Pg 40 Flashcards
What are all the different ways you can terminate a real covenant?
- time limit – specified use or circumstances – termination by contract defenses – termination by property defenses – release – waiver – impossibility – frustration of purpose – change of neighborhoods – changed circumstances – merger – abandonment – estoppel – beneficiary’s death – tax foreclosure – adverse possession – prescription - government acquisition – legal invalidity
How does a time limit terminate a real covenant?
The parties specify the duration in the instrument, so it terminates once that duration elapses
How can specified use or circumstances terminate a real covenant?
If the restriction only applies to certain situations
What are some contract defences that could terminate a real covenant?
Release, waiver, estoppel, impossibility, frustration of purpose, changed circumstances, beneficiaries’ death
What are some property defences that could terminate a real covenant?
Tax foreclosure, adverse possession, merger
How can release terminate a real covenant?
If the beneficiary releases the restriction through a voluntary act that frees the party from the obligations. This can happen by re-transferring the interest or cancelling the agreement
**This only binds the releaser. If a developer conveyed Lot 1 to A with a single-family dwelling covenant on all the retained lots, and conveyed lot 2 to B in the same way but later released him, A can still stop B from using the property for anything besides single-family dwelling because the release only terminated the right for the developer to enforce the obligation, but B still has a duty to A based on the developer’s covenant to A that ran with the land to bind B
How can a waiver terminate a real covenant?
If the person entitled to the remedy intentionally passes on taking any action and manifests it expressly or by an act, he cannot later assert the right.
How can impossibility terminate a real covenant?
If performance is impossible it depends on the intent of the original parties whether the burdened party should be liable. Express terms control, or if the impossibility was reasonably foreseeable. If it was intended to put the risk on the burdened party, then the impossibility is not a defence
How can frustration of purpose terminate a real covenant?
The performance could be possible, but it wouldn’t accomplish the purpose that the original parties created the restriction for, so then there’s no reason for the restriction to continue
How can change of neighbourhood terminate a real covenant?
If the neighbourhood of the burdened land changes enough, then the court can declare the covenant terminated or refuse to enforce it.
The change must be physical, substantial, create a use of land that is contrary to the covenant restrictions, and affect the general vicinity (not just a few parcels). The change must also cause the restriction to become useless and its benefits to be substantially lost so that it would be inequitable to enforce the covenant.
Loss of value or change in zoning is not enough. The easement terminates when the purpose it was created for ends
How can changed circumstances terminate a real covenant?
If the reason for the restriction is no longer valid so that the changed conditions adversely affected the land and made it impossible to achieve the original parties’ intent, the covenant can be terminated. The focus is on the burdened lot, so a restriction will still be enforced if it still substantially is valuable to the benefitted land. Must argue the intended benefit and the degree of hardship on the burdened land
If the change is so radical that it renders the restriction of no substantial benefit to the dominant estate and defeats the object of it, it will be terminated
If an owner of a huge parcel of land has a bed-and-breakfast that is famous for its view, and he sells the adjoining lot with a restriction that the new owner can never develop the land, then the bed-and-breakfast shuts down, will the restriction still be enforced?
No, because changed circumstances would’ve terminated it
Is a change in zoning enough to terminate a real covenant?
Not unless the new ordinance prohibits the uses permitted by the covenant
If A agrees with B to restrict her property to residential uses and at the time the whole neighborhood is residential, but now everything else is commercial, would that covenant still be enforced?
Probably not, because the slight benefit to B cannot justify the heavy burden on A, so the covenant will be terminated
How can merger terminate a real covenant?
If both the dominant and servient parcels come into ownership by the same party, any use restrictions are terminated by the merger