this kind of reform

Most reformers prefer the idea of PR rather than the SV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Explain what the supplementary vote

A

In the supplementary vote system voters have two choices, a first and second choice.

If any candidate achieves an overall majority i.e 50%+ of the first choice or round, he or she is automatically elected

If this does not happen, the top two candidates go into a second round of counting. All the others drop out.

The second choice votes are added to the first choices to give two final totals

As there are only two candidates left, one of them must achieve an absolute majority. So the winner has an overall majority of a combination of first and second round votes.

The following tables shows how this worked in the election of Sadiq Khan. He achieved 44.2% of the vote in the first round, but 161,427 voter put him as their second choice and this was enough to give him an overall majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Assess the supplementary vote with the elections for London mayor 2016.

A

Most commentators believe that the supplementary vote system have few serious rivals when it comes to electing a single official and it is used in the vast majority of democracies for this kind of election.

For example, Sadiq Khan who was the candidate for the labour party in the first round of votes won 1,148,716 which was 44.2% and in the second round of votes he gained 1,310,143 which meant he was elected mayor of London.

OTHER CANDIDATES:

Zac Goldsmith was a conservative candidate that in the first round of the votes won 909,755 which was 35% and in the second round of vote he gained 994,614 votes

Sian Berry who was green party candidate in the first round of the vote won 150,673 which meant she won 5.8% which disqualified her from the second round of votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

state advantages of the SV system

A
  • the winning candidate can claim to have an overall majority of support
  • it is relatively simple for voters to understand
  • voters first and second choice are relevant
48
Q

state disadvantages of the SV system

A
  • a winning candidate may not enjoy the first choice of support of an overall majority
  • the winning candidate may win on second choices
49
Q

Explain the context within STV was used

A

Decision makers hope to produce a party system that was most desirable in each of its different contexts.

For example, STV was adopted in Northern Ireland in order to reflect the fact that it is a divided community and that all the different communities should be represented in a multi party system. So five different parties achieved significant representation in the northern Ireland assembly.

50
Q

State a summary of electoral systems used in the UK

A

FPTP -
it is a plurality system used for UK general elections, English and Welsh Local elections

Additional Member System (AMS) -
it is a hybrid system, used for Scottish parliamentary elections, welsh assembly elections and Greater London Assembly elections

Single Transferrable Vote (STV) -
it is a proportional system, used for all northern Ireland elections and local elections in Scotland

Supplementary vote (SV) -
it is a majority system used to elect city mayors e.g mayor of london
51
Q

explain AMS in context

A

to Northern Ireland, in Scotland after devolution in 1997 the danger was perceived that the Labour Party would dominate the country if FPTP was retained.

The change to AMS ensured that the main English parties could not dominate which ironically worked well.

The political system in Scotland is now dominated by the SNP and the English parties have been placed at a disadvantage.

In wales, AMS has done its work well and there is a very balanced party system there

52
Q

explain FPTP in context

A

FPTP, seems destined to remain as the system used for general elections for some time to come.

This is largely because the political establishment (in both main parties) take a broadly conservative view of the issue

Most senior politicians prefer the status quo and fear the unknown as represented by proportional representation

53
Q

Compare FPTP with other systems

A

The british people had a choice in a 2011 referendum and rejected an alternative to FPTP which was the alternative vote (AV).

This system is used in Australia

The AV system is seldom used (it is sometimes used in by-elections in STV systems) and is unlikely to be considered in the future

The result of the 2011 referendum (which overwhelmingly rejected AV) should not be taken to indicate that the public is opposed to reform. There were a number of reasons why the public rejected AV which are unrelated to people wanting a charge to the FPTP system.

54
Q

Why was the AV rejected in the 2011 referendum?

A

The proposal was promoted by the liberal democrats (in coalition government at that time with the conservatives) and the party was very unpopular at this time. It is therefore estimated that many voters used the referendum to show dissatisfaction with the liberal democrats rather than to reject AV.

AV is a complex system, so many voters who rejected it may not understand it.

The pro-reform campaign was poorly run while the anti-reform campaign was well organised and funded

55
Q

Explain the effects of party system if a proportional system was introduced

A

Introducing a proportional representation for the UK general elections would produce a multi-party system

Parties like the Brexit Party, Greens, Liberal Democrats and Plaid cymru would win a significant number of seats

The larger parties, conservatives, labour, SNP would win considerably fewer seats than currently.

For some this is desirable, an outcome that would provide a pluralist, more representative result and mean that voters were better represented

On the other hand, some would argue that it might give an opening to extremist parties and probably create a chaotic political system with too many competing parties

56
Q

explain the effects on government formation due to a multi party system

A

This kind of multi party system described above would prevent any party from winning an overall majority in parliament

This can be seen as a desirable outcome to some as it would prevent governments being excessively powerful.

In order to govern as a minority government or coalition, a government would have to seek a consensus on every issue and democracy would be better served.

Critics point to the instability this would produce with governments frequently failing and having to be reformed as occurs in some european states.

