pilliavin's subway study Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is bystander behaviour?

A

when the presence of others reduces the likelihood that help will be offered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is prosocial behaviour

A

behaviour beneficial to other people that may not help the helper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did piliavin aim to do

A

to investigate bystander behaviour in a natural setting

to see if different aspects of the victim would affect if help was offered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the method used

A

4 researchers boarded a new york subway one member played the victim (always male)

the victim stood next to a pole on a critical section of the subway

after 70 seconds the victim collapsed and stayed until help was offered

in 38 trials the victim appeared drunk and in 65 they were carrying a cane (disabled condition)

2 observers noted down behaviour and if no help was given after 70-150 seconds a model stepped in to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the results

A

the person using the cane was helped almost all of the time and the drunk person was helped half of the time.

87% of disabled victims were helped in the first 70 seconds and only 17% of drunk people were helped

people were more likely to help if there was a bigger group on the subway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the conclusion made

A

certain characteristics affect if the person is helped if they are ‘more deserving’ they are more likely to be helped

amount of people did not influence whether help was given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a strength of this study PEE

A

participants are unaware they’re being watched

this was a field experiment done on a subway, participants were not aware they were being observed therefore their reactions were natural and closer to real life

this is important because it shows the study has high ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a weakness of this study PEE

A

used an urban sample

it was most likely that people on that subway lived in the city. this meant that people would have been used to these situations and seeing beggars or people falling over so they were more likely to ignore it

this is important as it shows results cannot be generalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly