Pg 12 Flashcards
Are options in gross to buy land/personal property subject to the rule against perpetuities?
Yes, and they are void if they can be exercised beyond the period of perpetuities.
But options to buy land appendant to a leasehold estate are not under RAP because alienability is not fettered and improvement of the land is promoted by the option to purchase. The options for lessees to buy in feesimple are valid even if they might be exercised beyond the perpetuity period
If a class can increase or decrease for longer than the perpetuities period, what happens?
The entire gift is void
If an entire gift to a class is subject to a condition precedent, that may not be satisfied within the perpetuities period, what happens?
The entire class gift is void
What are the two major exceptions to class gifts being voided if they will go longer than perpetuities period?
- each member of the class is gifted a stated amount – the initial gift is to a class whose membership will be determined within the perpetuities period
How is it an exception to RAP for a class gift if each member of the class is gifted a stated amount?
If the gift is $1000 each to every kid of A that reaches 30, each gift is treated separately when the rule is applied, so the gift can be valid for one member and void for others
If an initial gift is to a class whose membership will be determined within the perpetuities period with a giftover of the share of each class member to kids or heirs, how is that an exception to class gifts violating RAP?
This is treated separately when RAP applies, so the gift can be valid for some sub-classes and void for others.
IE: if you bequeath your personal estate in trust to pay income in equal shares to A’s kids for their lives, and then to your living issue in equal shares
What are two types of partial restraints that you can put on property?
– Purchase option
– right of first refusal
What is the difference between total restraint on alienation of property and partial restraint in regard to RAP?
– Total restraint: not allowed
– partial restraint: OK if it is reasonable
Are purchase options assignable?
Yes unless the option itself prohibits or circumscribes assignments
What is the difference between an option to purchase and the right of first refusal?
– Option to purchase: this grants the holder the power to compel the owner to sell, if he wants to or not
– preemptive right: requires the owner, when he does decide to sell, to offer the property first to the holder of the right to meet a third-party offer or buy at a set price. If the holder decides not to, the owner can sell to anyone
What is the split about whether or not RAP applies to options to purchase?
– Some courts say RAP does not apply to this because the holder has a vested property interest, or the holder only has a contract right and not a property interest
– some courts say it does apply
What is a right of first refusal?
An agreement to offer the sale of the property to a certain party first, and thus only vests when the right is exercised.
Does the right of first refusal violate RAP?
Yes if it inhibits alienability by:
– having a fixed price that as time passes has no relationship to market value
– if any potential buyer could exceed market value but preemptioner is allowed to pay the lesser amount
– or even if the preemptioner can meet any bona fide offer, that would deter people from bidding, which would depress the value and discourage the owner from trying to sell
Does RAP apply to options to renew leases?
No, and it doesn’t apply to the lessee’s option to purchase all or part of the leased premises, or options to extend the scope of an easement or profit. These are justified because their social benefit offsets the consequences of the violation
What are factors that you should consider to decide if a restraint on alienation of property is void?
– The type of price that is set. If it is fixed and very disproportionate to market market value, it is unreasonable
– the intent of the parties when they contracted for it. If it is for the purpose of restraining alienability, it is invalid, but if it was freely entered by mutual consent in the normal bargaining relationship, it is reasonable
– if the person imposing this restraint has an interest in the land he’s trying to protect and the enforcement accomplishes it, it is likely reasonable
– if the restraint is limited in duration, and it allows a substantial variety of types of transfers, or is limited in the number of persons it can be transferred to
– if restraint increases the value of the property or makes it more marketable, it is probably reasonable