Without a parliamentary majority governments, would lose their decisiveness and be unable to deliver their electoral mandate

57
Q

explain the effects of voters of proportional systems

A

Supporters of the introduction of a proportional system insist that voters interests would be better served

every vote would count and be of equal value and there would be more voter choice

proportional systems favour the selection of women and ethnic minority candidates

above all voters would no longer need to vote tactically and would be able to support their first choice candidates/parties

critics point out that proportional systems are more difficult to understand

they also say that the close relationship between MPS and constituencies would be a blow to democracies

the supporters of proportional representation see the debate as democracy vs over powerful government, equality vs discrimination

those who favour the retention of FPTP see the issue in terms of order over chaos strong vs weak government

58
Q

define referendums

A

Referendums refers to a vote, which may be national, regional or local in which qualified voters are asked a single question about a proposal where the answer is either ‘yes’ or ‘no’

National referendums are not legally binding on parliament or government, but it is unthinkable that their outcome would be ignored

59
Q

explain how referendums operate

A

Before 1975, referendums were almost in the UK political system.

  • There was an attempt to hold a referendum in Northern Ireland in 1973 but it failed as half the community boycotted it.
  • In 1975, there was a national referendum on whether the Uk should remain a member of the european community (a forerunner of the EU)
  • The Uk has joined the EC two years before. I was seen as a once in a generation event and so it proved.
  • The next national referendum was not held until 2011, when the country was asked if it wanted to adopt a new electoral system for general elections
  • In between these two national referendums there were some local and regional referendums, but it seemed that the device of holding referendums to decide key issues was seen as a ‘last resort’
  • since 2011, two ground breaking referendums have been held, so that they now seem to be that they are an established part of the Uk constitution

These two referendums were the 2014 vote on whether scotland should become an independent state and the 2016 referendum whose outcome meant that the UK would leave the EU

60
Q

What are referendums and why are they held

A

A referendum is simply defined as vote, conducted at local, regional or national level, in response to a question with a simple yes or no answer (In 2016 voters were asked to choose between leave or remain)

  • The key reason why a referendum might be held is that, for some reason it is felt preferable that the people themselves should resolve an issue rather than the elected representatives of the people

Criticisms of a referendum:
Many political commentators may ask why should a people’s vote be preferable to a vote in an elected assembly? It can be argued that in a representative democracy we elect people to make decisions on our behalf, to use their judgement and to mediate between competing demands. Why should we make these decisions ourselves?

61
Q

state and explain why referendums are used

A

Referendums may be used if the:

  • the issue may be so crucial that it is felt that only a popular vote can resolve it. This was the case with the proposal to reform the electoral system in 2011.
  • it may be that the issue causes so much conflict within the political system and among its elected representatives that the only way to resolve it without excessive political conflict is to let the people decide directly. Both sides in a political conflict have to accept the outcome. This was the case with both referendums on Uk membership of the EC in 1975 and the EU in 2016.
  • A referendum may be the only way to resolve a conflict within the wider community. In 1998 the people of Northern Ireland were invited to vote on whether to accept the good friday agreement (also known as the Belfast Agreement) which was to end many years of conflict between nationalist and loyalist communities in the province and establish a power sharing from of government
  • The liberal doctrine of government by consent demands that the system of government to which people submit can only exist with the consent of the people themselves. This implies that any fundamental change to the way we are governed must achieved direct consent through any fundamental change to the way we are governed must achieve direct consent through a referendum. When increased powers were proposed to be given to devolved administration in scotland and wales in 1997. (so called devolution), it had to be put to the people of those nations
62
Q

Define government by consent

A

Government by consent refers to the idea, developed by liberal theorists that government must enjoy the consent of the people who are to be governed

This implies that the people must show consent to how they are governed and what the system of government should be

63
Q

explain the 1975 referendum of should the UK remain a member of the European community

  • NATIONAL REFERENDUM
A

1975 - Should the Uk remain a member of the european community?

Level - National

Why was it held?
- The labour government was divided on the issue

Commentary: This was the first Uk wide referendum. In campaigning for it, prime minister Harold Wilson’s pamphlet said ‘the government will accept your verdict’

outcome:
yes % - 67.2%

no % - 32.8%

TURNOUT: 64.5%

64
Q

Explain the 1997 referendum of whether should additional powers be devolved to Scotland and a Scottish parliament established?

  • REGIONAL - scotland referendum
A

1997 - should additional powers be devolved to Scotland and a Scottish parliament established

Level - Regional referendums in scotland

Why was it held?
- A fundamental change in the system of government needed a popular consent

Commentary:
The Labour manifesto in 1997 committed to giving both Scotland and Wales a referendum over whether power should be devolved to them. As a result of both countries ‘yes’ vote, the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly were established.

outcome:
yes% - 74.3%

no% - 25.7%

TURNOUT: 60.4%

65
Q

Explain the 1997 referendum of whether should additional powers be devolved to wales and a welsh assembly established?

  • REGIONAL referendum in wales
A

1997 - Should additional powers be devolved to wales and welsh assembly established?

Level - Regional Referendums in wales

Why was it held?
A fundamental change in the system of government needed a popular consent

Outcome:

yes % - 50.3

no % - 49.7%

TURNOUT: 50.1%

66
Q

Explain the 1998 referendum on whether the belfast agreement should be implemented?

