Personality Flashcards

1
Q

Personality

A

One’s characteristic pattern of thought, emotion, and behavior, along with accompanying psychological mechanisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Debate on universal applicability of “personality”

variable

A

Some languages pay a lot of attention to personality

personality= trans-situationally stable; but many cultures do not discuss transsituational stability

Simply extension of studying western individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

personality as being universal

A

All cultural groups possess terms that describe one’s enduring characteristics

“Personality” exists (but may need to reconceptualize as something existing within relationships for certain cultures)

Ie personality within an individual within a relationship, but won’t be consistent across relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lexical approach to personality

A

all important individual differences in personality are encoded in natural language

1)look for all dictionary entries that are trait adjective
2)reduce list by eliminating synonyms, physical descriptors, temporary states, unfamiliar terms
3)administer list of traits to participants to answer
4)factor analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Factor analysis

A

How many facets or factors underlie a particular construct

If people score high on question 1,3,4 this might be flagged as one factors

If people score high on question 2,5,6, this might be flagged as another factor

Terms given similar rating are addressing one factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Five Factor Model of Personality

A

1)Openness to experience= intelligence and curiosity about the world
2)Conscientiousness: how responsible and dependable someone is
3)Extraversion:how active and dominant someone is
4)Agreeableness: how warm and pleasant an individual is
5)Neuroticism: emotional instability and unpredictability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Studies using NEO-PI-R across 50 cultures reveal universality in 5 factors structure

A

Started with english terms->broken up into 5 factors-> translate those same words in different language(carrying the same meaning)-> still should yield the 5 factors
Use same approach in different languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What if we used the lexical approach in another language such as Tagalog?
In tagalog they found:

A

Gregariousness: liking the company of others, talks a lot, humorous
Self assurance: assertive,brace, insensitive, not gullible
Concern for other vs. egotism: not violent, humble, generous
Conscientious: dependable, hardworking, religious
Intellect: clever, sensible, inquisitive, talented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

tagalog equiaveleny with FFM

A

High in gregariousness= high in extraversion
Low Self assurance= high in neuroticism
High on intellect= high openness to experience
conscientiousness= conscientiousness
High Concern for others= agreeableness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In tagalog they also found 2 other factors not in english:

A

1)Temperamentalness: emotional reactivity, hot-headedness, irritable
2)Negative valence: sadistic, social deviance, crazy
These two above factors show there are some unique indigenous tagalog personality factors that are not universal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Emic measure:

A

a measure is created from within a culture, and used to assess people from within the culture

Emic: sees more variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Etic measure

A

a measure is created from one culture, and exported for use in another culture
Etic: sees more universality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

self esteem in independent self construal

A

Strong emphasis on having and maintaining high self esteem

Self-enhancement: tendency to view selves positively and socially desirable

Motivated by desire to bolster self-image, demonstrate un

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

self esteem in interdependent self construal

A

Social categories, affiliation, social roles

Self-effacement:tendency to view selves in critical/disparaging manner

Motivated by desire to fit in with others, self-improve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

self enhancement

A

More emphasis on positive traits
Try to not think about discrepancy between actual and ideal self
Predictive of depression symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

self effacement

A

More attention paid to negative traits
Experience more actual-ideal discrepancy
Not as concerned about actual-ideal discrepancy
Bc its already part of what they think about

17
Q

Compensatory strategies in self enhancement

A

do things to compensate when they have shortcomings

1)downward social comparison
2)discounting
3)external attributions

18
Q

Self-enhancement
Often studied using rosenberg self-esteem scale

A

Euro-north American data tend to scale higher on scale, East asian data are more aligned at the midpoint of scale

Therefore, Euro-Americans are more likely to engage in self-enhancement compared to E. Asians/everyone else

We are seeing cultural variability in this data

19
Q

alternative explanation to roseberg scale findings

A

1)It is not that E. Asians don’t enhance, instead they group enhance and do less self-enhancing
~This is incorrect because european canadians self and group enhance

2)White people self-enhance across all domains, and E. asians might only self-enhance in specific domains that matter to them
~This is incorrect

3)Modesty norms: E.Asian people show less self-enhancement because they are taught to be more modest
~Correct

20
Q

Overconfidence:

A

having an unjustifiably positive belief in one’s characteristics or performance

21
Q

overestimation

A

thinking that you did better than you actually did, or thinking that you were better than you actually are

22
Q

overplacement

A

thinking you are better than more people than you actually are

23
Q

overprecision:

A

the extent to which people are certain about their guests when they have no information that warrants that certainty

24
Q

Implicit theory of the self:

A

are we able to change ourselves?

25
Q

Implicit theory of the world:

A

is the world around us malleable or fixed?

26
Q

Incremental theory of the self:

A

We can change ourselves

Belief that abilities are malleable and are capable of being changed with efforts

27
Q

Entity theory of the self:

A

we can’t change ourselves

Belief that abilities are largely fixed, reflecting innate features of the self
Implication for responding to failure

28
Q

Incremental theory of the world:

A

the world can change

Perspective that the world is seen as being flexible and responsive to our efforts to change it

We shape the world to how we want it to be

29
Q

Entity theory of the world:

A

the world can not change

Perspective that the world around you is fixed and beyond your ability to change it

30
Q

Primary control:

A

Independent view of self, Incremental theory of the world, entity theory of the self

Exercising agency by making changes in your environment to suit one’s own needs
Assume an internal locus of control

31
Q

Secondary control

A

Interdependent view of self, entity theory of the world, incremental theory of the self

Exercising agency by adjusting goals and desires to control the psychological impact of reality
Assume an external locus of control

32
Q

differences in control and expression of agency through choices:

independent self construal

A

Important decisions must be made by ourselves

33
Q

differences in control and expression of agency through choices:

Interdependent self-construal

A

Important decisions often made by close others

34
Q

If children were asked to play a game, how engaged would they be depending on who makes the choice in the game?

A

If made by themselves
European american most motivated by decision made my themselves

If made by a social circle (ie mother)/ ingroup choice?
Asian american most motivated by decisions made by mother

If made by a stranger
Lowest level of motivation for european and asian

35
Q

Too many choices:

A

Detrimental to have too many choices presented to us
Overwhelming choices deplete mental resources

36
Q

Paradox of choice

A

we dont want too much choice, we dont want too little choice

Too little choice-> leads to learned helplessness (person is unable to find resolutions to difficult situations)