General introduction Flashcards

1
Q

where does the word personality come from?

A

the Latin “persona”, meaning “mask“. – different mask for every role and situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

is there something stable behind personality?

A

yes and evolving across time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

personality definition (Funder, 2004)

A

“Personality refers to an individual’s characteristic patterns of thought, emotion and behaviour together with the psychological mechanisms – hidden or not - behind those patterns.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

personality definition (Burger, 2004)

A

“Personality can be defined as consistent behaviour patterns and intrapersonal processes originating within the individual.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

general definition

A

Basically, ‘personality’ refers to our attempts to capture or summarise an individual’s ‘essence’; or that which is consistent across situations and over time – consistency can be demonstrated over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

individual differences

A

Individual differences - cornerstone subject area in modern psychology

Where psychology emerged from philosophy

Theorists own experiences is where theories come from

The search for broad generalisations and laws of behaviour omits the extraordinary diversity of human behaviour, it omits individual differences. – looking for group or experimental effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

indv diffs assumptions

A

People vary on a range of psychological attributes. This variation is consistent between situations and across time. – why people vary open to question – temperament?

It is possible to measure and assess these individual differences.

People can be classified according to their personality characteristics and intelligence. – or not safe?

Individual differences are useful for explaining and predicting behaviour and performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does the study of indv diffs examine?

A

the ways in which people are psychologically similar and psychologically different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when can personality psych be traced back to?

A

Greek philosophers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Plato (360BC)

A

“No two persons are born exactly alike; but each differs from the other in natural endowments, one being suited for one occupation and the other for another.” (Plato 360BC)

Skinner also had same idea

adoption studies show it to be wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when did psych split from philosophy?

A

early 19th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

phrenology

A

Franz Gall (1758 -1828)

  • lumps and bumps on the skull reveal character traits and mental abilities
  • 1832 – 29 UK Phrenology Societies

It was proposed that selection of MPs be based on phrenology

Today - various parts of the brain have particular functions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2 main camps of modern personality psychology

A

Scientific psychology (e.g. Trait approaches, Behaviourists and Social Learning Theorists and cognitive)

Clinical psychology (e.g. Psychoanalysts, Humanists and Existentialists)

They both strive to understand the ways in which people are psychologically similar and psychologically different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the six different paradigms/approaches to personality

A

The psychoanalytic approach

The trait approach

The biological and evolutionary approaches

The phenomenological/humanistic approach

The learning approach (behaviourism and social learning theories)

The cognitive approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the psychoanalytic approach

A

Unconscious mind & unconscious motivations that drive us

Resolving internal conflict

Problem – sexual desires – understood in different way - understand trauma now

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the trait approach

A

How people differ

Conceptualising and measuring differences

Continuum of traits and behaviours

Can test for reliability and validity

17
Q

the biological and evolutionary approaches

A

Anatomy, physiology, inheritance and evolution

Inherited predispositions

Not coherent whole

18
Q

the phenomenological/humanistic approach

A

Conscious experience of the world

Personal responsibility and self acceptance

Underpins qualitative research methods

Subjective experience and realities

19
Q

the learning approach (behaviourism and SL theories)

A

Comprises Behaviourism, Social Learning Theory and Cognitive Personality Theory

Learning helps to adapt their behaviour via rewards and punishments

20
Q

the cognitive approach

A

Role of perception and memory

Different ways in which people process information

Trauma learning

21
Q

why so many personality theories?

A

The theories originators hold different philosophical assumptions (paradigms) about people. The theories are often incompatible.

Different theories address different questions.

Each approach has interesting and useful things to say about human personality but each is incomplete.

We can’t come up with one big theory of personality because of this trade off.

Look at all to get nearer to reality

Express lots about themselves

22
Q

philosophical assumptions

A

Freedom (humanists) versus determinism (Freud – unconscious and behaviourists - stimuli)

Hereditary (biological) versus environmental (social)

Uniqueness (idiographic - Freud – cant lump people together) versus universality (nomothetic – quantifiable and measurable)

Proactive versus reactive

Optimistic (humanist) versus pessimistic (Freudian)

Conscious (phrenology and humanistic) versus unconscious (cog and Freud)

23
Q

ways to evaluate philosophical assumptions

A

coherence

relevance

comprehensiveness

compellingness

24
Q

coherence

A

is the philosophical position clear, logical and consistent?

25
Q

relevance

A

does the theory deal with issues that are important and meaningful to us today? Are the theoretical assumptions compatible with empirical reality?

26
Q

comprehensiveness

A

does the theory encompass a wide array of phenomena? Does it cover what it claims to cover in a profound or superficial way?

27
Q

compellingness

A

Does the theory convince you?

28
Q

what makes a useful theory?

A
  1. Generates hypotheses/research
  2. Falsifiable – problem with Freudian theory
  3. Organises and integrates existing data and empirical knowledge
  4. Suggests practical answers to day-to-day problems
  5. Internal consistency
  6. Simplicity/parsimony
29
Q

basic issues

A

To what extent is personality culturally determined? – personality’s partly determined by culture

Which is more important in determining what people do, the person or the situation?

Personality differences between men and women – what are they and where do they come from? – not clear

30
Q

individualistic cultures

A

(include most Northern European countries and the USA) emphasise individual needs/accomplishments.

People tend to have an ‘I’ orientation.

Great value placed on autonomy, youth, equality and individual security

31
Q

collectivist cultures

A

(include many Asian, African, Central and South American countries) emphasise cooperation rather than competition and group rather than individual accomplishments.

People tend to have a ‘we’ orientation.

Great value placed on duty, tradition, age, hierarchy, group security

‘I’ isn’t a good thing

32
Q

the person-situation debate

A

The person vs. situation debate has been a strongly contested topic since the late 1960’s.

Walter Mischell, (1968) - Personality and Assessment.

The issue: Which is more important in determining what people do, the person or the situation?

Situational variables are best suited to predicting behaviour in specific situations, personality traits are more able to predict patterns of behaviour that persist across situations and time

33
Q

the Forer/Barnum effect

A

The Barnum effect is also called the Forer effect after B. R. Forer (1948).

The Barnum effect - people tend to accept vague and general personality descriptions as uniquely applicable to themselves.

People tend to accept questionable, even false statements about themselves, if they are deemed positive or flattering enough.

34
Q

the Barnum effect study

A

Forer (1948): asked students to evaluate the personality description from 0 to 5, with “5” meaning “excellent” and “4” meaning “good.”

Accuracy of the personality description amazed the participants

The class average evaluation was 4.26.

The test has been repeated hundreds of time with psychology students, the average is still around 4.2.

35
Q

pseudoscience

A

tarot, astrology, fortune telling

36
Q

what do personality theories/assessment have to be?

A

specific, reliable, valid and testable.

37
Q

the psychometric approach

A

Psychometrics - theory and methods of psychological measurement.

Psychometrics includes Intelligence testing, measurement of personality traits and vocational testing.

The impact of testing on the individual and in wider society is substantial which highlights the importance of high professional standards for the development, administration and interpretation of tests.