  • Level: REGIONAL - Northern Ireland
A

1998 - Should the belfast agreement be implemented?

Level - Regional referendums in northern ireland

Why was it held?
This required support across the whole divided community

commentary:
This was held as a result of the Northern Ireland peace process.

Outcome:
Yes% - 71.7%

No% - 28.9%

TURNOUT: 81%

67
Q

Explain the 2004 referendum on should additional powers be devolved to the north east england and a regional assembly established

Level: REGIONAL - North East England

A

2004 - Should additional powers be devolved to the north east england and a regional assembly established

Level: North East England - Regional

Why was it held?
A fundamental change in the system of government needed a popular consent

outcome:
Yes% = 22.1%

No% - 77.9%

TURNOUT: 47.7%

68
Q

Explain the 2005 referendum should a congestion charge zone be introduced in Edinburgh?

LEVEL: local referendums

A

2005- Should a congestion charge zone be introduced in Edinburgh

Level: Local referendum held in Edinburgh

Why was it held?
It was a highly controversial proposal

Outcome:
Yes% = 25.6%

No% = 74.4%

TURNOUT: 61.7%

69
Q

Explain the 2011 referendum on should the UK adopt the alternative vote system for general elections

Level: National referendum

A

2011 - Should the UK adopt the alternative vote system for general elections

LEVEL: National referendum

Why was it held?
The coalition government was divided on the issues of electoral reform

commentary:
Held due to the coalition agreement between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats

Outcome:
Yes% = 32.1%

No% = 67.9%

Turnout:
42.2%

70
Q

Explain the 2014 referendum on should Scotland become a completely independent country?

LEVEL: National Referendum

A

2014 - Should Scotland become a completely independent country

LEVEL: REGIONAL referendum - Scotland

Why was it held?
A fundamental question about who governs Scotland

Commentary:
Held due to pressure from the Scottish government. 16- and 17-year olds were allowed to vote.

Outcome:
Yes% = 44.7%
No% = 55.3%

Turnout:

84.6%

71
Q

Explain the 2016 referendum on should the UK remain a member of the European union?

LEVEL: National Referendum

A

2016 - Should the UK remain a member of the european union?

Level: NATIONAL REFERENDUM

Why was it held?
A fundamental constitutional question. The governing conservative party was split on the issue, and also wanted to meet the challenge of UKIP

commentary:

Held due to promise made by the Conservatives in the 2015 general election manifesto

Outcome:
remain% = 48.1%
leave% = 51.9%

Turnout:
72.2%

72
Q

Explain the process of holding a referendum

A

holding a referendum is not a simple task. It requires a lot of preparation and planning. In general, the stages leading to referendum are these:

  • the governing party adopts a policy that a referendum should be held on an issue
  • the precise wording of the referendum question is established
  • legislation is passed in parliament, setting up the arrangements for a referendum including the date it is to be held
  • The referendum is held and the result announced
  • Referendums are never legally binding, but it is virtually unthinkable that a representative body should not obey the outcome. If the result requires change, legal and political arrangements for the change are made
  • A number of regulations tend to the govern the conduct of the referendum campaigns
  • in national and regional referendums there is official recognition of the bodies that campaign on each side of the question
  • expenditure on referendum campaigns is regulated to ensure that each side spends approximately equal funds

This is done by the electoral commission which also ensures that both sides in the electoral campaign do not issue false information and organises the counting of votes

73
Q

Define proposition

A

Proposition is a device used in some countries including Switzerland and parts of the US, where a petition signed by a large number of voters can trigger a referendum. The voters, rather than the government decide what issues should be put to a referendum

74
Q

Explain referendums and initiatives

A

A variation of the referendum system is the initiatives. An initiatives occurs when the people themselves decide a referendum should be held.

In the Uk, it is government and the legislature that decide when a referendum should be held, but initiatives are widely held in some states in the US

The way initiatives normally work is that citizens must create a petition asking for a popular vote. When an agreed number of names are on the petition, a referendum (sometimes known as a ‘proposition’ in the US) is triggered. An example is a California where the petition required equals 5% of voters at the last election for state governor.

75
Q

state examples of the US propositions (REFERENDUMS)

A

2008 - Arizona state - to amend the state constitution to prohibit same sex marriage. Passed

2012 - California state - to temporarily increase sales tax in the state to pay for improved education and other services. Passed.

2012 - Massachusetts state - to make assisted legal suicide legal. Failed.

2014 - Oregon State - to legalised recreational use of marijuana. Passed

76
Q

Explain Switzerland’s similar system to the US

A

Switzerland operates a similar system to the US. There 100,000 signatures are needed to trigger a referendum. Some swiss examples are:

1971 - to grant voting rights to women. Passed

2014 - to order the government to prevent ‘mass immigration’ Passed

2016 - to authorize the building of a new road tunnel under the Alps. Passed.

2016 - to expel all foreign born criminals from the country. Failed

In the UK, it remains firmly in the hands of the government and parliament which issues should be put to the electorate in a referendum

77
Q

How do Referendums and elections differ?

