Personality 2 Flashcards

1
Q

In order for our research to be useful it needs to have validity.

A

it measures what you want to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Measuring personality abstract and specific

A
  1. abstract: broad— conceptual
  2. specific thing to measure the abstract thing operational
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Correlation vs. Causation

A

Research question: What factors are related to well-being
Hypothesis: Extraversion is related to well being
correlation does not equal causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Study: Costa and Macrae: participants complete measures of extraversion and well-being independent and dependent

A

Independent variable: Extraversion (I see myself as someone who is…)
Dependent variable: Well-being: Positive affect (Indicate to what extent you have felt during the past month)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Study: Steel, Schmidt and Schultz
findings between positive and extraversion

A

Meta-anaysis of 50 relevant studies found a strong, positive correlation between extraversion and positive affect r=.44

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define well-being

A

emotions over the last 30 days
stress levels over 60 days
informant report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does this correlation not tell us about how these variables are related to one another?

A

Causal hypothesis 1: Extraversion causing your wellbeing
Causal hypothesis 2: Well-being causing your extraversion: reverse causality
third variable explanation: Number of siblings, family dynamic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

study: Manipulation extroversion vs. introversion

A

Instructed to be extroverted for a week then introverted for a week. Told to do a list of specific ideas for how and when you will use these types of behaviors in ur life.
Participants completed three online assignments. 1. at the beginning of the study after the 1st week of behavior change. (day 8) and after the second week of behavior change.
then asked about life satisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Results of the extro vs. introversion study

A

Extroversion increases your well-being introversion decreases your well-being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the logic here? how do experiments tell us about causality?

A

Everything should be the same about each group, except for the independent variable they received.
Our study was high in internal validity, to know there was a change in the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Disadvantages of experiments

A

this is not the real world, they have a lot of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

predicted validity

A

if your measures are capturing personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Objective tests

A

Clear with one answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

projective tests

A

have no answer, open to interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

objective tests: rational method

A

how can i tell how empathetic someone is?
“I find that i am in tune with others moods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Empirically-derived tests

A

Known groups: find people in the world where some are highly empathetic and those who are not
find a group we know are low hostility–> then look who have high hostility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

IAT tests

A

Press 2 different keys for calm or anxious words as well as words presented about yourself “I, Me, Self”
Are you faster when anxiety and self are grouped together or when calm and self are grouped together?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

single trait approaches

A

Really only one major dimension of a persons personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Within the single trait approaches: high Self monitoring

A

High self monitor: you know when you are changing your behavior around different people and they actively try to change their behavior to fit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

low self monitor

A

have one personality and dont trying to fit for others. you’re authentic and true to urself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

The big 5

A

they are specific so there power is limited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

the many trait apprach

A

at its extreme argues that if you really want o know about somebody, you need to measure a bunch of specific traits about them.

23
Q

essential trait

A

Spearate and continuous dimensions of personality. knowing these allows the greatest predictive power
ex. i am genuinely outgoing

24
Q

the big 5

A

Conscientious –> organized
Agreeableness –> soft-hearted
Neuroticism –> anxious
Openness –>
Extraversion–> sociable

25
Q

Reliable associations with a wide range of life outcomes study

A

subjective well-being
extraversion predicts subjective well-being
extravert –> social relationships show high well being
Negative emotionality: nerocisiom: constantly feeling dissatisfaction shows lower well-being

26
Q

Forgiveness: aggreeableness

A

how nice you are shows how forgiving you are

27
Q

Traits don’t allow for perfect prediction of behavior

A

the big 5 is not allows accurate
well being comes from extraversion and other aspects of personality.
Ex. socio-economic status, life events…

28
Q

Multi-determination

A

anything that happens in your life is multiply determined.

29
Q

Interactive effects

A

individual traits interact with each other. Relationship of the two variables change when interact with the 3rd variable.

30
Q

can skills explain unique in relevant outcomes beyond what can be explained by traits alone?

A

ex. predict peoples delivery of a speech.
measure using the big 5
then add in the skill
Skills help predict a better outcome of how they will do

31
Q

Physiological reactivity study

A

participants with strong political attitudes
skin conductance with filler images and threatening images of spiders. Measures average persons response to filler image and average response to threatening image.
this shows what they look like when threatened. liberals and conservatives might be this bc of how reactive they are when u threaten them
hypothesis was supported

32
Q

Neurotransmitters

A

Stressor, body releases epinephrine and norepinephrine then fight or flight can kick in. and see can u deal with the stress or not

33
Q

men vs. women

A

men: fight or flight
women tend (calm and quiet children; protects them and helps them develop) and befriend (call their friends to tell them what is going on, helps you deal with things).

34
Q

Stressful day at work study

A

fathers after a stressful day tend to withdrawal from family
Mothers after a stressful day use that stress to be more nurturing to their children

35
Q

There is rarely a 1:1 ratio between personality and biology

A

low serotoin= depression

36
Q

High testosterone

A

Aggression, sexual behavior

37
Q

Bydirectional relationships

A

causal effects on behavior on biology one is contributing to the other

38
Q

Study in marriages taking blood samples and tests levels of testosterone after marriage and having children

A

results: usually in men the levels go down more than women

39
Q

Experimental manipulation

A

-for high power people, power only made them narcissistic if you also have high testosterone
- if you got power with low testosterone, you end up not using your power to become narcissistic

40
Q

Cortisol levels high and low associations

A

Chronically high cortisol is associated w anxiety, depression, and a high risk of cardiovascular disease
- Chronically low levels associated with dangerous senstation seeking

41
Q

Oxytocin

A

Some kind of empirical data shows a relationship between oxytocin and morality

42
Q

trustworthiness with oxytocin

A

the more oxytocin you have the more trustworthy you are
ex. the money game and your brain produced oxytocin, the more oxytocin on deck, the more likely you will return the money

43
Q

Measure of trust (money)

A

give 10 dollars to another person and it tripples

44
Q

measure of trustworthiness

A

how much they give back to you. Were you right or wrong to give this money to them?

45
Q

Oxytocin= the love hormone (study of relationships)

A

moral behavior and oxytocin only a small number of studies showed a difference between oxytocin and morality
oxytocin increases your desire to affiliate with others

46
Q

barriers of oxytocin and morality

A

Avoidant attachment style: they do not feel they can trust
cannot build connections. this is frustrating

47
Q

Study in the netherlands

A

Oxytocin spray or saline, asked to take a 5 moral choice dilemma questions: sacrifice one person to save a larger group of people??
Oxytocin group: sacrificed person an ingroup members
Saline: sacrificed a person in an outgroup member

48
Q

Oxytocin study on sprays type of design and independent and dependent variables

A

Experimental study
Independent: oxytocin or not
second independent: ingroup sacrifice vs. outgroup sacrifice
Dependent: how many people say they would save one person or not
the placebo group: there was no difference between ingroup and out-

49
Q

twin studies: heritability

A

Usually find more similarities in identical twins than fraternal twins; meaning traits are more heritable. (the larger the number the more heritable it is on the scale)

50
Q

what can heritability tell you

A

genes matter; everything is heritable
environment matters; shared family environment influences psychopathology, most big 5 traits

51
Q

what does heritablity not tell u

A

does not mean genetic
it cannot tell you HOW genes effect personality and behavior, there is no pin point effect

52
Q

the problem of mediation

A

genes– there’s a genetic componement but not a rise in behavior

53
Q

principals of multideterminsim

A