Performance Management Flashcards
Analysis layout
Quantitative
Brief conclusion
Qualitative
Pros
3-4 Points and reason
Cons
3-4 risks, reasons and recommendation to mitigate
Overall recommendation/conclusion
Qualitative phases
- that have not yet been incorporated into the analysis. This could negatively/positively affect the results of the NPV.
- There is a risk that the price increase will affect demand and additional units will not be sold. Again, this could negatively affect the results of the NPV.
- There is a threat of offshore manufacturers copying, which could increase competition and decrease profits, especially if a patent is not obtained.
- contract in place that guarantees sales
- This can provide a competitive advantage.
- lose control over quality because the business practices employed and manufacturing processes will be at the discretion of the overseas manufacturer, which could impact reputation, decreasing profits
- It is easier for others to copy the design if manufacturing is outsourced overseas and no longer under your control. This increases the threat of greater competition.
- There is a foreign-currency exchange risk in moving production overseas, which could cause fluctuations in profitability.
- This will necessitate sharing management decisions, which could slow down the speed at which future decisions are made.
- reduces your creative control
- not a good fit for you
- is not a driver of that cost
Recommendation phases
- consider producing and maximizing sales on product that makes the highest contribution margin per constrain. A market analysis would need to be done to determine minimum and maximum sales volumes for each type.
- ensure that you have a compatible working relationship and that you have jointly established the future direction you want the company to go in.
- consider hiring a lawyer to walk you through the agreement to ensure you understand and agree with all aspects of the agreement prior to signing. If there are any areas of the contract you do not agree with, you could propose different terms and attempt to negotiate these.
- To protect yourself from arbitrary price increases from Sassy, you could add a clause to the franchise agreement that states price increases can only occur once a year and cannot exceed a certain percentage, such as the consumer price index.
- ensure you have enough time to research and have a well-thought-out business plan before proceeding with a store to ensure its success, or risk losing money on your venture.
- hire someone to perform market research on consumers
Vision, mission and value analysis
Vision
Mission
Values
Overall conclusion
Cost allocation
Your current costing system allocates costs based on a system derived by the
accounting department. In many cases it would appear that the allocation base for the
cost is not the appropriate cost driver. This results in costs being allocated to a product that does not create the cost or benefit from it. This can result in a skewed perception of what the true profitability of a product line is and can lead to poor decision-making.
Pricing strategy
Pricing based on variable costs will not yield accurate or useful information when the amount of fixed costs is significant and when the fixed cost per unit for each product is not approximately the same.
Explain NPV analysis
An NPV analysis is appropriate because the cash flows associated with the opportunity will occur over a long period of time.
The NPV analysis considers only the incremental cash flows that would result if the proposal is accepted. Based on the assumptions provided, accepting the opportunity would generate a “positive NPV of approximately $5.6 million over the 25-year period”. Therefore, from a quantitative perspective, you should “accept” the proposal.
Performance management system
The objective of the performance management system should be to encourage greater effort and decisions that are in the best interest of the organization as a whole.
Current system
Qualities and Issue
Current Performance management system
straightforward to calculate and understand, and focusing on “cash flow” is important to the business.
However, this system is also very simplistic.
Some of the issues with it are as follows:
* It considers only financial results and ignores other aspects of operations that might
be critical to long-term success, such as “fan experience and team competitiveness”.
* It motivates management to make decisions that are focused on the shorter term,
potentially ignoring projects that “reduce cash flows in the short term but improve
cash flows over the longer term”.
* A concern with any assessment based on a single performance measure is that it
can be subject to manipulation.
* Management likely does not have control “over all of the elements that impact
operating cash flows”.
Balanced scorecard
The balanced scorecard is a performance management system that emphasizes the
importance of measuring success against more than just a single financial measure
such as “annual cash flows”. Paying attention to various balanced scorecard perspectives based on key performance indicators should lead to long-term financial success while maintaining important company values.
The result of implementing the balanced scorecard is that management will be
motivated to make decisions that achieve the key success factors, which are in the
long-term best interest of the company, as opposed to focusing only on “short-term goals”.
A balanced scorecard measures performance in an organization from four different perspectives: financial, customer, internal, and learning and growth. This forces managers to focus on various aspects of the business in a balanced way, and not just solely on financial metrics.
BSC Financial perspective
The financial perspective uses key financial metrics to track the success of the organization. As each division is an “investment” centre, you should evaluate their ability to generate “revenues, control costs, and invest in capital”.
BSC Customer perspective
The customer perspective looks at how well the organization meets its customers’ needs. This ties heavily into your key success factor of…
BSC Internal perspective
The internal perspective assesses efficiency and quality — things that a company does well inside the organization. This ties heavily into key success factor “of quality”.
Learning and growth perspective
Learning and growth evaluates how the company supports its employees and the culture of the organization. Tie with KSF (key sucess factors).
Bonus calculation
All perspectives have been weighted equally (25% each), to stress the importance all perspectives have on the success of the division. Managers have been evaluated by comparing their results to…