A

Referendums are very different to elections as there are many key differences as stated below which illustrates the key differences between the two devices

  • Referendums are always on a single issue whereas elections are fought on a wide range of issues across all the business of government
  • Referendums demand a single yes/no answer whereas elections result in a more nuanced, varied outcome, with different levels of representation awarded to different parties.

As we have seen, the government and parliament decide when referendums should be held. Elections, by contrast, normally occur at regular intervals determined by law.

There is one crucial similarity, Both referendums and elections grant legitimacy to decisions. In the case of an action, the winners claim a mandate for their policies; with referendums, the electorate are directly granting authority to governments to implement a specific decisions

78
Q

Explain the impact of referendums

A

There is a maxim in politics that governments should never call a referendum unless they are very confident about what the answer will be:

  • There are two reasons why it is sensible
  • Governments use of referendums as a way of securing direct consent for policies they might have introduced themselves. Examples would be devolution for scotland and wales and Northern Ireland in the late 1990s. Devolution was effectively a policy of the labour government at the time.,but they needed to reinforce the idea with confirmation in a referendum. The government was confident it would win the three votes
  • If a government supports one side of a referendum debate, it will be placed in a difficult position if its loses the debate. It is a severe blow to its authority. This happened in 2016, when thr UK voted to leave the EU. The result was traumatic. The prime minister, David Cameron felt this position was untenable and resigned. The wider result was a complete change in the government state on Europe and many ministers lost their positions. The referendum also shook the labour party. Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the labour party at the time lost support of most of the party’s MP’s largely because he was seen to campaign poorly for remain.
  • The 2014 vote on the Scottish referendum was what the government of the Uk wanted but it did have a major impact on the policies of devolution. The closeness of the outcome was a huge boost to the SNP. Before that, during the campaign as the outcome was thrown increasingly into doubt, all three main english parties were forced to promise scotland greater powers for their parliament and government
  • The government won the vote but it was too close for comfort. The scottish referendum result did not result in independence but it result in a major shift in power towards Edinburgh
  • The government won the vote but it was too close for comfort. The Scottish Referendum result did not result in independence but it result in a major shift in power towards Edinburgh. Then 2 years later with the EU referendum a fresh scottish crisis. 62% of scots voted to remain. This meant that scots were being dragged out of the EU againist their will. The result has been renewed calls for a second referendum on scottish independence so that scotland can stay in the EU.

Referendums can therefore change things whatever the outcome.

They can promote political change and they can also remove policies from the immediate political agenda, as occurred when electoral reform was soundly rejected in 2011

79
Q

Explain how public opinion turned in favour of the use of referendums

A

Until recently public opinion seemed to be turning in favour of the use of referendums, especially after the vote on Scottish independence in 2014. That referendum was deemed as a success in that it involved the majority of people of Scotland and its result was emphatic enough to settle the issue for some time to come

Then the referendum on the Uk’s membership of the EU changed attitudes again. The result, which shook the political establishment and was totally unexpected in the light of the opinion polls, demonstrated how divided a society the UK had become

In some senses the issue was settled, a majority was narrowly voted to leave the EU, but is also led to fears that the narrow minority which voted to remain in the EU was tyrannized by the majority

Many commentators suspected that many of those who voted to leave were not voting on the issue of the EU itself; but on wider issues that their voices were not being heard by the political system based in london

The EU poll revealed that many concerns that people have expressed about referendums. The winning side of course has had a different perspective. For them, it was hugely successful exercise in popular democracy. Conventional policies had been defeated by the will of the majority.

80
Q

State FOR arguments for the question “Should referendums be used to settle political issues”

A

FOR ARGUEMENTS -

  • Referendums are the purest form of democracy, uncorrupted by the filter of representative democracy. They demonstrate the pure will of the people, as occurred in the EU vote
  • Referendums can mend rifts in society, as occurred with the decisive vote in 1998 on the Belfast Agreement
  • Referendums can solve conflicts within the political system and so stave off a crisis. This was especially the case with the EU referendums in both 1975 and 2016.
  • Referendums are particularly useful when
    expressed (as opposed to implied) consent of
    the people is important, so that the decision will be respected. This was very true of the votes on
    devolution in 1997.
  • Arguably the people are much more informed than they have ever been in the past. The internet and social media in particular have
    facilitated this. This makes them more capable of making decisions for themselves rather than
    relying on elected representatives.
81
Q

State AGAINIST arguments for the question: “Should referendums be used to settle political issues”

A
  • The people may not be able to understand the complexities of an issue such as the consequences of leaving the EU or adopting a new electoral system.
  • Referendums can cause social rifts. This arguably occurred in both 2014 in Scotland and 2016 in the EU referendum.
  • There is a danger that the excessive use of referendums may undermine the authority of representative democracy. This has been a particular danger in some states in the US.
  • A referendum can represent the ‘tyranny of the majority’. This means that the majority that wins the vote can use their victory to force the minority to accept a change which is against their interests. The Scots, who voted strongly to stay in the EU in 2016, claimed they were being tyrannized by the English majority.
  • Voters may be swayed by emotional rather than rational appeals. It may also be that they are influenced by false information.
  • Some questions should not be reduced to simple yes/no answers; they are more complicated. The 2011 question on electoral reform is an example of this. Perhaps several different opinions should have been considered, not one.
82
Q

State two reasons why the 2016 referendum on the european union was controversial.

