Personality 2 Flashcards
In order for our research to be useful it needs to have validity.
it measures what you want to measure
Measuring personality abstract and specific
- abstract: broad— conceptual
- specific thing to measure the abstract thing operational
Correlation vs. Causation
Research question: What factors are related to well-being
Hypothesis: Extraversion is related to well being
correlation does not equal causation
Study: Costa and Macrae: participants complete measures of extraversion and well-being independent and dependent
Independent variable: Extraversion (I see myself as someone who is…)
Dependent variable: Well-being: Positive affect (Indicate to what extent you have felt during the past month)
Study: Steel, Schmidt and Schultz
findings between positive and extraversion
Meta-anaysis of 50 relevant studies found a strong, positive correlation between extraversion and positive affect r=.44
Define well-being
emotions over the last 30 days
stress levels over 60 days
informant report
what does this correlation not tell us about how these variables are related to one another?
Causal hypothesis 1: Extraversion causing your wellbeing
Causal hypothesis 2: Well-being causing your extraversion: reverse causality
third variable explanation: Number of siblings, family dynamic
study: Manipulation extroversion vs. introversion
Instructed to be extroverted for a week then introverted for a week. Told to do a list of specific ideas for how and when you will use these types of behaviors in ur life.
Participants completed three online assignments. 1. at the beginning of the study after the 1st week of behavior change. (day 8) and after the second week of behavior change.
then asked about life satisfaction
Results of the extro vs. introversion study
Extroversion increases your well-being introversion decreases your well-being
What is the logic here? how do experiments tell us about causality?
Everything should be the same about each group, except for the independent variable they received.
Our study was high in internal validity, to know there was a change in the independent variable
Disadvantages of experiments
this is not the real world, they have a lot of control
predicted validity
if your measures are capturing personality
Objective tests
Clear with one answer
projective tests
have no answer, open to interpretation
objective tests: rational method
how can i tell how empathetic someone is?
“I find that i am in tune with others moods
Empirically-derived tests
Known groups: find people in the world where some are highly empathetic and those who are not
find a group we know are low hostility–> then look who have high hostility
IAT tests
Press 2 different keys for calm or anxious words as well as words presented about yourself “I, Me, Self”
Are you faster when anxiety and self are grouped together or when calm and self are grouped together?
single trait approaches
Really only one major dimension of a persons personality
Within the single trait approaches: high Self monitoring
High self monitor: you know when you are changing your behavior around different people and they actively try to change their behavior to fit.
low self monitor
have one personality and dont trying to fit for others. you’re authentic and true to urself
The big 5
they are specific so there power is limited