1 Flashcards
According to anthropology there are 3 important factors:
1)every human community faces the same set of problems
2)for every problem there is a set number of solutions
3)every community/cultural group is capable of making use of all solutions, but they have preference for certain solutions
1)kluckhohn and strodtbeck’s (follows anthropology 3 principles)
Different communities/groups choose to focus on certain orientations
kluckholn and strodtbeck’s time orientation
Where in the chronological timeline do people focus on?
alternative orientations:
Past orientation (focusing on ancestors)
Ie shrines
present orientation (focusing on here and now)
future orientation (thinking more about investing in themselves for the future
kluckholn and strodtbeck: “Nature” orientation
(how it is meant to interact with the environment)
alternative orientations:
Subjugation to nature: accept fate, deal with natural forces as they exist
Harmony with nature: we are an extension of the environment, not possible for environment and body to be separate
Mastery over nature:land reclamation projects (creating new land/projects)
klockholn and strodtbeck’s “Human nature” orientation
what is the nature of humanity
alternative orientations:
Are humans inherently:
Good: history that humans are created by divine energy, therefore humans are inherently good
Evil:at birth people are born with sin/evil and we need to wash it away (liberating belief system for confucians)
If you get baptized, then you’re safe
“mixed” (not good or evil):
We have inherent goodness in us (babies don’t like harming), but there are also some natural neg behaviors
klockholns Relational orientation :
what is the nature of the relationships between people?
alternative orientations:
Collateral
Power sharing, well fare of the group over the needs of the self
Lineal
Hierarchy
Decisions made at top and they dictate the people at the lower end of hierarchy
Individualistic
Make decisions by themselves for themselves
Consultations with others is optional(no need to consider others opinions)
Hofstedes’ 5 value Dimensions
5 value dimensions: what are the different value dimensions in which we can divide up cultures
hoftstede power distance
whether people in a group particularly those who are at the bottom of society, accept and expect unequal distributions of power in society
Country with low power distance:
Low rates of corruption in gov
Equal distribution of wealth and income
Children given more autonomy
Ie:western european, english speaking
High power distance
Rampant corruption, political scandals common
Uneven distribution of wealth and income
Children taught to respect authority
Eastern european, southeast asian
hoftstede’s 2)uncertainty avoidance
Whether people in a group are comfortable with ambiguity and unstructured interactions
Low uncertainty avoidance:
Tolerate different opinions and viewpoints
Dislike rules and norms
Teachers may say i dont know
English speaking, nordic
High uncertainty avoidance:
Different opinions are dangerous
Emotional need for rules for calrity and structure
Teachers supposed to have all the answers
East asian, south american
hoftsede’s masculinity dimension
Whether men and women in a group have differentiated gender roles, referring to traditional gender roles(men should be more assertive and ambitious, women should be more modest and caring)
Feminine
Min gender role differentiation
Many women elected into politics
Sexualiy is not moral issue
Nordic country