A

The 2016 referendum on the european union was like no other and was more controversial than anything before. This was for two reasons:

  • the decision was so incredibly significant, determining the whole future of the UK
  • It caused so much fragmentation within the political system, both the labour and conservative parties were convulsed by the result and a major schism developed between Scotland and the rest of the UK. Furthermore, the losing side especially argued that the campaign had been distorted by false information and by negative campaigning, playing on peoples fears.
83
Q

state advantages of representative democracy in making key decisions

A
  • representatives are more likely to adopt a rational approach and resist emotional reactions to questions, e.g many voters were concerned about immigration in the EU referendum and were responding to appeals to their patriotism and the perceived dangers to ‘British Values’ posed by too many migrants entering communities. Elected representatives on the other hand could weigh up the benefits as well as the problems of high numbers of migrants
  • Elected politicians have an army of well informed advisers to help them make decisions. They can ensure that the information on which they base their judgements are accurate. Most people have to rely on the media print, broadcast and social for their information, which is at bets conflicting and at worst dubious. This was certainly a problem leading up to a EU referendum during the campaign
  • Elected representatives have to concern themselves with the competing interests of both the majority and minorities. Voters, on the other hand and for understandable reasons usually only think of their own interests. The citizens of Edinburgh and Manchester have voted in local referendums against the imposing of congestion charges on motorists entering the city centre. It seems the majority of voters did not consider the minority of voters who suffer from air pollution and public transport users. In contrast, london did introduce congestion charges in 2003 under elected mayor Ken Livingstone. He could take into account the interests of public transport users and the wider population suffering from pollution as well as motorists
84
Q

state disadvantages of representative democracy for key decisions

A
  • those who opposed the use of referendum in 2016, on whether the UK should leave the EU were adamant that such a key decision should have been made by parliament - perhaps the subject of a free vote in the house of commons and not by the people who are poorly placed to exercise a rational judgement
85
Q

state the role and importance of all elections

A
  • elections are used to choose representatives. In a democracy, legislators and decision makers have to be elected
  • elections are the most important way in which citizens become involved in politics. For many, it is their own form of political participation. It is vital that citizens do participation to ensure the public accountability of government and the legislature
  • Elections are a time when government and elected representatives can be called to account. During the campaign the candidates must justify what they and their party have done. All their past record and their current policies are put under close scrutiny during the run up to an election
  • democracy demands that the people have choice over those who represent their interests. Elections provide that choice, thoroughly explained.
  • Elections have an educative function. An informed citizenry is essential if democracy is to remain healthy. During election campaigns the public can become better informed over the key political issues that face their locality, region or nation
  • elections provide a mandate. The winners in an election are granted democratic legitimacy, the political authority to carry out the political programme they are proposing. Without such a mandate and the accountability that goes with it, democracy will fail
86
Q

state the positive aspects of elections

A

Uk elections enjoy the following positive features:

  • there is relatively little corruption. Some electoral fraud takes place in some areas but it is rare and usually detected. The secrecy of the ballot is virtually guaranteed. The counting of votes is carefully and thoroughly regulated. The conduct of elections is safeguarded by the electoral commission, which is independent of government
  • the constituency system ensures clear representation of citizens
  • elections usually produce a clear, decisive result - 2010 was a rare exception
  • elections are held on a regular basis and supposedly since 2011 when the fixed term parliament act was passed, all elections take place on fixed dates in the future. (This has not occurred due to government choice in the last five years where there have been three general elections)
  • UK elections are free in that it is relatively cheap and easy for any citizen to stand for election and virtually all adults are permitted to vote
  • Elections in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are based on roughly proportional lines so the outcome could be said to be fair to all parties
  • There is a freedom of information and of the media so that the voters have free access to independent information upon which they can base their choice
87
Q

state the negative aspects of elections

A

Uk elections suffer from the following negative features:

  • The FPTP system used for general elections and local elections in England and Wales is widely acknowledged to be unfair and unrepresentative. This means that many votes are wasted and votes are of an unequal vote
  • Small parties find it difficult to gain a foothold because of the electorate system in england
  • Uk general elections produce governments that do not enjoy the support of a majority of the electorate. In recent elections, the winning party had failed to achieve 40% of the popular vote
88
Q

Explain electoral systems and the government

A

The nature of elections and the nature of government are very different things.
Voters are choosing from a selection of candidates but are really deciding which party they prefer and who will form a government. That is usually the main concern of voters when they enter a polling booth. The problem is up to 60% of them will not the get the government they voted for

But elections in the Uk have been proved to be effective in producing strong and stable governments at all levels. This though, is beginning to charge.

In Scotland and wales, no majority has emerged in the 2016 elections. Before 2019, the previous three general elections in 2010, 2015, 2017 failed to produce a government with a decisive majority and twice with no majority at all.

