Pg 33 Flashcards
If an easement does not specify the dimensions and location, what happens?
It extends over only as much area as is reasonably necessary for the purpose of the easement.
What is the majority position when the location of an easement is fixed regarding movement of the easement?
It cannot be moved without the consent of both estates
If the parties do not adequately establish the location and width of an easement, what happens?
The courts will establish it by finding a convenient and reasonable location
Once an easement’s location is fixed, can either party unilaterally relocate it?
- majority: no
– minority: the servient estate can relocate if it gives the dominant estate benefits substantially similar to the original and has no adverse effect
** Essay pts: for speaking about split of authority
If there is no provision that deals with the maintenance and repair of an easement, what happens?
The easement owner has a duty to make repairs and not to interfere with the servient owner’s use and enjoyment, and can make improvements if they do not unreasonably increase the burden on the survient estate. The survient estate has no obligation regarding maintenance and repair
What are the factors to determine whether a fee simple title or an easement is being conveyed?
– the amount of consideration
– particularity of description of the property [easements do not need definite statements of width/dimensions or exact location, but fee title needs this]
– extent of limitation on use of the property
– type of interest that best serves the purpose of the parties
– particularities of wording in conveyance documents
– who the property was assessed to/paid taxes
– how parties to the conveyance or their heirs or assignees have treated the property
If you have an easement of ingress/egress across a servient estate that currently serves a single house, then you subdivide the lot into 30 lots and want to continue using the easement for all 30, is that change in the use of the easement allowed?
Only if it is a reasonable burden. You can make reasonable use of an easement if it doesn’t put an unreasonable burden on the servient estate
** Essay: argue both ways on this issue for bonus points. “If it is an unreasonable burden, you can’t use it, if it isn’t reasonable, you can.“
Is it possible to add new lots to serve an existing easement that are not part of the dominant estate?
You cannot extend an easement to service property that is not the dominant estate.
If the terms of an easement are explicit, is it possible to deviate from them?
Not without agreement from both parties. I.e.: 10 feet is 10 feet, it cannot be widened
If there is no explicit language regarding the scope of an easement, what are the two approaches?
– Factor approach: considers the circumstances of the original grant, the amount of consideration paid for it, prior and subsequent uses, etc.
– rule of reason: only reasonable rights and burdens are allowed. Courts attempt to do what the parties would have if they considered the matter and acted reasonably.
If a defendant has a right of way across your property, and the easement does not state a mode of transportation, originally when it was made the defendant used to ride a horse across your property, but times have changed and now he wants to drive a car, would this be allowed under the factor approach and the rule of reason approach?
– factor approach: asks if the parties have cars at the time, if the road was paved, how much was paid for the easement, if cars were ever driven on the road, etc.
– rule of reason: decides if driving is a reasonable activity for the defendant and if it unreasonably burdens the servient estate
How do you determine the scope of use for an implied easement?
Look at the circumstances
How do you determine the scope of use for a prescriptive easement?
Consider the previous use to see if the servient tenant would have acquiesced to the new use. I.e.: if someone walks across your property every day for 25 years and now wants to drive, probably you would’ve stopped her from driving a long time ago
What are the rights of the dominant tenant regarding an easement?
They have the right to use the easement, but not to possess it, so they cannot sue to eject others that are using it, they can only bring suit for unreasonable interference with the easement
What are the servient tenant’s rights regarding an easement?
By granting use to the dominant tenant, the servient does not lose the right to use the property the same way if it doesn’t unreasonably interfere with the dominant tenant’s use