Personality type theory - Personality and health Flashcards
Personality type theory
The typological approach to personality is underpinned by the assumption that people are qualitatively different from each other - there are different types of people.
Type theory focuses on patterns of traits that characterise people and sorts these patterns into types of people.
The aim of type theory is to classify people into categories that are distinct and discontinuous - you are either one type or the other.
Still working with traits – can’t create type without measuring traits that make it up
personality type approach
you are either an introvert or an extravert.
Categorising someone as either an extravert or introvert reflects a type approach.
personality trait approach
you can be anywhere on a continuum ranging from introversion to extraversion.
He/she is somewhat extraverted - Characterising someone as a bit or somewhat extraverted reflects a dimensional trait approach.
Sheldon’s somatotypes
ectomorph
mesomorph
endomorph
endomorph
relaxed, sociable, tolerant, comfort-loving, peaceful
plump, buxom, developed visceral structure
mesopmorph
active, assertive, vigorous, combative
muscular
ectomorph
quiet, fragile, restrained, non-assertive, sensitive
lean, delicate, poor muscles
an early personality typology
The Ancient Greeks: “The Four Humors”
Excess blood = sanguine (cheerful), ruddy and robust.
Excess black bile = melancholic and depressed.
Excess yellow bile/choler = choleric, angry and bitter.
Excess phlegm = phlegmatic, cold and apathetic.
contemporary research in health psychology
Having a “Type A” Personality (chronic hostility/choleric) appears to raise the risk of having a heart attack.
Jungian personality theory
Following his split from Freud, Jung developed his own theory of personality types – agreed with unconscious
Drawing upon the work of Freud and Adler along with his own clinical observations Jung suggested there must be at least two different personality types:
- Extraversion – focuses more on the external world – externally orientated
- Introversion – focuses more on the internal world - internally oriented
Jungian types
Jung recognised that individuals are never wholly extraverted or introverted but incorporate aspects of both, although one type predominates in an individual’s functioning.
Jung believed that preferences are innate “inborn predispositions.”
Jungian types - dominant function
Extraversion or Introversion
- To address the differences that existed within groups of introverts and extraverts Jung classified the ways in which people can relate to the world according to two Auxiliary Functions.
Jungian types - 2 auxiliary functions
each with two opposite ways of functioning (ways of relating to the world within the dominant functions):
- perceiving information - via our senses or intuition.
- making decisions - objective logic or subjective feelings.
Auxiliary functions are ‘preferences’ – we can use both but we have a preference for one over the other.
- Think of this like ‘handedness’. We use both hands but we have a strong preference for one over the other.
Jung’s extraverted types
Extraverted Sensing
Extraverted Intuition
Extraverted Thinking
Extraverted Feeling
Jung’s introverted types
Introverted Sensing
Introverted Intuition
Introverted Thinking
Introverted Feeling
what env influences did Jung recognise innate preferences interact with?
Cultural background
Family environment
Education
and many other social and economic conditions
Briggs and Myers
developed Jung’s typology.
Described a fourth auxiliary function or preference - how we deal with the world on a day-to-day basis
- Judging preference – prefer ordered and structured environment.
- Perceiving preference – prefer flexible, unstructured environment.
define 16 different Personality Types.
preferred mode of operation within 4 traits/functions
Extraverted - Introverted
Sensing - Intuitive
Thinking - Feeling
Judging - Perceiving
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
commercially available questionnaire, widely used in business to assist employment decisions.
- However, empirical evidence questions the reliability and validity of the MBTI.
- The existence of these 16 types has also been questioned.
- Re-test data (3 months later) indicates approximately 50% are classified as a different type – personality is unlikely to change in this short period – little use for predicting behaviour
indv diffs - health and illness
Long history to the study of individual differences in health and illness (e.g., Four humours etc).
Contemporary times – Health Psychology and Positive Psychology.
- People react differently to health and illness.
- Cancer – “feeling fine all things considered”.
- Heavy cold – acting as though at death’s door.
- Health is not simply about the absence of physical or mental disease. Rather it includes the attitudes that individuals have towards their health. It is here that individual differences matter.
personality, health and illness
Considering how certain personality types might be linked to health and illness and in particular cardiovascular disease.
Heart disease is a global problem:
- 17.4 million deaths worldwide (WHO, 2005)
In the UK heart disease and related circulatory illnesses are the main cause of death:
- 198,000 deaths each year (1 in 5 men and 1 in 8 women die from coronary heart disease (British Heart Foundation, 2010) – gender inequalities and issues with the evidence
Therefore, globally, a lot of money has been invested in research in this area.
type A personality
There is a long history linking heart disease to personality and looking for a causal link. Modern interest was stirred by Friedman and Rosenman (1959).
- These physicians tried but could not predict cardiovascular disease from physical factors alone so started to examine personality factors.
- Observed a relationship between coronary heart disease and certain emotional and psychological characteristics.
They identified a coronary-prone behaviour pattern which they labelled “Type A” personality and contrasted this with non-coronary prone “Type B” personality (Friedman & Rosenman, 1974).
The emotional and behavioural style of a Type A individual is marked by an aggressive ongoing struggle to achieve more in less time and often in competition with other people.
type A indvs tend to
lead fast paced lives, work longer hours and longer weeks than Type B individuals.
be intolerant of others and have a need for control.
show different physiological responses to stress compared with other types of people.
type B personality
Very relaxed and unhurried in approach.
Might work hard sometimes but are not driven in the compulsive manner of the Type A.
Less interested in competition, power or achievement and are more able to take life as it comes.