This may lead us to the conclusion that the traditional link between FPTP and single party government has been broken

89
Q

what would hypothetically happen if the Uk were to adopt PR system for local and national eletions

A

If the UK were to adopt PR for local and national elections, the country would have to get used to the idea of multi party government. This might also mean an unstable government

  • The experience of the coalition government in 2010-15 is mixed. It was a table and lasted 5 years with few major defeats in parliament but there was also concern the junior coalition partner, the liberal democrats did not have the sufficient influence, so the government was still dominated by one party
  • The evidence that voters were unhappy with the experience of coalition, two party government is that they turned decisively against the liberal democrats by defeating them in all but 8 seats

Even so it is difficult to judge the real level of support for small parties because so many voters do not support them as they fear it will be a wasted vote

90
Q

Explain electoral systems in relation to party systems

A

Despite the success in the last decade of the conservative party at general elections, there has been a decline in support for the two largest parties over the last few decades and certainly there has been a rise in support for smaller parties like UKIP, the Brexit Party, the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Green party

Another way to consider this is to ask whether the Uk to political system is now pluralistic, with voters seeking parties that are more focused on their particular concerns

  • if this is the case, the two party system must be doomed irrespective of the electoral system

On the other hand, voters may ultimately shrink away from a multi-party system and return to a preference for a two party choice

How much choice do voters really want? If the Uk adopted PR for general elections, would more voters opt for smaller parties?

As things stand, voters tend to be forced into voting either conservative or labour because any other vote would be ‘wasted’. They are also sometimes forced to vote tactically, opting for their second choice in order to influence the outcome.

Under PR, every vote counts and every vote is of equal value. With some systems, such as STV voters are even able to discriminate between candidates in the same party

The lack of choice under FPTP, is quite stark but we do not need to ask whether voters want more choice, especially if greater choice leads to less stable governments

91
Q

define tactical voting

A

Tactical voting refers to when voters in Uk general elections feel that their first-choice vote will be wasted because it is for a party that has no chance of winning the constituency, they may change their vote to a second choice

By doing this, they may have an influence on the outcome. Typically supporters of the liberal democrats or green party vote either labour or conservative because their first choice party cannot win the constituency. This is known as tactical voting

92
Q

Explain electoral systems in relation to voter choice

A

When voters were asked whether they wanted to change to the electoral system in the 2011 referendum, they rejected it decisively.

This suggests that they prefer the status quo i.e, a two-party system underpinned by a plurality voting system.

However, this may be an illusion. The alternative proposed was the alternative vote system (AV), which did offer more choice but was far the proportional. If the electoral were asked to choose between FPTP and a proportional system today, the answer might be different.

93
Q

state FOR ARGUEMENTS for the question: Do elections enhance democracy?

A

Positive arguments:

  • Elections allow the electorate to hold the
    outgoing government to account. There is a clear choice between the government and other parties
  • Elections create representative assemblies in an organized way and not at regular intervals.
  • There is widespread public confidence that elections in the UK are well regulated and that the outcomes are genuine expressions of the will of the people.
  • Under FPTP, elections usually produce strong and stable governments, with majorities in the House of Commons.
  • UK elections provide strong constituency
    representation so that voters are confident that
    there will be representation of their interests
94
Q

State AGAINIST ARGUEMNTS for the question: Do elections enhance democracy?

A

Negative arguments:

  • Voters may feel that a vote for smaller parties is wasted, so the choice is not as wide as many appear to be the case
  • Referendums can also cause social rifts. This is arguably the case in both 2014 in Scotland and in 2016 in the EU referendum
  • There is a danger that the excessive use of referendums may undermine the authority of representative democracy. This has been a particular danger in some states in the US.
  • Under FPTP, elections produce majority governments that are supported by a minority of the electorate
  • While elections to devolved assemblies are generally proportional, elections to the west minister parliament are not proportional, exaggerating the popularity of large parties and discriminating against small parties.
95
Q

define absolute majority

A

absolute majority refers refers to the result of a vote where the winner receives more votes than all the other candidates put together. In other words, the winner receives at least 50% of the total votes.

96
Q

define constituency

A
  • A constituency is a geographical area used to determine which people each elected representative represents. UK parliamentary constituencies are roughly 75,000 voters in size. Constituencies in devolved systems and local government are much smaller but also roughly equal in size. Elected representatives are expected to look after the interests of their constituency.
97
Q

define first past the post (FPTP)

A

FPTP is the name commonly used to describe the UK’s electoral system for general elections, although its more formal title is ‘plurality in single member constituencies’

98
Q

define government by consent

A

government by consent refers to the idea, developed by liberal theorists, that government must enjoy the consent of the people who are to be governed. This also implies that the people must show consent to how they are governed and what system of government they should be.

99
Q

define majority government

A

majority government refers A government whose members and supporters constitute a majority of the members of the legislature (e.g. The House of Commons or Scottish Parliament). This means they find it relatively easy to pass legislation and tends to make the stable and long lasting.

100
Q

define minority government

A

minority governments refers to a government whose members and supporters do not constitute a majority of members. In other words, there are more opposition supporting members than government supporting members. Such a minority government finds it difficult to pass legislation and is likely to be unstable and short lived.

101
Q

define plurality

A

plurality is the term which refers refers to the result of an election where the winner only has to obtain more votes than any of their opponents. It does not mean that the winner has an absolute majority.

102
Q

define proportional representation (PR)

A

Proportional representation (PR) refers to any electoral system that tends to produce a proportional outcome. In other words, the seats in a representative body are awarded in an election broadly in the same proportion as the votes cast for each party. An example would be if a party wins 40% of the votes it will be awarded approximately 40% of the seats available. The regional list system and single transferable vote system are good examples of PR.

103
Q

define referendums

A

referendums refers to a vote, which may be national, regional or local, in which qualified voters are asked a single question about a proposal where the answer is either yes or no. National referendums are not legally binding on Parliament or government, but it is unthinkable that their outcome would be ignored.

104
Q

define safe seats

A

safe seats refer to a constituency where it is highly unlikely that the seat will change hands from one party to another at an election.

105
Q

define tactical voting

A

tactical voting refers to when voters in UK general elections feel that their first-choice vote will be wasted because it is for a party that has no chance of winning the constituency, they may change their vote to a second choice. By doing this they may have an influence on the outcome. Typically, supporters of the Liberal Democrats or Green Party vote either Labour or Conservative because their first-choice party cannot win the constituency. This is known as tactical voting.

106
Q

due to increasing criticisms of FPTP what did it lead to the introduction of?

A

In recent decades FPTP itself has come under increasing criticism for the notable flaws that it has.

The criticisms have been sharper since the introduction and successful use of other systems in the UK:
• The additional member system (AMS) in Wales and Scotland and the London Assembly

  • The single transferable vote (STV) in Northern Ireland
  • The supplementary vote (SV) for London mayors
107
Q

State an example of FPTPs supporters e.g DAVID CAMERON

A

During the AV referendum in 2011 Prime Minister at the time, Davis Cameron, protested that ‘Britain is in real danger of exchanging an electoral system that works for one we would come to regret profoundly.”

108
Q

define accountability

A

Accountability refers to Literally, being held responsible for your actions. In a political sense, citizens judge their elected representatives for their policies, votes and actions over their time in office.

109
Q

differentiate between elections, electoral systems and party systems

A

ELECTIONS IN THE UK:

  • give the opportunity for citizens for citizens to cast a vote for their elected representatives
  • a feature of liberal and representative democracy
  • a way in which governments are both held accountable and chosen

ELECTORAL SYSTEM:

  • a process by which the votes cast can be translated into elected officials or seats
  • a variety of systems are available, broadly falling into three types - proportional, plurality and majoritarian

PARTY SYSTEM:

  • the number of parties that have a realistic chance of forming a government
  • a result of the electoral process that is chosen, not a choice in itself
110
Q

state purposes of elections

A

To understand why elections are features of liberal and representative democracies it is important to understand what holding an election is meant to achieve.
1- Holding the current elected representatives to account

An election allows for the current office holders to be judged on their performance over the time they have been in office. For most UK elected offices, this is either a 4- or 5-year term. This ensures that there are consequences for an elected official for the decisions and actions they take while in office, most importantly that they can be voted out if their representatives are unhappy. This should ensure that there is clear communication between officials and voters, as ensuring they feel represented and happy is the only way to ensure re-election.

2 -Choosing an elected representative and government

In all the elections in the UK voters are choosing politicians to represent their views. Candidates will campaign either on their personal beliefs and policies, or if a member of a party, on the policies in their parties’ manifesto. By winning an election this person has a mandate to act on behalf of those who voted. In most UK elections, the lections of the individuals lead to the formation of a government, usually by a party that won a majority of seats in that election. Failing this, a number of parties may choose to work together, forming a coalition in order to govern.

3- Legitimising political power
A government formed as a product of a free and fair election is a ‘legitimate government’. This means that it has the right to exercise power and authority over an area and the people within it. When such a government introduces a new policy, or changes an old one, it has the right to do so, having won an election.

4-Limiting the power of elected representatives

Not only do elections legitimise a government, they also serve to limit it. Part of the limitations placed on the government is knowing that it will face election again in five years. Elections also result un the election of representatives who do not form a government. These are still legitimately elected officials and they form the opposition. They can use this position to scrutinise and challenge the government’s policies.

5- Development of political policy

As part of an election, most parties or candidates publish a manifesto. This is a document outlining the policies the party will implement if elected. Public opinion through the election can shape these policies, and ultimately the winner of an election is usually chosen on these policies. During the 2017 general election, the Conservative Party advanced a policy that would require people to sell their homes to pay for social care in their old age. This was dubbed the ‘dementia tax’ by those opposed to it. Such was the public outcry surrounding the policy that the Conservative Party abandoned it during the election campaign, demonstrating the public influence over the party policy.

6-Selection of a political elite

In the UK parties can decide who runs in an election under their party name. They choose those they think most likely to win elections and be successful as elected officials. Once all the elected representatives are chosen, some of these will be included in the formation of a government. This political elite is then responsible for the smooth running of a country; the election provides an opportunity to ensure they are capable and competent in doing so.

111
Q

Explain Majoritarian systems with examples

A

Majoritarian system:
A majority is 50% +1 to win.
This may refer to the number of votes needed to win a seat, or it may refer to the number of seats needed to forma government. It is likely to produce a two-party system

Example system:

Supplementary vote (SV)

112
Q

Explain Plurality system with examples

A

Plurality system:
A plurality of votes is having more votes than anyone else, thus winning but not having an overall majority. In a plurality system no majority is required to win a seat. It is likely to produce a two-party system

Example system:

FPTP

113
Q

Explain Proportional system with examples

A

Proportional system:

A proportional system allocates seats in a manner whish roughly reflects the % of votes gained by a party. No purely proportional systems are used in the UK, but a number of systems used are more proportional than FPTP. It is likely to produce a multi-party system.

Example systems:

  • Additional Member System (AMS)
  • Single Transferrable Vote (STV)
114
Q

state FOR arguments for the question: Should FPTP be replaced for UK general elections

A

YES

  • Recent elections demonstrate that FPTP is no longer even fulfilling the traditional strengths that it promised, such as a strong, single party government
  • FPTP produces a poor result regardless of your view, its lack of proportionality is increasingly evident, and this does not fit with the principles of representative democracy, and it does not deliver either MPs or a government with a majority of votes cast
  • The government that it does deliver can be argued to lack legitimacy and yet possess huge power: what Lord Hailsham referred to as ‘an elected dictatorship’. Even governments with small majorities have been able to push through policy with little regard to the opposition view.
  • The inequality in voter value across the UK does not fit with the principle of ‘one person, one vote’ and is not going to be remedied simply by moving constituency boundaries.
  • Beyond this inequality, many votes are wasted, meaning they have little or no impact on the electoral outcome. This undermines legitimacy, encourages tactical voting and may discourage turnout, all of which undermine democratic principles.
  • The two-party system represents a lack of true competition in UK elections, which undermines liberal and pluralist democratic principles. The only accountability that voters can often exercise is to choose the other major party which is not a great deal of choice.
115
Q

state AGAINIST arguements for the question: should FPTP be replaced by Uk General elections?

A

NO :

  • It is widely understood by the public, not just in terms of how the ballot works, but also how the winner of an election is calculated. As a result of this, an educated public is more likely to turn out to vote, which improves the legitimacy of the resulting government.
  • The governments that it has produced are usually strong and stable. The 2010 coalition lasted for the full term of parliament.
  • It is possible for smaller parties to do well, as the SNP demonstrated in 2015 and 2019, while at the same time it can keep parties with more extreme political views out of office. While UKIP gained nearly 4m votes, it only won one seat in 2015. However, its impact has been through moving the Conservatives more to the right and major parts of the mainstream party becoming more Eurosceptic. This, some would argue, allows the best of both worlds.
  • The clear choice of voters ina two party system, and the likelihood of a single party government, make it easier for the voters to hold a government to account simply by voting for the other major party
  • Proportional systems weaken or remove the link between geographical areas and the people who represent them, which is a key feature of FPTP. This link allows for effective local representation of the whole of the UK in Parliament

Given the successful use of other systems across the UK and the drawbacks of FPTP in the 21st Century, there have been growing questions over whether the FPTP system should be replaced for UK general elections. Although a referendum on the issue was held in 2011, it only gave the public choice between FPTP and the alternative vote (AV). AV is similar to SV except voters can express more than two preferences and instead of eliminating all but the top two candidates, the bottom candidate is eliminated one at a time until one person has a majority. While the public voted against the proposal this does not mean they rejected the idea of electoral reform outright, but rather rejected AV. After two more contentious elections in 2015 and 2017, the questions over FPTP have not gone away.

116
Q

STATE FOR arguments for the question: are referendums good for the UK?

A

YES:

  • They can encourage education and participation, as shown in the Scottish independence and Brexit referendums, which enhances legitimacy and consent in the political system
  • They have provided a clear answer to political issues and the results have been implemented, such as the creation of devolved bodies.
  • They have enhanced liberal democracy by serving as a way of limiting the power of government.
  • The management of referendums is overseen by the independent Electoral Commission in the same manner as elections. This limits government manipulation of them.
  • They have enhanced representation in the UK by allowing popular sovereignty to be directly expressed.
  • As an accepted constitutional convention, they provide another way in which the public can engage in politics between elections and ensure a responsive government with a mandate to act.
  • As referendums are advisory, Parliament remains sovereign and can implement the decision in an effective manner. Although the public voted to leave the EU, Parliament decides on the manner of the withdrawal.
117
Q

State AGAINIST arguments for the question: are referendums good for the uk?

A

NO :

  • Turnout for some referendums has been low, such as the AV referendum, which undermines the legitimacy of the decision and the effectiveness of direct democracy.
  • Close results can be more divisive rather than settling an issue, as seen in Brexit and Scottish independence referendums
  • The campaigns surrounding some referendums have been misleading raising questions over the legitimacy of the result
  • They have undermined representative democracy in the UK, challenging key principles of the ‘trustee model’ in which elected representatives act in the best interests of the electorate on the basis of the consent given at an election
  • The issues raised are often complex, with voters lacking the necessary information to make a fully informed decision and the question being too complex to reduce to a yes or no choice.
  • The government decides when and if to call a referendum, which concentrates power in the government rather than limiting it.
  • Parliamentary sovereignty is undermined in reality as having offered a referendum there is a lot of political pressure for the government to honour the will of the people.